Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Iris Recognition Performance in Children: A Longitudinal Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.06346 v1 pith:MM6PYBLS submitted 2021-01-16 eess.IV

Iris Recognition Performance in Children: A Longitudinal Study

classification eess.IV
keywords childrenirisrecognitionbeentimeyearsagingbiometric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

There is uncertainty around the effect of aging of children on biometric characteristics impacting applications relying on biometric recognition, particularly as the time between enrollment and query increases. Though there have been studies of such effects for iris recognition in adults, there have been few studies evaluating impact in children. This paper presents longitudinal analysis from 209 subjects aged 4 to 11 years at enrollment and six additional sessions over a period of 3 years. The influence of time, dilation and enrollment age on iris recognition have been analyzed and their statistical importance has been evaluated. A minor aging effect is noted which is statistically significant, but practically insignificant and is comparatively less important than other variability factors. Practical biometric applications of iris recognition in children are feasible for a time frame of at least 3 years between samples, for ages 4 to 11 years, even in presence of aging, though we note practical difficulties in enrolling young children with cameras not designed for the purpose. To the best of our knowledge, the database used in this study is the only dataset of longitudinal iris images from children for this age group and time period that is available for research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.