REVIEW 5 cited by
McEval: Massively Multilingual Code Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
McEval: Massively Multilingual Code Evaluation
read the original abstract
Code large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable advances in code understanding, completion, and generation tasks. Programming benchmarks, comprised of a selection of code challenges and corresponding test cases, serve as a standard to evaluate the capability of different LLMs in such tasks. However, most existing benchmarks primarily focus on Python and are still restricted to a limited number of languages, where other languages are translated from the Python samples (e.g. MultiPL-E) degrading the data diversity. To further facilitate the research of code LLMs, we propose a massively multilingual code benchmark covering 40 programming languages (McEval) with 16K test samples, which substantially pushes the limits of code LLMs in multilingual scenarios. The benchmark contains challenging code completion, understanding, and generation evaluation tasks with finely curated massively multilingual instruction corpora McEval-Instruct. In addition, we introduce an effective multilingual coder mCoder trained on McEval-Instruct to support multilingual programming language generation. Extensive experimental results on McEval show that there is still a difficult journey between open-source models and closed-source LLMs (e.g. GPT-series models) in numerous languages. The instruction corpora, evaluation benchmark, and leaderboard are available at \url{https://mceval.github.io/}.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Across Programming Language Silos: A Study on Cross-Lingual Retrieval-augmented Code Generation
Cross-lingual RACG shows non-trivial but unequal knowledge transfer across 13 programming languages, depending on linguistic affinity and pretraining diversity, with limited reliance on natural language information wh...
-
Quantize with Confidence? An Empirical Study of Quantization for Code Generation
4-bit quantization of code LLMs mostly preserves pass@1, but AQLM matches or beats full precision while QuIP# degrades most on complex prompts; sensitivity is model-dependent.
-
Multi-LCB: Extending LiveCodeBench to Multiple Programming Languages
Multi-LCB extends LiveCodeBench to 12 languages by translating Python tasks, revealing Python overfitting and performance disparities when evaluating 24 LLMs.
-
Large Language Models for Multilingual Code Intelligence: A Survey
A survey of methods, benchmarks, and open challenges for large language models in multilingual code generation and translation.
-
Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report
Qwen2.5-Coder models claim state-of-the-art results on over 10 code benchmarks, outperforming larger models of similar size.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.