The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2106.05609 · v1 · pith:KDNY7HLL · submitted 2021-06-10 · cs.LG

GNNAutoScale: Scalable and Expressive Graph Neural Networks via Historical Embeddings

Reviewed by Pithpith:KDNY7HLLopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG
keywords expressiveembeddingshistoricalframeworkgnnautoscalegraphgraphsnode
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present GNNAutoScale (GAS), a framework for scaling arbitrary message-passing GNNs to large graphs. GAS prunes entire sub-trees of the computation graph by utilizing historical embeddings from prior training iterations, leading to constant GPU memory consumption in respect to input node size without dropping any data. While existing solutions weaken the expressive power of message passing due to sub-sampling of edges or non-trainable propagations, our approach is provably able to maintain the expressive power of the original GNN. We achieve this by providing approximation error bounds of historical embeddings and show how to tighten them in practice. Empirically, we show that the practical realization of our framework, PyGAS, an easy-to-use extension for PyTorch Geometric, is both fast and memory-efficient, learns expressive node representations, closely resembles the performance of their non-scaling counterparts, and reaches state-of-the-art performance on large-scale graphs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Real vs. Semi-Simulated: Rethinking Evaluation for Treatment Effect Estimation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Counterfactual metrics on semi-simulated benchmarks fail to identify the treatment effect estimators preferred by observable metrics on real datasets, with simple meta-learners outperforming specialized causal models.

  2. Real vs. Semi-Simulated: Rethinking Evaluation for Treatment Effect Estimation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Large-scale study finds that counterfactual metrics on semi-simulated data do not select the same estimators as observable metrics on real data, and benchmark rankings fail to transfer.