REVIEW 4 cited by
AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Artificial intelligence has significantly advanced healthcare, particularly through large language models (LLMs) that excel in medical question answering benchmarks. However, their real-world clinical application remains limited due to the complexities of doctor-patient interactions. To address this, we introduce \textbf{AI Hospital}, a multi-agent framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between \emph{Doctor} as player and NPCs including \emph{Patient}, \emph{Examiner}, \emph{Chief Physician}. This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation (MVME) benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs to evaluate LLMs' performance in symptom collection, examination recommendations, and diagnoses. Additionally, a dispute resolution collaborative mechanism is proposed to enhance diagnostic accuracy through iterative discussions. Despite improvements, current LLMs exhibit significant performance gaps in multi-turn interactions compared to one-step approaches. Our findings highlight the need for further research to bridge these gaps and improve LLMs' clinical diagnostic capabilities. Our data, code, and experimental results are all open-sourced at \url{https://github.com/LibertFan/AI_Hospital}.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
TinyTroupe: An LLM-powered Multiagent Persona Simulation Toolkit
TinyTroupe provides a toolkit for fine-grained persona-based LLM multi-agent simulations with built-in support for population sampling, experimentation, and validation.
-
Toward the Autonomous AI Doctor: Quantitative Benchmarking of an Autonomous Agentic AI Versus Board-Certified Clinicians in a Real World Setting
In a retrospective sample of 500 urgent-care telehealth visits, a proprietary AI doctor matched clinicians' top diagnosis 81% of the time and treatment plans 99.2% of the time, but the design cannot support claims of ...
-
FinTeam: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Intelligence System for Comprehensive Financial Scenarios
A four-agent LLM pipeline trained with role-specific data improves human preference on comprehensive Chinese financial analysis tasks.
-
AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research
A survey that organizes AI-for-research work into five tasks, comprehension, survey, discovery, writing, and peer review, and compiles associated tools and benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.