The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2109.11561 · v3 · pith:57KG2724 · submitted 2021-09-23 · quant-ph · gr-qc· hep-th

When entanglement harvesting is not really harvesting

Reviewed by Pithpith:57KG2724open to challenge →

classification quant-ph gr-qchep-th
keywords entanglementharvestingdetectorswhencommunicationfieldprotocolcausal
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We revisit the entanglement harvesting protocol when two detectors are in causal contact. We study the role of field-mediated communication in generating entanglement between the two detectors interacting with a quantum field. We provide a quantitative estimator of the relative contribution of communication versus genuine entanglement harvesting. For massless scalar fields in flat spacetime, we show that when two detectors can communicate via the field, the detectors do not really harvest entanglement from the field, and instead they get entangled only via the field-mediated communication channel. In other words, in these scenarios the entanglement harvesting protocol is truly "harvesting entanglement" from the field only when the detectors are not able to communicate. In contrast, for massive scalar fields both communication and genuine harvesting contribute equally to the bipartite entanglement when the detectors are causally connected. These results emphasize the importance of taking into account the causal relationships between two parties involved in this relativistic quantum information protocol before we can declare that it is truly entanglement harvesting.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Entanglement between accelerated probes in a de Sitter spacetime

    gr-qc 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Entanglement between accelerated probes in de Sitter spacetime varies independently with acceleration and curvature depending on detector motion configurations, unlike the single-probe effective-acceleration mapping.

  2. Bipartite entanglement harvesting with multiple detectors

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Multiple Unruh-DeWitt detectors harvest more vacuum entanglement when arranged in specific configurations, with harvested negativity scaling linearly in linear chains.

  3. When does entanglement through gravity imply gravitons?

    gr-qc 2026-01 accept novelty 5.0

    Entanglement through Newtonian potentials does not imply gravitons unless retardation effects are detected.