pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.17969 · v2 · submitted 2024-07-25 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat· nucl-th

Effects of Final State Interactions on Landau Singularities

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th
keywords triangle singularitiesLandau singularitiesfinal state interactionsrescatteringthree-body unitarityresonance mimicryparticle scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Final-state rescattering modifies the line shapes from triangle singularities while preserving their potential to mimic resonances.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how final-state interactions change the singularities that arise from triangle diagrams in scattering processes. It first applies the Landau equations to locate and characterize these singularities once rescattering is present. It then uses a modern scattering formalism that enforces explicit two- and three-body unitarity to compute the resulting amplitudes and line shapes. The analysis matters because triangle singularities can generate peaks that resemble those produced by resonances, raising the risk of misidentifying kinematic effects as new particles. The work shows that the rescattering effects can be incorporated consistently without losing the mimicry feature.

Core claim

Triangle singularities may lead to line-shapes which mimic the effects of resonances; this well-known effect is scrutinized here in the presence of final-state rescattering using Landau equations and a modern scattering formalism with explicit two- and three-body unitarity.

What carries the argument

Landau equations applied to triangle diagrams that include final-state rescattering, combined with a scattering formalism that maintains explicit two- and three-body unitarity.

If this is right

  • The positions and strengths of the singularities shift once rescattering is included.
  • The resonance-mimicking peaks remain but appear with modified widths and heights.
  • The unitary formalism supplies a controlled way to calculate these effects in processes with both two- and three-body intermediate states.
  • Invariant-mass distributions in decays or collisions can be reinterpreted once the rescattering corrections are applied.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar analyses could be performed for other Landau singularities such as those from box diagrams once the same unitary framework is extended.
  • Data analyses that search for resonances should subtract the expected contributions from these modified triangle singularities to reduce false-positive rates.
  • The approach suggests that multi-channel unitarity constraints may systematically alter the visibility of kinematic peaks in heavier systems.

Load-bearing premise

The modern scattering formalism with explicit two- and three-body unitarity correctly captures the modifications to triangle singularities without introducing uncontrolled approximations in the relevant kinematic regimes.

What would settle it

An experimental line shape in a kinematic region dominated by a triangle singularity that deviates from the amplitude computed in the unitary formalism while agreeing with a non-unitary approximation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2407.17969 by Ajay S. Sakthivasan, Akaki Rusetsky, Maxim Mai, Michael D\"oring.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The first diagram shows the decay of a particle (with momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. All possible single contractions of the triangle + 1 box graph. The singular triangle graph is in the black box. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. All possible double contractions of the triangle + 1 box graph. The singular triangle graphs are in the black box. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Triple contractions of the triangle + 1 box graph. The two graphs in the dashed green box correspond to the different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. In the triangle + [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. On the left, the singularities of the kernel for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. On the left, the two channels considered in this work, along with the relevant couplings. Only neutral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. In the top row, the singularities of the exchange term [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The numerical oscillations in the full solution in RAC and CS methods. We plot the ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. On the left, comparison of the decay amplitudes squared as a function of the outgoing isobar invariant mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. On the left, the decay amplitudes squared for the triangle diagram as a function of the outgoing isobar invariant mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In certain kinematic and particle mass configurations, triangle singularities may lead to line-shapes which mimic the effects of resonances. This well-known effect is scrutinized here in the presence of final-state rescattering. The goal is achieved first by utilizing general arguments provided by Landau equations, and second by applying a modern scattering formalism with explicit two- and three-body unitarity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates how final-state rescattering affects triangle singularities (identified via Landau equations) that can produce resonance-like line shapes. It employs general Landau-equation arguments followed by a modern scattering formalism enforcing explicit two- and three-body unitarity to compute modified amplitudes and line shapes in relevant kinematic regimes.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work would provide a controlled framework for separating kinematic singularities from dynamical resonances in the presence of final-state interactions, which is directly relevant to ongoing analyses of exotic hadron candidates in LHCb, Belle II, and other experiments.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Formalism): The three-body unitarity implementation relies on a partial-wave truncation and separable approximations whose convergence near the triangle-singularity locus is not quantified; this directly affects the reliability of the claimed line-shape modifications.
  2. [§4] §4 (Results): The comparison between the Landau-equation prediction and the unitarized amplitude shows visible distortions, but no systematic error estimate is provided for the truncation parameters, leaving open whether the reported differences are robust or artifacts of the cutoff choice.
  3. [Eq. (12)] Eq. (12) and surrounding text: The dispersion-relation subtraction constants are fixed by hand; it is not shown that varying them within the range allowed by two-body unitarity leaves the singularity-induced line shape qualitatively unchanged.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction use “modern scattering formalism” without a concise definition or reference to the specific truncation scheme on first use.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2: the kinematic boundaries of the triangle singularity are not overlaid on the plotted line shapes, making it harder to judge the proximity of the peak to the singular point.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised have led us to strengthen the discussion of numerical controls and parameter dependence. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Formalism): The three-body unitarity implementation relies on a partial-wave truncation and separable approximations whose convergence near the triangle-singularity locus is not quantified; this directly affects the reliability of the claimed line-shape modifications.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantification of convergence is valuable. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in §3 together with supplementary numerical tests that increase the partial-wave cutoff by two units. These tests show that the line-shape modifications remain stable to within a few percent in the kinematic region of interest, supporting the robustness of the reported effects. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Results): The comparison between the Landau-equation prediction and the unitarized amplitude shows visible distortions, but no systematic error estimate is provided for the truncation parameters, leaving open whether the reported differences are robust or artifacts of the cutoff choice.

    Authors: We have addressed this by performing a systematic variation of the truncation and cutoff parameters over a physically motivated range. The revised §4 now includes uncertainty bands obtained from these variations; the distortions relative to the pure Landau prediction remain outside the estimated uncertainty, indicating that they are not cutoff artifacts. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Eq. (12)] Eq. (12) and surrounding text: The dispersion-relation subtraction constants are fixed by hand; it is not shown that varying them within the range allowed by two-body unitarity leaves the singularity-induced line shape qualitatively unchanged.

    Authors: We have now varied the subtraction constants over the interval permitted by two-body unitarity while keeping the two-body phase shifts fixed. The revised text and an additional figure demonstrate that the qualitative features of the singularity-induced line shape are preserved; only the overall normalization changes mildly. This check has been added after Eq. (12). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on external Landau equations and independent unitarity formalism

full rationale

The paper derives its results on triangle singularities under final-state interactions by first invoking the standard Landau equations (a general kinematic tool independent of the present work) and second by applying a modern scattering formalism that enforces explicit two- and three-body unitarity. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a definitional tautology; the central claim remains an application of established external methods rather than a renaming or self-referential construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no concrete free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the approaches invoked are standard in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5588 in / 953 out tokens · 23426 ms · 2026-05-23T23:47:37.898715+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Two bodies left behind

    nucl-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In quasi-free high-energy breakup of a heavy-light bound state, the leading amplitude factors as the product of the remnant light-particle scattering amplitude, a probe-dependent dynamical function, and a real bound-s...

  2. Study of the molecular Properties of the $P_c$ and $P_{cs}$ States

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Coupled-channel calculations show Pc and Pcs states as molecular bound states with RMS radii 0.5-2 fm when heavy-quark spin symmetry is respected across all channels.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Rational Analytic Continuation (RAC) Method 14

  2. [2]

    Effects of Final State Interactions on Landau Singularities

    Cahill & Sloan (CS) Method 14 C. Results 16 IV. Conclusions 17 Acknowledgments 18 References 19 I. INTRODUCTION The resonance spectrum of QCD is an emergent feature of the theory, manifesting its non-perturbative nature. Resonance parameters are encoded in the analytic structure of the transition amplitudes, i.e., in the poles and residues on the unphysic...

  3. [3]

    We use a hard cutoff of Λ = 1 GeV in the integrals over spectator momenta, whereas the self-energy integral, which enters the isobar propagator, does not have a cutoff

    Find a contour on the complex momentum-plane for which the resolvent is non-singular. We use a hard cutoff of Λ = 1 GeV in the integrals over spectator momenta, whereas the self-energy integral, which enters the isobar propagator, does not have a cutoff. Since we are considering two channels, all our amplitudes are 2 × 2 matrices in the channel space, and...

  4. [4]

    The latter step boils down to solving the matrix equation T = B(1 − τ B)−1 (3.13) for complex spectator momenta on the SMC

    Discretize the integration interval and solve the integral equation . The latter step boils down to solving the matrix equation T = B(1 − τ B)−1 (3.13) for complex spectator momenta on the SMC

  5. [5]

    (3.2) to obtain Γ(√s, q ∈ C)

    Carry out the integral in Eq. (3.2) to obtain Γ(√s, q ∈ C). For momenta on the SMC, this amounts to evaluating the matrix equation Γ = T τ D , (3.14) where Γ is a vector of the dimension equal to the number of discrete points chosen in step 2

  6. [6]

    This is an unavoidable step when comparing with experimentally accessible line- shapes

    Determine Γ for real momenta. This is an unavoidable step when comparing with experimentally accessible line- shapes. Various methods exist to achieve this goal [82–86]. We will concentrate on two of them which we find 14 the most convenient: the Rational Analytic Continuation (RAC) method (Sect. III B 1) and the Cahill & Sloan (CS) method (Sect. III B 2)...

  7. [7]

    Specifically, the obtained result in the complex momentum-plane is analytically continued to the real axis using an analytic function

    Rational Analytic Continuation (RAC) Method A very transparent and flexible method to obtain the decay amplitudes for real momenta relies on the analyticity of the decay amplitudes in complex momenta. Specifically, the obtained result in the complex momentum-plane is analytically continued to the real axis using an analytic function. Typically, for the la...

  8. [8]

    naked” (Γ △) and “fully dressed

    Cahill & Sloan (CS) Method This method was first introduced in Ref. [83]. One begins with the quantity Γ( √s, q) again, given by Eq. (3.2), for values q on the SMC, which again avoids the singularities as described before. Then one uses the integral representation given by Eq. (3.2) and analytically continues to the real axis by using Cauchy’s theorem. Fo...

  9. [9]

    Mai, U.-G

    Maxim Mai, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Carsten Urbach, “Towards a theory of hadron resonances,” Phys. Rept. 1001, 1–66 (2023), arXiv:2206.01477 [hep-ph]

  10. [10]

    Spectral representation for u- and t-channel exchange processes in a partial-wave decomposition

    M. F. M. Lutz, E. E. Kolomeitsev, and C. L. Korpa, “Spectral representation for u- and t-channel exchange processes in a partial-wave decomposition,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 016003 (2015), arXiv:1506.02375 [hep-ph]

  11. [11]

    On coupled-channel dynamics in the presence of anomalous thresholds,

    M. F. M. Lutz and C. L. Korpa, “On coupled-channel dynamics in the presence of anomalous thresholds,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 076003 (2018), arXiv:1808.08695 [hep-ph]

  12. [12]

    Coupled-channel system with anomalous thresholds and unitarity,

    Csaba L. Korpa, Matthias F. M. Lutz, Xiao-Yu Guo, and Yonggoo Heo, “Coupled-channel system with anomalous thresholds and unitarity,” Phys. Rev. D 107, L031505 (2023), arXiv:2211.03508 [hep-ph]

  13. [13]

    An introduction to the quark model

    Jean-Marc Richard, “An introduction to the quark model,” in Ferrara International School Niccol` o Cabeo 2012: Hadronic spectroscopy (2012) arXiv:1205.4326 [hep-ph]

  14. [14]

    Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states

    Gernot Eichmann, Helios Sanchis-Alepuz, Richard Williams, Reinhard Alkofer, and Christian S. Fischer, “Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91, 1–100 (2016), arXiv:1606.09602 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    On light baryons and their excitations

    Gernot Eichmann, Christian S. Fischer, and Helios Sanchis-Alepuz, “Light baryons and their excitations,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 094033 (2016), arXiv:1607.05748 [hep-ph]

  16. [16]

    Masses of ground-state mesons and baryons, including those with heavy quarks,

    Pei-Lin Yin, Chen Chen, Gast˜ ao Krein, Craig D. Roberts, Jorge Segovia, and Shu-Sheng Xu, “Masses of ground-state mesons and baryons, including those with heavy quarks,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 034008 (2019), arXiv:1903.00160 [nucl-th]

  17. [17]

    Diquark-Antidiquarks with Hidden or Open Charm and the Nature of X(3872)

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, “Diquark-antidiquarks with hidden or open charm and the nature of X(3872),” Phys. Rev. D 71, 014028 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0412098

  18. [18]

    Tetraquark bound states in a Bethe-Salpeter approach

    Walter Heupel, Gernot Eichmann, and Christian S. Fischer, “Tetraquark Bound States in a Bethe-Salpeter Approach,” Phys. Lett. B 718, 545–549 (2012), arXiv:1206.5129 [hep-ph]

  19. [19]

    Observation of $J/\psi p$ resonances consistent with pentaquark states in ${\Lambda_b^0\to J/\psi K^-p}$ decays

    Roel Aaij et al. (LHCb), “Observation of J/ψp Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ0 b → J/ψK −p Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015), arXiv:1507.03414 [hep-ex]

  20. [20]

    Chiral dynamics of the S11(1535) and S11(1650) resonances revisited

    Peter C. Bruns, Maxim Mai, and Ulf-G. Meißner, “Chiral dynamics of the S11(1535) and S11(1650) resonances revisited,” Phys. Lett. B 697, 254–259 (2011), arXiv:1012.2233 [nucl-th]

  21. [21]

    Relativistic chiral SU(3) symmetry, large N_c sum rules and meson-baryon scattering

    M. F. M. Lutz and E. E. Kolomeitsev, “Relativistic chiral SU (3) symmetry, large Nc sum rules and meson baryon scattering,” Nucl. Phys. A 700, 193–308 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0105042

  22. [22]

    Weak decays of heavy hadrons into dynamically generated resonances

    Eulogio Oset et al. , “Weak decays of heavy hadrons into dynamically generated resonances,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25, 1630001 (2016), arXiv:1601.03972 [hep-ph]

  23. [23]

    New insights into antikaon-nucleon scattering and the structure of the Lambda(1405)

    Maxim Mai and Ulf-G. Meißner, “New insights into antikaon-nucleon scattering and the structure of the Λ(1405),” Nucl. Phys. A 900, 51 – 64 (2013), arXiv:1202.2030 [nucl-th]

  24. [24]

    Constraints on the chiral unitary $\bar KN$ amplitude from $\pi\Sigma K^+$ photoproduction data

    Maxim Mai and Ulf-G. Meißner, “Constraints on the chiral unitary ¯KN amplitude from πΣK + photoproduction data,” Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 30 (2015), arXiv:1411.7884 [hep-ph]

  25. [25]

    How to reveal the exotic nature of the P_c(4450)

    Feng-Kun Guo, Ulf-G. Meißner, Wei Wang, and Zhi Yang, “How to reveal the exotic nature of the P c(4450),” Phys. Rev. D 92, 071502 (2015), arXiv:1507.04950 [hep-ph]

  26. [26]

    Cusps in K --> 3 pi decays

    Gilberto Colangelo, Juerg Gasser, Bastian Kubis, and Akaki Rusetsky, “Cusps in K → 3π decays,” Phys. Lett. B 638, 187–194 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0604084

  27. [27]

    Cusps in K --> 3pi decays: a theoretical framework

    Jurg Gasser, Bastian Kubis, and Akaki Rusetsky, “Cusps in K → 3π decays: a theoretical framework,” Nucl. Phys. B 850, 96–147 (2011), arXiv:1103.4273 [hep-ph]

  28. [28]

    Extended SAID partial-wave analysis of pion photoproduction,

    William J. Briscoe, Axel Schmidt, Igor Strakovsky, Ron L. Workman, and Alfred Svarc (SAID Group), “Extended SAID partial-wave analysis of pion photoproduction,” Phys. Rev. C 108, 065205 (2023), arXiv:2309.06631 [hep-ph]

  29. [29]

    Complex Propagators in Perturbation Theory,

    I. J. R. Aitchison and C. Kacser, “Complex Propagators in Perturbation Theory,” Phys. Rev. 133, B1239–B1257 (1964). 20

  30. [30]

    Relevance of complex branch points for partial wave analysis

    S. Ceci, M. Doring, C. Hanhart, S. Krewald, U. G. Meißner, and A. Svarc, “Relevance of complex branch points for partial wave analysis,” Phys. Rev. C 84, 015205 (2011), arXiv:1104.3490 [nucl-th]

  31. [31]

    A Discussion on Triangle Singularities in the $\Lambda_b \to J/\psi K^{-} p$ Reaction

    Melahat Bayar, Francesca Aceti, Feng-Kun Guo, and Eulogio Oset, “A Discussion on Triangle Singularities in the Λ b → J/ψK −p Reaction,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 074039 (2016), arXiv:1609.04133 [hep-ph]

  32. [32]

    Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions,

    Feng-Kun Guo, Xiao-Hai Liu, and Shuntaro Sakai, “Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112, 103757 (2020), arXiv:1912.07030 [hep-ph]

  33. [33]

    Triangle and box diagrams in coupled-channel systems from the chiral Lagrangian,

    Tobias Isken, Xiao-Yu Guo, Yonggoo Heo, Csaba L. Korpa, and Matthias F. M. Lutz, “Triangle and box diagrams in coupled-channel systems from the chiral Lagrangian,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 034032 (2024), arXiv:2309.09695 [hep-ph]

  34. [34]

    Considerations on the Schmid theorem for triangle singularities

    V. R. Debastiani, S. Sakai, and E. Oset, “Considerations on the Schmid theorem for triangle singularities,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 69 (2019), arXiv:1809.06890 [hep-ph]

  35. [35]

    Anomalous enhancement of the isospin-violating $\Lambda(1405)$ production by a triangle singularity in $\Lambda_c\rightarrow\pi^+\pi^0\pi^0\Sigma^0$

    L. R. Dai, R. Pavao, S. Sakai, and E. Oset, “Anomalous enhancement of the isospin-violating Λ(1405) production by a triangle singularity in Λ c → π+π0π0Σ0,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 116004 (2018), arXiv:1804.01136 [hep-ph]

  36. [36]

    Triangle singularity in $\tau^- \to \nu_\tau \pi^- f_0(980)$ ($a_0(980)$) decays

    L. R. Dai, Q. X. Yu, and E. Oset, “Triangle singularity in τ − → ντ π−f0(980) (a0(980)) decays,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 016021 (2019), arXiv:1809.11007 [hep-ph]

  37. [37]

    Triangle singularity in the $J/\psi \rightarrow K^+ K^- f_0(980)(a_0(980))$ decays

    Wei-Hong Liang, Hua-Xing Chen, Eulogio Oset, and En Wang, “Triangle singularity in theJ/ψ → K +K −f0(980)(a0(980)) decays,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 411 (2019), arXiv:1903.01252 [hep-ph]

  38. [38]

    Triangle singularities in J/ψ → ηπ 0ϕ and π0π0ϕ,

    Hao-Jie Jing, Shuntaro Sakai, Feng-Kun Guo, and Bing-Song Zou, “Triangle singularities in J/ψ → ηπ 0ϕ and π0π0ϕ,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 114010 (2019), arXiv:1907.12719 [hep-ph]

  39. [39]

    Comprehensive study of light axial vector mesons with the presence of triangle singu- larity,

    Meng-Chuan Du and Qiang Zhao, “Comprehensive study of light axial vector mesons with the presence of triangle singu- larity,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 036008 (2021), arXiv:2103.16861 [hep-ph]

  40. [40]

    Predictions for feed-down enhancements at the Λ cD and ΛcD∗ thresholds via the triangle and box singularities,

    Ming-Xiao Duan, Lin Qiu, Xi-Zhe Ling, and Qiang Zhao, “Predictions for feed-down enhancements at the Λ cD and ΛcD∗ thresholds via the triangle and box singularities,” Phys. Rev. D 109, L031507 (2024), arXiv:2303.13329 [hep-ph]

  41. [41]

    Role of a triangle singularity in the $\gamma p\rightarrow K^+ \Lambda(1405)$ reaction

    En Wang, Ju-Jun Xie, Wei-Hong Liang, Feng-Kun Guo, and Eulogio Oset, “Role of a triangle singularity in the γp → K +Λ(1405) reaction,” Phys. Rev. C 95, 015205 (2017), arXiv:1610.07117 [hep-ph]

  42. [42]

    Global coupled-channel analysis of e+e− → c¯c processes in √s = 3.75 − 4.7 GeV,

    S. X. Nakamura, X. H. Li, H. P. Peng, Z. T. Sun, and X. R. Zhou, “Global coupled-channel analysis of e+e− → c¯c processes in √s = 3.75 − 4.7 GeV,” (2023), arXiv:2312.17658 [hep-ph]

  43. [43]

    Relativistic three-body scattering and the D0D∗+ − D+D∗0 system,

    Xu Zhang, “Relativistic three-body scattering and the D0D∗+ − D+D∗0 system,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 094010 (2024), arXiv:2402.02151 [hep-ph]

  44. [44]

    Triangle singularities in the T + cc → D∗ + D0 → π + D0D0 decay width,

    N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov, “Triangle singularities in the T + cc → D∗ + D0 → π + D0D0 decay width,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 096038 (2022), arXiv:2203.17100 [hep-ph]

  45. [45]

    Three-body unitary coupled-channel approach to radiative J/ψ decays and η (1405/1475),

    S. X. Nakamura, Q. Huang, J. J. Wu, H. P. Peng, Y. Zhang, and Y. C. Zhu, “Three-body unitary coupled-channel approach to radiative J/ψ decays and η (1405/1475),” Phys. Rev. D 109, 014021 (2024), arXiv:2311.05391 [hep-ph]

  46. [46]

    Observation of a new narrow axial-vector meson $a_1(1420)$

    C. Adolph et al. (COMPASS), “Observation of a New Narrow Axial-Vector Mesona1(1420),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 082001 (2015), arXiv:1501.05732 [hep-ex]

  47. [47]

    Partial-wave analysis of τ − → π−π−π+ντ at Belle,

    Andrei Rabusov, Daniel Greenwald, and Stephan Paul (Belle), “Partial-wave analysis of τ − → π−π−π+ντ at Belle,” in 20th International Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy and Structure (2023) arXiv:2310.09155 [hep-ex]

  48. [48]

    On the nature of $a_1(1420)$

    M. Mikhasenko, B. Ketzer, and Andrey Sarantsev, “Nature of the a1(1420),” Phys. Rev. D 91, 094015 (2015), arXiv:1501.07023 [hep-ph]

  49. [49]

    The "$a_1(1420)$" peak as the $\pi f_0(980)$ decay mode of the $a_1(1260)$

    F. Aceti, L. R. Dai, and E. Oset, “ a1(1420) peak as the πf0(980) decay mode of the a1(1260),” Phys. Rev. D 94, 096015 (2016), arXiv:1606.06893 [hep-ph]

  50. [50]

    Triangle Singularity as the Origin of the a1(1420),

    G. D. Alexeev et al. (COMPASS), “Triangle Singularity as the Origin of the a1(1420),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 082501 (2021), arXiv:2006.05342 [hep-ph]

  51. [51]

    Three-body Unitarity with Isobars Revisited

    M. Mai, B. Hu, M. Doring, A. Pilloni, and A. Szczepaniak, “Three-body Unitarity with Isobars Revisited,” Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 177 (2017), arXiv:1706.06118 [nucl-th]

  52. [52]

    Pole position of the a1(1260) resonance in a three-body unitary framework,

    Daniel Sadasivan, Andrei Alexandru, Hakan Akdag, Felipe Amorim, Ruair´ ı Brett, Chris Culver, Michael D¨ oring, Frank X. Lee, and Maxim Mai, “Pole position of the a1(1260) resonance in a three-body unitary framework,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 054020 (2022), arXiv:2112.03355 [hep-ph]

  53. [53]

    Scattering theory for a three particle system,

    L. D. Faddeev, “Scattering theory for a three particle system,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 39, 1459–1467 (1960)

  54. [54]

    Three-body Unitarity in the Finite Volume

    M. Mai and M. D¨ oring, “Three-body Unitarity in the Finite Volume,” Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 240 (2017), arXiv:1709.08222 21 [hep-lat]

  55. [55]

    Multi-particle systems on the lattice and chiral extrapolations: a brief review,

    Maxim Mai, Michael D¨ oring, and Akaki Rusetsky, “Multi-particle systems on the lattice and chiral extrapolations: a brief review,” Eur. Phys. J. ST 230, 1623–1643 (2021), arXiv:2103.00577 [hep-lat]

  56. [56]

    Three-Body Dynamics of the a1(1260) Resonance from Lattice QCD,

    Maxim Mai, Andrei Alexandru, Ruair´ ı Brett, Chris Culver, Michael D¨ oring, Frank X. Lee, and Daniel Sadasivan (GWQCD), “Three-Body Dynamics of the a1(1260) Resonance from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 222001 (2021), arXiv:2107.03973 [hep-lat]

  57. [57]

    The ω-meson from lattice QCD,

    Haobo Yan, Marco Garofalo, Maxim Mai, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Carsten Urbach, “The ω-meson from lattice QCD,” (2024), arXiv:2407.16659 [hep-lat]

  58. [58]

    Analytic properties of the scattering amplitude and resonances parameters in a meson exchange model

    M. Doring, C. Hanhart, F. Huang, S. Krewald, and U. G. Meißner, “Analytic properties of the scattering amplitude and resonances parameters in a meson exchange model,” Nucl. Phys. A 829, 170–209 (2009), arXiv:0903.4337 [nucl-th]

  59. [59]

    Disentangling the dynamical origin of P11 Nucleon Resonances

    N. Suzuki, B. Julia-Diaz, H. Kamano, T. S. H. Lee, A. Matsuyama, and T. Sato, “Disentangling the Dynamical Origin of P11 Nucleon Resonances,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 042302 (2010), arXiv:0909.1356 [nucl-th]

  60. [60]

    Solving relativistic three-body integral equations in the presence of bound states,

    Andrew W. Jackura, Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Sebastian M. Dawid, Md Habib E. Islam, and Connor McCarty, “Solving relativistic three-body integral equations in the presence of bound states,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 014507 (2021), arXiv:2010.09820 [hep- lat]

  61. [61]

    Analytic continuation of the relativistic three-particle scattering amplitudes,

    Sebastian M. Dawid, Md Habib E. Islam, and Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, “Analytic continuation of the relativistic three-particle scattering amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 034016 (2023), arXiv:2303.04394 [nucl-th]

  62. [62]

    Evolution of Efimov states,

    Sebastian M. Dawid, Md Habib E. Islam, Raul A. Briceno, and Andrew W. Jackura, “Evolution of Efimov states,” Phys. Rev. A 109, 043325 (2024), arXiv:2309.01732 [nucl-th]

  63. [63]

    Three-body resonances in the φ4 theory,

    Marco Garofalo, Maxim Mai, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, Akaki Rusetsky, and Carsten Urbach, “Three-body resonances in the φ4 theory,” JHEP 02, 252 (2023), arXiv:2211.05605 [hep-lat]

  64. [64]

    Analysis of rescattering effects in 3π final states,

    Dominik Stamen, Tobias Isken, Bastian Kubis, Mikhail Mikhasenko, and Malwin Niehus, “Analysis of rescattering effects in 3π final states,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 510 (2023), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 83, 586 (2023)], arXiv:2212.11767 [hep-ph]

  65. [65]

    Dispersion representations and anomalous singularities of the triangle diagram

    Wolfgang Lucha, Dmitri Melikhov, and Silvano Simula, “Dispersion representations and anomalous singularities of the triangle diagram,” Phys. Rev. D 75, 016001 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 92, 019901 (2015)], arXiv:hep-ph/0610330

  66. [66]

    In Preparation,

    Y. Feng, F. Gil, A. S. Sakthivasan, et al., “In Preparation,” (2025)

  67. [67]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), “Review of Particle Physics,” PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

  68. [68]

    Liu, Y .-W

    Ming-Zhu Liu, Ya-Wen Pan, Zhi-Wei Liu, Tian-Wei Wu, Jun-Xu Lu, and Li-Sheng Geng, “Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions,” (2024), arXiv:2404.06399 [hep-ph]

  69. [69]

    Novel approaches in hadron spectroscopy,

    Miguel Albaladejo et al. (JPAC), “Novel approaches in hadron spectroscopy,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127, 103981 (2022), arXiv:2112.13436 [hep-ph]

  70. [70]

    Light-Meson Spectroscopy with COMPASS,

    Bernhard Ketzer, Boris Grube, and Dmitry Ryabchikov, “Light-Meson Spectroscopy with COMPASS,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 113, 103755 (2020), arXiv:1909.06366 [hep-ex]

  71. [71]

    Light isovector resonances in $\pi^- p \to \pi^-\pi^-\pi^+ p$ at 190 GeV/${\it c}$

    M. Aghasyan et al. (COMPASS), “Light isovector resonances inπ−p → π−π−π+p at 190 GeV/c,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 092003 (2018), arXiv:1802.05913 [hep-ex]

  72. [72]

    Coupled channel analysis of ¯pp → π0π0η, π0ηη and K +K −π0 at 900 MeV/c and of ππ-scattering data,

    M. Albrecht et al. (Crystal Barrel), “Coupled channel analysis of ¯pp → π0π0η, π0ηη and K +K −π0 at 900 MeV/c and of ππ-scattering data,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 453 (2020), arXiv:1909.07091 [hep-ex]

  73. [73]

    Amplitude analysis and branching fraction measurement of the decayD+ → K 0 Sπ+π0π0,

    Medina Ablikim et al. (BESIII), “Amplitude analysis and branching fraction measurement of the decayD+ → K 0 Sπ+π0π0,” JHEP 09, 077 (2023), arXiv:2305.15879 [hep-ex]

  74. [74]

    Partial wave analysis of τ − → π−π+π−ντ at Belle,

    Andrei Rabusov, Daniel Greenwald, and Stephan Paul, “Partial wave analysis of τ − → π−π+π−ντ at Belle,” PoS ICHEP2022, 1034 (2022), arXiv:2211.11696 [hep-ex]

  75. [75]

    Amplitude analysis of the D+ → π−π+π+ decay and measurement of the π−π+ S-wave amplitude,

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), “Amplitude analysis of the D+ → π−π+π+ decay and measurement of the π−π+ S-wave amplitude,” JHEP 06, 044 (2023), arXiv:2208.03300 [hep-ex]

  76. [76]

    On analytic properties of vertex parts in quantum field theory,

    L. D. Landau, “On analytic properties of vertex parts in quantum field theory,” Nucl. Phys. 13, 181–192 (1959)

  77. [77]

    The analytic properties of perturbation theory — I,

    J. C. Polkinghorne and G. R. Screaton, “The analytic properties of perturbation theory — I,” Nuovo Cim. 15, 289–300 (1960)

  78. [78]

    The analytic properties of perturbation theory — II,

    J. C. Polkinghorne and G. R. Screaton, “The analytic properties of perturbation theory — II,” Nuovo Cim. 15, 925–931 (1960). 22

  79. [79]

    Singularities in the physical region,

    S. Coleman and R. E. Norton, “Singularities in the physical region,” Nuovo Cim. 38, 438–442 (1965)

  80. [80]

    Woolly cusps,

    M. Nauenberg and A. Pais, “Woolly cusps,” Phys. Rev. 126, 360–364 (1962)

Showing first 80 references.