pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.06053 · v2 · submitted 2024-03-10 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Spinfoams, γ-duality and parity violation in primordial gravitational waves

Eugenio Bianchi , Monica Rincon-Ramirez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 03:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords Barbero-Immirzi parameterγ-dualityparity violationprimordial gravitational wavesspinfoamcosmic inflationeffective field theoryloop quantum gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Primordial gravitational wave observations can determine the Barbero-Immirzi parameter via γ-duality.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the Barbero-Immirzi parameter γ in loop quantum gravity's spinfoam dynamics measures gravitational parity violation through a duality rotation called γ-duality in the EPRL model. An effective field theory is constructed for gravity plus a scalar field that has the same parity violation, resulting in higher-curvature terms whose even and odd parity couplings are related by γ. In the context of cosmic inflation using this effective action, the detection of a parity-violating polarization in primordial tensor modes, along with the spectral tilt and tensor-to-scalar ratio, would allow extraction of γ's value. This extraction would reveal the discreteness scale of quantum space geometry. The connection matters because it turns an abstract quantum gravity parameter into a potentially measurable cosmological quantity.

Core claim

The Barbero-Immirzi parameter γ appears as a coupling constant in the spinfoam dynamics of loop quantum gravity. In this work, we highlight that γ can be understood as a measure of gravitational parity violation via a duality rotation for the EPRL spinfoam model. We call this property γ-duality, and we investigate an effective field theory for gravity and a scalar field with the same degree of parity violation. The resulting relation between the coupling constants of parity-even and parity-odd higher-curvature terms in the effective action is determined by γ, opening the possibility of its measurement in the semiclassical regime. For a choice of γ-dual effective action, we study cosmic infla

What carries the argument

γ-duality: the identification of the Barbero-Immirzi parameter γ as quantifying parity violation through duality rotation in the EPRL spinfoam model, which determines the ratio of parity-odd to parity-even higher curvature couplings in the effective action.

If this is right

  • The value of γ can be extracted from cosmological data on primordial gravitational waves.
  • This value corresponds to the discreteness scale in quantum geometry.
  • The effective theory predicts specific relations in higher-curvature terms fixed by γ.
  • Cosmic inflation models incorporating this duality yield testable predictions for tensor modes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future polarization-sensitive gravitational wave detectors could constrain quantum gravity parameters.
  • The approach opens a window to test spinfoam models against cosmological observations.
  • If γ is measured, it might inform the choice of the Immirzi parameter in other LQG applications.

Load-bearing premise

An effective field theory can be constructed for gravity and a scalar field with the same degree of parity violation as the EPRL spinfoam model, such that the relation between the coupling constants of parity-even and parity-odd higher-curvature terms is determined by γ.

What would settle it

A measurement of the tensor-to-scalar ratio, tensor tilt, and chirality parameter in primordial gravitational waves that cannot be fit by any real value of γ under the γ-dual effective action.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2403.06053 by Eugenio Bianchi, Monica Rincon-Ramirez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The expressions for the tilt nT∗ and the polarization Π∗ (123,124) are in agreement with the ones found in a more general case in [27, 28] where a different approxi￾mation for the mode equation is used. In particular the log(s) expansion (108) allows us to determine the late time limit (121) in which the power spectrum is explic￾itly time independent. VI. DISCUSSION In this paper we have introduced a new c… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: , Right): γ = r 1 + q 2 2 − q 2 , with q ≡ π 8 8nT + r Π . (129) In this way, a measurement of the polarization and tilt of primordial gravitational waves, together with their rela￾tive amplitude to the scalar modes, can provide a mea￾surement of the Barbero-Immirzi parameter and, there￾fore, of the scale of the discreteness (1) in loop quantum gravity. The relation (129) arises from the analysis of slow… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Barbero-Immirzi parameter $\gamma$ appears as a coupling constant in the spinfoam dynamics of loop quantum gravity. In this work, we highlight that $\gamma$ can be understood as a measure of gravitational parity violation via a duality rotation for the EPRL spinfoam model. We call this property $\gamma$-duality, and we investigate an effective field theory for gravity and a scalar field with the same degree of parity violation. The resulting relation between the coupling constants of parity-even and parity-odd higher-curvature terms in the effective action is determined by $\gamma$, opening the possibility of its measurement in the semiclassical regime. For a choice of $\gamma$-dual effective action, we study cosmic inflation and show that the observation of a primordial tensor polarization, together with the tensor tilt and the tensor-to-scalar ratio, provides a measurement of the Barbero-Immirzi parameter and, therefore, of the scale of discreteness of the quantum geometry of space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes interpreting the Barbero-Immirzi parameter γ in the EPRL spinfoam model as a measure of gravitational parity violation via γ-duality. It introduces a γ-dual effective field theory for gravity and a scalar field in which the relation between parity-even and parity-odd higher-curvature couplings is fixed by γ. Applying this to cosmic inflation, the paper claims that detecting primordial tensor polarization, combined with the tensor tilt and tensor-to-scalar ratio, would measure γ and thus the discreteness scale of quantum geometry.

Significance. This work offers a creative bridge between loop quantum gravity and cosmological observables by linking spinfoam parity properties to gravitational wave chirality. If the effective theory faithfully represents the spinfoam dynamics, it could enable measurements of fundamental LQG parameters through future observations of primordial gravitational waves. The approach is novel, but its impact hinges on establishing a firmer connection between the spinfoam amplitudes and the chosen EFT.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3, definition of the γ-dual effective action: The relation between the coefficients of the parity-even and parity-odd higher-curvature terms (e.g., the ratio fixing the strength of the parity-violating term relative to the parity-preserving one) is imposed by the choice of action to match the 'degree of parity violation' in the EPRL model. This is not derived from the spinfoam path integral, vertex amplitudes, or large-spin asymptotics on a parity-violating background. The central claim in §5 that observations of tensor polarization, n_T and r measure γ therefore rests on this imposed correspondence rather than an emergent property of the quantum theory.
  2. [§4] §4, inflation analysis: The expressions relating the tensor chirality parameter to n_T and r are obtained under the exact γ-dual ratio of couplings. No sensitivity analysis is provided showing how deviations from this precise ratio (as might arise in a more general EFT) affect the invertibility of the mapping from observables back to γ, which is required for the measurement claim to be robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction should state more explicitly that the results hold for a specific choice of γ-dual effective action, to prevent readers from inferring a unique derivation from the spinfoam model.
  2. [§3] Notation for the higher-curvature terms and the precise definition of 'degree of parity violation' could be clarified with an explicit equation early in §3 for readers unfamiliar with the EPRL vertex.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major points below, clarifying the scope of our effective theory construction.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3, definition of the γ-dual effective action: The relation between the coefficients of the parity-even and parity-odd higher-curvature terms (e.g., the ratio fixing the strength of the parity-violating term relative to the parity-preserving one) is imposed by the choice of action to match the 'degree of parity violation' in the EPRL model. This is not derived from the spinfoam path integral, vertex amplitudes, or large-spin asymptotics on a parity-violating background. The central claim in §5 that observations of tensor polarization, n_T and r measure γ therefore rests on this imposed correspondence rather than an emergent property of the quantum theory.

    Authors: We agree that the ratio between parity-even and parity-odd coefficients is imposed in the effective action to reproduce the degree of parity violation present in the EPRL spinfoam model through γ-duality, rather than being derived from the full spinfoam path integral or large-spin asymptotics. Our construction uses γ-duality as a guiding principle to define an EFT with matching parity properties, providing a phenomenological link to observables. We will revise §3 to state this assumption more explicitly and qualify the measurement claim in §5 accordingly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4, inflation analysis: The expressions relating the tensor chirality parameter to n_T and r are obtained under the exact γ-dual ratio of couplings. No sensitivity analysis is provided showing how deviations from this precise ratio (as might arise in a more general EFT) affect the invertibility of the mapping from observables back to γ, which is required for the measurement claim to be robust.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the expressions in §4 assume the exact γ-dual ratio without exploring deviations. We will add a sensitivity analysis (or brief discussion) in the revised manuscript to examine how small deviations from the precise ratio impact the invertibility of the mapping from (tensor polarization, n_T, r) to γ, thereby strengthening the robustness of the measurement claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

γ-dual EFT chosen by construction so parity-odd/even ratio is fixed by γ

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "we investigate an effective field theory for gravity and a scalar field with the same degree of parity violation. The resulting relation between the coupling constants of parity-even and parity-odd higher-curvature terms in the effective action is determined by γ, opening the possibility of its measurement in the semiclassical regime. For a choice of γ-dual effective action, we study cosmic inflation and show that the observation of a primordial tensor polarization, together with the tensor tilt and the tensor-to-scalar ratio, provides a measurement of the Barbero-Immirzi parameter"

    The EFT is defined such that the parity-even/odd coupling ratio equals a function of γ chosen to reproduce the EPRL 'degree of parity violation'. The subsequent claim that observations measure γ is then true by this definitional choice, not by deriving the ratio from the spinfoam path integral or asymptotics.

full rationale

The paper selects an effective action whose parity violation degree is defined to match the EPRL spinfoam via a γ-determined coupling ratio. The claimed measurement of γ (hence discreteness scale) from tensor observables then follows directly from this imposed relation. This matches the self-definitional pattern; the derivation chain reduces to the initial choice rather than an independent extraction from amplitudes. No load-bearing self-citations or other patterns are evident from the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the γ-duality property in the spinfoam model and the ability to construct a matching effective field theory for inflation. Based on abstract only.

free parameters (1)
  • γ (Barbero-Immirzi parameter)
    Central parameter whose value is to be determined from observations; appears as coupling in spinfoam dynamics.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The EPRL spinfoam model exhibits γ-duality, allowing γ to measure gravitational parity violation via duality rotation.
    This is the key property highlighted in the work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5706 in / 1450 out tokens · 53345 ms · 2026-05-24T03:09:44.476978+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Toller matrices and the Feynman $i\varepsilon$ in spinfoams

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Toller matrices T^(±) in causal spinfoam amplitudes satisfy T^(+) + T^(-) = D and admit equivalent definitions via analyticity, iε prescription, and boost-eigenvalue integrals that reproduce the Euclidean-to-Lorentzia...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 49 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Quantum Information Structure of Space- time

    there are two independent coupling functionsfGB(ϕ) and fCS(ϕ). Here, the new condition of γ-duality relates the ratio of the two to the Barbero-Immirzi parameter. V. INFLA TION AND PRIMORDIAL GRA VIT A TIONAL W A VES In this section we study the power spectrum of pri- mordial gravitational waves in a model of inflation given by the γ-dual action (70). We ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Rovelli and F

    C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto, Covariant Loop Quan- tum Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi, A short review of loop quantum gravity, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84, 042001 (2021), arXiv:2104.04394 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity

    C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B442, 593 (1995), [Erratum: Nucl. Phys.B456,753(1995)], arXiv:gr-qc/9411005 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  6. [6]

    Quantum Theory of Gravity I: Area Operators

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, Quantum theory of geometry. 1: Area operators, Class. Quant. Grav. 14, A55 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9602046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  7. [7]

    Quantum Theory of Geometry II: Volume operators

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, Quantum theory of geometry. 2. Volume operators, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 1, 388 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9711031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization of Space

    E. Bianchi and H. M. Haggard, Bohr-sommerfeld quan- tization of space, Phys. Rev. D86, 124010 (2012), arXiv:1208.2228 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    The length operator in Loop Quantum Gravity

    E. Bianchi, The length operator in loop quantum grav- ity, Nucl. Phys. B807, 591 (2009), arXiv:0806.4710 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    J. F. Barbero G., Real Ashtekar variables for Lorentzian signature space times, Phys. Rev. D 51, 5507 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9410014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  11. [11]

    Immirzi, Real and complex connections for canonical gravity, Class

    G. Immirzi, Real and complex connections for canonical gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 14, L177 (1997), arXiv:gr- qc/9612030

    work page arXiv 1997

  12. [12]

    Barbero's Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action

    S. Holst, Barbero’s Hamiltonian derived from a gener- alized Hilbert-Palatini action, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5966 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9511026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  13. [13]

    Hojman, C

    R. Hojman, C. Mukku, and W. A. Sayed, Parity viola- tion in metric torsion theories of gravitation, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1915 (1980)

    work page 1915

  14. [14]

    The Spin Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity

    A. Perez, The Spin Foam Approach to Quantum Grav- ity, Living Rev. Rel. 16, 3 (2013), arXiv:1205.2019 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  15. [15]

    LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter

    J. Engle, E. Livine, R. Pereira, and C. Rovelli, LQG ver- tex with finite Immirzi parameter, Nucl. Phys. B 799, 136 (2008), arXiv:0711.0146 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    J. W. Barrett and L. Crane, A Lorentzian signature model for quantum general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 3101 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9904025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  17. [17]

    Discrete Symmetries in Covariant LQG

    C. Rovelli and E. Wilson-Ewing, Discrete Symmetries in Covariant LQG, Phys. Rev. D 86, 064002 (2012), arXiv:1205.0733 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    Kol, Duality in Einstein’s Gravity, (2022), arXiv:2205.05752 [hep-th]

    U. Kol, Duality in Einstein’s Gravity, (2022), arXiv:2205.05752 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Kol and S.-T

    U. Kol and S.-T. Yau, Duality in Gauge Theory, Gravity and String Theory, (2023), arXiv:2311.07934 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Monteiro, No U(1) electric-magnetic duality in Ein- stein gravity, (2023), arXiv:2312.02351 [hep-th]

    R. Monteiro, No U(1) electric-magnetic duality in Ein- stein gravity, (2023), arXiv:2312.02351 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Effective Field Theory for Inflation

    S. Weinberg, Effective Field Theory for Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 77, 123541 (2008), arXiv:0804.4291 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    Lue, Arthur and Wang, Limin and Kamionkowski, Marc, Cosmological Signature of New Parity-Violating Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 10.1103/Phys- 15 RevLett.83.1506 (1999)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 1999

  23. [23]

    Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity

    S. Alexander and N. Yunes, Chern-Simons Modi- fied General Relativity, Phys. Rept. 480, 1 (2009), arXiv:0907.2562 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Chern-Simons Modification of General Relativity

    R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, Chern-Simons modification of general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 68, 104012 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0308071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  25. [25]

    Alexander, M

    S. Alexander, M. E. Peskin, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Leptogenesis from gravity waves in models of infla- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 081301 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0403069

    work page arXiv 2006

  26. [26]

    Birefringent Gravitational Waves and the Consistency Check of Inflation

    S. Alexander and J. Martin, Birefringent gravitational waves and the consistency check of inflation, Phys. Rev. D 71, 063526 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0410230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  27. [27]

    C. R. Contaldi, J. Magueijo, and L. Smolin, Anoma- lous CMB polarization and gravitational chirality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 141101 (2008), arXiv:0806.3082 [astro- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  28. [28]

    Satoh and J

    M. Satoh and J. Soda, Higher curvature corrections to primordial fluctuations in slow-roll inflation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2008 (09), 019

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    Slow-roll Inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons Corrections

    M. Satoh, Slow-roll Inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons Corrections, JCAP 11, 024, arXiv:1008.2724 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    S. Dyda, E. E. Flanagan, and M. Kamionkowski, Vac- uum Instability in Chern-Simons Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 86, 124031 (2012), arXiv:1208.4871 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  31. [31]

    Parity-violating and anisotropic correlations in pseudoscalar inflation

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso, and M. Shi- raishi, Parity-violating and anisotropic correlations in pseudoscalar inflation, JCAP 01, 027, arXiv:1411.2521 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Parity-violating CMB correlators with non-decaying statistical anisotropy

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso, and M. Shiraishi, Parity-violating CMB correlators with non-decaying statistical anisotropy, JCAP 07, 039, arXiv:1505.02193 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Parity breaking signatures from a Chern-Simons coupling during inflation: the case of non-Gaussian gravitational waves

    N. Bartolo and G. Orlando, Parity breaking signatures from a Chern-Simons coupling during inflation: the case of non-Gaussian gravitational waves, JCAP 07, 034, arXiv:1706.04627 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and A. A. Popov, Propagation of Gravitational Waves in Chern- Simons Axion Einstein Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 100, 084009 (2019), arXiv:1909.01324 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Bordin and G

    L. Bordin and G. Cabass, Graviton non-Gaussianities and Parity Violation in the EFT of Inflation, JCAP 07, 014, arXiv:2004.00619 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2004

  36. [36]

    Alexander and C

    S. Alexander and C. Creque-Sarbinowski, UV com- pletions of Chern-Simons gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104046 (2023), arXiv:2207.05094 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    J.-O. Gong, M. Mylova, and M. Sasaki, New shape of parity-violating graviton non-Gaussianity, JHEP 10, 140, arXiv:2303.05178 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Jenks, L

    L. Jenks, L. Choi, M. Lagos, and N. Yunes, Parametrized parity violation in gravitational wave propagation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044023 (2023), arXiv:2305.10478 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Creque-Sarbinowski, S

    C. Creque-Sarbinowski, S. Alexander, M. Kamionkowski, and O. Philcox, Parity-violating trispectrum from Chern-Simons gravity, JCAP 11, 029, arXiv:2303.04815 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Bojowald, Absence of a singularity in loop quantum cosmology, Phys

    M. Bojowald, Absence of a singularity in loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5227 (2001)

    work page 2001

  41. [41]

    Mathematical structure of loop quantum cosmology

    A. Ashtekar, M. Bojowald, and J. Lewandowski, Math- ematical structure of loop quantum cosmology, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7, 233 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0304074

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  42. [42]

    Ashtekar and P

    A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, Loop quantum cosmology: a status report, Classical and Quantum Gravity 28, 213001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Loop Quantum Cosmology: A brief review

    I. Agullo and P. Singh, Loop Quantum Cosmology, in Loop Quantum Gravity: The First 30 Years , edited by A. Ashtekar and J. Pullin (WSP, 2017) pp. 183–240, arXiv:1612.01236 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Agull´ o, A

    I. Agull´ o, A. Wang, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Loop quan- tum cosmology: relation between theory and observa- tions, (2023), arXiv:2301.10215 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Towards Spinfoam Cosmology

    E. Bianchi, C. Rovelli, and F. Vidotto, Towards Spin- foam Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 82, 084035 (2010), arXiv:1003.3483 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    Gozzini and F

    F. Gozzini and F. Vidotto, Primordial Fluctuations From Quantum Gravity, Front. Astron. Astrophys. Cos- mol. 7, 629466 (2021), arXiv:1906.02211 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Frisoni, F

    P. Frisoni, F. Gozzini, and F. Vidotto, Primordial fluctuations from quantum gravity: 16-cell topological model, (2023), arXiv:2312.02399 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Perez and C

    A. Perez and C. Rovelli, Physical effects of the Immirzi parameter, Phys. Rev. D 73, 044013 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0505081

    work page arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    Quantum Gravity, Torsion, Parity Violation and all that

    L. Freidel, D. Minic, and T. Takeuchi, Quantum gravity, torsion, parity violation and all that, Phys. Rev. D 72, 104002 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0507253

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  50. [50]

    Generalized effective description of loop quantum cosmology

    A. Ashtekar and B. Gupt, Generalized effective descrip- tion of loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 92, 084060 (2015), arXiv:1509.08899 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Phenomenology with fluctuating quantum geometries in loop quantum cosmology

    I. Agullo, A. Ashtekar, and B. Gupt, Phenomenol- ogy with fluctuating quantum geometries in loop quan- tum cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 074003 (2017), arXiv:1611.09810 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Quantum Geometry and Black Hole Entropy

    A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi, and K. Krasnov, Quantum geometry and black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 904 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9710007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  53. [53]

    K. A. Meissner, Black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 5245 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0407052

    work page arXiv 2004

  54. [54]

    Renormalization and black hole entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity

    T. Jacobson, Renormalization and black hole entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 4875 (2007), arXiv:0707.4026 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  55. [55]

    Entropy of Non-Extremal Black Holes from Loop Gravity

    E. Bianchi, Entropy of Non-Extremal Black Holes from Loop Gravity, (2012), arXiv:1204.5122 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    The scaling of black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity

    A. Ghosh and A. Perez, The scaling of black hole en- tropy in loop quantum gravity, (2012), arXiv:1210.2252 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  57. [57]

    J. F. Barbero G. and D. Pranzetti, Black Hole Entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity (2023) arXiv:2212.13469 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    LQG propagator from the new spin foams

    E. Bianchi, E. Magliaro, and C. Perini, LQG propagator from the new spin foams, Nucl. Phys. B822, 245 (2009), arXiv:0905.4082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  59. [59]

    Lorentzian spinfoam propagator

    E. Bianchi and Y. Ding, Lorentzian spinfoam propaga- tor, Phys. Rev. D 86, 104040 (2012), arXiv:1109.6538 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  60. [60]

    Parity and reality properties of the EPRL spinfoam

    Y. Neiman, Parity and reality properties of the EPRL spinfoam, Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 065008 (2012), arXiv:1109.3946 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    J. W. Barrett, R. J. Dowdall, W. J. Fairbairn, F. Hell- mann, and R. Pereira, Lorentzian spin foam ampli- tudes: Graphical calculus and asymptotics, Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 165009 (2010), arXiv:0907.2440 [gr- qc]. 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  62. [62]

    Regge, General Relativity without Coordinates, Nuovo Cim

    T. Regge, General Relativity without Coordinates, Nuovo Cim. 19, 558 (1961)

    work page 1961

  63. [63]

    The twistorial structure of loop-gravity transition amplitudes

    S. Speziale and W. M. Wieland, The twistorial structure of loop-gravity transition amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 86, 124023 (2012), arXiv:1207.6348 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  64. [64]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Westview Press, 1995) Read- ing, USA: Addison-Wesley (1995) 842 p

    work page 1995

  65. [65]

    Streater and A

    R. Streater and A. Wightman, PCT, Spin and Statis- tics, and All That , Princeton Landmarks in Mathemat- ics and Physics (Princeton University Press, 2016)

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    W., An Introduction to Manifolds (Springer New York, 2010)

    Tu, L. W., An Introduction to Manifolds (Springer New York, 2010)

    work page 2010

  67. [67]

    Bott and L

    R. Bott and L. Tu, Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer New York, 1995)

    work page 1995

  68. [68]

    Baez, John C and Muniain, Javier P, Gauge Fields, Knots, and Gravity (World Scientific, 1994)

    work page 1994

  69. [69]

    Nash and S

    C. Nash and S. Sen, Topology and Geometry for Physi- cists, Dover Books on Mathematics (Dover Publica- tions, 2013)

    work page 2013

  70. [70]

    Kosmann, D´ eriv´ ees de lie des spineurs, Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata 91, 317 (1971)

    Y. Kosmann, D´ eriv´ ees de lie des spineurs, Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata 91, 317 (1971)

    work page 1971

  71. [71]

    Fatibene and M

    L. Fatibene and M. Francaviglia, General theory of lie derivatives for lorentz tensors, Communications in Mathematics 19, 11 (2011)

    work page 2011

  72. [72]

    Black hole entropy and Lorentz-diffeomorphism Noether charge

    T. Jacobson and A. Mohd, Black hole entropy and Lorentz-diffeomorphism Noether charge, Phys. Rev. D 92, 124010 (2015), arXiv:1507.01054 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    The First Law of Black Hole Mechanics for Fields with Internal Gauge Freedom

    K. Prabhu, The First Law of Black Hole Mechanics for Fields with Internal Gauge Freedom, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 035011 (2017), arXiv:1511.00388 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    Carlip, Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions , Cam- bridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2003)

    S. Carlip, Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions , Cam- bridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  75. [75]

    D. J. Rezende and A. Perez, 4d Lorentzian Holst action with topological terms, Phys. Rev. D 79, 064026 (2009), arXiv:0902.3416 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  76. [76]

    Beyond Einstein-Cartan gravity: Quadratic torsion and curvature invariants with even and odd parity including all boundary terms

    P. Baekler and F. W. Hehl, Beyond Einstein-Cartan gravity: Quadratic torsion and curvature invariants with even and odd parity including all boundary terms, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 215017 (2011), arXiv:1105.3504 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  77. [77]

    G. Date, R. K. Kaul, and S. Sengupta, Topological in- terpretation of Barbero-Immirzi parameter, Phys. Rev. D 79, 044008 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    From the Einstein-Cartan to the Ashtekar-Barbero canonical constraints, passing through the Nieh-Yan functional

    S. Mercuri, From the Einstein-Cartan to the Ashtekar- Barbero canonical constraints, passing through the Nieh-Yan functional, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024036 (2008), arXiv:0708.0037 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  79. [79]

    Banerjee, Some aspects of Holst and Nieh–Yan terms in general relativity with torsion, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 27, 135012 (2010)

    K. Banerjee, Some aspects of Holst and Nieh–Yan terms in general relativity with torsion, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 27, 135012 (2010)

    work page 2010

  80. [80]

    Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    S. Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    work page 2019

Showing first 80 references.