Pith. sign in

REVIEW

RGP: Neural Network Pruning through Its Regular Graph Structure

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.15192 v2 pith:QJWYL67H submitted 2021-10-28 cs.LG cs.AI

RGP: Neural Network Pruning through Its Regular Graph Structure

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords pruninggraphnetworkneuralmodelparameterreductionregular
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Lightweight model design has become an important direction in the application of deep learning technology, pruning is an effective mean to achieve a large reduction in model parameters and FLOPs. The existing neural network pruning methods mostly start from the importance of parameters, and design parameter evaluation metrics to perform parameter pruning iteratively. These methods are not studied from the perspective of model topology, may be effective but not efficient, and requires completely different pruning for different datasets. In this paper, we study the graph structure of the neural network, and propose regular graph based pruning (RGP) to perform a one-shot neural network pruning. We generate a regular graph, set the node degree value of the graph to meet the pruning ratio, and reduce the average shortest path length of the graph by swapping the edges to obtain the optimal edge distribution. Finally, the obtained graph is mapped into a neural network structure to realize pruning. Experiments show that the average shortest path length of the graph is negatively correlated with the classification accuracy of the corresponding neural network, and the proposed RGP shows a strong precision retention capability with extremely high parameter reduction (more than 90%) and FLOPs reduction (more than 90%).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.