REVIEW 3 cited by
ShieldLM: Empowering LLMs as Aligned, Customizable and Explainable Safety Detectors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The safety of Large Language Models (LLMs) has gained increasing attention in recent years, but there still lacks a comprehensive approach for detecting safety issues within LLMs' responses in an aligned, customizable and explainable manner. In this paper, we propose ShieldLM, an LLM-based safety detector, which aligns with common safety standards, supports customizable detection rules, and provides explanations for its decisions. To train ShieldLM, we compile a large bilingual dataset comprising 14,387 query-response pairs, annotating the safety of responses based on various safety standards. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that ShieldLM surpasses strong baselines across four test sets, showcasing remarkable customizability and explainability. Besides performing well on standard detection datasets, ShieldLM has also been shown to be effective as a safety evaluator for advanced LLMs. ShieldLM is released at \url{https://github.com/thu-coai/ShieldLM} to support accurate and explainable safety detection under various safety standards.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Fine-Grained Chinese Hate Speech Understanding: Span-Level Resources, Coded Term Lexicon, and Enhanced Detection Frameworks
The paper creates a span-level Chinese hate speech dataset and a 830-term coded hate lexicon, but its two-stage training method's reported superiority is contradicted by the paper's own COLD results.
-
Agentic Data Environments
The paper proposes Agentic Data Environments that amplify agent capabilities (via information management, retrieval, and elicitation) while bounding failure consequences (via branching and data flow control).
-
Libra: Large Chinese-based Safeguard for AI Content
Libra-Guard, a Chinese-language AI content safety model, reaches 86.8% accuracy on the new 5,720-sample Libra-Test benchmark, beating open-source baselines and approaching GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-Sonnet.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.