Matrix element corrections in the Pythia8 parton shower in the context of matched simulations at next-to-leading order
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:CNR77N35record.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
We discuss the role of matrix element corrections (MEC) to parton showers in the context of MC@NLO-type matchings for processes that feature unstable resonances, where MEC are liable to result in double-counting issues, and are thus generally not employed. By working with Pythia8, we show that disabling all MEC is actually unnecessary in computations based on the narrow-width approximation, and we propose alternative MEC settings which, while still avoiding double counting, allow one to include hard-recoil effects in the simulations of resonance decays. We illustrate our findings by considering top-antitop production at the LHC, and by comparing MadGraph_aMC@NLO predictions with those of POWHEG-BOX and standalone Pythia8.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.