Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

DICES Dataset: Diversity in Conversational AI Evaluation for Safety

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.11247 v1 pith:PCXRFGVS submitted 2023-06-20 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords safetyconversationaldatasetdicesdiversityevaluationdatasetsanalyses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning approaches often require training and evaluation datasets with a clear separation between positive and negative examples. This risks simplifying and even obscuring the inherent subjectivity present in many tasks. Preserving such variance in content and diversity in datasets is often expensive and laborious. This is especially troubling when building safety datasets for conversational AI systems, as safety is both socially and culturally situated. To demonstrate this crucial aspect of conversational AI safety, and to facilitate in-depth model performance analyses, we introduce the DICES (Diversity In Conversational AI Evaluation for Safety) dataset that contains fine-grained demographic information about raters, high replication of ratings per item to ensure statistical power for analyses, and encodes rater votes as distributions across different demographics to allow for in-depth explorations of different aggregation strategies. In short, the DICES dataset enables the observation and measurement of variance, ambiguity, and diversity in the context of conversational AI safety. We also illustrate how the dataset offers a basis for establishing metrics to show how raters' ratings can intersects with demographic categories such as racial/ethnic groups, age groups, and genders. The goal of DICES is to be used as a shared resource and benchmark that respects diverse perspectives during safety evaluation of conversational AI systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pluralis v0.1 is a culture-first, multimodal, multilingual VLM safety benchmark spanning 6 APAC locales with 6,448 prompts and an agreement-gated LLM judge that disentangles safety from cultural appropriateness.

  2. Will Annotators Disagree? Identifying Subjectivity in Value-Laden Arguments

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Directly predicting whether annotators will disagree on a value label outperforms inferring disagreement from per-annotator value predictions on the Touché23-ValueEval dataset.

  3. Beyond the Binary: Capturing Diverse Preferences With Reward Regularization

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reward models trained with a margin derived from synthetic LLM judgments better match aggregate human preferences than standard binary-trained reward models, mainly on subjective prompts.

Pith tools