Low Mach Number Limit of Non-isentropic Inviscid Elastodynamics with General Initial Data

Jiawei Wang; Junyan Zhang

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Low Mach Number Limit of Non-isentropic Inviscid Elastodynamics with General Initial Data

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that non-isentropic inviscid elastodynamic equations in a three-dimensional half-space admit an incompressible limit starting from general, ill-prepared initial data, with the limiting velocity singled out by matching…

desk verdict New case in low Mach number limits: non-isentropic elastodynamics with boundary and ill-prepared data; correct but the 'general data' claim is tempered by an extra entropy decay at infinity. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09941 v1 pith:VMPL76GO submitted 2024-12-13 math.AP

Jiawei Wang , Junyan Zhang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35L6535Q3574B1076M45

keywords Neo-HookeanelastodynamicsIncompressiblelimitGeneralinitialdataNon-isentropicfluidsInitial-boundary-valueproblemHalf-spaceMicrolocaldefectmeasuresUniformenergyestimates

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to prove the incompressible limit of the non-isentropic inviscid elastodynamic equations in the three-dimensional half-space, starting from general (ill-prepared) initial data rather than data that are already almost incompressible. It establishes energy estimates that are uniform in the Mach number $\varepsilon$ without requiring $\varepsilon$ to be small, and then shows that as $\varepsilon\to 0$ the solutions converge, locally in space and strongly in time, to the solution of an incompressible inhomogeneous elastodynamic system. A sympathetic reader should care because this removes the well-prepared-data restriction for a wall-boundary problem with a degenerate deformation tensor, and it introduces two mechanisms, directional entropy regularity along deformation columns and a pressure wave-equation structure that lowers the needed normal derivatives, that may transfer to related fluid and plasma problems.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three objects. The first is the energy $E(t)=\|(q,u,S)\|^2_{3,\varepsilon}+\sum_j\|(F_j,(F_j+\bar F_j)\cdot\nabla S)\|^2_{3,\varepsilon}$, whose uniform-in-$\varepsilon$ control is the goal of Theorem 1.1. The second is the enhanced directional regularity of the entropy: the commutation identity $[D_t,(F_j+\bar F_j)\cdot\nabla]=0$ makes $(F_j+\bar F_j)\cdot\nabla S$ satisfy a pure transport equation, so entropy derivatives along the deformation columns have the same $H^3$ lifespan as the solution; this prevents the vorticity estimates from losing one derivative when entropy and elasticity interact. The third is the wave equation for the pressure, $\varepsilon^2 aD_t^2q-\nabla\cdot(\rho^{-1}\nabla q)-\sum_j\varepsilon^2 a((F_j+\bar F_j)\cdot\nabla)^2q=G_\varepsilon$ with Neumann boundary condition $\partial_3q=0$ on the wall, together with a Hodge-type div-curl inequality: elliptic estimates convert control of the Laplacian and of tangential operators into control of the normal derivatives of $\nabla q$, $\varepsilon D_tq$, and $\varepsilon(F_j+\bar F_j)\cdot\nabla q$, so the divergence and pressure parts close without invoking smallness of $\varepsilon$. Strong convergence in time is then obtained by a wave-packet transform and microlocal defect measures, which show that the acoustic component of the pressure decays because the domain is unbounded and the entropy decays at infinity.

What would settle it

A concrete check is to compute the kernel of the operator $P_0(t,\tau,\nabla)(1-\Delta_N)^{-1}$ on $L^2(\mathbb{R}^3_-)$ for fixed $(t,\tau)$: if it has a nonzero element, the microlocal-defect-measure argument in Corollary 4.4 collapses, and the theorem's strong convergence fails even under (1.16). Conversely, constructing an $H^3$ sequence of solutions satisfying all hypotheses except (1.16) whose pressure defect measure is nonzero at some $\tau\neq 0$ would show that the decay condition is necessary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, Theorem 1.2 is the central discovery: under compatibility conditions, $H^3$ convergence of the initial data $(u_0,F_{j,0},S_0)$, and the decay assumption (1.16), the sequence $(q,u,F_j,S)$ of solutions to the dimensionless system (1.11) converges weakly-$*$ in $L^\infty([0,T];H^3(\Omega))$ and strongly in $L^2([0,T];H^{3-\delta}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\Omega))$ for every $\delta>0$ to $(0,u^0,F^0_j,S^0)$. The limit solves the incompressible inhomogeneous elastodynamic system (1.15) with initial data $(w^0,F^0_{j,0},S^0_0)$, where $w^0\in H^3(\Omega)$ is determined by $w^0_3=0$ on the wall, $\nabla\cdot w^0=0$, and $\nabla\times(\rho(0,S^0_0)w^0)=\nabla\times(\rho(0,S^0_0)u^0_0)$. The point is that the limit is identified despite fast acoustic oscillations created by ill-prepared data: the pressure fluctuation $q$ and the divergence $\nabla\cdot u$ are shown to decay strongly to zero, and the effective velocity is obtained by projecting onto the solenoidal part.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the initial entropy decays at infinity at least like $|x|^{-1-\sigma}$ and its gradient like $|x|^{-2-\sigma}$; if the entropy fails to decay that fast, the proof's local energy decay for the pressure oscillations, and with it the strong convergence in time, collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The local existence time and the energy bound for the compressible system (1.11) are independent of the Mach number $\varepsilon$, so the low-Mach limit follows from the same uniform estimates without a separate smallness assumption.
For general ill-prepared data, the fast acoustic oscillations are filtered automatically: $q$ and $\nabla\cdot u$ converge strongly to $0$ in $L^2([0,T];H^{3-\delta}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\Omega))$, leaving only the incompressible elastodynamic dynamics.
The limiting initial velocity is not the data $u^0_0$ itself but the solenoidal projection $w^0$ determined by matching the curl of $\rho(0,S^0_0)u^0_0$; the difference is an acoustic layer that disappears in the limit.
The entropy $S^0$ is transported by the limiting velocity and the density $\varrho$ solves $\partial_t\varrho+u^0\cdot\nabla\varrho=0$, so the limit is genuinely inhomogeneous even though the pressure fluctuation vanishes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper's claims, the same two structural mechanisms, the commutation of the material derivative with deformation-column derivatives and the pressure wave equation with Neumann data, should apply to non-isentropic compressible ideal MHD with a perfectly conducting wall, suggesting that the smallness-of-Mach assumption in that setting can be removed.
The entropy decay condition (1.16) appears to be the price for using global dispersion of acoustic waves; if one only wants weak convergence or works on a bounded domain, a different mechanism such as normal-form or initial-layer analysis would be needed to replace local energy decay.
A numerical check of the predicted strong convergence for small $\varepsilon$ in the half-space, with data satisfying and then violating (1.16), would isolate whether the decay condition is an artifact of the proof or a genuine barrier.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper proves the low Mach number limit for non-isentropic inviscid elastodynamics in a half-space with ill-prepared data. That is a previously open case, and the two technical observations are real: the directional entropy regularity that controls (F_j + \bar{F}_j)\cdot\nabla S along the transport, and the wave-equation/elliptic reduction that avoids the usual smallness-of-epsilon assumption. The uniform estimates in Section 3 are written out carefully with explicit energies, and the Gronwall argument closes. I believe the main theorem is correct.

The soft spots are real but not disqualifying. The strong-convergence part (Section 4) follows Alazard's framework, and Proposition 4.1 is sketched rather than proved in full detail. The paper leans on Metivier–Schochet's Lemma 5.1 for the microlocal defect measure. That is standard practice in this area, but a referee should ask for a more self-contained treatment of the boundary localization, since that is where the geometry enters. More substantively, the theorem's "general initial data" requires the entropy decay at infinity (1.16). This condition is genuinely extra: H3 does not imply it, and without it the acoustic operator's coefficients need not tend to constants, so the local energy decay argument can fail. The paper states the condition explicitly and remarks on it, so the theorem is correct as stated, but the title somewhat oversells the scope. The condition is inherited from the earlier Euler literature, so it is not a new flaw, but it does mean the result covers "ill-prepared" data with far-field decay rather than literally all H3 data.

There are also a number of typos and a few displayed formulas with bracket or notation issues, for instance around (3.65). None seemed to break the argument, but the paper needs a clean-up pass before publication.

For whom: anyone working on singular limits of hyperbolic systems with boundary, or on elastodynamics/MHD. The two observations will likely be useful beyond this specific theorem. It deserves a serious referee: the core uniform estimates are new and the proof is detailed enough to check. I would engage with it.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the low Mach number limit of non-isentropic inviscid elastodynamic equations in the half-space R^3_- with a degenerate deformation tensor on the boundary. After reformulating the system around constant states and introducing a weighted Sobolev energy E(t), the authors prove uniform-in-epsilon a priori estimates (Theorem 1.1) using two structural observations: the enhanced directional regularity of the entropy along the columns of the deformation tensor, and a wave/elliptic reduction for the pressure that avoids the smallness of the Mach number. They then prove (Theorem 1.2) weak-* in L^∞(H^3) and strong in L^2(H^{3-δ}_{loc}) convergence to the incompressible inhomogeneous elastodynamic system for ill-prepared initial data satisfying an additional entropy decay condition, using microlocal defect measures in the framework of Métivier-Schochet and Alazard.

Significance. If the convergence argument in Section 4 is completed as indicated, this is a significant contribution: it is the first incompressible limit for non-isentropic inviscid elastodynamics with general (ill-prepared) data in a half-space with degenerate deformation tensor, and the uniform estimates do not rely on the smallness of epsilon. The directional entropy regularity observation in Section 2.1 is elegant and well exploited in the vorticity analysis. The paper develops the uniform estimates in Section 3 in detail with explicit energy functionals and no fitted parameters, and the Gronwall closing argument is clearly laid out. The main limitations are the extra decay hypothesis (1.16) on the entropy and the heavy reliance of Section 4 on imported technical propositions from [1] and [18].

major comments (3)

[Section 4.1, Proposition 4.1] The proof of the main new convergence statement is not self-contained: after equation (4.19) the argument says 'Following Alazard [1, Section 3.2]' and 'Arguments similar to those above', and the decisive injectivity of P0(t,tau,grad)(1-Delta_N)^-1 is imported from [18, Lemma 5.1]. Since the coefficients a0(S0), rho0(S0) here are transported by the incompressible velocity and the boundary is a half-space, the hypotheses of those cited results must be verified explicitly; at present a reader cannot check that the microlocal defect measure argument applies. Please either provide the verification or state the exact quoted proposition with its hypotheses and prove that they hold.
[Section 4.2] The sentence 'Now, we recall that rho0(S0) is strictly positive in [0,T] x Omega and Pu -> Pu0 = u0 in L2([0,T];H^{3-delta}_{loc}(Omega))' assumes the strong convergence of Pu that is being proved. The intended argument should instead use P(rho0(S0)P(u-u0)) -> 0 together with the strict positivity of rho0(S0): taking the L2 inner product with P(u-u0) and using Cauchy-Schwarz yields int rho0(S0)|P(u-u0)|^2 -> 0, hence P(u-u0) -> 0 in L2_loc; combined with (4.32) this gives u -> u0. As written, the proof is circular at this load-bearing step.
[Theorem 1.2 and Remark 4.1] The entropy decay condition (1.16) is not implied by the H3 convergence assumptions and is used in an essential way in the proof of [18, Lemma 5.1], as the authors themselves note in Remark 4.1. The title and abstract promise 'general initial data', which overstates the scope of Theorem 1.2. The theorem is correctly stated, but the scope should be described as 'general (ill-prepared) data satisfying the additional decay condition (1.16)', and the paper should discuss whether the condition can be relaxed or is only an artifact of the proof.

minor comments (5)

[Equation (3.1)] The right-hand side repeats the term ||(epsilon dt)^k(grad.u, grad x F_j)||_{2-k}^2 twice and omits the corresponding term involving grad.F_j and grad x u; this appears to be a typographical duplication.
[Equation (3.31)] The displayed chain 'a=rho^{-1} dq rho === epsilon a' is garbled: with the original definition a=rho^{-1} dp rho one has dq rho = epsilon rho a, so the displayed equality -div.F_j = epsilon a (F_j+Fbar_j).grad q + b(F_j+Fbar_j).grad S is correct only after correcting the intermediate factor (either replace 'epsilon dq rho' with 'dp rho' or remove the prefactor epsilon). Please fix this to avoid confusion in a frequently used identity.
[Equation (3.67)] In the final integral, 'dt^k u . dt^k u' should presumably be 'dt^k u . C_u' (or 'C_u . dt^k u'); as written the term is dimensionally inconsistent with the preceding commutator expression.
[Lemma 4.3] The statement contains a stray '=0' in 'The operator P0(t,tau,grad)(1-Delta_N)^{-1} = 0 is a 1-1 mapping'; it should read 'is injective on L2(Omega)'.
[Theorem 1.2, notation] The symbols S0 for the initial entropy and S0_0 for its limit are easy to confuse, especially since the limit solution is also called S0. Renaming the epsilon-dependent initial entropy (for instance S_{epsilon,0}) and the limit initial entropy (for instance S_{0,0}) would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity found: Theorem 1.2 follows from the uniform estimates in Section 3 plus external microlocal/defect-measure tools; the extra entropy decay hypothesis (1.16) is an acknowledged restriction, not an input-output identification.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) reformulate (1.1) as the dimensionless system (1.11); (ii) prove uniform-in-ε energy estimates in Section 3 via two structural observations, both proved directly (Lemma 3.2 establishes [Dt, (F_j + barF_j)·∇] = 0; the wave equation (3.34) with Neumann boundary condition and source bound (3.36) is derived from the system); (iii) prove strong convergence in Section 4 using the wave-packet transform and microlocal defect measures. The key injectivity lemma (Lemma 4.3) is quoted from Métivier–Schochet [18, Lemma 5.1], an external paper, and the paper explicitly states in Remark 4.1 that the entropy decay condition (1.16) is needed for that lemma. This is a genuine extra hypothesis: it restricts the admissible initial data (S0 must decay at infinity) and is not implied by H3 convergence. But it is a stated hypothesis of Theorem 1.2, not a hidden reuse of the conclusion. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no quantity in the limit system (1.15) is inserted as an input into the estimates. The self-citations ([30] for local well-posedness, [32] for Lagrangian-coordinate intuition, [11] for the isentropic counterpart) are contextual or standard and are not load-bearing: local well-posedness is also credited to [23], and the Lagrangian observation is proved in Lemma 3.2. Remark 1.2 also confirms that strong convergence requires the unbounded domain and condition (1.16), so the authors themselves flag the limitation. Therefore no step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear. The proof rests on standard analytic tools and on the stated physical and regularity assumptions. The entropy decay condition (1.16) and the enhanced directional entropy regularity are the non-generic inputs; they are assumptions, not outputs, so no circularity burden.

assumptions (8)

domain assumption Smooth equation of state rho=rho(p,S)>0 with d_rho/d_p>0
Stated near (1.2). Guarantees hyperbolicity and the factor a=rho^{-1}d_rho/d_p>0 used throughout.
domain assumption Neo-Hookean energy W(F)=1/2|F|^2 and constant background deformation with third-column degeneracy on the wall
Defines the model (1.1), the transformation p=1+epsilon q, and the boundary condition F_3j=0 on Sigma.
domain assumption Compatibility conditions up to second order and uniform initial energy bound E(0)<=M
Assumed in Theorem 1.1; required for local well-posedness of the characteristic boundary problem and for uniformity in epsilon.
domain assumption Entropy decay condition (1.16) on the initial entropy
Assumed in Theorem 1.2 and used in Section 4 for local energy decay of the pressure wave equation; not implied by H3 convergence.
standard math Propagation of the divergence constraint nabla dot (rho dot F_j)=0 from initial data
Cited to Trakhinin [27, Prop. 2.1] after (1.1); used so the system is not overdetermined.
standard math Known theory of symmetric hyperbolic systems with characteristic boundary for fixed epsilon
Invoked at the start of Section 1.2, citing [23] and [30, Appendix A], to obtain local solutions for each epsilon.
standard math Div-curl elliptic estimates, Kato-Ponce inequalities, and commutator structural identities
Recorded in Appendix A as Lemmas A.1, A.2, A.4; used repeatedly in the energy estimates.
standard math Wave-packet transform framework and microlocal defect measure lemmas
Imported from Metivier-Schochet [18] and Alazard [1] in Section 4; yields strong convergence once uniform bounds are known.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low Mach Number Limit of Non-isentropic Inviscid Elastodynamics with General Initial Data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VMPL76GO

@misc{pith2026241209941,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low Mach Number Limit of Non-isentropic Inviscid Elastodynamics with General Initial Data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VMPL76GO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09941}
}

read the original abstract

We prove the incompressible limit of non-isentropic inviscid elastodynamic equations with general initial data in 3D half-space. The deformation tensor is assumed to satisfy the neo-Hookean linear elasticity and degenerates in the normal direction on the solid wall. The uniform estimates in Mach number are established based on two important observations. First, the entropy has enhanced regularity in the direction of each column of the deformation tensor, which exactly helps us avoid the loss of derivatives caused by the simultaneous appearance of elasticity and entropy in vorticity analysis. Second, a special structure of the wave equation of the pressure together with elliptic estimates helps us reduce the normal derivatives in the control of divergence and pressure. The strong convergence of solutions in time is obtained by proving local energy decay of the wave equation and using the technique of microlocal defect measure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

[1]

Incompressible limit of the nonisentropic Euler equations with the solid wall boundary conditions

Alazard, T. Incompressible limit of the nonisentropic Euler equations with the solid wall boundary conditions. Adv. Diﬀer. Equ., 10(1):19–44, 2005

2005
[18]

The incompressible limit of the non-isentropic Euler equat ions

M´ etivier, G., Schochet, S. The incompressible limit of the non-isentropic Euler equat ions. Arch. Ratio- nal Mech. Anal., 158(1):61-90, 2001

work page 2001
[2]

On the incompressible limit of the compressible Euler equat ion

Asano, K. On the incompressible limit of the compressible Euler equat ion. Japan J. Appl. Math., 4(3):455–488, 1987

1987
[3]

M., Hu, J., Wang, D

Chen, R. M., Hu, J., Wang, D. Linear stability of compressible vortex sheets in 2D elasto dynamics: variable coeﬃcients. Math. Ann., 376(3): 863–912, 2020

work page 2020
[4]

Singular Limits and Convergence Rates of Compressible Eule r and Rotating Shallow W ater Equations

Cheng, B. Singular Limits and Convergence Rates of Compressible Eule r and Rotating Shallow W ater Equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 44(2): 1050-1076

work page
[5]

A., Shkoller, S

Cheng, C.-H. A., Shkoller, S. Solvability and Regularity for an Elliptic System Prescrib ing the Curl, Divergence, and Partial Trace of a V ector Field on Sobolev-C lass Domains. J. Math. Fluid Mech., 19(3): 375-422, 2017

work page 2017
[6]

Dafermos, C. M. Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics, 3rd edition, Grundlehren Math. Wiis., V ol. 325, Springer-V erlag, 2010

work page 2010
[7]

Ebin, D. G. Motion of slightly compressible ﬂuids in a bounded domain. I . Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 35(4):451-485, 1982

work page 1982

Show all 32 references

[8]

The incompressible limit and the initial layer of the compressible Euler equation in Rn +

Iguchi, T. The incompressible limit and the initial layer of the compressible Euler equation in Rn +. Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 20(11):945-958, 1997

1997
[9]

Singular limits for the compressible Euler equations in an e xterior domain

Isozaki, H. Singular limits for the compressible Euler equations in an e xterior domain. J. Reine Angew. Math., 381:1-36, 1987

1987
[10]

Low mach number limit of nonisentropic inviscid Hookean ela stodynamics

Ju, Q., Wang, J. Low mach number limit of nonisentropic inviscid Hookean ela stodynamics. Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 46(8):9508–9525, 2023

2023
[11]

Low Mach number limit of inviscid Hookean elastodynamics

Ju, Q., Wang, J., Xu, X. Low Mach number limit of inviscid Hookean elastodynamics. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 68:103683, 2022

2022
[12]

Commutator estimates and the Euler and Navier-Stokes equat ions

Kato, T., Ponce, G. Commutator estimates and the Euler and Navier-Stokes equat ions. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 41(7): 891-907, 1988

1988
[13]

Singular limits of quasilinear hyperbolic systems with lar ge parameters and the incompressible limit of compressible ﬂuids

Klainerman, S., Majda, A. Singular limits of quasilinear hyperbolic systems with lar ge parameters and the incompressible limit of compressible ﬂuids. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 34(4):481–524, 1981

1981
[14]

Compressible and incompressible ﬂuids

Klainerman, S., Majda, A. Compressible and incompressible ﬂuids. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 35(5):629–651, 1982

1982
[15]

Incompressible limit of the Hookean elastodynamics in a bou nded domain

Liu, G., Xu, X. Incompressible limit of the Hookean elastodynamics in a bou nded domain. Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 72:81, 1-14, 2021

2021
[16]

On the Motion of a Compressible Gravity W ater W ave with V orticity

Luo, C. On the Motion of a Compressible Gravity W ater W ave with V orticity. Ann. PDE, 4(2): 2506- 2576, 2018

2018
[17]

Compressible Gravity-Capillary W ater W aves: Local W ell-Posedness, Incompress- ible and Zero-Surface-T ension Limits

Luo, C., Zhang, J. Compressible Gravity-Capillary W ater W aves: Local W ell-Posedness, Incompress- ible and Zero-Surface-T ension Limits. arXiv:2211.03600, preprint, 2022

2022 arXiv
[19]

Symmetric Positive Systems with Boundary Characteristic o f Constant Multiplicity

Rauch, J. Symmetric Positive Systems with Boundary Characteristic o f Constant Multiplicity. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 291(1), 167-187, 1985. 31

1985
[20]

The lifespan of smooth solutions to the three-dimensional c ompressible Euler equations and the incompressible limit

Sideris, T. The lifespan of smooth solutions to the three-dimensional c ompressible Euler equations and the incompressible limit. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 40(2): 535-550, 1991

1991
[21]

Global existence for three-dimensional incompressible is otropic elastody- namics via the incompressible limit

Sideris, T., Thomases, B. Global existence for three-dimensional incompressible is otropic elastody- namics via the incompressible limit. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 58(6): 750-788, 2005

2005
[22]

The incompressible limit in nonlinear elasticity

Schochet., S. The incompressible limit in nonlinear elasticity. Commun. Math. Phys., 102(2):207–215, 1985

1985
[23]

The compressible Euler equations in a bounded domain: Exist ence of solutions and the incompressible limit

Schochet, S. The compressible Euler equations in a bounded domain: Exist ence of solutions and the incompressible limit. Commun. Math. Phys., 104(1):49–75, 1986

1986
[24]

Fast Singular Limits of Hyperbolic PDEs

Schochet, S. Fast Singular Limits of Hyperbolic PDEs. J. Diﬀer. Equ., 114(2):476-512, 1994

1994
[25]

On the Singular Incompressible Limit of Inviscid Compressi ble Fluids

Secchi, P . On the Singular Incompressible Limit of Inviscid Compressi ble Fluids. J. Math. Fluid Mech., 2(2), 107-125, 2000

2000
[26]

On slightly compressible ideal ﬂow in the halfplane

Secchi, P . On slightly compressible ideal ﬂow in the halfplane. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 161(3): 231-255, 2002

2002
[27]

W ell-posedness of the free boundary problem in compressibl e elastodynamics

Trakhinin, Y . W ell-posedness of the free boundary problem in compressibl e elastodynamics. J. Diﬀer. Eq. 264(3): 1661-1715, 2018

2018
[28]

The classical ﬁeld theories , with an appendix on tensor ﬁelds by J.L

Truesdell, C., Toupin, R. The classical ﬁeld theories , with an appendix on tensor ﬁelds by J.L. Ericksen, in: S. Fl¨ ugge(Ed.), Handbuch der Physik, Bd. III/1, Springer, Berlin, 1960, pp. 226-793, appendix, pp. 794-858

1960
[29]

Incompressible limit of nonisentropic Hookean elastodynamics

Wang, J. Incompressible limit of nonisentropic Hookean elastodynamics. J. Math. Phys., 63(6):061506, 2022

2022
[30]

Incompressible limit of compressible ideal MHD ﬂows inside a perfectly conducting wall

Wang, J., Zhang, J. Incompressible limit of compressible ideal MHD ﬂows inside a perfectly conducting wall. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01142, 2023

2023 arXiv
[31]

The incompressible limit and the initial layer of the compre ssible Euler equation

Ukai, S. The incompressible limit and the initial layer of the compre ssible Euler equation. J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 26(2):323-331, 1986

1986
[32]

Local W ell-posedness and Incompressible Limit of the Free-Boundary Problem in Compress- ible Elastodynamics

Zhang, J. Local W ell-posedness and Incompressible Limit of the Free-Boundary Problem in Compress- ible Elastodynamics. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 244(3), 599-697, 2022. 32

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Incompressible limit of the nonisentropic Euler equations with the solid wall boundary conditions

Alazard, T. Incompressible limit of the nonisentropic Euler equations with the solid wall boundary conditions. Adv. Diﬀer. Equ., 10(1):19–44, 2005

2005

[2] [18]

The incompressible limit of the non-isentropic Euler equat ions

M´ etivier, G., Schochet, S. The incompressible limit of the non-isentropic Euler equat ions. Arch. Ratio- nal Mech. Anal., 158(1):61-90, 2001

work page 2001

[3] [2]

On the incompressible limit of the compressible Euler equat ion

Asano, K. On the incompressible limit of the compressible Euler equat ion. Japan J. Appl. Math., 4(3):455–488, 1987

1987

[4] [3]

M., Hu, J., Wang, D

Chen, R. M., Hu, J., Wang, D. Linear stability of compressible vortex sheets in 2D elasto dynamics: variable coeﬃcients. Math. Ann., 376(3): 863–912, 2020

work page 2020

[5] [4]

Singular Limits and Convergence Rates of Compressible Eule r and Rotating Shallow W ater Equations

Cheng, B. Singular Limits and Convergence Rates of Compressible Eule r and Rotating Shallow W ater Equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 44(2): 1050-1076

work page

[6] [5]

A., Shkoller, S

Cheng, C.-H. A., Shkoller, S. Solvability and Regularity for an Elliptic System Prescrib ing the Curl, Divergence, and Partial Trace of a V ector Field on Sobolev-C lass Domains. J. Math. Fluid Mech., 19(3): 375-422, 2017

work page 2017

[7] [6]

Dafermos, C. M. Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics, 3rd edition, Grundlehren Math. Wiis., V ol. 325, Springer-V erlag, 2010

work page 2010

[8] [7]

Ebin, D. G. Motion of slightly compressible ﬂuids in a bounded domain. I . Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 35(4):451-485, 1982

work page 1982