Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Stable In-hand Manipulation with Finger Specific Multi-agent Shadow Reward

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.07349 v1 pith:ZZ7VL4QM submitted 2023-09-13 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords manipulationrewarddensein-handconstraintsfmsrrewardsshadow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Reinforcement Learning has shown its capability to solve the high degrees of freedom in control and the complex interaction with the object in the multi-finger dexterous in-hand manipulation tasks. Current DRL approaches prefer sparse rewards to dense rewards for the ease of training but lack behavior constraints during the manipulation process, leading to aggressive and unstable policies that are insufficient for safety-critical in-hand manipulation tasks. Dense rewards can regulate the policy to learn stable manipulation behaviors with continuous reward constraints but are hard to empirically define and slow to converge optimally. This work proposes the Finger-specific Multi-agent Shadow Reward (FMSR) method to determine the stable manipulation constraints in the form of dense reward based on the state-action occupancy measure, a general utility of DRL that is approximated during the learning process. Information Sharing (IS) across neighboring agents enables consensus training to accelerate the convergence. The methods are evaluated in two in-hand manipulation tasks on the Shadow Hand. The results show FMSR+IS converges faster in training, achieving a higher task success rate and better manipulation stability than conventional dense reward. The comparison indicates FMSR+IS achieves a comparable success rate even with the behavior constraint but much better manipulation stability than the policy trained with a sparse reward.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools