pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.10565 · v5 · submitted 2023-11-17 · ✦ hep-th

Worldsheet Formalism for Decoupling Limits in String Theory

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 05:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords decoupling limitsworldsheet formalismtype IIA string theoryBFSS matrix theoryambitwistor stringT-dualitynodal singularitiesCarrollian strings
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a critical limit of type IIA string theory the fundamental string develops nodal worldsheet singularities whose T-duality generates a web of decoupling limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a worldsheet sigma model for the fundamental string in the critical decoupling limit of type IIA superstring theory, where a Ramond-Ramond one-form is tuned to cancel D0-brane tension. In this limit the light modes are D0-branes governed by BFSS matrix theory. The string worldsheet acquires singularities whose local topology consists of nodal Riemann spheres. T-duality on this model generates a web of dualities that relates the limit to tensionless strings, ambitwistor strings, Carrollian strings, and Spin Matrix models of AdS/CFT. This supplies a common worldsheet origin for these apparently distinct decoupling regimes.

Core claim

When the background Ramond-Ramond one-form is tuned to its critical value, the fundamental string develops singularities on its worldsheet whose topology is described by nodal Riemann spheres; T-duality transformations of the resulting sigma model furnish a worldsheet derivation of the duality web that unifies a variety of decoupling limits including tensionless and Carrollian string theories.

What carries the argument

The critical-limit string sigma model whose worldsheet singularities have the topology of nodal Riemann spheres and whose T-duality generates the decoupling-limit duality web.

If this is right

  • The fundamental string action in this limit matches that of ambitwistor string theory.
  • Some of the limits correspond to Carrollian string theory.
  • The formalism connects to Spin Matrix limits in the AdS/CFT correspondence.
  • T-duality provides a derivation of the expanded duality web among type II decoupling limits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The nodal singularities may allow a twistor-like formulation for computing observables in these limits.
  • This approach could be extended to include fermionic sectors or other superstring theories.
  • Matching to BFSS matrix theory suggests possible holographic checks in the discrete light-cone quantization.
  • Similar worldsheet singularities might appear in other fine-tuned backgrounds beyond type IIA.

Load-bearing premise

A background Ramond-Ramond one-form must be tuned precisely to cancel the D0-brane tension so that D0-branes become the lightest excitations.

What would settle it

Direct computation of the worldsheet action after T-duality that fails to reproduce the known tensionless or Carrollian string actions, or the absence of nodal singularities in the critical-limit worldsheet, would falsify the claimed unification.

read the original abstract

We study the bosonic sector of a decoupling limit of type IIA superstring theory, where a background Ramond-Ramond one-form is fined tuned to its critical value, such that it cancels the associated background D0-brane tension. The light excitations in this critical limit are D0-branes, whose dynamics is described by the Banks-Fischler-Shenker-Susskind (BFSS) Matrix theory that corresponds to M-theory in the Discrete Light-Cone Quantization (DLCQ). We develop the worldsheet formalism for the fundamental string in the same critical limit of type IIA superstring theory. We show that the fundamental string develops singularities on its worldsheet, whose topology is described by nodal Riemann spheres as in ambitwistor string theory. We study the T-duality transformations of this string sigma model and provide a worldsheet derivation for the recently revived and expanded duality web that unifies a zoo of decoupling limits in type II superstring theories. By matching the string worldsheet actions, we demonstrate how some of these decoupling limits are related to tensionless (and ambitwistor) string theory, Carrollian string theory, the Spin Matrix limits of the AdS/CFT correspondence, and more.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the bosonic sector of a decoupling limit of type IIA superstring theory in which a background Ramond-Ramond one-form is tuned to a critical value that cancels the D0-brane tension. The light degrees of freedom are then D0-branes governed by BFSS Matrix theory. It constructs the corresponding worldsheet sigma-model for the fundamental string, shows that the worldsheet develops singularities whose topology consists of nodal Riemann spheres, performs T-duality transformations on this model, and matches the resulting actions to those of tensionless/ambitwistor strings, Carrollian strings, and Spin-Matrix limits arising in AdS/CFT.

Significance. If the central construction is valid, the paper supplies an explicit worldsheet derivation of a duality web that unifies several decoupling limits previously studied in isolation. The concrete action-matching procedure and the T-duality analysis constitute a technical strength; the identification of nodal Riemann-sphere singularities provides a direct link to ambitwistor-string geometry. These elements could facilitate further study of non-perturbative regimes in string theory.

major comments (1)
  1. [Introduction and definition of the critical limit] The definition of the critical limit (Introduction and the paragraph immediately following the abstract statement of the tuned RR one-form): the exact cancellation of D0-brane tension is asserted to render the fundamental-string excitations light. The manuscript works exclusively in the bosonic sector and does not supply an explicit check that the string worldsheet coupling leaves the effective tension identically zero at leading order; any residual tension would invalidate the subsequent sigma-model construction and the claimed action identifications with tensionless and Carrollian limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying a point that requires clarification in the definition of the critical limit. We address the comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate an explicit check.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Introduction and definition of the critical limit] The definition of the critical limit (Introduction and the paragraph immediately following the abstract statement of the tuned RR one-form): the exact cancellation of D0-brane tension is asserted to render the fundamental-string excitations light. The manuscript works exclusively in the bosonic sector and does not supply an explicit check that the string worldsheet coupling leaves the effective tension identically zero at leading order; any residual tension would invalidate the subsequent sigma-model construction and the claimed action identifications with tensionless and Carrollian limits.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the vanishing effective tension is not provided in the current manuscript and that this constitutes a gap. In the revised version we will add a short calculation, performed entirely within the bosonic sector, that starts from the worldsheet sigma-model action with the tuned RR one-form and demonstrates that the Nambu-Goto term cancels identically at leading order. The resulting action then contains only the higher-order terms responsible for the nodal singularities. This addition will be placed immediately after the definition of the critical limit and will directly support the subsequent T-duality identifications. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivations follow from explicit construction in tuned background

full rationale

The decoupling limit is defined by an external fine-tuning of the RR one-form to cancel D0 tension, after which the worldsheet sigma-model, nodal singularities, T-duality maps, and action matchings to tensionless/ambitwistor/Carrollian/Spin-Matrix limits are constructed using standard techniques. No step reduces by definition or by self-citation to its own inputs; the tuning is an input parameter choice, not a derived output, and the subsequent results are independent derivations within the bosonic sector.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone; the work builds on standard string theory concepts like sigma models and T-duality.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5741 in / 1277 out tokens · 35960 ms · 2026-05-24T05:56:34.248993+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Twisted Origin for Magnetic Carroll Supersymmetry

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Magnetic Carroll supersymmetry descends from a twisted relativistic parent rather than naive contraction, realized in 3D N=2 with vector multiplet action whose conformal extension matches global super-BMS4.

  2. Strings near BTZ black holes: A Carrollian Chronicle

    hep-th 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper classifies families of closed bosonic string solutions in the near-horizon non-extremal BTZ spacetime and identifies novel features via string-Carroll expansion.

  3. Nil-Equivariant Tropological Sigma Models on Filtered Geometries

    hep-th 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tropological sigma models on 4D targets are defined on filtered manifolds with nilpotent Engel algebra symmetries and conjectured to correspond to filtered Gromov-Witten invariants.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

158 extracted references · 158 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 86 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Membranes at Quantum Criticality

    P. Hoˇ rava,Membranes at quantum criticality , JHEP 03 (2009) 020, [ 0812.4287]

  2. [2]

    Yan, Renormalization of supersymmetric Lifshitz sigma models , JHEP 03 (2023) 008, [2210.04950]

    Z. Yan, Renormalization of supersymmetric Lifshitz sigma models , JHEP 03 (2023) 008, [2210.04950]

  3. [3]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, [ hep-th/9711200]

  4. [4]

    N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena, N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals , JHEP 10 (2008) 091, [0806.1218]. – 76 –

  5. [5]

    Another Conjecture about M(atrix) Theory

    L. Susskind, Another conjecture about M(atrix) theory , hep-th/9704080

  6. [6]

    Why is the Matrix Model Correct?

    N. Seiberg, Why is the matrix model correct? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 3577–3580, [hep-th/9710009]

  7. [7]

    D0 Branes on T^n and Matrix Theory

    A. Sen, D0-branes on T n and matrix theory , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 51–59, [hep-th/9709220]

  8. [8]

    de Wit, J

    B. de Wit, J. Hoppe and H. Nicolai, On the quantum mechanics of supermembranes , Nucl. Phys. B 305 (1988) 545

  9. [9]

    M Theory As A Matrix Model: A Conjecture

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: a conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112–5128, [ hep-th/9610043]

  10. [10]

    E. A. Bergshoeff, K. T. Grosvenor, C. S ¸im¸ sek and Z. Yan,An action for extended string Newton-Cartan gravity, JHEP 01 (2019) 178, [ 1810.09387]

  11. [11]

    Non-Relativistic Closed String Theory

    J. Gomis and H. Ooguri, Nonrelativistic closed string theory , J. Math. Phys. 42 (2001) 3127–3151, [hep-th/0009181]

  12. [12]

    Ebert and Z

    S. Ebert and Z. Yan, Anisotropic compactification of nonrelativistic M-theory, JHEP 11 (2023) 135, [ 2309.04912]

  13. [13]

    Extended Galilean symmetries of non-relativistic strings

    C. Batlle, J. Gomis and D. Not, Extended Galilean symmetries of non-relativistic strings , JHEP 02 (2017) 049, [ 1611.00026]

  14. [14]

    The Galilean Superstring

    J. Gomis and P. K. Townsend, The Galilean superstring, JHEP 02 (2017) 105, [ 1612.02759]

  15. [15]

    Tachyons in the Galilean limit

    C. Batlle, J. Gomis, L. Mezincescu and P. K. Townsend, Tachyons in the Galilean limit , JHEP 04 (2017) 120, [ 1702.04792]

  16. [16]

    Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations

    L. Mason and D. Skinner, Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations , JHEP 07 (2014) 048, [1311.2564]

  17. [17]

    Loop Integrands for Scattering Amplitudes from the Riemann Sphere

    Y. Geyer, L. Mason, R. Monteiro and P. Tourkine, Loop integrands for scattering amplitudes from the Riemann sphere , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 121603, [ 1507.00321]

  18. [18]

    C. D. A. Blair, J. Lahnsteiner, N. A. J. Obers and Z. Yan, Unification of Decoupling Limits in String and M Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 161603, [ 2311.10564]

  19. [19]

    OM Theory in Diverse Dimensions

    R. Gopakumar, S. Minwalla, N. Seiberg and A. Strominger, OM theory in diverse dimensions , JHEP 08 (2000) 008, [ hep-th/0006062]

  20. [20]

    Open Branes in Space-Time Non-Commutative Little String Theory

    T. Harmark, Open branes in space-time noncommutative little string theory , Nucl. Phys. B 593 (2001) 76–98, [ hep-th/0007147]

  21. [21]

    U. H. Danielsson, A. Guijosa and M. Kruczenski, IIA/B, wound and wrapped , JHEP 10 (2000) 020, [ hep-th/0009182]

  22. [22]

    Dijkgraaf, J

    R. Dijkgraaf, J. de Boer, T. Harmark and N. A. Obers, U-duality and theories without gravity , unpublished

  23. [23]

    C. D. A. Blair, J. Lahnsteiner, N. A. Obers and Z. Yan, Matrix Theory Reloaded: A BPS Road to Holography, 2410.03591

  24. [24]

    L´ evy-Leblond,Group-theoretical foundations of classical mechanics: the lagrangian gauge problem,

    J.-M. L´ evy-Leblond,Group-theoretical foundations of classical mechanics: the lagrangian gauge problem, . – 77 –

  25. [25]

    Marmo, G

    G. Marmo, G. Morandi, A. Simoni and E. Sudarshan, Quasi-invariance and central extensions, Physical Review D 37 (1988) 2196

  26. [26]

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis and A. Kleinschmidt, Non-Lorentzian theories with and without constraints, JHEP 01 (2023) 167, [ 2210.14848]

  27. [27]

    Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes from Ambitwistor Strings: from Genus Two to the Nodal Riemann Sphere

    Y. Geyer and R. Monteiro, Two-loop scattering amplitudes from ambitwistor strings: from genus two to the nodal Riemann sphere , JHEP 11 (2018) 008, [ 1805.05344]

  28. [28]

    Kreyszig, Differential geometry

    E. Kreyszig, Differential geometry. Courier Corporation, 2013

  29. [29]

    Deligne and D

    P. Deligne and D. Mumford, The irreducibility of the space of curves of given genus , Publications Math´ ematiques de l’IHES36 (1969) 75–109

  30. [30]

    Brasselet, Intersection of algebraic cycles , Journal of Mathematical Sciences 82 (1996) 3625–3632

    J.-P. Brasselet, Intersection of algebraic cycles , Journal of Mathematical Sciences 82 (1996) 3625–3632

  31. [31]

    Classical and Quantized Tensionless Strings

    J. Isberg, U. Lindstrom, B. Sundborg and G. Theodoridis, Classical and quantized tensionless strings, Nucl. Phys. B 411 (1994) 122–156, [ hep-th/9307108]

  32. [32]

    Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra

    A. Bagchi, Tensionless strings and Galilean conformal algebra , JHEP 05 (2013) 141, [1303.0291]

  33. [33]

    On the null origin of the ambitwistor string

    E. Casali and P. Tourkine, On the null origin of the ambitwistor string , JHEP 11 (2016) 036, [1606.05636]

  34. [34]

    B. Chen, Z. Hu, Z.-F. Yu and Y.-F. Zheng, Path-integral quantization of tensionless (super) string, JHEP 08 (2023) 133, [ 2302.05975]

  35. [35]

    Strings with Non-Relativistic Conformal Symmetry and Limits of the AdS/CFT Correspondence

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers and Z. Yan, Strings with non-relativistic conformal symmetry and limits of the AdS/CFT correspondence , JHEP 11 (2018) 190, [1810.05560]

  36. [36]

    Harmark, J

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers and G. Oling, Relating non-relativistic string theories, JHEP 11 (2019) 071, [ 1907.01663]

  37. [37]

    Bidussi, T

    L. Bidussi, T. Harmark, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and G. Oling, Longitudinal Galilean and Carrollian limits of non-relativistic strings , 2309.14467

  38. [38]

    Albrychiewicz, K.-I

    E. Albrychiewicz, K.-I. Ellers, A. Franco Valiente and P. Hoˇ rava,Tropological sigma models, JHEP 06 (2024) 135, [ 2311.00745]

  39. [39]

    T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest and C. Stein, Introduction to algorithms. MIT press, 2022

  40. [40]

    Hoˇ rava and C

    P. Hoˇ rava and C. J. Mogni,String perturbation theory on the Schwinger-Keldysh time contour , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 261602, [ 2009.03940]

  41. [41]

    Hoˇ rava and C

    P. Hoˇ rava and C. J. Mogni,Keldysh rotation in the large-N expansion and string theory out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 106014, [ 2010.10671]

  42. [42]

    Hoˇ rava and C

    P. Hoˇ rava and C. J. Mogni,Large-N expansion and string theory out of equilibrium , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 106013, [ 2008.11685]

  43. [43]

    GCA in 2d

    A. Bagchi, R. Gopakumar, I. Mandal and A. Miwa, GCA in 2d , JHEP 08 (2010) 004, [0912.1090]. – 78 –

  44. [44]

    Galilean Conformal Algebras and AdS/CFT

    A. Bagchi and R. Gopakumar, Galilean conformal algebras and AdS/CFT , JHEP 07 (2009) 037, [0902.1385]

  45. [45]

    Bondi, M

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg and A. W. K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269 (1962) 21–52

  46. [46]

    Sachs, Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory , Phys

    R. Sachs, Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory , Phys. Rev. 128 (1962) 2851–2864

  47. [47]

    The BMS/GCA correspondence

    A. Bagchi, Correspondence between asymptotically flat spacetimes and nonrelativistic conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 171601, [ 1006.3354]

  48. [48]

    Souriau, Structure des syst` emes dynamiques: maˆ ıtrises de math´ ematiques, (No Title) (1970)

    J.-M. Souriau, Structure des syst` emes dynamiques: maˆ ıtrises de math´ ematiques, (No Title) (1970)

  49. [49]

    Geometrical Spinoptics and the Optical Hall Effect

    C. Duval, Z. Horvath and P. Horvathy, Geometrical spinoptics and the optical Hall effect , J. Geom. Phys. 57 (2007) 925–941, [ math-ph/0509031]

  50. [50]

    Polarized Spinoptics and Symplectic Physics

    C. Duval, Polarized Spinoptics and Symplectic Physics , 1312.4486

  51. [51]

    R. C. Myers, Dielectric branes, JHEP 12 (1999) 022, [ hep-th/9910053]

  52. [52]

    M(atrix) Theory: Matrix Quantum Mechanics as a Fundamental Theory

    W. Taylor, M(atrix) theory: Matrix quantum mechanics as a fundamental theory , Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 419–462, [ hep-th/0101126]

  53. [53]

    Bergshoeff, E

    E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin and P. K. Townsend, Supermembranes and eleven-dimensional supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 189 (1987) 75–78

  54. [54]

    Goldstone and J

    J. Goldstone and J. Hoppe , unpublished (1982)

  55. [55]

    Hoppe, MIT PhD Thesis (1982); Quantum theory of a relativistic surface, workshop on Constraints theory and relativistic dynamics (Florence, 1986), eds

    J. Hoppe, MIT PhD Thesis (1982); Quantum theory of a relativistic surface, workshop on Constraints theory and relativistic dynamics (Florence, 1986), eds. G. Longhi and L. Lusanna , 1987

  56. [56]

    Baake, P

    M. Baake, P. Reinicke and V. Rittenberg, Fierz identities for real Clifford algebras and the number of supercharges, Journal of Mathematical Physics 26 (1985) 1070–1071

  57. [57]

    Flume, On quantum mechanics with extended supersymmetry and nonabelian gauge constraints, Annals of Physics 164 (1985) 189–220

    R. Flume, On quantum mechanics with extended supersymmetry and nonabelian gauge constraints, Annals of Physics 164 (1985) 189–220

  58. [58]

    Claudson and M

    M. Claudson and M. B. Halpern, Supersymmetric ground state wave functions , Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 689–715

  59. [59]

    de Wit, M

    B. de Wit, M. Luscher and H. Nicolai, The supermembrane is unstable , Nucl. Phys. B 320 (1989) 135–159

  60. [60]

    P. K. Townsend, D-branes from M-branes, Phys. Lett. B 373 (1996) 68–75, [ hep-th/9512062]

  61. [61]

    Bound States Of Strings And $p$-Branes

    E. Witten, Bound states of strings and p-branes , Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 335–350, [hep-th/9510135]

  62. [62]

    Klusoˇ n,Null-dimensional reduction of M2-brane , Int

    J. Klusoˇ n,Null-dimensional reduction of M2-brane , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37 (2022) 2250090, [2103.00566]

  63. [63]

    Oling and Z

    G. Oling and Z. Yan, Aspects of nonrelativistic strings , Front. in Phys. 10 (2022) 832271, [2202.12698]

  64. [64]

    P. K. Townsend, Four lectures on M theory , in ICTP Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 385–438, 12, 1996. hep-th/9612121. – 79 –

  65. [65]

    S-Duality and Noncommutative Gauge Theory

    R. Gopakumar, J. M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and A. Strominger, S duality and noncommutative gauge theory, JHEP 06 (2000) 036, [ hep-th/0005048]

  66. [66]

    String Theory and Noncommutative Geometry

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, String theory and noncommutative geometry , JHEP 09 (1999) 032, [hep-th/9908142]

  67. [67]

    Duality, Quotients, and Currents

    M. Roˇ cek and E. P. Verlinde,Duality, quotients, and currents , Nucl. Phys. B 373 (1992) 630–646, [hep-th/9110053]

  68. [68]

    An Introduction to T-Duality in String Theory

    E. Alvarez, L. Alvarez-Gaume and Y. Lozano, An Introduction to T duality in string theory , Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 41 (1995) 1–20, [ hep-th/9410237]

  69. [69]

    T-duality for open strings

    E. Alvarez, J. L. F. Barbon and J. Borlaf, T duality for open strings , Nucl. Phys. B 479 (1996) 218–242, [ hep-th/9603089]

  70. [70]

    N. A. Obers and B. Pioline, U duality and M theory , Phys. Rept. 318 (1999) 113–225, [hep-th/9809039]

  71. [71]

    The Incredible Shrinking Torus

    W. Fischler, E. Halyo, A. Rajaraman and L. Susskind, The incredible shrinking torus , Nucl. Phys. B 501 (1997) 409–426, [ hep-th/9703102]

  72. [72]

    Matrix String Theory

    R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde and H. L. Verlinde, Matrix string theory , Nucl. Phys. B 500 (1997) 43–61, [ hep-th/9703030]

  73. [73]

    Proposals on nonperturbative superstring interactions

    L. Motl, Proposals on nonperturbative superstring interactions, hep-th/9701025

  74. [74]

    Non Relativistic Dp Branes

    J. Gomis, F. Passerini, T. Ramirez and A. Van Proeyen, Non relativistic Dp branes , JHEP 10 (2005) 007, [ hep-th/0507135]

  75. [75]

    Brane Dualities in Non-relativistic Limit

    K. Kamimura and T. Ramirez, Brane dualities in non-relativistic limit , JHEP 03 (2006) 058, [hep-th/0512146]

  76. [76]

    Non-Relativistic M2-Brane

    J. Klusoˇ n and P. Novosad,Non-Relativistic M2-Brane, JHEP 06 (2019) 072, [ 1903.12450]

  77. [77]

    Ebert, H.-Y

    S. Ebert, H.-Y. Sun and Z. Yan, Dual D-brane actions in nonrelativistic string theory , JHEP 04 (2022) 161, [ 2112.09316]

  78. [78]

    C. M. Hull, Timelike T duality, de Sitter space, large N gauge theories and topological field theory, JHEP 07 (1998) 021, [ hep-th/9806146]

  79. [79]

    Spacelike Branes

    M. Gutperle and A. Strominger, Space-like branes, JHEP 04 (2002) 018, [ hep-th/0202210]

  80. [80]

    C. M. Hull, De Sitter space in supergravity and M theory , JHEP 11 (2001) 012, [hep-th/0109213]

Showing first 80 references.