Cosmological constraints with deep learning from KiDS-450 weak lensing maps
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:SLT7TOEGrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have recently been demonstrated on synthetic data to improve upon the precision of cosmological inference. In particular they have the potential to yield more precise cosmological constraints from weak lensing mass maps than the two-point functions. We present the cosmological results with a CNN from the KiDS-450 tomographic weak lensing dataset, constraining the total matter density $\Omega_m$, the fluctuation amplitude $\sigma_8$, and the intrinsic alignment amplitude $A_{\rm{IA}}$. We use a grid of N-body simulations to generate a training set of tomographic weak lensing maps. We test the robustness of the expected constraints to various effects, such as baryonic feedback, simulation accuracy, different value of $H_0$, or the lightcone projection technique. We train a set of ResNet-based CNNs with varying depths to analyze sets of tomographic KiDS mass maps divided into 20 flat regions, with applied Gaussian smoothing of $\sigma=2.34$ arcmin. The uncertainties on shear calibration and $n(z)$ error are marginalized in the likelihood pipeline. Following a blinding scheme, we derive constraints of $S_8 = \sigma_8 (\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.777^{+0.038}_{-0.036}$ with our CNN analysis, with $A_{\rm{IA}}=1.398^{+0.779}_{-0.724}$. We compare this result to the power spectrum analysis on the same maps and likelihood pipeline and find an improvement of about $30\%$ for the CNN. We discuss how our results offer excellent prospects for the use of deep learning in future cosmological data analysis.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Increasing the Precision of Surrogate Models for Weak Lensing Mass Maps with Flow Matching
A flow matching generative model produces weak lensing mass maps with fidelity improved to below 1% and 5% on basic and higher-order statistics relative to GAN benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.