Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

WEAVE First Light Observations: Origin and Dynamics of the Shock Front in Stephan's Quintet

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the large-scale shock in Stephan's Quintet is weak in the hot X-ray plasma and boosts radio emission about tenfold by adiabatically compressing a pre-existing cosmic-ray electron population, rather than by…

desk verdict A solid, data-rich paper with a plausible adiabatic-compression story; the factor-of-ten boost is the one number that needs hardening before it carries the argument. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13635 v1 pith:SAZQTFOG submitted 2024-11-20 astro-ph.GA

M. I. Arnaudova , S. Das , D. J. B. Smith , M. J. Hardcastle , N. Hatch , S. C. Trager , R. J. Smith , A. B. Drake
show 57 more authors
J. C. McGarry S. Shenoy J. P. Stott J. H. Knapen K. M. Hess K. J. Duncan A. Gloudemans P. N. Best R. García-Benito R. Kondapally M. Balcells G. S. Couto D. C. Abrams D. Aguado J. A. L. Aguerri R. Barrena C. R. Benn T. Bensby S. R. Berlanas D. Bettoni D. Cano-Infantes R. Carrera P. J. Concepción G. B. Dalton G. D'Ago K. Dee L. Domínguez-Palmero J. E. Drew E. L. Escott C. Fariña M. Fossati M. Fumagalli E. Gafton F. J. Gribbin S. Hughes A. Iovino S. Jin I. J. Lewis M. Longhetti J. Méndez-Abreu A. Mercurio A. Molaeinezhad E. Molinari M. Monguió D. N. A. Murphy S. Picó M. M. Pieri A. W. Ridings M. Romero-Gómez E. Schallig T. W. Shimwell R. Skvarĉ R. Stuik A. Vallenari J. M. van der Hulst N. A. Walton C. C. Worley
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Stephan'sQuintetgalaxyinteractionsshockfrontadiabaticcompressionsynchrotronemissioncosmic-rayelectronsintegralfieldspectroscopylow-frequencyradioastronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper dissects the large-scale shock front in Stephan's Quintet with new optical integral-field spectroscopy, 144 MHz and 1.7/4.86 GHz radio images, and archival infrared maps. It establishes that the shock is hypersonic (Mach number above 25) in the cold gas it ionizes, yet weak (Mach ~2–4) in the hot X-ray plasma where radio-emitting electrons reside. Because such a weak shock cannot efficiently accelerate particles, the paper argues that the radio brightening comes from adiabatic compression of a pre-existing cosmic-ray electron population. The quantitative support is that the theoretical compression boost of 8.6–17.5, computed at 1.4 GHz, brackets the observed factor-of-ten jump in 1.7 GHz flux density between the outside and inside of the dynamically defined shock region. If correct, this means a galaxy-collision shock can raise radio luminosity by a factor of ten without creating fresh relativistic electrons.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the theoretical radio boosting factor from Colafrancesco et al. (2017), $A \sim C^{(-s+2)/3} [C^{2/3}]^{1-\alpha} C^{-1}$, with $s = 2\alpha - 1$ the momentum spectral index and $\alpha = -0.85$ the low-frequency radio spectral index. The compression ratio $C$ is tied to the Mach number by the Rankine–Hugoniot relation $M = (2C/(\gamma_g + 1 - C(\gamma_g-1)))^{1/2}$; taking $\gamma_g = 5/3$ and $4/3$ as limiting adiabatic indices gives $C \approx 3.3$–$4.9$ and hence $A \approx 8.6$–$17.5$. The observed counterpart is the ratio of 1.7 GHz flux density inside the dynamically defined shock region to that just outside, which is about 10. Supporting machinery includes the velocity–velocity-dispersion diagram that defines the shock region dynamically, the spectral curvature parameter (uniform at $\sim$0.32 in the shock, implying an aged pre-existing electron spectrum), and the magnetic-field/lifetime estimate using equipartition and the van der Laan–Perola model.

What would settle it

Measure the X-ray surface-brightness and temperature jump across the same shock front, since a Mach number near 3.8 predicts a compression factor $C$ of 3.3–4.9 and hence a clear X-ray discontinuity; if the X-ray jump is absent or much smaller while the radio boost remains about ten, the adiabatic-compression explanation for the radio jump would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the large-scale shock in Stephan's Quintet is a weak shock in the hot phase: $\mathcal{M}\sim 2$–$4$, rising to $\sim$3.8 if the front is inclined at $31^\circ$ to the line of sight. At these Mach numbers diffusive shock acceleration is inefficient, so the observed synchrotron emission is not produced at the shock front. Instead the front acts as a compressor: the pre-existing cosmic-ray electron population, mixed into the hot plasma, is adiabatically compressed along with the magnetic field, shifting the electron energy distribution to higher energies and raising the synchrotron luminosity. The shock in the cold neutral gas is a different object: there the velocity jump and assumed pre-shock density give a hypersonic Mach number exceeding 25, sufficient to ionize the HI filaments and explain the emission-line spectrum. The paper therefore separates the shock's role in the cold phase, ionization and excitation, from its role in the hot phase, compression of fossil radio plasma.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 1.7 GHz flux density just outside the dynamically defined shock region represents the pre-compression state of the plasma now inside it, with no correction for unrelated radio sources, path-length differences, or projection; a secondary reliance is the assumed pre-shock density of $n_H = 1$ cm$^{-3}$ for the cold-gas Mach number.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 35 kpc radio filament can be explained without ongoing particle acceleration at the current shock, separating the shock's radiative signature from its particle-acceleration efficiency.
  • The electron lifetime limit of about 11 Myr is comparable to the estimated 14 Myr crossing time of the intruder galaxy, placing the shock's origin at the ongoing collision.
  • The Balmer-decrement extinction map's anti-correlation with infrared PAH, H2 and hot-dust emission indicates that the shock has cleared or destroyed dust in the diffuse gas, while surviving dense grains can host H2 condensation.
  • The hypersonic cold-gas shock with Mach number above 25 can ionize the pre-existing HI filaments and explains the observed HI deficiency near the front.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper is right, low-Mach shocks in galaxy groups and clusters can produce radio-bright regions by compressing fossil electrons, so the absence of efficient particle acceleration does not make a shock radio-silent.
  • A direct testable extension is to measure the X-ray surface-brightness jump and radio spectral curvature at the same location: compression should preserve the pre-shock curved spectrum, while re-acceleration would flatten it inside the shock.
  • The same approach, defining the shock dynamically and comparing inside/outside radio flux density, could be applied to other merging galaxy groups to search for more compression-boosted radio plasma.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper combines WEAVE LIFU first-light integral-field spectroscopy with LoTSS 144 MHz, VLA 1.7 and 4.86 GHz, and JWST MIRI/NIRCam data to study the large-scale shock front in Stephan's Quintet. The authors dynamically define a shock region from H-alpha velocity and velocity-dispersion cuts, stack spectra to obtain an electron temperature upper limit T_e < 22,500 K and density n_e = 480 +/- 70 cm^-3, compare BPT line ratios with MAPPINGS III fast-shock models, estimate Mach numbers in the cold gas (M >~ 25) and hot plasma (M ~ 2-4), and propose that the hot-phase shock adiabatically compresses pre-existing relativistic electrons, boosting the 1.7 GHz radio luminosity by a factor of about ten, in agreement with a theoretical compression factor A ~ 8.6-17.5 from Eq. (3).

Significance. If the adiabatic-compression interpretation is correct, this is an important observational case in which synchrotron emission is enhanced without fresh particle acceleration, with implications for radio relics and cosmic-ray physics in galaxy groups. The paper is strong in its use of first-light WEAVE data, BIC-based multi-component spectral fitting, kinematically defined regions, spectral-index and spectral-curvature maps, and a quantitative comparison built on independently measured Mach number, spectral index, and compression ratio; no parameter is fitted to force the central claim. The main weakness is the empirical baseline used for the observed radio boost, which needs to be strengthened before the factor-of-ten agreement can be considered established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 5.5] The observed radio boost of ~10 is the decisive test of the adiabatic-compression scenario, but the baseline is neither quantified nor justified. The text says 'we consider the 1.7 GHz flux density outside the dynamically defined shock region ... and inside the boundary to represent the flux density before and after the shock-induced compression,' yet no flux values, uncertainties, or error propagation are given. The exterior region may contain unrelated radio sources (e.g., SQ-R, NGC 7319, background objects), projection effects, path-length differences, or a pre-existing surface-brightness gradient; without a control measurement (for example, a radial profile across the front, a compact-source-subtracted image, or a spectral-index comparison showing that the same electron population is being compared) the agreement between observed and theoretical boost factors is not a meaningful confirmation. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the shocked radio plasma is compressed rather than re-accelerated.
  2. [Sec. 5.4 and Sec. 5.5] The theoretical boost range A ~ 8.6-17.5 is evaluated using M ~ 3.8, but the manuscript also allows M_hot >~ 1.9 (Section 5.4). At the lower end, with M = 2, Eq. (4) gives C ~ 2.2-2.8 depending on the adiabatic index, and Eq. (3) gives A ~ 4-6, well below the claimed observed factor of about ten. Because the adiabatic-compression claim rests on quantitative agreement, the paper must propagate the full uncertainty in M_hot (including the assumed 31-degree inclination), alpha, and C through Eq. (3), and state whether the agreement persists over the allowed range. A narrower Mach-number determination from the X-ray data, or a conservative lower bound on A, would make the test robust.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 5.2.1 and Fig. 9] The pre-shock density is stated as n = 1 cm^-2 in the text of Section 5.2.1 but as n = 0.1 cm^-3 in the caption of Figure 9, while Section 5.4 refers to n_H = 1 cm^-3 as the value assumed by the MAPPINGS models; these values need to be reconciled and the units corrected.
  2. [Sec. 5.3, 5.5, 5.6] The spectral index used for the boost calculation is not consistent across the paper: Section 5.3 reports an integrated alpha_LOW of -0.87 +/- 0.16, Section 5.5 uses alpha = -0.85, and Section 5.6 refers to 'the lowest measured radio spectral index' in deriving s = -2.7; the precise choice and its uncertainty should be stated once and used consistently.
  3. [Sec. 5.5] The observed flux-density ratio of about ten should be reported with the actual inside/outside 1.7 GHz flux densities, the uncertainty from image noise, and the sensitivity to the exact kinematic mask (the sigma >= 150 km/s and v = 6000-6600 km/s cuts defined in Section 4.1); the current '~10' is not reproducible.
  4. [Sec. 5.4] The cold-gas Mach number M >~ 25 is sensitive to the assumed pre-shock density n_H = 1 cm^-3, which is not independently constrained; the paper should state explicitly that M_cold scales as n_H^-1/2 and give a conservative range for plausible IGM densities.
  5. [Sec. 5.1] The statement that the MCMC fitting of the stacked spectrum uses 'a method similar to that described in Section 4.1' appears to refer to the spectral fitting method of Section 3 rather than the kinematic region definition of Section 4.1; please correct the cross-reference.
  6. [Sec. 5.2.1] The text says the pre-shock density n = 1 cm^-2 'is the only value available for the models with varying metal abundances,' but the MAPPINGS III library contains multiple densities; if this statement is accurate, a citation or explanation is needed, and otherwise the sentence should be revised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the radio-boost comparison uses an independently estimated Mach number, measured spectral index, and a direct flux-density ratio; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The central claim (Section 5.5) is that a weak shock in the hot plasma (M ~ 3.8) adiabatically compresses a pre-existing cosmic-ray electron population, boosting the synchrotron radio luminosity by about a factor of ten. The quantitative test compares a theoretical boost factor A ~ 8.6-17.5, computed from Eq. 3 with the compression ratio C from Eq. 4, to an observed 1.7 GHz flux-density ratio of ~10 between the inside and outside of the dynamically defined shock region. None of the inputs to the theoretical A is fitted to the observed ratio: M comes from the kinematics of NGC7318b relative to the group systemic velocity and the X-ray sound speed (Section 5.4), the spectral index alpha_LOW = -0.85 is measured from the 144 MHz and 1.7 GHz images (Section 5.3), and C follows from M through the standard Rankine-Hugoniot relation (Eq. 4). The observed ratio is a direct aperture measurement, not an adjusted parameter, and the shock mask is defined from optical emission-line velocity dispersion, not from the radio images used to measure the ratio. The paper itself flags the subjectivity of the kinematic decomposition and states the conclusions are insensitive to its details (Section 4.1), which addresses the closest potential concern about the inside/outside baseline. The assumption that the exterior radio flux represents the pre-shock state of the interior plasma is a physical and projection-dependent assumption, but it is not circular: it is not used to construct the theoretical boost factor. Self-citations (e.g., Arnaudova et al. 2024 for stacking methodology, Jin et al. 2024 for the WEAVE pipeline, Smith et al. 2016 for the WEAVE-LOFAR survey) are methodological and non-load-bearing for the weak-shock/adiabatic-compression conclusion. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external data and literature, and no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new physical entities; its conclusions rest on a set of standard astrophysical assumptions and a few hand-chosen parameters (mainly pre-shock densities and temperatures, and the kinematic cuts defining the shock region). The adiabatic compression claim is the least parametrically loaded part of the paper; the cold-gas hypersonic claim is the most assumption-sensitive.

free parameters (7)
  • Pre-shock cold gas density n_H = 1 cm^-3 (assumed)
    Assumed following MAPPINGS III models in Section 5.4. It sets the cold-gas shock velocity v_s ~ sqrt(n_h/n_H) delta-v, producing M_cold > 25. If n_H were much larger (e.g., ~ hundreds per cm^-3), the cold shock would no longer be hypersonic.
  • Pre-shock hot plasma temperature T = 0.4 keV (4.6e6 K)
    Taken from O'Sullivan et al. (2009); sets the sound speed c_s = 440 km/s and the weak-shock Mach numbers M ~ 2-4.
  • Shock region geometry for equipartition = cylinder radius 6 kpc, height 35 kpc
    Chosen in Section 5.6 to estimate B_eq = 9.5 micro-G. The field estimate is not central to the adiabatic compression claim.
  • Volume filling factor and proton energy ratio = 1.0 and 0
    Assumed in the PySynch equipartition calculation, Section 5.6.
  • Electron Lorentz factor limits = gamma_min=1, gamma_max=1e5
    Assumed for the radiating electron distribution in Section 5.6.
  • MAPPINGS pre-shock density for line-ratio comparison = 1 cm^-3 in text; 0.1 cm^-3 in Figure 9 caption
    The manuscript is internally inconsistent between Section 5.2.1 and the Figure 9 caption. This density is used to select shock model tracks for the BPT comparison.
  • Extinction parameters for Balmer decrement = case B T=1e4 K, n_e=100 cm^-3, Calzetti curve, R_V=4.05
    Standard assumptions used in Section 4.2 to derive the A_V map and dust survival interpretation.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The shock region is the set of spaxels with velocity 6000-6600 km/s and velocity dispersion >= 150 km/s in the v-sigma diagram.
    Defined in Section 4.1; all shock properties and the radio boundary are measured within this region. The authors claim results are insensitive to the exact cuts, but the definition is an input.
  • domain assumption The hot X-ray plasma is at rest with respect to the group systemic velocity of 6600 km/s.
    Used in Section 5.4 to compute the shock velocity in the hot medium (delta-v = 826 km/s). If the hot gas has its own bulk motion, M_hot changes.
  • domain assumption Ram pressure balance between the cold and hot phases gives v_cold = sqrt(n_hot/n_cold) v_shock.
    Invoked in Section 5.4 to translate the line-of-sight velocity offset into a cold-gas shock velocity.
  • domain assumption Case B recombination applies to the Balmer lines.
    Standard assumption for the extinction map in Section 4.2.
  • domain assumption The relativistic radio-emitting plasma is co-spatial with the hot X-ray phase.
    Assumed in Sections 5.4-5.5; the adiabatic compression argument requires the cosmic-ray electrons to be in the volume-filling hot medium.
  • domain assumption The pre-collision X-ray temperature of the filament was 0.4 keV.
    Used to set the Mach number; cited from O'Sullivan et al. (2009) in Section 5.4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of WEAVE First Light Observations: Origin and Dynamics of the Shock Front in Stephan's Quintet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SAZQTFOG

@misc{pith2026241113635,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: WEAVE First Light Observations: Origin and Dynamics of the Shock Front in Stephan's Quintet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SAZQTFOG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13635}
}
abstract

We present a detailed study of the large-scale shock front in Stephan's Quintet, a byproduct of past and ongoing interactions. Using integral-field spectroscopy from the new William Herschel Telescope Enhanced Area Velocity Explorer (WEAVE), recent 144 MHz observations from the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey (LoTSS), and archival data from the Very Large Array and James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), we obtain new measurements of key shock properties and determine its impact on the system. Harnessing the WEAVE large integral field unit's (LIFU) field of view (90 $\times$ 78 arcsec$^{2}$), spectral resolution ($R\sim2500$) and continuous wavelength coverage across the optical band, we perform robust emission line modeling and dynamically locate the shock within the multi-phase intergalactic medium (IGM) with higher precision than previously possible. The shocking of the cold gas phase is hypersonic, and comparisons with shock models show that it can readily account for the observed emission line ratios. In contrast, we demonstrate that the shock is relatively weak in the hot plasma visible in X-rays (with Mach number of $\mathcal{M} \sim 2 - 4$), making it inefficient at producing the relativistic particles needed to explain the observed synchrotron emission. Instead, we propose that it has led to an adiabatic compression of the medium, which has increased the radio luminosity ten-fold. Comparison of the Balmer line-derived extinction map with the molecular gas and hot dust observed with JWST suggests that pre-existing dust may have survived the collision, allowing the condensation of H$_{2}$ - a key channel for dissipating the shock energy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13635 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A composite image of Stephan’s Quintet made with JWST NIR￾Cam’s F277W, F356W and F444W bands, orientated such that North is up, and East to the left. NGC 7320c is outside the FoV, located to the east of NGC 7319. The green contours represent the 144 MHz radio flux density from LoTSS, with the lowest contour corresponding to a flux density of 1.2 mJy beam−1 and each subsequent contour increasing by a factor of two. T… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The complex velocity structure in the LSSR. The left panel presents the H𝛼 + [N ii] complex obtained by summing a spectral region 100 Å wide, centred on H𝛼, continuum-subtracted in each spaxel using a linear approximation (the regions used for emission lines and continuum estimation are indicated in the lower part of the right panel by the solid and dashed lines, respectively). The black contours indicate the locati… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The fitted properties of the H𝛼 emission for all spaxels with a 3𝜎 detection in each of the four bright lines (H𝛽 𝜆4861, [Oiii] 𝜆5007, H𝛼 𝜆6563, and [Nii] 𝜆6583). The panels, which are labelled in the upper-right corner, show: (a) line flux, (b) Equivalent Width, (c) line-of-sight velocity, and (d) velocity dispersion. In the upper-left panel (a) we have overlaid grey contours to indicate the LoTSS 144 MHz flux dens… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The line-of-sight versus velocity dispersion diagram used to dynamically identify regions of interests in SQ. The left panel shows the 2D distribution of the line-of-sight velocity and velocity dispersion for the different regions denoted, along with their 1D marginal …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparing the H𝛼 emission with the PAH and H2 emission traced by the JWST MIRI data. The top row shows the F770W JWST image (which traces the PAH emission), while the bottom row shows the F1000W image (which traces the molecular Hydrogen gas) both relative to the flux …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The dust properties of the shocked region surrounding NGC 7318a & b. The first panel presents the V-band extinction (𝐴𝑉 ) obtained with the Balmer decrement method, where the black contours indicate the dynamically defined shock region as discussed in Section 4.1. The …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Radio observations of Stephan’s Quintet taken by LoTSS at 144 MHz (left panel) and VLA at 1.7 and 4.86 GHz (centre and right panels, taken in C￾and D- array, respectively). In each panel, the white hexagon indicates the field covered by the WEAVE first-light LIFU obser…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Key wavelength ranges of the stacked spectrum of the shock region (as defined in Section 4.1, shown as red in the embedded plot in the first panel). The different panels show the emission line complexes of interest as indicated in the upper right corner, where the data…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The [O iii] 𝜆5007Å/H𝛽 and [N ii] 𝜆6583Å/H𝛼 emission line ratios for all spaxels within the shock region, overlaid with shock models without a precursor of different elemental abundances from the MAPPINGS III library for a pre-shock density of 𝑛 = 0.1 cm−3 . The shock v…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The left panel shows the spatial distribution of all spaxels with a 3𝜎 detection in all BPT-[Nii] lines colour-coded based on the orthogonal distance (ΔNii) to the extreme starburst line from Kewley et al. (2001), as indicated by the right panel. The grey and black co…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spectral index image obtained using the LoTSS 144 MHz and VLA C-Array 1.7 GHz images (top panel), and VLA C-Array 1.7 GHz and VLA D-Array 4.86 GHz images (middle panel), along with the variation of the SCP (bottom panel) across SQ. For context, we have added LoTSS 144…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Treble Clef radio phoenix and its old nonthermal filaments

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    VLSS J0318.9+5755 (the Treble Clef) is a radio phoenix with ultra-steep spectrum in a massive merging cluster at z≈0.117 in the Zone of Avoidance, shaped by ICM gas motions that may also power a candidate radio halo.

  2. The topology of the magnetic field in Abell 2255 out to its virial radius. Results from the LOFAR Galaxy Cluster Ultra-Deep Field

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The magnetic field in Abell 2255 shows ordered, region-dependent orientations inferred from synchrotron intensity gradients, with radial fields in bridges and tangential fields in relics.

  3. The DESI View of the Faint Radio Source Population in LoTSS DR2

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Probabilistic spectroscopic classification of 251k LoTSS radio sources yields the largest high-confidence sample and confirms LERGs accrete below ~1% Eddington while HERGs accrete above it.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    J., Hartsuiker J

    Allen R. J., Hartsuiker J. W., 1972, @doi [ ] 10.1038/239324a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972Natur.239..324A 239, 324

    work page doi:10.1038/239324a0 1972

  3. [3]

    G., Groves B

    Allen M. G., Groves B. A., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Kewley L. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/589652 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJS..178...20A 178, 20

    doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  4. [4]

    S., Yoshida M., 1999, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/307559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...521..565A 521, 565

    Aoki K., Kosugi G., Wilson A. S., Yoshida M., 1999, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/307559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...521..565A 521, 565

    doi:10.1086/307559 1999

  5. [5]

    N., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/502646 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...639L..51A 639, L51

    Appleton P. N., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/502646 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...639L..51A 639, L51

    doi:10.1086/502646 2006

  6. [6]

    N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/76 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...76A 836, 76

    Appleton P. N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/76 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...76A 836, 76

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/76 2017

  7. [7]

    N., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/accc2a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951..104A 951, 104

    Appleton P. N., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/accc2a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951..104A 951, 104

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accc2a 2023

  8. [8]

    I., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae233 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.4547A 528, 4547

    Arnaudova M. I., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae233 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.4547A 528, 4547

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae233 2024

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    A., Phillips M

    Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130766 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASP...93....5B 93, 5

    1981 doi

  2. [10]

    E., Hernquist L., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177957 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...471..115B 471, 115

    Barnes J. E., Hernquist L., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177957 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...471..115B 471, 115

    1996 doi

  3. [11]

    Beck R., Krause M., 2005, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.200510366 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AN....326..414B 326, 414

    2005 doi

  4. [13]

    Botteon A., Brunetti G., Ryu D., Roh S., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936216 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...634A..64B 634, A64

    doi

  5. [14]

    W., 2014, @doi [International Journal of Modern Physics D] 10.1142/S0218271814300079 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014IJMPD..2330007B 23, 1430007

    Brunetti G., Jones T. W., 2014, @doi [International Journal of Modern Physics D] 10.1142/S0218271814300079 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014IJMPD..2330007B 23, 1430007

    2014 doi

  6. [15]

    M., Burbidge G

    Burbidge E. M., Burbidge G. R., 1961, @doi [ ] 10.1086/147146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1961ApJ...134..244B 134, 244

    1961 doi

  7. [16]

    CASA Team et al., 2022, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASP..134k4501C 134, 114501

    2022 doi

  8. [17]

    Calistro Rivera G., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.3468C 469, 3468

    2017 doi

  9. [18]

    C., Kinney A

    Calzetti D., Armus L., Bohlin R. C., Kinney A. L., Koornneef J., Storchi-Bergmann T., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308692 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...533..682C 533, 682

    2000 doi

  10. [20]

    Cazaux S., Tielens A. G. G. M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/381775 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...604..222C 604, 222

    2004 doi

  11. [21]

    T., et al., 2018, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...619A..36C 619, A36

    Chy \.z y K. T., et al., 2018, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...619A..36C 619, A36

    2018 doi

  12. [22]

    Cibinel A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz690 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.5631C 485, 5631

    2019 doi

  13. [23]

    E., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...710..248C 710, 248

    Cluver M. E., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...710..248C 710, 248

    2010 doi

  14. [24]

    M., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx1806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.4747C 471, 4747

    Colafrancesco S., Marchegiani P., Paulo C. M., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx1806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.4747C 471, 4747

    2017 doi

  15. [25]

    H., Ramos Almeida C., Watkins A

    Comer \'o n S., Knapen J. H., Ramos Almeida C., Watkins A. E., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039382 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...645A.130C 645, A130

    2021 doi

  16. [26]

    S., Ramsay S

    Dalton G., et al., 2012, in McLean I. S., Ramsay S. K., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV. p. 84460P, @doi 10.1117/12.925950

    2012 doi

  17. [27]

    Della Bruna L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243395 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A..29D 666, A29

    2022 doi

  18. [28]

    H., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937384 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A.197D 635, A197

    D \' az-Garc \' a S., Knapen J. H., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937384 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A.197D 635, A197

    2020 doi

  19. [30]

    C ., 2023, Advances in Space Research, 71, 1219

    Doj c inovi \'c I., Kova c evi \'c -Doj c inovi \'c J., Popovi \'c L. C ., 2023, Advances in Space Research, 71, 1219

    2023

  20. [31]

    Dom \' nguez A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...763..145D 763, 145

    2013 doi

  21. [32]

    A., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423948 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...619..755D 619, 755

    Dopita M. A., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423948 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...619..755D 619, 755

    2005 doi

  22. [33]

    A., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/508261 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..167..177D 167, 177

    Dopita M. A., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/508261 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..167..177D 167, 177

    2006 doi

  23. [34]

    M., Drissen L., Kehrig C., Martin T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935686 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...629A.102D 629, A102

    Duarte Puertas S., Iglesias-P \'a ramo J., Vilchez J. M., Drissen L., Kehrig C., Martin T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935686 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...629A.102D 629, A102

    2019 doi

  24. [35]

    Duarte Puertas S., Vilchez J. M., Iglesias-P \'a ramo J., Drissen L., Kehrig C., Martin T., P \'e rez-Montero E., Arroyo-Polonio A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038734 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...645A..57D 645, A57

    2021 doi

  25. [36]

    En lin T. A., Br \"u ggen M., 2002, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05261.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.331.1011E 331, 1011

    2002

  26. [37]

    A., Gopal-Krishna 2001, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20000198 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...366...26E 366, 26

    En lin T. A., Gopal-Krishna 2001, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20000198 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...366...26E 366, 26

    2001 doi

  27. [38]

    Feretti L., Giovannini G., Govoni F., Murgia M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-012-0054-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&ARv..20...54F 20, 54

    2012 doi

  28. [39]

    L., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PASP..111...63F 111, 63

    Fitzpatrick E. L., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PASP..111...63F 111, 63

    1999 doi

  29. [40]

    L., Danese L., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/268.1.235 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.268..235G 268, 235

    Granato G. L., Danese L., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/268.1.235 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.268..235G 268, 235

    1994 doi

  30. [41]

    S., Ramsay S

    Grandmont F., Drissen L., Mandar J., Thibault S., Baril M., 2012, in McLean I. S., Ramsay S. K., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV. p. 84460U, @doi 1...

    2012 doi

  31. [42]

    C., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/6010.1086/141956 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...744...60G 744, 60

    Green J. C., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/6010.1086/141956 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...744...60G 744, 60

    2012

  32. [43]

    W., 2003, in Heck A., ed., Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol

    Greisen E. W., 2003, in Heck A., ed., Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 285, Information Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas. p. 109, @doi 10.1007/0-306-48080-8_7

    2003 doi

  33. [44]

    N., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811263 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...502..515G 502, 515

    Guillard P., Boulanger F., Pineau Des For \^e ts G., Appleton P. N., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811263 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...502..515G 502, 515

    2009 doi

  34. [45]

    Guillard P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac313f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...925...63G 925, 63

    2022 doi

  35. [46]

    J., Birkinshaw M., Worrall D

    Hardcastle M. J., Birkinshaw M., Worrall D. M., 1998, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-8711.1998.01159.x10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01159.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.294..615H 294, 615

    1998

  36. [47]

    J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...678A.151H 678, A151

    Hardcastle M. J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...678A.151H 678, A151

    2023 doi

  37. [48]

    J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx820 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469..639H 469, 639

    Harwood J. J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx820 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469..639H 469, 639

    2017 doi

  38. [49]

    Heesen V., et al., 2022, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142878 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...664A..83H 664, A83

    2022 doi

  39. [50]

    P., Palumbo G

    Hickson P., Mendes de Oliveira C., Huchra J. P., Palumbo G. G., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/171932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...399..353H 399, 353

    1992 doi

  40. [51]

    F., Hernquist L., Cox T

    Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Di Matteo T., Robertson B., Springel V., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499298 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..163....1H 163, 1

    2006 doi

  41. [52]

    M., Petropoulou V., Sulentic J

    Iglesias-P \'a ramo J., L \'o pez-Mart \' n L., V \' lchez J. M., Petropoulou V., Sulentic J. W., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118055 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...539A.127I 539, A127

    2012 doi

  42. [53]

    Jin S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.2688J 530, 2688

    2024 doi

  43. [54]

    P., Tielens A

    Jones A. P., Tielens A. G. G. M., Hollenbach D. J., McKee C. F., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...433..797J 433, 797

    1994 doi

  44. [55]

    G., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244622 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...670A..21J 670, A21

    Jones M. G., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244622 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...670A..21J 670, A21

    2023 doi

  45. [56]

    P., 2007, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/521717 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...669..729K 669, 729

    Kang H., Ryu D., Cen R., Ostriker J. P., 2007, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/521717 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...669..729K 669, 729

    2007 doi

  46. [57]

    Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341...33K 341, 33

    2003

  47. [58]

    Kelz A., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497455 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006PASP..118..129K 118, 129

    2006 doi

  48. [59]

    J., Dopita M

    Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Heisler C. A., Trevena J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321545 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...556..121K 556, 121

    2001 doi

  49. [60]

    J., Groves B., Kauffmann G., Heckman T., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.372..961K 372, 961

    Kewley L. J., Groves B., Kauffmann G., Heckman T., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.372..961K 372, 961

    2006

  50. [61]

    H., Cisternas M., Querejeta M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1742K 454, 1742

    Knapen J. H., Cisternas M., Querejeta M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1742K 454, 1742

    2015 doi

  51. [62]

    S., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...784....1K 784, 1

    Konstantopoulos I. S., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...784....1K 784, 1

    2014 doi

  52. [63]

    P., Rodr \' guez-Ardila A., Fraga L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038088 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...642A.203L 642, A203

    Lima-Costa F., Martins L. P., Rodr \' guez-Ardila A., Fraga L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038088 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...642A.203L 642, A203

    2020 doi

  53. [64]

    S., 2011, High Energy Astrophysics

    Longair M. S., 2011, High Energy Astrophysics

    2011

  54. [65]

    Markevitch M., Vikhlinin A., 2007, @doi [Physics Reports] 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.01.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PhR...443....1M 443, 1

    2007 doi

  55. [66]

    Markevitch M., Govoni F., Brunetti G., Jerius D., 2005, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/430695 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...627..733M 627, 733

    2005 doi

  56. [67]

    W., M \'a rquez I., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310817 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...485L..69M 485, L69

    Moles M., Sulentic J. W., M \'a rquez I., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310817 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...485L..69M 485, L69

    1997 doi

  57. [68]

    Murgia M., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015302 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...526A.148M 526, A148

    2011 doi

  58. [69]

    T., Spangler S

    Myers S. T., Spangler S. R., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...291...52M 291, 52

    1985 doi

  59. [70]

    J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1263 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435..149N 435, 149

    Nikiel-Wroczy \'n ski B., Soida M., Urbanik M., Beck R., Bomans D. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1263 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435..149N 435, 149

    2013 doi

  60. [71]

    M., Raychaudhury S., David L

    O'Sullivan E., Giacintucci S., Vrtilek J. M., Raychaudhury S., David L. P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1560 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...701.1560O 701, 1560

    2009 doi

  61. [72]

    E., Ferland G

    Osterbrock D. E., Ferland G. J., 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  62. [73]

    A., Chandler C

    Perley R. A., Chandler C. J., Butler B. J., Wrobel J. M., 2011, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...739L...1P 739, L1

    2011 doi

  63. [74]

    Pierce J. C. S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad455 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.1736P 522, 1736

    2023 doi

  64. [75]

    M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8a4e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...936L..14P 936, L14

    Pontoppidan K. M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8a4e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...936L..14P 936, L14

    2022 doi

  65. [76]

    Proxauf B., \"O ttl S., Kimeswenger S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...561A..10P 561, A10

    2014 doi

  66. [77]

    R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa2fc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853...87R 853, 87

    Rigby J. R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa2fc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853...87R 853, 87

    2018 doi

  67. [78]

    F., D \' az A

    Rodr \' guez-Baras M., Rosales-Ortega F. F., D \' az A. I., S \'a nchez S. F., Pasquali A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442..495R 442, 495

    2014 doi

  68. [79]

    M., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/429877 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005PASP..117..620R 117, 620

    Roth M. M., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/429877 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005PASP..117..620R 117, 620

    2005 doi

  69. [80]

    Ryu D., Kang H., Cho J., Das S., 2008, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1154923 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008Sci...320..909R 320, 909

    2008 doi

  70. [81]

    F., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...574A..47S 574, A47

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...574A..47S 574, A47

    2015 doi

  71. [82]

    L., McAlpine W., Hickox R

    Satyapal S., Ellison S. L., McAlpine W., Hickox R. C., Patton D. R., Mendel J. T., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu650 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441.1297S 441, 1297

    2014 doi

  72. [83]

    J., Finkbeiner D

    Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...500..525S 500, 525

    1998 doi

  73. [84]

    W., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...659A...1S 659, A1

    Shimwell T. W., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...659A...1S 659, A1

    2022 doi

  74. [85]

    H., 2021, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies9040121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Galax...9..121S 9, 121

    Singh V., Dutta S., Wadadekar Y., Ishwara-Chandra C. H., 2021, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies9040121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Galax...9..121S 9, 121

    2021 doi

  75. [86]

    W., O'Shea B

    Skillman S. W., O'Shea B. W., Hallman E. J., Burns J. O., Norman M. L., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/592496 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...689.1063S 689, 1063

    2008 doi

  76. [87]

    Smith D. J. B., Simpson C., Swinbank A. M., Rawlings S., Jarvis M. J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16279.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.404.1089S 404, 1089

    2010

  77. [88]

    Smith D. J. B., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.2435S 436, 2435

    2013 doi

  78. [89]

    Smith D. J. B., et al., 2016, in Reyl \'e C., Richard J., Cambr \'e sy L., Deleuil M., P \'e contal E., Tresse L., Vauglin I., eds, SF2A-2016: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics. pp 271--280 ( @eprint arXiv 1611.02706 ), @doi ...

    2016 doi arXiv

  79. [90]

    S., Gallagher J

    Sparke L. S., Gallagher J. S., 2000, Galaxies in the universe: an introduction. Cambridge University Press

    2000

  80. [91]

    Stephan M., 1877, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/37.6.334 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1877MNRAS..37..334S 37, 334

    doi

  81. [92]

    Sulentic J. W., Rosado M., Dultzin-Hacyan D., Verdes-Montenegro L., Trinchieri G., Xu C., Pietsch W., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/324455 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122.2993S 122, 2993

    2001 doi

  82. [93]

    R., Clark B

    Thompson A. R., Clark B. G., Wade C. M., Napier P. J., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/190688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJS...44..151T 44, 151

    1980 doi

  83. [94]

    Trinchieri G., Sulentic J., Breitschwerdt D., Pietsch W., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...401..173T 401, 173

    2003 doi

  84. [95]

    Trinchieri G., Sulentic J., Pietsch W., Breitschwerdt D., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...444..697T 444, 697

    2005 doi

  85. [96]

    Vazza F., Roediger E., Br \"u ggen M., 2012, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...544A.103V 544, A103

    2012 doi

  86. [97]

    Vink J., Yamazaki R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780..125V 780, 125

    2014 doi

  87. [98]

    A., et al., 2014, in Chiozzi G., Radziwill N

    Walton N. A., et al., 2014, in Chiozzi G., Radziwill N. M., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9152, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy III. p. 91520R, @doi 10.1117/12.2055457

    2014 doi

  88. [99]

    H., 2011, Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011JAHH...14....3W 14, 3

    Wielebinski R., Junkes N., Grahl B. H., 2011, Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011JAHH...14....3W 14, 3

    2011

  89. [100]

    A., Yun M

    Williams B. A., Yun M. S., Verdes-Montenegro L., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/339839 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....123.2417W 123, 2417

    2002 doi

  90. [101]

    Xanthopoulos E., Muxlow T. W. B., Thomasson P., Garrington S. T., 2004, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08133.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.353.1117X 353, 1117

    2004

  91. [103]

    K., Lu N., Condon J

    Xu C. K., Lu N., Condon J. J., Dopita M., Tuffs R. J., 2003b, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/377445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...595..665X 595, 665

    doi

  92. [104]

    K., et al., 2008, in Chary R

    Xu C. K., et al., 2008, in Chary R. R., Teplitz H. I., Sheth K., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 381, Infrared Diagnostics of Galaxy Evolution. p. 88

    2008

  93. [105]

    Yttergren M., Misquitta P., S \'a nchez-Monge \'A ., Valencia-S M., Eckart A., Zensus A., Peitl-Thiesen T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040188 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A..83Y 656, A83

    2021 doi

  94. [106]

    Zaragoza-Cardiel J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1024 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.1307Z 451, 1307

    2015 doi

  95. [107]

    B., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...815...48Z 815, 48

    Zhu G. B., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...815...48Z 815, 48

    2015 doi

  96. [108]

    W., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882..135Z 882, 135

    Zhu H., Slane P., Raymond J., Tian W. W., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882..135Z 882, 135

    2019 doi

  97. [109]

    J., et al., 2017, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-016-0005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NatAs...1E...5V 1, 0005

    van Weeren R. J., et al., 2017, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-016-0005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NatAs...1E...5V 1, 0005

    2017 doi

  98. [110]

    M., Rots A

    van der Hulst J. M., Rots A. H., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/113060 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981AJ.....86.1775V 86, 1775

    1981 doi

  99. [111]

    C., 1969, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969A&A.....3..468V 3, 468

    van der Laan H., Perola G. C., 1969, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969A&A.....3..468V 3, 468

    1969

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.