Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 54 references

Relevance of on-site and intersite Coulomb interactions in the Kitaev-Heisenberg magnet Na$_3$Co$_2$SbO$_6$

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-24 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum chemistry of Na3Co2SbO6 shows Kitaev and Gamma couplings are antiferromagnetic but weaker than Heisenberg, driven largely by direct Coulomb exchange and on-site multiconfigurational dressing.

desk verdict QC calc on Na3Co2SbO6 flags direct Coulomb and multiconfigurational dressing as dominant in the couplings but the hierarchy rests on standard active-space choices whose robustness isn't shown in the abstract. read the letter →

arxiv 2404.12742 v3 submitted 2024-04-19 cond-mat.str-el

Pritam Bhattacharyya , Abdul Basit , Thorben Petersen , Stephan Rachel , Satoshi Nishimoto , Liviu Hozoi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Kitaev-HeisenbergmodelNa3Co2SbO6quantumchemistrydirectCoulombexchangehoneycomblatticeCo2+magnetsspinfrustrationKitaevliquid
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses quantum-chemical methods to compute the magnetic exchange interactions between Co2+ moments in the honeycomb lattice compound Na3Co2SbO6. It establishes that the Kitaev and off-diagonal Gamma terms are substantial and antiferromagnetic, though smaller than the isotropic Heisenberg contribution. All nearest-neighbor couplings receive large contributions from direct Coulomb exchange and on-site multiconfigurational dressing, effects absent from existing descriptive models of Kitaev-Heisenberg magnetism. These results indicate that including such mechanisms is necessary to understand and possibly tune the system toward a Kitaev spin liquid ground state.

What carries the argument

Quantum-chemical evaluation of nearest-neighbor exchange parameters (J, K, Γ) that incorporates direct Coulomb exchange and multiconfigurational on-site effects for interacting Co2+ moments.

What would settle it

Experimental extraction of exchange parameters from neutron scattering or magnetic susceptibility data that yields Kitaev or Gamma terms larger than Heisenberg or opposite in sign would falsify the computed hierarchy and signs.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the LS-coupled t2g5 eg2 description of Co2+ ions, the Kitaev and Γ interactions are substantial and antiferromagnetic but somewhat weaker than the Heisenberg contribution; all nearest-neighbor couplings feature massive contributions from direct Coulomb exchange and/or on-site multiconfigurational dressing, mechanisms not considered so far in descriptive models of Kitaev-Heisenberg magnetism.

Load-bearing premise

The LS-coupled t2g5 eg2 description of the Co2+ ions together with the chosen quantum-chemistry approximations accurately capture the relative sizes and signs of the exchange couplings without significant systematic errors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Kitaev and Gamma terms receive antiferromagnetic contributions from direct Coulomb exchange and multiconfigurational dressing.
  • Standard Kitaev-Heisenberg models must be extended to include these direct and on-site mechanisms to describe cobalt-based honeycomb magnets.
  • Systematic wave-function quantum-chemical studies can identify routes to tune intersite couplings toward the Kitaev spin liquid regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar direct-exchange contributions may operate in other t2g5 eg2 cobalt compounds proposed as Kitaev candidates.
  • Controlling orbital overlap or crystal-field splitting could selectively enhance or suppress the direct Coulomb channel relative to superexchange.
  • The same mechanisms likely affect the relative size of Gamma terms in related honeycomb lattices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a first-principles quantum-chemistry study of nearest-neighbor exchange couplings in the honeycomb magnet Na3Co2SbO6. It concludes that the Kitaev and off-diagonal Γ interactions are antiferromagnetic and substantial but weaker than the Heisenberg term, with all couplings receiving large contributions from direct Coulomb exchange and on-site multiconfigurational dressing—mechanisms not previously emphasized in Kitaev-Heisenberg models.

Significance. If the computed hierarchy and signs are robust, the work identifies previously neglected direct-exchange and multiconfigurational channels that must be included in microscopic models of Co2+ t2g5 eg2 Kitaev materials and suggests routes to tune couplings toward a spin-liquid regime. The ab initio wave-function approach itself is a methodological strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods and Results sections (computational details and Table of exchange parameters)] The central claim—that Kitaev and Γ are weaker than Heisenberg yet still substantial, with dominant direct-Coulomb and multiconfigurational contributions—rests on the accuracy of the LS-coupled t2g5 eg2 description together with the specific CAS/active-space, basis-set, and crystal-structure choices. Without explicit benchmarks against known Co2+ compounds or quantified error bars on the relative magnitudes, systematic bias in the direct vs. indirect pathways cannot be ruled out and directly affects the reported hierarchy.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the exchange parameters (J, K, Γ) should be defined explicitly at first use and kept consistent with the Hamiltonian written in the text.
  2. [Introduction] The abstract states that the mechanisms are 'not considered so far'; a short literature sentence placing the present results against prior DFT or phenomenological fits on the same compound would help readers assess novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the positive assessment of its significance and methodological approach. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim—that Kitaev and Γ are weaker than Heisenberg yet still substantial, with dominant direct-Coulomb and multiconfigurational contributions—rests on the accuracy of the LS-coupled t2g5 eg2 description together with the specific CAS/active-space, basis-set, and crystal-structure choices. Without explicit benchmarks against known Co2+ compounds or quantified error bars on the relative magnitudes, systematic bias in the direct vs. indirect pathways cannot be ruled out and directly affects the reported hierarchy.

    Authors: We agree that validation of the computational protocol is important for establishing the robustness of the reported coupling hierarchy. The LS-coupled t2g5 eg2 description follows standard practice for octahedral Co2+ as validated in prior quantum-chemistry studies on cobaltates; the chosen CAS and basis-set settings are those routinely employed for this ion to capture both direct exchange and multiconfigurational dressing. While the present manuscript does not contain new benchmarks, the same methodology has reproduced experimental trends in related Co2+ honeycomb compounds. We will add a concise discussion of active-space and basis-set convergence tests (already performed during the study) together with a short comparison to literature results on benchmark Co2+ systems. This addition will make the expected accuracy and absence of obvious bias in the direct/indirect balance explicit without altering the central conclusions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: first-principles QC extraction of couplings

full rationale

The manuscript computes Kitaev, Γ, and Heisenberg couplings via quantum-chemistry methods (CAS/active-space, basis sets, crystal structure) applied to the LS-coupled t2g5 eg2 configuration of Co2+. These are direct outputs of the electronic-structure workflow; no parameter is fitted to a subset of the target couplings and then re-predicted, no self-definition equates input to output, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior self-citations. The reported hierarchy and mechanism attributions follow from the computed matrix elements without reduction to the paper's own fitted values. This is the normal non-circular case for ab-initio QC studies.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such quantities remain unknown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Relevance of on-site and intersite Coulomb interactions in the Kitaev-Heisenberg magnet Na$_3$Co$_2$SbO$_6$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2404.12742

@misc{pith2026240412742,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Relevance of on-site and intersite Coulomb interactions in the Kitaev-Heisenberg magnet Na$_3$Co$_2$SbO$_6$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2404.12742}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2404.12742}
}
abstract

The detection of considerable spin frustration in honeycomb cobalt oxide compounds indicates the presence of sizable Kitaev interactions in these systems, enlarging the pool of Kitaev spin liquid candidates. Several key questions remain to be answered, as basic as the mechanisms behind Kitaev couplings in Co$^{2+}$ $t_{2g}^5e_g^2$ magnets. Analyzing the quantum chemistry of interacting magnetic moments in Na$_3$Co$_2$SbO$_6$, a representative $LS$-coupled $t_{2g}^5e_g^2$ oxide, we find that the Kitaev and off-diagonal $\Gamma$ interactions are substantial and antiferromagnetic but somewhat weaker than the Heisenberg contribution. All nearest-neighbor couplings feature massive contributions from direct Coulomb exchange and/or on-site multiconfigurational dressing, mechanisms not considered so far in descriptive models of Kitaev-Heisenberg magnetism. These findings call for systematic wave-function quantum chemical studies in order to understand direct-indirect exchange synergies in Kitaev-Heisenberg magnets and how to possibly tune intersite couplings towards the Kitaev spin liquid ground state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2404.12742 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Successive atomic layers in Na [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Powder-averaged dynamical structure factor for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Direct exchange (red bars), CT kinetic exchange [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    fields into distinct components. By allowing subse- quently for all possible orbital occupations within the Co 3dshell, which is referred to as complete-active-space self-consistent-field (CASSCF) [2, 23], an admixture of 8%t 4 2ge3 g character is found in the ground-state CASSCF wave-function, in agreement with conclusions drawn from the analysis of X-ra...

    work page doi:10.22000/tny338gct87gzce4

  2. [2]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann. Phys.321, 2 (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [4]

    Fulde,Correlated Electrons in Quantum Matter (World Scientific, Singapore, 2012)

    P. Fulde,Correlated Electrons in Quantum Matter (World Scientific, Singapore, 2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [5]

    Khaliullin, Orbital Order and Fluctuations in Mott Insulators, Prog

    G. Khaliullin, Orbital Order and Fluctuations in Mott Insulators, Prog. Theor. Phys. Supp.160, 155 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [6]

    Jackeli and G

    G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Mott insulators in the strong spin-orbit coupling limit: From Heisenberg to a quantum compass and Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [7]

    S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valenti, Mod- els and materials for generalized Kitaev magnetism, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter29, 493002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [8]

    Liu and G

    H. Liu and G. Khaliullin, Pseudospin exchange interac- tions ind 7 cobalt compounds: Possible realization of the Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B97, 014407 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [10]

    R. Sano, Y. Kato, and Y. Motome, Kitaev-Heisenberg Hamiltonian for high-spind 7 Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B97, 014408 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 54 references
  1. [11]

    S. M. Winter, Magnetic couplings in edge-sharing high- spind 7 compounds, J. Phys. Mater.5, 045003 (2022)

    2022

  2. [12]

    Liu and H.-Y

    X. Liu and H.-Y. Kee, Non-Kitaev versus Kitaev honey- comb cobaltates, Phys. Rev. B107, 054420 (2023)

    2023

  3. [13]

    Songvilay, J

    M. Songvilay, J. Robert, S. Petit, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, W. D. Ratcliff, F. Damay, V. Bal´ edent, M. Jim´ enez-Ruiz, P. Lejay, E. Pachoud, A. Hadj-Azzem, V. Simonet, and C. Stock, Kitaev interactions in the Co honeycomb anti- ferromagnets Na3Co2SbO6 and Na2Co2TeO6, Phys. Rev...

    2020

  4. [14]

    C. Kim, J. Jeong, G. Lin, P. Park, T. Masuda, S. Asai, S. Itoh, H.-S. Kim, H. Zhou, J. Ma, and J.-G. Park, An- tiferromagnetic Kitaev interaction inJ eff = 1/2 cobalt honeycomb materials Na3Co2SbO6 and Na2Co2TeO6, J. Phys. Condens. Matter34, 045802 (2022)

    2022

  5. [15]

    A. L. Sanders, R. A. Mole, J. Liu, A. J. Brown, D. Yu, C. D. Ling, and S. Rachel, Dominant Kitaev inter- actions in the honeycomb materials Na 3Co2SbO6 and Na2Co2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B106, 014413 (2022)

    2022

  6. [16]

    X. Li, Y. Gu, Y. Chen, V. O. Garlea, K. Iida, K. Ka- mazawa, Y. Li, G. Deng, Q. Xiao, X. Zheng, Z. Ye, Y. Peng, I. A. Zaliznyak, J. M. Tranquada, and Y. Li, Giant magnetic in-plane anisotropy and competing insta- bilities in Na3Co2SbO6, Phys. Rev. X12, 041024 (2022)

    2022

  7. [17]

    van Veenendaal, E

    M. van Veenendaal, E. H. T. Poldi, L. S. I. Veiga, P. Ben- cok, G. Fabbris, R. Tartaglia, J. L. McChesney, J. W. Freeland, R. J. Hemley, H. Zheng, J. F. Mitchell, J.-Q. Yan, and D. Haskel, Electronic structure of Co 3dstates in the Kitaev material candidate honeycomb cobaltate...

    2023

  8. [18]

    Hozoi, U

    L. Hozoi, U. Birkenheuer, H. Stoll, and P. Fulde, Spin- state transition and spin-polaron physics in cobalt oxide perovskites:ab initioapproach based on quantum chem- ical methods, New J. Phys.11, 023023 (2009)

    2009

  9. [19]

    Iakovleva, T

    M. Iakovleva, T. Petersen, A. Alfonsov, Y. Skourski, H.- J. Grafe, E. Vavilova, R. Nath, L. Hozoi, and V. Kataev, Static magnetic and ESR spectroscopic properties of 6 the dimer-chain antiferromagnet BiCoPO 5, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 094413 (2022)

    2022

  10. [20]

    Albert, T

    C. Albert, T. J. Ball´ e, F. A. Breitner, Y. Krupskaya, A. Alfonsov, Z. Zangeneh, S. Avdoshenko, M. S. El- deeb, L. Hozoi, A. Vilangottunjalil, E. Haubold, A. Char- nukha, B. B¨ uchner, A. Jesche, and V. Kataev, Terahertz Magneto-Optical Excitations of the sd-Hybrid States of ...

    2021

  11. [21]

    Sugano, Y

    S. Sugano, Y. Tanabe, and H. Kamimura,Multiplets of Transition-Metal Ions in Crystals(Academic Press, New York, 1970)

    1970

  12. [23]

    [2, 8, 21, 23, 26, 28, 29, 41–51] for detailed infor- mation about the numerical calculations

    See Supplemental Material at [URL], which includes Refs. [2, 8, 21, 23, 26, 28, 29, 41–51] for detailed infor- mation about the numerical calculations

  13. [25]

    Petersen, L

    T. Petersen, L. Prodan, K. Geirhos, H. Nakamura, I. K´ ezsm´ arki, and L. Hozoi, Dressedjeff-1/2 objects in mixed-valence lacunar spinel molybdates, Sci. Rep.13, 2411 (2023)

    2023

  14. [26]

    Petersen, P

    T. Petersen, P. Bhattacharyya, U. K. R¨ oßler, and L. Ho- zoi, Resonating holes vs molecular spin-orbit coupled states in group-5 lacunar spinels, Nat. Commun.14, 5218 (2023)

    2023

  15. [28]

    Chaloupka and G

    J. Chaloupka and G. Khaliullin, Hidden symmetries of the extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model: Implications for the honeycomb-lattice iridatesA 2IrO3, Phys. Rev. B92, 024413 (2015)

    2015

  16. [31]

    Y. Gu, X. Li, Y. Chen, K. Iida, A. Nakao, K. Munakata, V. O. Garlea, Y. Li, G. Deng, I. A. Zaliznyak, J. M. Tranquada, and Y. Li, In-plane multi-q magnetic ground state of Na3Co2SbO6, Phys. Rev. B109, L060410 (2024)

    2024

  17. [32]

    R. E. Watson and A. J. Freeman, Hartree-Fock atomic scattering factors for the iron transition series, Acta. Cryst.14, 27 (1961)

    1961

  18. [33]

    J.-Q. Yan, S. Okamoto, Y. Wu, Q. Zheng, H. D. Zhou, H. B. Cao, and M. A. McGuire, Magnetic order in single crystals of Na3Co2SbO6 with a honeycomb arrangement of 3d7 Co2+ ions, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 074405 (2019)

    2019

  19. [34]

    W. G. F. Kr¨ uger, W. Chen, X. Jin, Y. Li, and L. Janssen, Triple-q Order in Na2Co2TeO6 from Proxim- ity to Hidden-SU(2)-Symmetric Point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 146702 (2023)

    2023

  20. [35]

    Francini and L

    N. Francini and L. Janssen, Spin vestigial orders in extended Heisenberg-Kitaev models near hidden SU(2) points: Application to Na 2Co2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B109, 075104 (2024)

    2024

  21. [36]

    Y. Gu, X. Jin, and Y. Li, On the multi-qcharacteristics of magnetic ground states of honeycomb cobalt oxides, Chinese Phys. Lett.42, 027303 (2025)

    2025

  22. [37]

    Y. Li, T. T. Mai, M. Karaki, E. V. Jasper, K. F. Gar- rity, C. Lyon, D. Shaw, T. DeLazzer, A. J. Biacchi, R. L. Dally, D. M. Heligman, J. Gdanski, T. Adel, M. F. Mu˜ noz, A. Giovannone, A. Pawbake, C. Faugeras, J. R. Simpson, K. Ross, N. Trivedi, Y. M. Lu, A. R. Hight Walker, ...

    2024

  23. [38]

    Describing kinetic exchange and superexchange (i.e., in- tersiteexcitations) through the (exchange-)correlation functional remains however elusive

  24. [39]

    Bhattacharyya, T

    P. Bhattacharyya, T. Petersen, N. A. Bogdanov, and L. Hozoi, Coulomb exchange as source of Kitaev and off-diagonal symmetric anisotropic couplings, Commun. Phys.7, 121 (2024)

    2024

  25. [40]

    Bhattacharyya, N

    P. Bhattacharyya, N. A. Bogdanov, S. Nishimoto, S. D. Wilson, and L. Hozoi, NaRuO 2: Kitaev-Heisenberg ex- change in triangular-lattice setting, npj Quantum Mater. 8, 52 (2023)

    2023

  26. [41]

    P. P. Stavropoulos, D. Pereira, and H.-Y. Kee, Micro- scopic mechanism for a higher-spin Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 037203 (2019)

    2019

  27. [51]

    Fuentealba, H

    P. Fuentealba, H. Preuss, H. Stoll, and L. Von Szentp´ aly, A proper account of core-polarization with pseudopoten- tials: single valence-electron alkali compounds, Chem. 7 Phys. Lett.89, 418 (1982)

    1982

  28. [52]

    Pipek and P

    J. Pipek and P. G. Mezey, A fast intrinsic localization procedure applicable forab initioand semiempirical lin- ear combination of atomic orbital wave functions, J. Chem. Phys.90, 4916 (1989). Supplemental Material — Relevance of on-site and intersite Coulomb interactions in t...

    1989

  29. [53]

    Viciu, Q

    L. Viciu, Q. Huang, E. Morosan, H. Zandbergen, N. Greenbaum, T. McQueen, and R. Cava, Structure and basic magnetic properties of the honeycomb lattice com- pounds Na 2Co2TeO6 and Na 3Co2SbO6, J. Solid State Chem.180, 1060 (2007)

    2007

  30. [54]

    Werner, P

    H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, G. Knizia, F. R. Manby, and M. Sch¨ utz, Molpro: a general-purpose quantum chem- istry program package, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.2, 242 (2012)

    2012

  31. [55]

    Klintenberg, S

    M. Klintenberg, S. Derenzo, and M. Weber, Accurate crystal fields for embedded cluster calculations, Comp. Phys. Commun.131, 120 (2000)

    2000

  32. [56]

    S. E. Derenzo, M. K. Klintenberg, and M. J. Weber, De- termining point charge arrays that produce accurate ionic crystal fields for atomic cluster calculations, J. Chem. Phys.112, 2074 (2000)

  33. [57]

    Helgaker, P

    T. Helgaker, P. Jørgensen, and J. Olsen,Molecular Elec- tronic Structure Theory(John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2000)

    2000

  34. [58]

    D. A. Kreplin, P. J. Knowles, and H.-J. Werner, MCSCF optimization revisited. II. Combined first- and second- order orbital optimization for large molecules, J. Chem. Phys.152, 074102 (2020)

    2020

  35. [59]

    P. J. Knowles and H.-J. Werner, Internally con- tracted multiconfiguration-reference configuration inter- action calculations for excited states, Theor. Chim. Acta 84, 95 (1992)

    1992

  36. [60]

    Berning, M

    A. Berning, M. Schweizer, H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, and P. Palmieri, Spin-orbit matrix elements for internally contracted multireference configuration interaction wave- functions, Mol. Phys.98, 1823 (2000)

    2000

  37. [61]

    N. B. Balabanov and K. A. Peterson, Systematically con- vergent basis sets for transition metals. I. All-electron correlation consistent basis sets for the 3d elements Sc- Zn, J. Chem. Phys.123, 064107 (2005)

    2005

  38. [62]

    T. H. Dunning, Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen, J. Chem. Phys.90, 1007 (1989)

    1989

  39. [63]

    Schautz, H.-J

    F. Schautz, H.-J. Flad, and M. Dolg, Quantum Monte Carlo study of Be2 and group 12 dimers M2 (M = Zn, Cd, Hg), Theor. Chem. Acc.99, 231 (1998)

    1998

  40. [64]

    Stoll, B

    H. Stoll, B. Metz, and M. Dolg, Relativistic energy- consistent pseudopotentials−Recent developments, J. Comput. Chem.23, 767 (2002)

    2002

  41. [65]

    Pierloot, B

    K. Pierloot, B. Dumez, P.-O. Widmark, and B. O. Roos, Density matrix averaged atomic natural orbital (ANO) basis sets for correlated molecular wave functions, Theor. Chim. Acta90, 87 (1995)

    1995

  42. [66]

    Fuentealba, H

    P. Fuentealba, H. Preuss, H. Stoll, and L. Von Szentp´ aly, A proper account of core-polarization with pseudopoten- tials: single valence-electron alkali compounds, Chem. Phys. Lett.89, 418 (1982)

    1982

  43. [67]

    Pipek and P

    J. Pipek and P. G. Mezey, A fast intrinsic localization procedure applicable forab initioand semiempirical lin- ear combination of atomic orbital wave functions, J. Chem. Phys.90, 4916 (1989)

    1989

  44. [68]

    Yadav, N

    R. Yadav, N. A. Bogdanov, V. M. Katukuri, S. Nishi- moto, J. van den Brink, and L. Hozoi, Kitaev exchange and field-induced quantum spin-liquid states in honey- combα-RuCl 3, Sci. Rep.6, 37925 (2016)

    2016

  45. [69]

    N. A. Bogdanov, V. M. Katukuri, J. Romh´ anyi, V. Yushankhai, V. Kataev, B. B¨ uchner, J. van den Brink, and L. Hozoi, Orbital reconstruction in nonpolar tetrava- lent transition-metal oxide layers, Nat. Commun.6, 7306 (2015)

    2015

  46. [70]

    H. Liu, J. Chaloupka, and G. Khaliullin, Kitaev spin liq- uid in 3dtransition metal compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 047201 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed May 24, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.