From Text to Insight: Large Language Models for Materials Science Data Extraction
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:PREKHBMGrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The vast majority of materials science knowledge exists in unstructured natural language, yet structured data is crucial for innovative and systematic materials design. Traditionally, the field has relied on manual curation and partial automation for data extraction for specific use cases. The advent of large language models (LLMs) represents a significant shift, potentially enabling efficient extraction of structured, actionable data from unstructured text by non-experts. While applying LLMs to materials science data extraction presents unique challenges, domain knowledge offers opportunities to guide and validate LLM outputs. This review provides a comprehensive overview of LLM-based structured data extraction in materials science, synthesizing current knowledge and outlining future directions. We address the lack of standardized guidelines and present frameworks for leveraging the synergy between LLMs and materials science expertise. This work serves as a foundational resource for researchers aiming to harness LLMs for data-driven materials research. The insights presented here could significantly enhance how researchers across disciplines access and utilize scientific information, potentially accelerating the development of novel materials for critical societal needs.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Agentic generation of verifiable rules for deterministic, self-expanding reaction classification
Multi-agent LLMs generate and verify 14,073 deterministic reaction rules from 665,901 patents, enabling 97.7% classification of unseen reactions with finer resolution than fixed proprietary systems.
-
From Text to Discovery: How Large Language Models Are Accelerating and Complicating Research Across Scientific and Humanistic Disciplines
LLMs accelerate research workflows from idea generation to writing but introduce challenges like hallucination, bias, opacity, and ten systemic risks requiring new governance frameworks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.