The Destruction of the Axiom of Determinacy by Forcings on mathbb{R} when Theta is Regular
classification
🧮 math.LO
keywords
mathbbmathsfthetanontrivialprovesvdashforcingforcings
read the original abstract
$\mathsf{ZF + AD}$ proves that for all nontrivial forcings $\mathbb{P}$ on a wellorderable set of cardinality less than $\Theta$, $1_{\mathbb{P}} \Vdash_{\mathbb{P}} \neg\mathsf{AD}$. $\mathsf{ZF + AD} + \Theta$ is regular proves that for all nontrivial forcing $\mathbb{P}$ which is a surjective image of $\mathbb{R}$, $1_{\mathbb{P}} \Vdash_{\mathbb{P}} \neg\mathsf{AD}$. In particular, $\mathsf{ZF + AD + V = L(\mathbb{R})}$ proves that for every nontrivial forcing $\mathbb{P} \in L_\Theta(\mathbb{R})$, $1_{\mathbb{P}} \Vdash_{\mathbb{P}} \neg\mathsf{AD}$.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.