Field-induced rocking curve effects in attosecond electron diffraction

Peter Baum; Yuya Morimoto

arxiv: 2311.03766 · v1 · submitted 2023-11-07 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Field-induced rocking curve effects in attosecond electron diffraction

Yuya Morimoto , Peter Baum This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 05:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

keywords attosecond electron diffractionrocking curveoptical field deflectionBragg spot dynamicssilicon membranetime-resolved diffraction

0 comments

The pith

Optical electric and magnetic fields at a laser-driven silicon crystal deflect the probe electrons and shift Bragg-spot intensities via time-dependent rocking curves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines what happens when attosecond electron pulses diffract from a single-crystal silicon membrane that is simultaneously driven by the optical cycles of near-infrared laser light. For every Bragg spot the team records intensity changes and small position shifts whose timing correlates with a 0.5–1.2 fs delay after the laser peak; at high intensities these correlations turn nonlinear. The authors attribute the shifts to local and integrated deflections of the electron beam by the laser’s electric and magnetic fields, which alter the effective rocking curve of the diffraction condition in addition to any genuine atomic-structure-factor changes. They argue that the measured delays and the symmetry properties of the signals are sufficient to separate the field-induced rocking-curve contribution from concurrent structural dynamics.

Core claim

Beam deflections produced by the optical electric and magnetic fields at the crystal membrane create time-dependent rocking-curve effects that modify diffraction intensities; the observed 0.5–1.2 fs time delays and symmetry relations allow these field effects to be disentangled from any simultaneous changes in the atomic structure factor.

What carries the argument

Time-dependent rocking-curve effects arising from local and integrated electron-beam deflections by the optical electric and magnetic fields.

If this is right

All Bragg spots exhibit correlated intensity and position changes whose timing tracks the optical cycle with 0.5–1.2 fs delays.
Under single-cycle, high-peak-intensity excitation the intensity–delay relation becomes nonlinear.
Field-induced rocking-curve modifications add to, and must be distinguished from, any true atomic-structure-factor dynamics.
The combination of measured delays and symmetry properties supplies the separation criterion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Experiments that aim to track atomic motion must either subtract the field-deflection contribution or choose delay windows where the rocking-curve term is minimal.
The same deflection mechanism will appear in any transmission geometry where the probe electrons traverse a region of strong optical field inside or near the sample.
Extending the measurement to thicker crystals or different materials would test whether the disentanglement criterion remains robust when multiple scattering or stronger field gradients are present.

Load-bearing premise

That the measured time delays and observed symmetries are enough by themselves to separate the field-induced rocking-curve signals from any overlapping atomic-structure-factor dynamics without further controls or modeling.

What would settle it

A control measurement in which the same intensity and position shifts appear even when the electron beam passes through an unilluminated region of the membrane or when the laser field is blocked while the crystal remains in place.

read the original abstract

Recent advances in electron microscopy trigger the question whether attosecond electron diffraction can resolve atomic-scale electron dynamics in crystalline materials in space and time. Here we explore the physics of the relevant electron-lattice scattering process in the time domain. We drive a single-crystalline silicon membrane with the optical cycles of near-infrared laser light and use attosecond electron pulses to produce electron diffraction patterns as a function of delay. For all Bragg spots, we observe time-dependent intensity changes and position shifts that are correlated with a time delay of 0.5-1.2 fs. For single-cycle excitation pulses with strong peak intensity, the correlations become nonlinear. Origin of these effects are local and integrated beam deflections by the optical electric and magnetic fields at the crystal membrane that modify the diffraction intensities in addition to the atomic structure factor dynamics by time-dependent rocking-curve effects. However, the measured time delays and symmetries allow to disentangle both effects. Future attosecond electron diffraction and microscopy experiments need to be based on these results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reports concrete new observations of 0.5-1.2 fs correlated intensity and position shifts plus nonlinear single-cycle behavior in driven attosecond diffraction, but the claim that delays and symmetries alone cleanly separate field deflections from structure-factor changes lacks the supporting modeling or controls needed to make it unambiguous.

read the letter

The main point is that Morimoto and Baum have recorded time-dependent intensity changes and position shifts across Bragg spots in attosecond electron diffraction from an optically driven silicon membrane. These track with delays of 0.5-1.2 fs and turn nonlinear under single-cycle excitation. They trace the shifts to local and integrated beam deflections from the optical E and B fields, which produce rocking-curve intensity changes on top of any atomic structure-factor dynamics, and they argue the measured delays plus observed symmetries let the two contributions be told apart. Future work in the area should factor this in. That experimental report of the specific correlated shifts and the nonlinear regime is the clearest new result here. The paper usefully flags a systematic that could otherwise be misread as structural motion in similar setups. The soft spot sits in the separation step. The abstract states that the delays and symmetries suffice to disentangle the field-induced rocking-curve effects from structure-factor changes, yet it gives no quantitative model, no demonstration that other mechanisms could not produce overlapping signatures, and no description of how the delays were extracted or what error bars apply. Without that, the uniqueness of the diagnostic remains an assumption rather than a shown result. The work is aimed at people running attosecond or ultrafast electron diffraction on crystals. Anyone planning such measurements would benefit from the warning about field deflections. It deserves peer review because the observations are direct and the potential impact on interpretation is real, even though the disentangling argument will need more detail and checks to hold up under scrutiny.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports attosecond electron diffraction experiments on a near-infrared laser-driven single-crystalline silicon membrane. For all Bragg spots, time-dependent intensity changes and position shifts are observed that correlate with delays of 0.5-1.2 fs; these correlations become nonlinear under strong single-cycle excitation. The effects are attributed to local and integrated beam deflections by the optical electric and magnetic fields, which modify diffraction intensities via time-dependent rocking-curve effects in addition to any atomic structure-factor dynamics. The authors state that the measured time delays and symmetries suffice to disentangle the field-induced rocking-curve contributions from atomic dynamics.

Significance. If the disentangling procedure can be rigorously validated, the result would be significant for attosecond electron diffraction and microscopy: it identifies a practical confounding mechanism (optical-field deflections) and supplies an observational criterion for separating it from genuine structural dynamics. The demonstration of nonlinear behavior under single-cycle driving is also of interest. The experimental platform (attosecond pulses on a thin single-crystal membrane) is appropriate for the question.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'the measured time delays and symmetries allow to disentangle both effects' is load-bearing for the paper's interpretation, yet no quantitative model, orthogonality test, or control data are referenced that demonstrate the 0.5-1.2 fs window and observed symmetries are uniquely diagnostic of field deflections versus atomic dynamics (particularly under the nonlinear regime).
[Abstract] The manuscript provides no description of data-processing steps, error analysis, baseline subtraction, or rocking-curve modeling used to extract the reported delays and symmetries. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the correlations are robust or whether post-hoc window selection could have influenced the disentangling conclusion.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the rocking-curve effect and the distinction between local versus integrated deflections should be defined explicitly in the main text before the results are interpreted.
Figure captions should state the number of independent delay scans, the fitting procedure for the 0.5-1.2 fs correlations, and any symmetry criteria applied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'the measured time delays and symmetries allow to disentangle both effects' is load-bearing for the paper's interpretation, yet no quantitative model, orthogonality test, or control data are referenced that demonstrate the 0.5-1.2 fs window and observed symmetries are uniquely diagnostic of field deflections versus atomic dynamics (particularly under the nonlinear regime).

Authors: The observed time delays of 0.5-1.2 fs are consistent with the transit time of the electron wave packet through the thin membrane in the presence of the optical fields, and the symmetries arise from the polarization-dependent deflections by the electric and magnetic fields of the laser, which affect the local incidence angle on the rocking curve in a vectorial manner distinct from the isotropic modifications to the atomic structure factor. The nonlinear behavior under single-cycle excitation further supports this distinction through asymmetric intensity correlations. We acknowledge, however, that the manuscript does not reference an explicit quantitative model or orthogonality test to rigorously demonstrate uniqueness. We will add to the revised manuscript a quantitative model section, including a simple calculation of the deflection-induced rocking curve shifts and an analysis showing how the time window and symmetries provide orthogonal information to atomic dynamics, particularly highlighting the nonlinear signatures. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript provides no description of data-processing steps, error analysis, baseline subtraction, or rocking-curve modeling used to extract the reported delays and symmetries. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the correlations are robust or whether post-hoc window selection could have influenced the disentangling conclusion.

Authors: We agree that a detailed description of the data analysis is essential for evaluating the robustness of the results. Although the original manuscript includes a methods section, it lacks the level of detail requested. In the revised version, we will include a comprehensive description of the data-processing pipeline, including the steps for extracting time-dependent intensities and positions, error analysis based on statistical variations across multiple scans, baseline subtraction methods, and the specific rocking-curve modeling employed to interpret the deflections. This will also demonstrate that the reported time windows were not selected post-hoc but are determined by the physical transit times and are consistent across the dataset. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observations with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of time-dependent Bragg spot intensity changes and position shifts under optical excitation, with attribution to field deflections and rocking-curve effects based on observed 0.5-1.2 fs delays and symmetries. No equations, models, or derivations are presented that reduce any reported quantity (delays, nonlinearities, or disentanglement) to parameters fitted from the same dataset or to self-citations. The work is self-contained empirical observation against external physical benchmarks (laser-driven electron diffraction), satisfying the condition for score 0-2 with no load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract; the interpretation relies on standard domain assumptions of electron diffraction and electromagnetic field interactions with matter.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Established physics of electron-lattice scattering and optical electric/magnetic field interactions with thin membranes
The separation of rocking-curve effects from structure-factor dynamics assumes standard electromagnetic and scattering theory without additional justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5697 in / 1409 out tokens · 26363 ms · 2026-05-24T05:38:47.313350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

[1]

A. H. Zewail, Four-Dimensional Electron Microscopy, Science 328, 187 (2010)

work page 2010
[2]

R. J. D. Miller, Femtosecond Crystallography with Ultrabright Electrons and X-Rays: Capturing Chemistry in Action, Science 343, 1108 (2014)

work page 2014
[3]

Filippetto, P

D. Filippetto, P. Musumeci, R. K. Li, B. J. Siwick, M. R. Otto, M. Centurion, and J. P. F. Nunes, Ultrafast Electron Diffraction: Visualizing Dynamic States of Matter, Rev Mod Phys 94, 045004 (2022)

work page 2022
[4]

B. W. J. McNeil and N. R. Thompson, X-Ray Free-Electron Lasers, Nat Photonics 4, 814 (2010)

work page 2010
[5]

H. N. Chapman et al., Femtosecond X-Ray Protein Nanocrystallography, Nature 470, 73 (2011)

work page 2011
[6]

Morimoto and P

Y. Morimoto and P. Baum, Diffraction and Microscopy with Attosecond Electron Pulse Trains, Nat Phys 14, 252 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

Nabben, J

D. Nabben, J. Kuttruff, L. Stolz, A. Ryabov, and P. Baum, Attosecond Electron Microscopy of Sub-Cycle Optical Dynamics, Nature 619, 63 (2023)

work page 2023
[8]

Morimoto and P

Y. Morimoto and P. Baum, Attosecond Control of Electron Beams at Dielectric and Absorbing Membranes, Phys Rev A 97, (2018)

work page 2018
[9]

Morimoto, Attosecond Electron-Beam Technology: A Review of Recent Progress, Microscopy 72, 2 (2023)

Y. Morimoto, Attosecond Electron-Beam Technology: A Review of Recent Progress, Microscopy 72, 2 (2023)

work page 2023
[10]

K. E. Priebe, C. Rathje, S. V. Yalunin, T. Hohage, A. Feist, S. Schäfer, and C. Ropers, Attosecond Electron Pulse Trains and Quantum State Reconstruction in Ultrafast Transmission Electron Microscopy, Nat Photonics 11, 793 (2017)

work page 2017
[11]

Kozák, N

M. Kozák, N. Schönenberger, and P. Hommelhoff, Ponderomotive Generation and Detection of Attosecond Free-Electron Pulse Trains, Phys Rev Lett 120, 103203 (2018)

work page 2018
[12]

Schönenberger, A

N. Schönenberger, A. Mittelbach, P. Yousefi, J. McNeur, U. Niedermayer, and P. Hommelhoff, Generation and Characterization of Attosecond Microbunched Electron Pulse Trains via Dielectric Laser Acceleration, Phys Rev Lett 123, 264803 (2019)

work page 2019
[13]

D. S. Black, U. Niedermayer, Y. Miao, Z. Zhao, O. Solgaard, R. L. Byer, and K. J. Leedle, Net Acceleration and Direct Measurement of Attosecond Electron Pulses in a Silicon Dielectric Laser Accelerator, Phys Rev Lett 123, 264802 (2019)

work page 2019
[14]

Ryabov, J

A. Ryabov, J. W. Thurner, D. Nabben, M. V. Tsarev, and P. Baum, Attosecond Metrology in a Continuous-Beam Transmission Electron Microscope, Sci Adv 6, (2020)

work page 2020
[15]

Morimoto and P

Y. Morimoto and P. Baum, Single-Cycle Optical Control of Beam Electrons, Phys Rev Lett 125, (2020). 10

work page 2020
[16]

Dahan et al., Resonant Phase-Matching between a Light Wave and a Free-Electron Wavefunction, Nat Phys 16, 1123 (2020)

R. Dahan et al., Resonant Phase-Matching between a Light Wave and a Free-Electron Wavefunction, Nat Phys 16, 1123 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

Barwick, D

B. Barwick, D. J. Flannigan, and A. H. Zewail, Photon-Induced near-Field Electron Microscopy, Nature 462, 902 (2009)

work page 2009
[18]

Feist, K

A. Feist, K. E. Echternkamp, J. Schauss, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schäfer, and C. Ropers, Quantum Coherent Optical Phase Modulation in an Ultrafast Transmission Electron Microscope, Nature 521, 200 (2015)

work page 2015
[19]

V. S. Yakovlev, M. I. Stockman, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, Atomic-Scale Diffractive Imaging of Sub-Cycle Electron Dynamics in Condensed Matter, Sci Rep 5, (2015)

work page 2015
[20]

Morimoto, Y

Y. Morimoto, Y. Shinohara, M. Tani, B.-H. Chen, K. L. Ishikawa, and P. Baum, Asymmetric Single-Cycle Control of Valence Electron Motion in Polar Chemical Bonds, Optica 8, 382 (2021)

work page 2021
[21]

Shao and A

H.-C. Shao and A. F. Starace, Detecting Electron Motion in Atoms and Molecules, Phys Rev Lett 105, 263201 (2010)

work page 2010
[22]

Dixit, O

G. Dixit, O. Vendrell, and R. Santra, Imaging Electronic Quantum Motion with Light, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 11636 (2012)

work page 2012
[23]

P. Baum, J. Manz, and A. Schild, Quantum Model Simulations of Attosecond Electron Diffraction, in Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, Vol. 53 (2010), pp. 987–1004

work page 2010
[24]

N. M. Kroll and K. M. Watson, Charged-Particle Scattering in the Presence of a Strong Electromagnetic Wave, Phys Rev A 8, 804 (1973)

work page 1973
[25]

Kasmi, D

L. Kasmi, D. Kreier, M. Bradler, E. Riedle, and P. Baum, Femtosecond Single-Electron Pulses Generated by Two-Photon Photoemission Close to the Work Function, New J Phys 17, (2015)

work page 2015
[26]

Aidelsburger, F

M. Aidelsburger, F. O. Kirchner, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, Single-Electron Pulses for Ultrafast Diffraction, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 19714 (2010)

work page 2010
[27]

Kealhofer, S

C. Kealhofer, S. Lahme, T. Urban, and P. Baum, Signal-to-Noise in Femtosecond Electron Diffraction, Ultramicroscopy 159, 19 (2015)

work page 2015
[28]

G. M. Vanacore et al., Attosecond Coherent Control of Free-Electron Wave Functions Using Semi-Infinite Light Fields, Nat Commun 9, 2694 (2018)

work page 2018
[29]

Plettner, R

T. Plettner, R. L. Byer, E. Colby, B. Cowan, C. M. S. Sears, J. E. Spencer, and R. H. Siemann, Visible-Laser Acceleration of Relativistic Electrons in a Semi-Infinite Vacuum, Phys Rev Lett 95, 134801 (2005)

work page 2005
[30]

F. O. Kirchner, A. Gliserin, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, Laser Streaking of Free Electrons at 25 KeV, Nat Photonics 8, 52 (2014). 11

work page 2014
[31]

Feist, S

A. Feist, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schäfer, and C. Ropers, High-Purity Free-Electron Momentum States Prepared by Three-Dimensional Optical Phase Modulation, Phys Rev Res 2, 043227 (2020)

work page 2020
[32]

Ehberger, A

D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, and P. Baum, Tilted Electron Pulses, Phys Rev Lett 121, 094801 (2018)

work page 2018
[33]

Ligges, I

M. Ligges, I. Rajković, C. Streubühr, T. Brazda, P. Zhou, O. Posth, C. Hassel, G. Dumpich, and D. von der Linde, Transient (000)-Order Attenuation Effects in Ultrafast Transmission Electron Diffraction, J Appl Phys 109, (2011)

work page 2011
[34]

J., Kylstra N

Joachain C. J., Kylstra N. J., and Potvliege R. M., Atoms in Intense Laser Fields (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2011)

work page 2011
[35]

B.-H. Chen, E. Wittmann, Y. Morimoto, P. Baum, and E. Riedle, Octave-Spanning Single- Cycle Middle-Infrared Generation through Optical Parametric Amplification in LiGaS 2 , Opt Express 27, 21306 (2019)

work page 2019
[36]

Kealhofer, W

C. Kealhofer, W. Schneider, D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, All-Optical Control and Metrology of Electron Pulses, Science (1979) 352, 429 (2016)

work page 1979
[37]

Morimoto, B

Y. Morimoto, B. Chen, and P. Baum, Free‐Electron Tomography of Few‐Cycle Optical Waveforms, Ann Phys 534, (2022). 12 Fig. 1: Attosecond electron diffraction and measured time delays. (a) Concept of attosecond electron diffraction. A crystalline material (green) is excited by the optical cycles of laser light (red) and then investigated with attosecond ele...

work page 2022

[1] [1]

A. H. Zewail, Four-Dimensional Electron Microscopy, Science 328, 187 (2010)

work page 2010

[2] [2]

R. J. D. Miller, Femtosecond Crystallography with Ultrabright Electrons and X-Rays: Capturing Chemistry in Action, Science 343, 1108 (2014)

work page 2014

[3] [3]

Filippetto, P

D. Filippetto, P. Musumeci, R. K. Li, B. J. Siwick, M. R. Otto, M. Centurion, and J. P. F. Nunes, Ultrafast Electron Diffraction: Visualizing Dynamic States of Matter, Rev Mod Phys 94, 045004 (2022)

work page 2022

[4] [4]

B. W. J. McNeil and N. R. Thompson, X-Ray Free-Electron Lasers, Nat Photonics 4, 814 (2010)

work page 2010

[5] [5]

H. N. Chapman et al., Femtosecond X-Ray Protein Nanocrystallography, Nature 470, 73 (2011)

work page 2011

[6] [6]

Morimoto and P

Y. Morimoto and P. Baum, Diffraction and Microscopy with Attosecond Electron Pulse Trains, Nat Phys 14, 252 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [7]

Nabben, J

D. Nabben, J. Kuttruff, L. Stolz, A. Ryabov, and P. Baum, Attosecond Electron Microscopy of Sub-Cycle Optical Dynamics, Nature 619, 63 (2023)

work page 2023

[8] [8]

Morimoto and P

Y. Morimoto and P. Baum, Attosecond Control of Electron Beams at Dielectric and Absorbing Membranes, Phys Rev A 97, (2018)

work page 2018

[9] [9]

Morimoto, Attosecond Electron-Beam Technology: A Review of Recent Progress, Microscopy 72, 2 (2023)

Y. Morimoto, Attosecond Electron-Beam Technology: A Review of Recent Progress, Microscopy 72, 2 (2023)

work page 2023

[10] [10]

K. E. Priebe, C. Rathje, S. V. Yalunin, T. Hohage, A. Feist, S. Schäfer, and C. Ropers, Attosecond Electron Pulse Trains and Quantum State Reconstruction in Ultrafast Transmission Electron Microscopy, Nat Photonics 11, 793 (2017)

work page 2017

[11] [11]

Kozák, N

M. Kozák, N. Schönenberger, and P. Hommelhoff, Ponderomotive Generation and Detection of Attosecond Free-Electron Pulse Trains, Phys Rev Lett 120, 103203 (2018)

work page 2018

[12] [12]

Schönenberger, A

N. Schönenberger, A. Mittelbach, P. Yousefi, J. McNeur, U. Niedermayer, and P. Hommelhoff, Generation and Characterization of Attosecond Microbunched Electron Pulse Trains via Dielectric Laser Acceleration, Phys Rev Lett 123, 264803 (2019)

work page 2019

[13] [13]

D. S. Black, U. Niedermayer, Y. Miao, Z. Zhao, O. Solgaard, R. L. Byer, and K. J. Leedle, Net Acceleration and Direct Measurement of Attosecond Electron Pulses in a Silicon Dielectric Laser Accelerator, Phys Rev Lett 123, 264802 (2019)

work page 2019

[14] [14]

Ryabov, J

A. Ryabov, J. W. Thurner, D. Nabben, M. V. Tsarev, and P. Baum, Attosecond Metrology in a Continuous-Beam Transmission Electron Microscope, Sci Adv 6, (2020)

work page 2020

[15] [15]

Morimoto and P

Y. Morimoto and P. Baum, Single-Cycle Optical Control of Beam Electrons, Phys Rev Lett 125, (2020). 10

work page 2020

[16] [16]

Dahan et al., Resonant Phase-Matching between a Light Wave and a Free-Electron Wavefunction, Nat Phys 16, 1123 (2020)

R. Dahan et al., Resonant Phase-Matching between a Light Wave and a Free-Electron Wavefunction, Nat Phys 16, 1123 (2020)

work page 2020

[17] [17]

Barwick, D

B. Barwick, D. J. Flannigan, and A. H. Zewail, Photon-Induced near-Field Electron Microscopy, Nature 462, 902 (2009)

work page 2009

[18] [18]

Feist, K

A. Feist, K. E. Echternkamp, J. Schauss, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schäfer, and C. Ropers, Quantum Coherent Optical Phase Modulation in an Ultrafast Transmission Electron Microscope, Nature 521, 200 (2015)

work page 2015

[19] [19]

V. S. Yakovlev, M. I. Stockman, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, Atomic-Scale Diffractive Imaging of Sub-Cycle Electron Dynamics in Condensed Matter, Sci Rep 5, (2015)

work page 2015

[20] [20]

Morimoto, Y

Y. Morimoto, Y. Shinohara, M. Tani, B.-H. Chen, K. L. Ishikawa, and P. Baum, Asymmetric Single-Cycle Control of Valence Electron Motion in Polar Chemical Bonds, Optica 8, 382 (2021)

work page 2021

[21] [21]

Shao and A

H.-C. Shao and A. F. Starace, Detecting Electron Motion in Atoms and Molecules, Phys Rev Lett 105, 263201 (2010)

work page 2010

[22] [22]

Dixit, O

G. Dixit, O. Vendrell, and R. Santra, Imaging Electronic Quantum Motion with Light, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 11636 (2012)

work page 2012

[23] [23]

P. Baum, J. Manz, and A. Schild, Quantum Model Simulations of Attosecond Electron Diffraction, in Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, Vol. 53 (2010), pp. 987–1004

work page 2010

[24] [24]

N. M. Kroll and K. M. Watson, Charged-Particle Scattering in the Presence of a Strong Electromagnetic Wave, Phys Rev A 8, 804 (1973)

work page 1973

[25] [25]

Kasmi, D

L. Kasmi, D. Kreier, M. Bradler, E. Riedle, and P. Baum, Femtosecond Single-Electron Pulses Generated by Two-Photon Photoemission Close to the Work Function, New J Phys 17, (2015)

work page 2015

[26] [26]

Aidelsburger, F

M. Aidelsburger, F. O. Kirchner, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, Single-Electron Pulses for Ultrafast Diffraction, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 19714 (2010)

work page 2010

[27] [27]

Kealhofer, S

C. Kealhofer, S. Lahme, T. Urban, and P. Baum, Signal-to-Noise in Femtosecond Electron Diffraction, Ultramicroscopy 159, 19 (2015)

work page 2015

[28] [28]

G. M. Vanacore et al., Attosecond Coherent Control of Free-Electron Wave Functions Using Semi-Infinite Light Fields, Nat Commun 9, 2694 (2018)

work page 2018

[29] [29]

Plettner, R

T. Plettner, R. L. Byer, E. Colby, B. Cowan, C. M. S. Sears, J. E. Spencer, and R. H. Siemann, Visible-Laser Acceleration of Relativistic Electrons in a Semi-Infinite Vacuum, Phys Rev Lett 95, 134801 (2005)

work page 2005

[30] [30]

F. O. Kirchner, A. Gliserin, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, Laser Streaking of Free Electrons at 25 KeV, Nat Photonics 8, 52 (2014). 11

work page 2014

[31] [31]

Feist, S

A. Feist, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schäfer, and C. Ropers, High-Purity Free-Electron Momentum States Prepared by Three-Dimensional Optical Phase Modulation, Phys Rev Res 2, 043227 (2020)

work page 2020

[32] [32]

Ehberger, A

D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, and P. Baum, Tilted Electron Pulses, Phys Rev Lett 121, 094801 (2018)

work page 2018

[33] [33]

Ligges, I

M. Ligges, I. Rajković, C. Streubühr, T. Brazda, P. Zhou, O. Posth, C. Hassel, G. Dumpich, and D. von der Linde, Transient (000)-Order Attenuation Effects in Ultrafast Transmission Electron Diffraction, J Appl Phys 109, (2011)

work page 2011

[34] [34]

J., Kylstra N

Joachain C. J., Kylstra N. J., and Potvliege R. M., Atoms in Intense Laser Fields (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2011)

work page 2011

[35] [35]

B.-H. Chen, E. Wittmann, Y. Morimoto, P. Baum, and E. Riedle, Octave-Spanning Single- Cycle Middle-Infrared Generation through Optical Parametric Amplification in LiGaS 2 , Opt Express 27, 21306 (2019)

work page 2019

[36] [36]

Kealhofer, W

C. Kealhofer, W. Schneider, D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, All-Optical Control and Metrology of Electron Pulses, Science (1979) 352, 429 (2016)

work page 1979

[37] [37]

Morimoto, B

Y. Morimoto, B. Chen, and P. Baum, Free‐Electron Tomography of Few‐Cycle Optical Waveforms, Ann Phys 534, (2022). 12 Fig. 1: Attosecond electron diffraction and measured time delays. (a) Concept of attosecond electron diffraction. A crystalline material (green) is excited by the optical cycles of laser light (red) and then investigated with attosecond ele...

work page 2022