The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2208.08454 · v3 · pith:ZM3XI5XA · submitted 2022-08-17 · hep-ph

To Profile or To Marginalize -- A SMEFT Case Study

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:ZM3XI5XArecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification hep-ph
keywords profileanalysesbayesianframeworkglobalkinematiclikelihoodmarginalization
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Global SMEFT analyses have become a key interpretation framework for LHC physics, quantifying how well a large set of kinematic measurements agrees with the Standard Model. This agreement is encoded in measured Wilson coefficients and their uncertainties. A technical challenge of global analyses are correlations. We compare, for the first time, results from a profile likelihood and a Bayesian marginalization for a given data set with a comprehensive uncertainty treatment. Using the validated Bayesian framework we analyse a series of new kinematic measurements. For the updated dataset we find and explain differences between the marginalization and profile likelihood treatments.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Local Conformal Predictions for Calibrated Surrogates

    hep-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FALCON is a novel conformal prediction technique that learns locally calibrated confidence intervals for neural network surrogates modeling LHC scattering amplitudes.