Pith. sign in

REVIEW

CNN-based Speed Detection Algorithm for Walking and Running using Wrist-worn Wearable Sensors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.02348 v1 pith:NTRMJA7K submitted 2020-06-03 eess.SP cs.NE

classification eess.SPcs.NE
keywords runningspeedwalkingalgorithmfitnesscommondatadetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In recent years, there have been a surge in ubiquitous technologies such as smartwatches and fitness trackers that can track the human physical activities effortlessly. These devices have enabled common citizens to track their physical fitness and encourage them to lead a healthy lifestyle. Among various exercises, walking and running are the most common ones people do in everyday life, either through commute, exercise, or doing household chores. If done at the right intensity, walking and running are sufficient enough to help individual reach the fitness and weight-loss goals. Therefore, it is important to measure walking/ running speed to estimate the burned calories along with preventing them from the risk of soreness, injury, and burnout. Existing wearable technologies use GPS sensor to measure the speed which is highly energy inefficient and does not work well indoors. In this paper, we design, implement and evaluate a convolutional neural network based algorithm that leverages accelerometer and gyroscope sensory data from the wrist-worn device to detect the speed with high precision. Data from $15$ participants were collected while they were walking/running at different speeds on a treadmill. Our speed detection algorithm achieved $4.2\%$ and $9.8\%$ MAPE (Mean Absolute Error Percentage) value using $70-15-15$ train-test-evaluation split and leave-one-out cross-validation evaluation strategy respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools