The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2307.08331 · v1 · pith:EYZPKUA2 · submitted 2023-07-17 · eess.SP

Machine Learning for Ranking f-wave Extraction Methods in Single-Lead ECGs

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:EYZPKUA2record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification eess.SP
keywords dataextractionmethodssetssingle-leadapproachf-wavef-waves
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Introduction: The presence of fibrillatory waves (f-waves) is important in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), which has motivated the development of methods for f-wave extraction. We propose a novel approach to benchmarking methods designed for single-lead ECG analysis, building on the hypothesis that better-performing AF classification using features computed from the extracted f-waves implies better-performing extraction. The approach is well-suited for processing large Holter data sets annotated with respect to the presence of AF. Methods: Three data sets with a total of 300 two- or three-lead Holter recordings, performed in the USA, Israel and Japan, were used as well as a simulated single-lead data set. Four existing extraction methods based on either average beat subtraction or principal component analysis (PCA) were evaluated. A random forest classifier was used for window-based AF classification. Performance was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Results: The best performance was found for PCA-based extraction, resulting in AUROCs in the ranges 0.77--0.83, 0.62--0.78, and 0.87--0.89 for the data sets from USA, Israel, and Japan, respectively, when analyzed across leads; the AUROC of the simulated single-lead, noisy data set was 0.98. Conclusions: This study provides a novel approach to evaluating the performance of f-wave extraction methods, offering the advantage of not using ground truth f-waves for evaluation, thus being able to leverage real data sets for evaluation. The code is open source (following publication).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.