Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Toward Research Software Categories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14364 v1 pith:LDYMT345 submitted 2024-04-22 cs.SE

Wilhelm Hasselbring , Stephan Druskat , Jan Bernoth , Philine Betker , Michael Felderer , Stephan Ferenz , Anna-Lena Lamprecht , Jan Linxweiler
show 1 more author
Bernhard Rumpe
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.SE
keywords researchsoftwarecategoriesbeendifferentdiscusstemplatebefore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Research software has been categorized in different contexts to serve different goals. We start with a look at what research software is, before we discuss the purpose of research software categories. We propose a multi-dimensional categorization of research software. We present a template for characterizing such categories. As selected dimensions, we present our proposed role-based, developer-based, and maturity-based categories. Since our work has been inspired by various previous efforts to categorize research software, we discuss them as related works. We characterize all these categories via the previously introduced template, to enable a systematic comparison.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools