Bulk thimbles dual to trace relations

Douglas Stanford; Ji Hoon Lee

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 4 cited by

Bulk thimbles dual to trace relations

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Maximal giant is an unstable saddle in the half-BPS path integral

desk verdict A clean, suggestive derivation of the negative term in the giant graviton expansion from the maximal giant's unstable saddle, with an exact match that is not yet fully justified beyond the quadratic truncation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20769 v1 pith:LWQHK45I submitted 2024-12-30 hep-th

Ji Hoon Lee , Douglas Stanford This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords giantgravitonexpansiontracerelationsLefschetzthimblehalf-BPSstatesunstablesaddleAdS/CFTWickrotationpartitionfunction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The half-BPS partition function of U(N) N=4 super Yang-Mills can be written as an infinite-N answer plus a series of negative corrections, the trace relations. This paper argues that those negative corrections have a concrete bulk origin: they come from the maximal giant graviton, a D3-brane wrapping the largest $S^{3}$ inside $S^{5}$, which enters the path integral as an unstable saddle point. Because the saddle is unstable, its Lefschetz thimble quantizes a phase space with two Wick-rotated coordinates, producing states with R-charge N+1, N+2, ... that contribute exactly $-q^{N+1}/(1-q)$. If this is correct, the finite-rank identities among traces of matrices are dual to ghost-like states living on the maximal giant's thimble.

What carries the argument

The engine is the quadratic Lagrangian around the maximal giant, $L = N(-1+\dot\phi) + \frac{r^2\dot\phi^2}{2} + \frac{\dot r^2}{2} + \frac{3}{2}r^2 - 2r^2\dot\phi$, together with the coordinate change (3.6) that recasts it as two decoupled harmonic oscillators. In these variables the BPS condition is simply that the second oscillator sits in its ground state, while the first oscillator's configuration space transmutes into a phase space $(X_1,P_1)$ in the Landau-level sense. The maximal giant's thimble is then the path integral over $(X_1,P_1)$ with both coordinates continued to imaginary values; its one-loop determinant is the infinite product that evaluates to $-q^{N+1}/(1-q)$. The paper also uses a $\mathbb{CP}^\infty$ phase-space model whose fixed-point saddles reproduce the full giant graviton expansion (4.1).

What would settle it

Evaluate the next terms in the worldvolume Lagrangian near the maximal giant (quartic and higher in $r$) and recompute the one-loop path integral; if the energies of the $R=N+1+n$ states shift or the infinite product (3.19) changes, the claimed exact equality with the trace-relation series fails. A simpler check is to compute the same thimble directly in the full giant-graviton action without truncation and see whether $-q^{N+1}/(1-q)$ survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in the bulk computation of $Z_{\rm BPS}(q)=\lim_{\beta\to\infty} \mathrm{Tr}(e^{-\beta(H-R)}q^R)$, the maximal giant graviton is not merely a boundary of the allowed field space but an unstable saddle point whose Lefschetz thimble must be included. Truncating the worldvolume Lagrangian to quadratic order near the maximal giant, the authors map the dynamics to two harmonic oscillators; the BPS states are the ground state of one oscillator tensored with arbitrary states of the other. The path integral over the thimble then evaluates exactly to $-q^{N+1}/(1-q)$, matching the negative term in the identity $1+q+\cdots+q^N = \frac{1}{1-q} - \frac{q^{N+1}}{1-q}$. The states on this thimble have $H-R=1$ and $R=N+1+n$, and the paper identifies them as bulk duals of trace-relation operators corresponding to Young columns taller than $N$.

Load-bearing premise

The quadratic truncation of the worldvolume Lagrangian around the maximal giant is assumed to compute the thimble contribution exactly for all states with $R=N+1+n$, even though the BPS condition forces $r$ to become arbitrarily large and imaginary; if higher-order terms reshuffle the spectrum at large $|r|$, the match to $-q^{N+1}/(1-q)$ would be an artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The baby example (1.2) is explained: the physical sum over single-column Young diagrams equals the infinite-$N$ answer minus a single contribution from the maximal giant's thimble.
The ghost states (3.22) with $R=N+1+n$ provide a Hilbert-space realization of trace relations, placing them on the same footing as physical giant graviton states.
The $\mathbb{CP}^\infty$ path-integral model gives each $k$-giant sector a saddle point whose unstable directions carry the $k$-giant open-string excitations, so the full giant graviton expansion becomes a sum over thimbles.
If the claim holds, finite-$N$ corrections in the half-BPS sector are not small fluctuations around the vacuum but genuine saddle-point contributions of unstable branes, with the sign of each correction determined by the number of Wick-rotated coordinates ($i^2=-1$).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The quadratic truncation is doing more work than the paper demonstrates: the final sum runs over states with arbitrarily large imaginary $r$, so the exact match with the trace-relation series would be explained by an all-orders cancellation; testing quartic and higher terms in the worldvolume action would settle whether the truncation is exact or merely asymptotically correct.
The same unstable-saddle mechanism may generalize to the 1/4- and 1/8-BPS chiral ring sectors mentioned in the paper, where the $\mathbb{CP}^\infty$ phase space is replaced by a higher-dimensional projective space and the sign pattern $(-1)^k q^{k(k+1)/2}$ would then survive in a similar thimble decomposition.
The connection between the thimble's minus sign ($i^2$) and the fermionic localization of appendix B suggests that a worldvolume supersymmetry, rather than analytic continuation alone, might be the fundamental reason the negative terms appear; this could give an independent derivation of the trace-relation corrections.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does something concrete: it shows the negative term in the giant graviton expansion, -q^{N+1}/(1-q), can be reproduced as the contribution of the maximal giant graviton viewed as an unstable saddle of the half-BPS partition function. The Lefschetz thimble quantizes an imaginary phase space, and the resulting ghost states are proposed as bulk duals of trace relations. The Section 3 calculation is careful and the match is exact, including the infinite series. The CP^infinity path integral in Section 4 is an elegant independent model that reproduces the full expansion via equivariant localization.

The main soft spot is the one the reader flagged: the quadratic truncation around the maximal giant is used to generate the whole tail of the negative term, but the corresponding states have large imaginary r, outside the regime where the truncation is controlled. The paper acknowledges the description breaks down at low energies, but it does not show that higher-order terms in the D3 action leave the one-loop thimble answer unchanged. So the exact match might be an artifact of the quadratic approximation, or it might be protected by the same mechanism that makes the CP^infinity model one-loop exact. The paper does not settle this. It is a gap, not a fatal flaw: the leading term and the mechanism are still meaningful, and the CP^infinity model gives independent support.

There are also softer issues: the identification of individual ghost states with specific trace relations is asserted rather than derived, and the CP^infinity model is not shown to follow from the D3-brane path integral. The paper stays in the half-BPS sector, so the scope is limited.

But the paper does real work: it corrects a misidentification in Lee's earlier paper, gives a clear classical analysis of the unstable saddle and its Stokes multiplier, and proposes a concrete Hilbert-space interpretation for the ghost states. Anyone working on finite-N corrections to AdS/CFT or on the giant graviton expansion should read it. It deserves a serious referee, who should ask the authors to justify or soften the claim that the quadratic truncation captures the full infinite series, and to say more about how the D3 path integral could reduce to the CP^infinity model.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a bulk explanation for the negative terms in the half-BPS giant graviton expansion, specifically the term -q^{N+1}/(1-q) in the single-column partition function. The authors study the maximal giant graviton in AdS5 x S5 and argue that, in the path integral computing Z_BPS(q), this configuration is an unstable saddle. Its Lefschetz thimble quantizes a phase space with two Wick-rotated coordinates, producing ghost-like states with R = N+1+n. In Section 3, a quadratic truncation of the D3-brane action is mapped to two harmonic oscillators and the thimble path integral is evaluated using zeta-regularized infinite products, yielding exactly -q^{N+1}/(1-q). In Section 4, a CP^infinity path integral model with N monopoles is shown to reproduce the full giant graviton expansion as a sum over fixed points, each identified with k coincident maximal giants. The paper concludes that the negative terms in the expansion have a bulk origin in unstable saddles and their Wick-rotated fluctuations.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper supplies a concrete bulk mechanism for trace relations: they appear as ghost states from the quantization of the Lefschetz thimble attached to the maximal giant. The explicit match of the Section 3 computation with the known expansion term is a genuine technical achievement, and the use of zeta-regularized infinite products in Eqs. (3.17)-(3.20) is careful. Appendix A provides a useful clarification of when unstable saddles contribute with Stokes multiplier one, and Section 4's equivariant localization computation is elegant and exactly reproduces the giant graviton expansion. However, the main physical conclusion rests on the validity of the quadratic truncation for arbitrarily large imaginary fluctuations, which is not established in the manuscript.

major comments (3)

[Section 3, Eqs. (3.8), (3.16), (3.20)] The central computation uses the quadratic Lagrangian (2.6) to derive the infinite series -q^{N+1}/(1-q), but the states summed over have R = N+1+n and therefore, by (3.8), satisfy (X1^2+P1^2)/2 = -(n+1/2). For large n the relevant radial coordinate is imaginary with magnitude growing as sqrt(n), far outside the small-r regime in which (2.6) was derived. The authors themselves note after Eq. (3.9) that the description 'breaks down for lower energies' and is accurate only near R~N. Since the exact term-by-term match to the trace-relation series relies on the quadratic Hamiltonian for all n, the paper needs to justify that higher-order terms in r do not correct the spectrum or the one-loop determinant on this thimble. Without such a demonstration, the exact match may be an artifact of the truncation.
[Section 3, Eq. (3.15)] The replacement of H-R by H-R-1 is introduced to correct the zero-point energy of the truncated system, with the correction attributed to other fluctuation modes in [17]. This shift is essential: without it, the projected partition function would be multiplied by q, spoiling the match. The paper should explicitly state whether this shift also affects the excited ghost states (3.22), and whether the same shift is justified uniformly for all R, including the large-R states that dominate the tail of the series. If the shift is only valid near R~N, the infinite sum again becomes uncontrolled.
[Section 4, Eqs. (4.15)-(4.30)] The CP^infinity model is presented as a 'model', and the paper does not show that the full D3-brane path integral reduces to this model. The exact match of (4.30) with the giant graviton expansion is a property of equivariant localization on CP^infinity, not a derivation from the bulk worldvolume action. The claim that the k-th saddle 'has the bulk interpretation' of k coincident maximal giants is therefore an interpretation rather than a derivation. This limits the scope of Section 4, though it does not by itself invalidate the Section 3 computation.

minor comments (3)

[Section 3, Eq. (3.21)] The regularized infinite products used in (3.21), in particular the product over all integers n, deserve a more explicit definition or a reference to the zeta-regularization scheme; the current presentation may confuse readers unfamiliar with this technique.
[Section 1, Eq. (1.5)] The definition Z_BPS(q) = lim_{beta->infinity} Tr(e^{-beta(H-R)} q^R) is used throughout, but the paper does not discuss convergence of the trace over the full Hilbert space for |q|<1; a brief remark on the domain of q would be helpful.
[Section 4, around Eq. (4.25)] The determinant factors in (4.25) are stated with a terse derivation; expanding the intermediate steps for the unstable modes would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the thimble computation in Section 3 is self-contained, and the trace-relation series enters only as the final matching check.

full rationale

We walked the claimed derivation chain and found no step in which a prediction is equivalent, by construction or by self-citation, to its input. The central result is obtained by expanding the standard giant-graviton Lagrangian (2.4) near the maximal giant to get (2.6), mapping the truncated Hamiltonian (2.10) to two oscillators via (3.2)-(3.8), and evaluating the phase-space path integral (3.16). The only adjustable-looking quantity is the zero-point energy subtraction in (3.15), but it is fixed by the oscillator spectrum H-R = X_2^2+P_2^2 and is independently supported by the Casimir computation in [17]; it is not fitted to -q^{N+1}/(1-q). The Gaussian integrals and zeta-regulated products (3.21) are standard, and the target series appears only after the computation as the statement 'The final answer matches the negative term in (1.3)'. Similarly, the classical contribution (2.18)-(2.19) is an independent endpoint/thimble evaluation. Section 4 starts from the CP^∞ phase space whose quantization was already known from [19,20], so reproducing the expansion (4.30) is a consistency check, not a round-trip of the target. We also flag, as a non-circular validity concern, the authors' own caveat after (3.9) that the quadratic description 'breaks down for lower energies'; the ghost states (3.22) lie at large imaginary r, so the exactness of the truncated sum is a physical approximation issue, not a logical circularity. Footnote 7 corrects [1] but does not use it as evidence, and no argument here reduces to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's derivations rely on standard string-theory inputs (D3 action, known CP^infinity phase space for giants) and standard localization/thimble mathematics. No numbers are fitted to data; q and N are variables. The main load-bearing input that is not derived in the paper is the reduction to the two-mode system and the CP^infinity phase space.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The D3-brane worldvolume action (2.3) with the ansatz (2.4) correctly describes the half-BPS giant graviton sector.
Used in Section 2 to derive the Lagrangian (2.4). This is a standard string-theory input, not derived in the paper.
domain assumption Fluctuations of the maximal giant other than the r, phi modes have a gap in H-R and decouple in the beta -> infinity limit.
Invoked in Section 2, paragraph 'This ansatz is capable...' citing [18] table 2. Load-bearing for reducing to a two-dimensional phase space.
domain assumption The phase space of D3 giant gravitons is CP^infinity with symplectic form (2 pi N) omega_FS.
From [19,20], used in Section 4 to set up the path integral model. The paper does not derive this from the D3 action.
standard math Lefschetz thimble decomposition and the Stokes multiplier prescription for real beta (average of +/- imaginary beta) give the contribution of the unstable saddle.
Appendix A, following Witten [27]. The paper addresses the Stokes line ambiguity and chooses the average, yielding zero for odd d and one for even d.
standard math Duistermaat-Heckman localization makes the CP^m path integral one-loop exact.
Section 4, citing [23,24,25]. Standard localization theorem.

invented entities (1)

Ghost states of the maximal giant (3.22)
purpose: Said to be the bulk duals of trace relations, responsible for the negative terms in the half-BPS partition function.
The only evidence provided is that these states have R = N+1+n and H-R = 1, matching the quantum numbers of the negative contributions. No independent bulk or boundary computation (e.g., overlap with boundary trace-relation operators) is given.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bulk thimbles dual to trace relations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LWQHK45I

@misc{pith2026241220769,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bulk thimbles dual to trace relations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LWQHK45I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20769}
}

abstract

The maximal giant graviton is a D-brane wrapping a maximal $S^3\subset S^5$ within $\text{AdS}_5\times S^5$. It represents an upper bound on the $R$ charge that can be carried by certain bulk states. We study the maximal giant and its half-BPS fluctuations, motivated by a recent proposal \cite{Lee:2023iil} connecting these fluctuations to trace relations in the boundary theory. In a computation of the partition function of half-BPS states, we find that the maximal giant is an unstable saddle point and that its Lefschetz thimble corresponds to the quantization of an imaginary phase space. The states resulting from the quantization of this phase space contribute negatively to the partition function and can be regarded as bulk duals of trace relations. Finally, we study a model for a path integral that would connect together components of the bulk half-BPS field space with different numbers of giants.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20769 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Localization and wall-crossing of giant graviton expansions in AdS$_5$
hep-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The 1/2-BPS giant graviton expansions for U(N), SO(2k+1), Sp(k), and SO(2k) N=4 SYM are derived from supersymmetric localization of D3-branes in AdS5, with the analytic continuation explained as wall-crossing in a Lan...
The giant graviton expansion in AdS$_5\times$SE$_5$
hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Giant-graviton fluctuations on AdS5 imes SE5 are governed by a conical Fock-Darwin system whose lowest Landau level yields the protected finite-N index of the dual N=1 SCFT for T1,1.
Quiver superconformal index and giant gravitons: asymptotics and expansions
hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

For toric quiver theories, coefficients of the large-N superconformal index grow like exp(constant*sqrt(n)) times n^((m-5)/4) for the A-hat_m family, with polynomial growth for dP3 and Y^{p,0}.
A Brief Note on Complex AdS-Schwarzschild Black Holes
hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Complex AdS-Schwarzschild saddles that naively dominate low-temperature holographic partition functions are argued, in a mini-superspace model, not to contribute, preserving thermal AdS as the correct saddle.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

[17]

Large N Schur index of N = 4 SYM from semiclassical D3 brane,

M. Beccaria and A. Cabo-Bizet, “Large N Schur index of N = 4 SYM from semiclassical D3 brane,” JHEP 04 (2024) 110, arXiv:2402.12172 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024
[1]

Trace relations and open string vacua,

J. H. Lee, “Trace relations and open string vacua,” JHEP 02 (2024) 224, arXiv:2312.00242 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024
[2]

Exact correlators of g iant gravitons from dual N=4 SYM theory,

S. Corley, A. Jevicki, and S. Ramgoolam, “Exact correlators of g iant gravitons from dual N=4 SYM theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 5 (2002) 809–839, arXiv:hep-th/0111222

arXiv 2002
[3]

Giant gravitons in conformal ﬁeld theory,

V. Balasubramanian, M. Berkooz, A. Naqvi, and M. J. Strassler, “Giant gravitons in conformal ﬁeld theory,” JHEP 04 (2002) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0107119

arXiv 2002
[4]

The giant graviton expansion,

D. Gaiotto and J. H. Lee, “The giant graviton expansion,” JHEP 08 (2024) 025, arXiv:2109.02545 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024
[5]

Finite-N superconformal index via the AdS/CFT co rrespondence,

Y. Imamura, “Finite-N superconformal index via the AdS/CFT co rrespondence,” PTEP 2021 no. 12, (2021) 123B05, arXiv:2108.12090 [hep-th]

arXiv 2021
[6]

Finite N Corrections to the Superconformal Index of S-fold Theories,

R. Arai and Y. Imamura, “Finite N Corrections to the Superconformal Index of S-fold Theories,” PTEP 2019 no. 8, (2019) 083B04, arXiv:1904.09776 [hep-th]

arXiv 2019
[7]

Schur index of th e N = 4 U(N) supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory via the AdS/CFT correspondenc e,

R. Arai, S. Fujiwara, Y. Imamura, and T. Mori, “Schur index of th e N = 4 U(N) supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory via the AdS/CFT correspondenc e,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 8, (2020) 086017, arXiv:2001.11667 [hep-th]

arXiv 2020

Show all 28 references

[8]

Exact stringy microstates from gauge theories,

J. H. Lee, “Exact stringy microstates from gauge theories,” JHEP 11 (2022) 137, arXiv:2204.09286 [hep-th] . 19

2022 arXiv
[9]

Unitary matrix models, free fermions, and the giant graviton expansion,

S. Murthy, “Unitary matrix models, free fermions, and the giant graviton expansion,” Pure Appl. Math. Quart. 19 no. 1, (2023) 299–340, arXiv:2202.06897 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[10]

Finite N indices and the giant gravito n expansion,

J. T. Liu and N. J. Rajappa, “Finite N indices and the giant gravito n expansion,” JHEP 04 (2023) 078, arXiv:2212.05408 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[11]

Comments on the Giant-Graviton Expansion of t he Superconformal Index,

D. S. Eniceicu, “Comments on the Giant-Graviton Expansion of t he Superconformal Index,” arXiv:2302.04887 [hep-th]

arXiv
[12]

Giant graviton expansion f rom eigenvalue instantons,

Y. Chen, R. Mahajan, and H. Tang, “Giant graviton expansion f rom eigenvalue instantons,” arXiv:2407.08155 [hep-th]

arXiv
[13]

Invasion of the g iant gravitons from Anti-de Sitter space,

J. McGreevy, L. Susskind, and N. Toumbas, “Invasion of the g iant gravitons from Anti-de Sitter space,” JHEP 06 (2000) 008, arXiv:hep-th/0003075

2000 arXiv
[14]

SUSY and goliath,

M. T. Grisaru, R. C. Myers, and O. Tafjord, “SUSY and goliath,” JHEP 08 (2000) 040, arXiv:hep-th/0008015

2000 arXiv
[15]

Bubbling AdS space and 1/ 2 BPS geometries,

H. Lin, O. Lunin, and J. M. Maldacena, “Bubbling AdS space and 1/ 2 BPS geometries,” JHEP 10 (2004) 025, arXiv:hep-th/0409174

2004 arXiv
[16]

The giant gravito n expansion in AdS5 ×S5,

G. Eleftheriou, S. Murthy, and M. Rossell´ o, “The giant gravito n expansion in AdS5 ×S5,” arXiv:2312.14921 [hep-th]

arXiv
[18]

One-loop quantization of Eu clidean D3-branes in holographic backgrounds,

F. F. Gautason and J. van Muiden, “One-loop quantization of Eu clidean D3-branes in holographic backgrounds,” JHEP 06 (2024) 073, arXiv:2402.16779 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[19]

Supersymmetr ic states of N=4 Yang-Mills from giant gravitons,

I. Biswas, D. Gaiotto, S. Lahiri, and S. Minwalla, “Supersymmetr ic states of N=4 Yang-Mills from giant gravitons,” JHEP 12 (2007) 006, arXiv:hep-th/0606087

2007 arXiv
[20]

BPS branes from baryons,

C. E. Beasley, “BPS branes from baryons,” JHEP 11 (2002) 015, arXiv:hep-th/0207125

2002 arXiv
[21]

Review of localization in geometry,

V. Pestun, “Review of localization in geometry,” J. Phys. A 50 no. 44, (2017) 443002, arXiv:1608.02954 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[22]

Giant gravitons from holomorphic surfaces,

A. Mikhailov, “Giant gravitons from holomorphic surfaces,” JHEP 11 (2000) 027, arXiv:hep-th/0010206

2000 arXiv
[23]

On the Variation in the co homology of the symplectic form of the reduced phase space,

J. J. Duistermaat and G. J. Heckman, “On the Variation in the co homology of the symplectic form of the reduced phase space,” Invent. Math. 69 (1982) 259–268

1982
[24]

Equivariant localization of path integrals,

R. J. Szabo, “Equivariant localization of path integrals,” arXiv:hep-th/9608068

arXiv
[25]

Fermionic Localization of the Schwa rzian Theory,

D. Stanford and E. Witten, “Fermionic Localization of the Schwa rzian Theory,” JHEP 10 (2017) 008, arXiv:1703.04612 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[26]

Strings from Feynman Diagrams,

R. Gopakumar, R. Kaushik, S. Komatsu, E. A. Mazenc, and D. S arkar, “Strings from Feynman Diagrams,” arXiv:2412.13397 [hep-th] . 20

arXiv
[27]

Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory,

E. Witten, “Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory,” AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. 50 (2011) 347–446, arXiv:1001.2933 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[28]

Uniform asymptotic smoothing of stokes’s discon tinuities,

M. V. Berry, “Uniform asymptotic smoothing of stokes’s discon tinuities,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sc iences 422 no. 1862, (1989) 7–21. 21

1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [17]

Large N Schur index of N = 4 SYM from semiclassical D3 brane,

M. Beccaria and A. Cabo-Bizet, “Large N Schur index of N = 4 SYM from semiclassical D3 brane,” JHEP 04 (2024) 110, arXiv:2402.12172 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024

[2] [1]

Trace relations and open string vacua,

J. H. Lee, “Trace relations and open string vacua,” JHEP 02 (2024) 224, arXiv:2312.00242 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024

[3] [2]

Exact correlators of g iant gravitons from dual N=4 SYM theory,

S. Corley, A. Jevicki, and S. Ramgoolam, “Exact correlators of g iant gravitons from dual N=4 SYM theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 5 (2002) 809–839, arXiv:hep-th/0111222

arXiv 2002

[4] [3]

Giant gravitons in conformal ﬁeld theory,

V. Balasubramanian, M. Berkooz, A. Naqvi, and M. J. Strassler, “Giant gravitons in conformal ﬁeld theory,” JHEP 04 (2002) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0107119

arXiv 2002

[5] [4]

The giant graviton expansion,

D. Gaiotto and J. H. Lee, “The giant graviton expansion,” JHEP 08 (2024) 025, arXiv:2109.02545 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024

[6] [5]

Finite-N superconformal index via the AdS/CFT co rrespondence,

Y. Imamura, “Finite-N superconformal index via the AdS/CFT co rrespondence,” PTEP 2021 no. 12, (2021) 123B05, arXiv:2108.12090 [hep-th]

arXiv 2021

[7] [6]

Finite N Corrections to the Superconformal Index of S-fold Theories,

R. Arai and Y. Imamura, “Finite N Corrections to the Superconformal Index of S-fold Theories,” PTEP 2019 no. 8, (2019) 083B04, arXiv:1904.09776 [hep-th]

arXiv 2019

[8] [7]

Schur index of th e N = 4 U(N) supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory via the AdS/CFT correspondenc e,

R. Arai, S. Fujiwara, Y. Imamura, and T. Mori, “Schur index of th e N = 4 U(N) supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory via the AdS/CFT correspondenc e,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 8, (2020) 086017, arXiv:2001.11667 [hep-th]

arXiv 2020