Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 57 references

Intrinsic pinning of FeSe$_1$$_-$$_x$S$_x$ single crystals probed by torque magnetometry

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read FeSe's fourfold torque signals are intrinsic vortex pinning from gap nodes plus twin domains, with layered structure pinning out-of-plane vortices.

desk verdict A genuinely new torque observation in FeSe1−xSx whose intrinsic-pinning interpretation is plausible but underdetermined: the fourfold in-plane irreversible torque is real, but the case that it comes from gap nodes rather than twin-boundary pinning is not yet made. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16170 v1 pith:ZIYAQRGX submitted 2024-12-06 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Nan Zhou , Yue Sun , Q. Hou , T. Sakakibara , X. Z. Xing , C. Q. Xu , C. Y. Xi , Z. S. Wang
show 9 more authors
Y. F. Zhang Y. Q. Pan B. Chen X. Luo Y. P. Sun Xiaofeng Xu T. Tamegai Mingxiang Xu Zhixiang Shi
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el
keywords intrinsicpinningtorquemagnetometryFeSeiron-basedsuperconductorstwindomainsgapnodesvortexlayeredsuperconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports angle-resolved torque measurements on high-quality FeSe1−xSx single crystals (x = 0, 0.11, 0.15) in the superconducting mixed state. It finds a fourfold, irreversible in-plane torque with peaks along the a and b axes, and sharp out-of-plane torque peaks when the field crosses the FeSe planes. These signals are absent in the normal state, so they come from vortex pinning rather than equilibrium anisotropy. The authors argue that the in-plane pattern arises from the combined effects of superconducting gap nodes or deep minima and two 90°-rotated twin domains, while the out-of-plane peaks reflect pinning of vortices between weakly superconducting layers. If correct, torque magnetometry can read both gap symmetry and twin-domain content in these materials.

What carries the argument

The central object is the irreversible torque τ_irr = (τ_CW − τ_CCW)/2, obtained from clockwise and counterclockwise field rotations, which isolates hysteresis from vortex pinning while the reversible part (τ_CW + τ_CCW)/2 reflects equilibrium anisotropy. In-plane, the mechanism is the superposition of twofold gap-node pinning patterns coming from the two twin-domain orientations; out-of-plane, it is the layered FeSe structure itself, where the interlayer regions are weakly superconducting and serve as periodic intrinsic pinning sites for vortices lying in the ab plane.

What would settle it

Measure the in-plane irreversible torque on a single-domain (untwinned) FeSe crystal: if the fourfold pattern reduces to twofold, twin-domain superposition is the essential ingredient, whereas persistence of the fourfold pattern would indicate the gap nodes alone can produce it. As a second check, image the twin-domain areas on the same crystal used for torque and compare the 0°/180° versus 90°/270° peak-height ratio with the actual domain area ratio; a mismatch would point to another source of anisotropy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In FeSe1−xSx, the clockwise and counterclockwise torque differ only in the superconducting state, and the difference τ_irr = (τ_CW − τ_CCW)/2 shows sharp peaks at 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° for in-plane rotation and at 90° and 270° for out-of-plane rotation. The in-plane peaks are not equal: those at 0° and 180° exceed those at 90° and 270°, which the authors take as evidence that two families of twin domains, rotated 90° with respect to each other, each contribute a twofold signal whose superposition appears fourfold when the domain population is unequal. Combined with existing evidence for a nodal or deep-minimum gap structure, this leads to the claim that vortices are intrinsically pinned at free-energy minima associated with gap nodes, in close analogy to untwinned YBa2Cu3O7, with twin domains converting a twofold pattern into a fourfold one. The sharp out-of-plane peaks are attributed to vortices running parallel to the FeSe layers and being pinned between them, because the interlayer coupling is weaker than the intralayer pairing; the coherence length ξc ~ 8.7 Å is comparable to the lattice constant c ~ 5.52 Å, so the layered modulation acts as a natural pinning center.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation assumes that the in-plane torque signal is dominated by vortices sitting in free-energy minima created by the superconducting gap, and that the two twin-domain orientations occupy unequal areas, a ratio the paper does not independently measure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the in-plane fourfold torque is indeed intrinsic pinning from gap nodes or deep minima, torque measurements provide a bulk probe of gap symmetry in FeSe-family superconductors.
  • The asymmetry between the 0°/180° and 90°/270° peaks gives a non-destructive way to estimate the relative populations of the two twin-domain orientations in a crystal.
  • Out-of-plane intrinsic pinning predicts enhanced critical current when the magnetic field lies parallel to the FeSe layers at low temperature, a property that could matter for applications of layered superconductors.
  • Extrinsic pinning introduced by sulfur substitution competes with these intrinsic channels, so the doping series (especially x = 0.15) allows a separation of intrinsic versus defect-driven pinning.
  • The complete absence of irreversible torque above T_c confirms that these signals are a mixed-state pinning phenomenon rather than a normal-state anisotropy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test the authors call for but do not perform: measuring the in-plane torque on an untwinned or single-domain FeSe crystal should collapse the fourfold pattern to twofold if twin-domain superposition is essential, while a pure gap-node effect would keep the fourfold pattern.
  • The twin-domain population ratio inferred from torque peak heights could be cross-checked quantitatively against polarized-light microscopy of the same crystal, turning the qualitative asymmetry argument into a calibrated probe.
  • If the sharp out-of-plane peak comes from intrinsic interlayer pinning, its width and height should be independent of crystal thickness, whereas an added surface-pinning contribution should scale with thickness, separating the two proposed sources.
  • Torque-based pinning spectroscopy of this kind could be applied to other nematic superconductors with debated gap structure, offering a bulk, thermodynamic complement to surface-sensitive probes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports torque magnetometry measurements on high-quality CVT-grown FeSe1−xSx (x = 0, 0.11, 0.15) single crystals. The authors measure the angular dependence of both in-plane and out-of-plane torque at temperatures from 3 to 15 K and fields from 0.3 to 9 T, and extract the irreversible component as τ_irr = (τ_CW − τ_CCW)/2. In the superconducting mixed state they observe a fourfold in-plane irreversible torque with peaks at 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°, and out-of-plane irreversible torque peaks near 90° and 270°. They interpret the fourfold in-plane signal as intrinsic pinning arising from the combined effects of gap nodes/minima and twin domains, and the out-of-plane peaks as intrinsic pinning by the weakly superconducting interlayer regions of the layered FeSe structure.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the paper would extend the observation of intrinsic vortex pinning to the FeSe family and would provide bulk thermodynamic evidence for a nodal or deep-minima gap structure in FeSe1−xSx. The experimental work has notable strengths: the crystals are characterized by XRD, resistivity, and magnetization; the torque measurements are systematic in field and temperature; and the irreversible/reversible decomposition is made explicit. The supplementary upper-critical-field analysis provides a concrete estimate of ξc ≈ 8.7 Å, which is directly relevant to the layered-pinning argument. The weakness is that the central attribution to intrinsic pinning is not backed by a quantitative model or by control measurements, and the twin-boundary population that is essential to the in-plane interpretation is not independently characterized. The paper's own concluding remark that untwinned or single-domain crystals are needed shows that this limitation is recognized, but the title and abstract nevertheless assert intrinsic pinning as the main conclusion.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3 (general interpretation)] The paper would be strengthened by a quantitative discrimination between intrinsic and extrinsic pinning contributions. The irreversible torque is only presented as τ_irr(φ) and τ_irr(θ) curves; there is no extraction of a critical current density Jc(φ), no comparison of the torque magnitude with the elementary pinning force of a vortex line in the nodal gap landscape, and no estimate of the expected twin-boundary pinning force from the observed twin spacing. Such a comparison is needed to distinguish the proposed intrinsic mechanism from the conventional angle-dependent critical-current response of a twinned crystal. Without it, the central claim rests on the analogy with untwinned YBa2Cu3O7 and CeCoIn5, systems in which the twin-domain complication is absent.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3] The phrase 'In other word' should read 'In other words'.
  2. [Section 3] The word 'untwined' should be 'untwinned'.
  3. [Reference [8]] The journal name 'Physics C' should be 'Physica C'.
  4. [Throughout] Chemical formulas such as CeCoIn5 and FeSe1−xSx should be typeset consistently with proper subscripts and italics.
  5. [Supplemental material] The optical images of twin boundaries are labeled as Fig. S1 in the main text but appear with different numbering in the supplement; the figure numbering should be made consistent.
  6. [Data availability] The statement 'The authors do not have permission to share data' prevents independent verification of the raw torque curves; please clarify whether the data can be deposited in a repository or shared on request.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the torque observations are interpreted rather than fitted or predicted, and the one self-citation is corroborative only.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are interpretations of directly measured torque, not quantities derived from fitted inputs. The fourfold in-plane irreversible torque is observed (Fig. 2), and the attribution to intrinsic pinning combines external evidence for anisotropic gap nodes/minima (refs [31,32], thermal conductivity/STM) with the paper's own polarized-light imaging of twin domains (Fig. S1) and the geometric statement that two 90-degree-rotated twofold gap patterns superpose to a fourfold pattern. The unequal peak heights at 0/180 vs 90/270 are used post hoc to suggest unequal twin-domain populations; because the domain ratio is not independently measured and the peak pattern is not predicted from it, this is an underdetermined interpretation, not a circular derivation. The only quantitative input, the coherence length estimate xi_c ~ 8.7 A from Bc2 slopes (Figs. S2/S3), is used as a plausibility argument for interlayer pinning and is not fitted to the torque signal. The one notable self-citation (ref [33], overlapping authors, fourfold heat capacity attributed to twin domains) is corroborative: the present argument does not reduce to it, because twin domains are directly imaged in this paper and the twofold gap is documented by external QPI. Alternative explanations, such as direct vortex pinning by twin boundaries (which the introduction classifies as extrinsic defects), remain scientifically open, but that is underdetermination, not circularity. No step reduces by construction to its input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several domain assumptions imported from prior literature (gap nodes, twin domains, vortex pinning at gap minima) and one ad hoc assumption about the coherence length being smaller than estimated. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Coherence length ξc = ~8.7 Å (from Bc2 slopes)
    Derived from upper critical field slopes near Tc; used to argue for interlayer intrinsic pinning. The authors admit the value is over-estimated.
  • Resistivity power-law parameters (ρ0, A, α) = e.g., ρ0=1.83 μΩ cm for FeSe
    Fitted to zero-field resistivity data to characterize sample quality; not used in the central pinning claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Gap nodes or deep minima exist in FeSe1−xSx for x up to 0.15
    Assumed from prior thermal conductivity and STM studies (Refs. 31,32); the torque peaks are interpreted as evidence for these nodes.
  • domain assumption Twin domains exist in the measured crystals and are rotated by 90 degrees
    Shown by polarized-light microscopy in Fig. S1/S3 of the supplemental material; the two domains are assumed to have unequal populations to explain the peak asymmetry.
  • domain assumption The irreversible torque stems from vortex pinning at free-energy minima, not from other anisotropic magnetic responses
    This is the standard interpretation for YBa2Cu3O7 and CeCoIn5 (Refs. 4,17), adopted here without a quantitative model.
  • ad hoc to paper The effective coherence length ξc is comparable to or smaller than the interlayer spacing c
    The paper estimates ξc ~ 8.7 Å, larger than c ~ 5.52 Å, but argues the estimate is over-estimated due to multiband effects, making the interlayer region a weak superconductor. This is stated in Section 3 without a corrected estimate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Intrinsic pinning of FeSe$_1$$_-$$_x$S$_x$ single crystals probed by torque magnetometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZIYAQRGX

@misc{pith2026241216170,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Intrinsic pinning of FeSe$_1$$_-$$_x$S$_x$ single crystals probed by torque magnetometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZIYAQRGX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16170}
}
abstract

Intrinsic pinning is caused by natural pinning centers that occur because of the modulation of the order parameter or weak superconducting layers. Early work has shown that intrinsic pinning generates a high pinning force and critical current density in some layered oxide superconductors. Studying the intrinsic pinning of superconductors is crucial for both fundamental studies and potential applications. Herein, we use torque magnetometry to study angle-resolved in-plane and out-of-plane magnetic torque for a series of high-quality FeSe$_1$$_-$$_x$S$_x$ single crystals. A fourfold torque signal was observed when the magnetic field was within the \textit{ab} plane. We interpret that this fourfold in-plane irreversible torque is from the intrinsic pinning due to combined effects of gap nodes/minimum and twin domains. Additionally, we attributed the observed out-of-plane torque peaks to intrinsic pinning due to the layered structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16170 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Schematic experimental configuration for out-of-plane magnetic torque measurements. (b) Angular dependence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Intrinsic pinning of FeSe$_1$$_-$$_x$S$_x$ single crystals probed by torque magnetometry

    Introduction Understanding the mechanism of intrinsic pinning in high T c layered cuprates [1–8] and iron-based [9–14] su- perconductors is essential for fundamental studies and potential applications. Type-II superconductors are characterised by the appearance of thin filaments of nor- mally conducting material in the superconducting (SC) state. Each uni...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    The actual chemical composition was deter- mined via energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX)

    Experiment details The single crystals of FeSe 1−xSx (x = 0, 0.11, 0.15) studied here were synthesized using the vapor transport method [21]. The actual chemical composition was deter- mined via energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The crystallographic structure was characterized by x-ray diffraction (XRD) at room temperature using a Rigaku diffrac...

    work page

  3. [3]

    1(a) and Fig

    Results and discussion The XRD patterns and their log-scale plot of a series of FeSe1−xSx single crystals are shown in Fig. 1(a) and Fig. S4 [47], respectively. Only the (00 ℓ) peaks are observed, which can be well indexed based on a tetragonal structure with the P 4/nmm space group. The positions of the (00ℓ) peaks were found to shift systematically to h...

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    We interpret the in-plane fourfold irreversible torque to the intrinsic pin- ning, which is generated by a combined effects of gap nodes/minima and twin domains

    Conclusions In summary, we observed fourfold and twofold torque peaks at particular magnetic field directions in the SC state for FeSe 1−xSx single crystals. We interpret the in-plane fourfold irreversible torque to the intrinsic pin- ning, which is generated by a combined effects of gap nodes/minima and twin domains. We attribute out-of- plane twofold to...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Tachiki and S

    M. Tachiki and S. Takahashi, Solid State Commun. 70, 291 (1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    Tachiki and S

    M. Tachiki and S. Takahashi, Solid State Commun. 72, 1083 (1989)

    work page 1989

  7. [7]

    B. Roas, L. Schultz, and G. Saemann-Ischenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 479 (1990)

    work page 1990

  8. [8]

    Ishida, K

    T. Ishida, K. Okuda, H. Asaoka, Y. Kazumata, K. Noda, and H. Takei, Phys. Rev. B 56, 11897 (1997)

    work page 1997

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Awaji, R

    S. Awaji, R. Ishihara, K. Watanabe, K. Shikimachi, N. Hirano, and S. Nagaya, Appl. Phys. Express4, 013101 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    Civale, B

    L. Civale, B. Maiorov, J. MacManus-Driscoll, H. Wang, T. Holesinger, S. Foltyn, A. Serquis, and P. Arendt, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15, 2808 (2005)

    2005

  3. [11]

    B. Dam, J. Huijbregtse, F. Klaassen, R. Van der Geest, G. Doornbos, J. Rector, A. Testa, S. Freisem, J. Mar- tinez, B. St¨ auble-P¨ umpin,et al., Nature 399, 439 (1999)

    1999

  4. [12]

    Janossy, R

    B. Janossy, R. Hergt, and L. Fruchter, Physics C 170, 22 (1990)

    1990

  5. [13]

    K. Iida, J. H¨ anisch, E. Reich, F. Kurth, R. H¨ uhne, L. Schultz, B. Holzapfel, A. Ichinose, M. Hanawa, I. Tsukada, et al., Phys. Rev. B 87, 104510 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    M. L. Amig´ o, M. A. Crivillero, D. G. Franco, A. Bad ´ ıa- Maj´ os, J. Guimpel, J. Campo, F. Damay, F. Porcher, A. M. Condo, and G. Nieva, Supercond. Sci. and Tech- nol. 30, 085010 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    K. Iida, J. H¨ anisch, C. Tarantini, F. Kurth, J. Jaroszyn- ski, S. Ueda, M. Naito, A. Ichinose, I. Tsukada, E. Reich, et al., Sci. Rep. 3, 2139 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    P. J. Moll, L. Balicas, V. Geshkenbein, G. Blatter, J. Karpinski, N. D. Zhigadlo, and B. Batlogg, Nat. Mater. 12, 134 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Sakoda, K

    M. Sakoda, K. Iida, and M. Naito, Supercond. Sci. Tech- nol. 31, 093001 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Tarantini, K

    C. Tarantini, K. Iida, J. H¨ anisch, F. Kurth, J. Jaroszyn- ski, N. Sumiya, M. Chihara, T. Hatano, H. Ikuta, S. Schmidt, et al., Sci. Rep. 6, 36047 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    S. J. Chapman and G. Richardson, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 108, 397 (1997)

    1997

  12. [20]

    L. Liu, C. Zhu, Z. Liu, H. Deng, X. Zhou, Y. Li, Y. Sun, X. Huang, S. Li, X. Du, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 256401 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    H. Xiao, T. Hu, C. Almasan, T. Sayles, and M. Maple, Phys. Rev. B 78, 014510 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    H. Xiao, T. Hu, C. Almasan, T. Sayles, and M. Maple, Phys. Rev. B 73, 184511 (2006)

    2006

  15. [23]

    Willemin, C

    M. Willemin, C. Rossel, J. Hofer, H. Keller, Z. Ren, and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 57, 6137 (1998)

    1998

  16. [24]

    Willemin, C

    M. Willemin, C. Rossel, J. Hofer, H. Keller, A. Erb, and E. Walker, Phys. Rev. B 58, R5940 (1998)

    1998

  17. [25]

    Y. Sun, S. Pyon, and T. Tamegai, Phys. Rev. B 93, 104502 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Hosoi, K

    S. Hosoi, K. Matsuura, K. Ishida, H. Wang, Y. Mizukami, T. Watashige, S. Kasahara, Y. Matsuda, and T. Shibauchi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 8139 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Watson, T

    M. Watson, T. Kim, A. Haghighirad, S. Blake, N. Davies, M. Hoesch, T. Wolf, and A. Coldea, Phys. Rev. B 92, 121108 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Abdel-Hafiez, Y.-Y

    M. Abdel-Hafiez, Y.-Y. Zhang, Z.-Y. Cao, C.-G. Duan, G. Karapetrov, V. Pudalov, V. Vlasenko, A. Sadakov, D. Knyazev, T. Romanova, et al., Phys. Rev. B 91, 165109 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    F. Hsu, J. Luo, K. Yeh, T. Chen, T. Huang, P. Wu, Y. Lee, Y. Huang, Y. Chu, D. Yan, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 14262 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    Song, Y.-L

    C.-L. Song, Y.-L. Wang, P. Cheng, Y.-P. Jiang, W. Li, T. Zhang, Z. Li, K. He, L. Wang, J.-F. Jia, et al., Science 332, 1410 (2011)

    2011

  23. [31]

    Kasahara, T

    S. Kasahara, T. Watashige, T. Hanaguri, Y. Kohsaka, T. Yamashita, Y. Shimoyama, Y. Mizukami, R. Endo, H. Ikeda, K. Aoyama, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 16309 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Watashige, Y

    T. Watashige, Y. Tsutsumi, T. Hanaguri, Y. Kohsaka, S. Kasahara, A. Furusaki, M. Sigrist, C. Meingast, T. Wolf, H. v. L¨ ohneysen,et al., Phys. Rev. X 5, 031022 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Bourgeois-Hope, S

    P. Bourgeois-Hope, S. Chi, D. Bonn, R. Liang, W. Hardy, T. Wolf, C. Meingast, N. Doiron-Leyraud, and L. Taille- fer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 097003 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    Watashige, S

    T. Watashige, S. Arsenijevi´ c, T. Yamashita, D. Ter- azawa, T. Onishi, L. Opherden, S. Kasahara, Y. Tokiwa, Y. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 014707 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    Y. Sato, S. Kasahara, T. Taniguchi, X. Xing, Y. Kasahara, Y. Tokiwa, Y. Yamakawa, H. Kontani, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 1227 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Hanaguri, K

    T. Hanaguri, K. Iwaya, Y. Kohsaka, T. Machida, T. Watashige, S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Mat- suda, Sci. Adv. 4, eaar6419 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Y. Sun, S. Kittaka, S. Nakamura, T. Sakakibara, K. Irie, T. Nomoto, K. Machida, J. Chen, and T. Tamegai, Phys. Rev. B 96, 220505(R) (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    H. Xu, X. Niu, D. Xu, J. Jiang, Q. Yao, Q. Chen, Q. Song, M. Abdel-Hafiez, D. Chareev, A. Vasiliev,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 157003 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    P. O. Sprau, A. Kostin, A. Kreisel, A. E. B¨ ohmer, V. Tau- four, P. C. Canfield, S. Mukherjee, P. J. Hirschfeld, B. M. Andersen, and J. S. Davis, Science 357, 75 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Hashimoto, Y

    T. Hashimoto, Y. Ota, H. Q. Yamamoto, Y. Suzuki, T. Shimojima, S. Watanabe, C. Chen, S. Kasahara, Y. Matsuda, T. Shibauchi, et al., Nat. Commun. 9, 282 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    D. Liu, C. Li, J. Huang, B. Lei, L. Wang, X. Wu, B. Shen, Q. Gao, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, et al., Phys. Rev. X 8, 031033 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Y. Sun, A. Park, S. Pyon, T. Tamegai, and H. Kitamura, Phys. Rev. B 96, 140505(R) (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    N. Zhou, Y. Sun, C. Xi, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Xu, Y. Pan, J. Feng,et al., Physical Review B 104, L140504 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Kasahara, Y

    S. Kasahara, Y. Sato, S. Licciardello, M. ˇCulo, S. Arseni- jevi´ c, T. Ottenbros, T. Tominaga, J. B¨ oker, I. Eremin, T. Shibauchi, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 107001 (2020). viii

    2020

  37. [45]

    Y. Sun, S. Pyon, T. Tamegai, R. Kobayashi, T. Watashige, S. Kasahara, Y. Matsuda, and T. Shibauchi, Phys. Rev. B 92, 144509 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Putilov, C

    A. Putilov, C. Di Giorgio, V. Vadimov, D. Trainer, E. Lechner, J. Curtis, M. Abdel-Hafiez, O. Volkova, A. Vasiliev, D. Chareev, et al., Physical Review B 99, 144514 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    X. Yi, X. Xing, L. Qin, J. Feng, M. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Meng, N. Zhou, Y. Sun, and Z. Shi, Phys. Rev. B 103, 144501 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    R. Beck, M. Booth, D. Farrell, J. Rice, and D. Ginsberg, Philosophical Magazine B 65, 1373 (1992)

    1992

  41. [49]

    K. Gray, R. Kampwirth, and D. Farrell, Physical Review B 41, 819 (1990)

    1990

  42. [50]

    X. Xu, W. Jiao, N. Zhou, Y. Li, B. Chen, C. Cao, J. Dai, A. Bangura, and G. Cao, Phys. Rev. B 89, 104517 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    See Supplemental Material at [] for angular dependence of the in-plane reversible torque, angular dependence of the out-of-plane reversible torque, temperature and field dependence of the resistivity for FeSe single crystal, the estimation of the superconducting coherence length ξc

  44. [52]

    Moore, J

    S. Moore, J. Curtis, C. Di Giorgio, E. Lechner, M. Abdel- Hafiez, O. Volkova, A. Vasiliev, D. Chareev, G. Kara- petrov, and M. Iavarone, Physical Review B 92, 235113 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Chareev, Y

    D. Chareev, Y. Ovchenkov, L. Shvanskaya, A. Koval- skii, M. Abdel-Hafiez, D. J. Trainer, E. M. Lechner, M. Iavarone, O. Volkova, and A. Vasiliev, CrystEng- Comm 20, 2449 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    Terashima, N

    T. Terashima, N. Kikugawa, A. Kiswandhi, E.-S. Choi, J. S. Brooks, S. Kasahara, T. Watashige, H. Ikeda, T. Shibauchi, Y. Matsuda, et al., Phys. Rev. B 90, 144517 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Watson, T

    M. Watson, T. Kim, L. Rhodes, M. Eschrig, M. Hoesch, A. Haghighirad, and A. Coldea, Phys. Rev. B 94, 201107 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    Y. Sun, S. Pyon, T. Tamegai, R. Kobayashi, T. Watashige, S. Kasahara, Y. Matsuda, T. Shibauchi, and H. Kitamura, Appl. Phys. Express 8, 113102 (2015)

    2015

  49. [57]

    Kasahara, H

    S. Kasahara, H. Shi, K. Hashimoto, S. Tonegawa, Y. Mizukami, T. Shibauchi, K. Sugimoto, T. Fukuda, T. Terashima, A. H. Nevidomskyy, et al., Nature 486, 382 (2012). Supplemental information 4 S3 Twin boundaries in FeSe Figs. S3(a) and (b) show the surface topology of the FeSe s...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.