REVIEW 1 cited by
Differential Privacy and Fairness in Decisions and Learning Tasks: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper surveys recent work in the intersection of differential privacy (DP) and fairness. It reviews the conditions under which privacy and fairness may have aligned or contrasting goals, analyzes how and why DP may exacerbate bias and unfairness in decision problems and learning tasks, and describes available mitigation measures for the fairness issues arising in DP systems. The survey provides a unified understanding of the main challenges and potential risks arising when deploying privacy-preserving machine-learning or decisions-making tasks under a fairness lens.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Reconciling Privacy and Explainability in High-Stakes: A Systematic Inquiry
Gradient-based explainers yield almost uncorrelated attributions on DP-trained chest X-ray models, so the authors recommend privatizing explanations from a non-private model instead.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.