Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 179 references

Enhancing Spectroscopy and Microscopy with Emerging Methods in Photon-Correlation and Quantum Illumination

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that photon-correlation and quantum-illumination methods are moving from proof-of-principle demonstrations to practical nanoscale characterization tools in spectroscopy and microscopy.

desk verdict A genuinely useful review that does the synthesis job well, with a slightly over-optimistic 'real-world use' framing that the authors themselves mostly concede. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21356 v1 pith:E2GKF4UY submitted 2025-07-28 physics.optics quant-ph

Chieh Tsao , Haonan Ling , Alex Hinkle , Yifan Chen , Keshav Kumar Jha , Zhen-Li Yan , Hendrik Utzat This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords photoncorrelationquantumilluminationsuper-resolutionmicroscopyentangledpairssingle-photondetectorssub-shot-noiseimagingHong-Ou-Mandelinterferometryphoton-number-resolvedspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that quantum optical methods, especially photon correlations and illumination with engineered quantum light, are moving from proof-of-principle physics into practical nanoscale characterization. It surveys two broad strategies: analyzing the photon statistics of sample emission, and illuminating samples with quantum states whose correlations are defined in advance. The authors claim that recent detector advances, including time-tagged single-photon cameras and superconducting nanowire arrays, together with brighter entangled-photon sources, are what make this transition possible. If true, the payoff is new observables in materials science and biology: super-resolution without high laser power, measurements below classical shot noise, and photon-number-resolved spectra of multi-exciton states.

What carries the argument

The workhorses are the second-order photon-correlation function $g^{(2)}(\tau)$ measured in Hanbury Brown-Twiss setups and its higher-order and spatially resolved extensions, along with the quantum states used for illumination: spontaneous parametric down-conversion photon pairs, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, N00N states, and squeezed light. These objects carry the argument because every surveyed method is either a correlation measurement on emitted photons or a demonstration of a defined quantum state of light interacting with a sample; detector arrays and bright entangled-photon sources are presented as the enabling technology that turns these concepts into practical instruments.

What would settle it

A systematic comparative replication would settle the central claim: for each reported quantum advantage, such as entangled two-photon microscopy at six orders of magnitude lower flux, sub-shot-noise imaging with heralded photons, or squeezed-light Raman at 1.3 dB below shot noise, run the same measurement with optimized classical illumination at equal power and detection efficiency; if classical controls match the quantum signal-to-noise in every case, the review's narrative of practical quantum advantage fails. For the photon-number-resolved claims, recompute the $g^{(3)}$ scaling after correcting for SPAD crosstalk and dark counts to see whether the reported deviation from the exciton collision model persists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that photon-correlation and quantum-illumination techniques have reached a stage where they deliver demonstrated practical advantages in microscopy, spectroscopy, and metrology, rather than serving only as fundamental tests of quantum mechanics. The review organizes the field into two complementary approaches: resolving temporal, spatial, and spectral photon correlations from sample emission, and illuminating samples with quantum light of defined correlations. Across these approaches it collects concrete demonstrations—intensity-fluctuation and antibunching microscopy narrowing the point-spread function by factors of $\sqrt{n}$, entangled two-photon fluorescence imaging working at roughly six orders of magnitude lower photon flux than classical two-photon excitation, Hong-Ou-Mandel microscopy giving micrometer-level depth profiles with dispersion cancellation, sub-shot-noise imaging and squeezed-light Raman microscopy reducing noise below classical limits, and N00N-state phase measurements improving sensitivity over the standard quantum limit.

Load-bearing premise

The synthesis assumes that the roughly 178 cited experimental demonstrations and their physical interpretations are accurate and representative; if key headline results, such as entangled two-photon absorption rate enhancements or sub-shot-noise imaging, turn out to have classical explanations or fail to replicate, the case for practical quantum advantage weakens.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Photon-correlation microscopy can now achieve super-resolution factors of $\sqrt{n}$ without increasing illumination power, which is valuable for light-sensitive biological samples.
  • Entangled two-photon excitation in demonstrated cases requires roughly six orders of magnitude lower photon flux than classical two-photon excitation, reducing photobleaching and sample damage.
  • Hong-Ou-Mandel phase microscopy yields label-free depth profiles with micrometer precision and is robust to dispersion, making it suitable for fluctuating biological samples.
  • Sub-shot-noise and squeezed-light illumination improve signal-to-noise ratio when classical power is limited, as in the demonstrated 1.3 dB noise reduction in stimulated Raman microscopy.
  • Photon-number-resolved spectroscopy with SPAD arrays accesses multi-exciton states and biexciton binding energies that classical spectroscopy cannot cleanly resolve.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The detector roadmap implies a convergence: once superconducting nanowire arrays become affordable, many SPAD-prototyped methods such as spectrally resolved photon correlation and correlation imaging could gain an order of magnitude in efficiency, shifting the bottleneck to data bandwidth and real-time analysis.
  • The review's own emphasis on classical-versus-quantum SNR comparisons suggests a testable rule: quantum illumination will matter most where peak power rather than total flux is constrained, such as avoiding photodamage or ohmic heating, rather than as a universal replacement for classical light.
  • A near-term falsifiable check on the field's trajectory is whether photon-number-resolved spectroscopy becomes a routine materials-science tool; if detector costs stay prohibitive and crosstalk degrades higher-order correlations, practical impact will concentrate in a few high-value niches.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review surveys recent advances in photon-correlation spectroscopy and microscopy, as well as quantum illumination methods, positioning them as moving beyond proof-of-principle toward practical nanoscale characterization. It covers second- and higher-order correlation measurements using emerging single-photon detector arrays and SNSPDs, super-resolution techniques (SOFI, antibunching microscopy, SFSR), cathodoluminescence correlations, and quantum illumination schemes including heralded spectroscopy, entangled two-photon microscopy, HOM interferometry, ghost/heralded imaging, imaging with undetected photons, N00N states, hyperentangled pairs, and squeezed light. The Outlook discusses detector maturity, source brightness, data throughput, and the need for fair classical/quantum benchmarks.

Significance. If the surveyed trends hold, this review provides a timely and valuable cross-disciplinary synthesis that could help bridge quantum optics and applied spectroscopy/microscopy. Its strengths are its breadth, its balanced treatment of debated points (e.g., noting the statistical explanation for entangled two-photon absorption enhancement in ref. 103), the explicit caveats about detector limitations in the Outlook, and its concrete suggestions for future work, including the need for classical performance comparisons. The paper is a compendium of published results rather than a new derivation, so its value lies in accessibility and organization; it does not appear to contain internal contradictions, and the authors' own work (ref. 90) is cited without undue emphasis.

major comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] The claim in the Introduction that photon-correlation and quantum-illumination methods are 'increasingly moving beyond proof-of-principle toward real-world use' is stronger than the surveyed evidence strictly supports: the cited demonstrations (e.g., wasp-wing ghost imaging, ref. 116; Q-ISM on 3T3 cells, ref. 89; squeezed-light Raman on yeast, ref. 140; mid-IR IUP on mouse heart, ref. 126) are single-lab proof-of-concept studies, and the Outlook correctly lists unresolved challenges (detector cost and maturity, crosstalk, and the absence of fair classical-vs-quantum comparisons). I recommend either softening the wording to 'initial applications to biological and materials specimens' or adding a brief operational definition of 'real-world use' (e.g., independent replication, adoption by non-specialists, or commercial availability) along with a mapping of which, if any, of the surveyed methods meet those criteria. This would make the central thesis more precise without changing the review's overall message.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Photon coincidence microscopy] The word 'bunding' should be 'bunching' in the sentence 'thermal light, which shows thermal distribution in photon statistics and bunding at g(2)(0)'.
  2. [Imaging with undetected photons] The phrase 'This imaging without photon detection can be leverage d to capture mid-infrared images' contains a typo ('leverage d' should be 'leveraged') and could be reworded to clarify that it is the idler photons that are not detected, while signal photons are detected.
  3. [Hong-Ou-Mandel interference in microscopy and spectroscopy] The statement that the HOM dip shape remains unchanged under dispersion is only valid in the weak-dispersion regime; adding a qualifier such as 'for weakly dispersive samples' would improve accuracy.
  4. [Fig. 3b caption] The caption states 'The pixel pitch is 150 μm' without specifying whether this refers to the detector array or the reconstructed image; please clarify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the review's claims rest on independent external demonstrations, with one incidental self-citation that is not load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper is a literature review rather than a derivation chain. It surveys roughly 178 external experimental and theoretical results and organizes them around two themes: analyzing sample emission photon statistics and illuminating samples with quantum light. The central claim—that photon-correlation and quantum-illumination methods are increasingly moving beyond proof-of-principle toward real-world use—is supported by citations to independent groups, including wasp-wing ghost imaging (ref. 116), Q-ISM imaging of 3T3 cells (ref. 89), squeezed-light Raman microscopy of yeast (ref. 140), mid-IR imaging with undetected photons of a mouse heart (ref. 126), HOM phase microscopy (ref. 110), and N00N-state DIC microscopy (ref. 130). No equation in the paper is fitted to data; the only equations are the textbook definitions of g(2), the HOM effect, the SPDC process, and N00N states. There is no fitted parameter later renamed as a prediction, no self-citation chain invoked to forbid alternative interpretations, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation to prior work. The single self-citation, ref. 90 for SFSR, appears as one example among many in a survey of super-resolution methods; it is not load-bearing because the review's thesis does not depend on SFSR specifically. Moreover, the Outlook explicitly concedes remaining limitations, including the need for fair classical-versus-quantum comparisons, the high cost of SNSPD arrays, and the immaturity of visible entangled-photon sources. These caveats show that the review is not asserting its conclusion by definition or by circular argument. The score is therefore 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, the paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its implicit axioms are the trustworthiness of the cited literature and the correctness of standard quantum-optics formalism.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The cited experimental results are accurately reported by their original authors.
    The review's synthesis depends on the reliability of roughly 178 cited works; if key results are flawed, the narrative weakens.
  • standard math Standard quantum-optics definitions and formulas (g(2), HOM, N00N, squeezing) are correct as presented.
    The review uses textbook definitions; no new mathematical framework is introduced.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancing Spectroscopy and Microscopy with Emerging Methods in Photon-Correlation and Quantum Illumination." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E2GKF4UY

@misc{pith2026250721356,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancing Spectroscopy and Microscopy with Emerging Methods in Photon-Correlation and Quantum Illumination},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E2GKF4UY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21356}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum optics has driven major advances in our ability to generate and detect correlations between individual photons. Its principles are now increasingly translated into nanoscale characterization techniques, enhancing spectroscopy, microscopy, and metrology. In this Review, we highlight rapid progress in the field driven by advances in single-photon detectors and quantum light sources, including time-resolved single-photon counting cameras, superconducting nanowire detectors, and increasingly bright sources of entangled photons. We emphasize emerging applications in super-resolution microscopy, measurements below classical noise limits, and photon-number-resolved spectroscopy-a powerful paradigm for probing nanoscale electronic materials and molecular dynamics. We conclude by outlining key technological challenges and future opportunities across materials science and bio-nanophotonics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

179 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D., Fan, J., Migdall, A

    Eisaman, M. D., Fan, J., Migdall, A. & Polyakov, S. V. Invited Review Article: Single- photon sources and detectors. Review of Scientific Instruments 82, 071101 (2011)

    2011

  2. [2]

    Cusini, I. et al. Historical Perspectives, State of art and Research Trends of Single Photon Avalanche Diodes and Their Applications (Part 1: Single Pixels). Frontiers in Physics 10, (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Cusini, I. et al. Historical Perspectives, State of Art and Research Trends of SPAD Arrays and Their Applications (Part II: SPAD Arrays). Frontiers in Physics 10, (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Hadfield, R. H. et al. Single-photon detection for long-range imaging and sensing. Optica, OPTICA 10, 1124–1141 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for quantum information

    You, L. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for quantum information. Nanophotonics 9, 2673–2692 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Esmaeil Zadeh, I. et al. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state-of-the-art, future developments, and applications. Applied Physics Letters 118, 190502 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    A., Verma, V

    Lau, J. A., Verma, V. B., Schwarzer, D. & Wodtke, A. M. Superconducting single-photon detectors in the mid-infrared for physical chemistry and spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 52, 921–941 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    & Ling, A

    Anwar, A., Perumangatt, C., Steinlechner, F., Jennewein, T. & Ling, A. Entangled photon-pair sources based on three-wave mixing in bulk crystals. Review of Scientific Instruments 92, 041101 (2021)

    2021

Show all 179 references
  1. [9]

    Orieux, A., Versteegh, M. A. M., Jöns, K. D. & Ducci, S. Semiconductor devices for entangled photon pair generation: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076001 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Schimpf, C. et al. Quantum dots as potential sources of strongly entangled photons: Perspectives and challenges for applications in quantum networks. Applied Physics Letters 118, 100502 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    & Sharma, A

    Achar, S., Kundu, A., Chilukoti, A. & Sharma, A. Single and entangled photon pair generation using atomic vapors for quantum communication applications. Front. Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Ceccarelli, F. et al. Recent Advances and Future Perspectives of Single-Photon Avalanche Diodes for Quantum Photonics Applications. Advanced Quantum Technologies 4, 2000102 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    M., Tanner, M

    Natarajan, C. M., Tanner, M. G. & Hadfield, R. H. Superconducting nanowire single- photon detectors: physics and applications. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25, 063001 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Lubin, G. et al. Quantum correlation measurement with single photon avalanche diode arrays. Opt. Express 27, 32863 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Lubin, G. et al. Heralded Spectroscopy Reveals Exciton–Exciton Correlations in Single Colloidal Quantum Dots. Nano Lett. 21, 6756–6763 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Szoke, S., He, M., Hickam, B. P. & Cushing, S. K. Designing high-power, octave spanning entangled photon sources for quantum spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 244201 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Sultanov, V. et al. Tunable entangled photon-pair generation in a liquid crystal. Nature 631, 294–299 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    & Yallapragada, V

    Lubin, G., Oron, D., Rossman, U., Tenne, R. & Yallapragada, V. J. Photon Correlations in Spectroscopy and Microscopy. ACS Photonics 9, 2891–2904 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Stetefeld, J., McKenna, S. A. & Patel, T. R. Dynamic light scattering: a practical guide and applications in biomedical sciences. Biophys Rev 8, 409–427 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Enhanced Sensitivity of Photodetection via Quantum Illumination

    Lloyd, S. Enhanced Sensitivity of Photodetection via Quantum Illumination. Science 321, 1463–1465 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    & Roger, G

    Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. & Roger, G. Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804–1807 (1982)

    1982

  14. [22]

    Theoretical developments in cavity quantum optics: a brief review

    Meystre, P. Theoretical developments in cavity quantum optics: a brief review. Physics Reports 219, 243–262 (1992)

    1992

  15. [23]

    Srivathsan, B. et al. Narrow Band Source of Transform-Limited Photon Pairs via Four- Wave Mixing in a Cold Atomic Ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 123602 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    & Miller, B

    David, A. & Miller, B. Optical physics of quantum wells. in Quantum Dynamics of Simple Systems (eds. Oppo, G.-L., Barnett, S. M., Riis, E. & Wilkinson, M.) 239–266 (CRC Press, 2020). doi:10.1201/9781003072973-9

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    C., Alkauskas, A., Exarhos, A

    Bassett, L. C., Alkauskas, A., Exarhos, A. L. & Fu, K.-M. C. Quantum defects by design. Nanophotonics 8, 1867–1888 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Nano and Quantum Optics: An Introduction to Basic Principles and Theory

    Hohenester, U. Nano and Quantum Optics: An Introduction to Basic Principles and Theory. (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Defienne, H. et al. Advances in quantum imaging. Nat. Photon. 18, 1024–1036 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    J., Dagenais, M

    Kimble, H. J., Dagenais, M. & Mandel, L. Photon Antibunching in Resonance Fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 691–695 (1977)

    1977

  21. [29]

    W., Lane, S

    Hollars, C. W., Lane, S. M. & Huser, T. Controlled non-classical photon emission from single conjugated polymer molecules. Chemical Physics Letters 370, 393–398 (2003)

    2003

  22. [30]

    Kumar, P. et al. Photon Antibunching from Oriented Semiconducting Polymer Nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3376–3377 (2004)

    2004

  23. [31]

    He, Y.-M. et al. Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors. Nature Nanotech 10, 497–502 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    M., Beams, R

    Chakraborty, C., Kinnischtzke, L., Goodfellow, K. M., Beams, R. & Vamivakas, A. N. Voltage-controlled quantum light from an atomically thin semiconductor. Nature Nanotech 10, 507–511 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Koperski, M. et al. Single photon emitters in exfoliated WSe2 structures. Nature Nanotech 10, 503–506 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Srivastava, A. et al. Optically active quantum dots in monolayer WSe2. Nature Nanotech 10, 491–496 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    T., Bray, K., Ford, M

    Tran, T. T., Bray, K., Ford, M. J., Toth, M. & Aharonovich, I. Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nature Nanotech 11, 37–41 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Michler, P. et al. Quantum correlation among photons from a single quantum dot at room temperature. Nature 406, 968–970 (2000)

    2000

  29. [37]

    Somaschi, N. et al. Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state. Nature Photon 10, 340–345 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    & Bawendi, M

    Nair, G., Zhao, J. & Bawendi, M. G. Biexciton Quantum Yield of Single Semiconductor Nanocrystals from Photon Statistics. Nano Lett. 11, 1136–1140 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    Koley, S. et al. Photon correlations in colloidal quantum dot molecules controlled by the neck barrier. Matter 5, 3997–4014 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Zhu, H. et al. One-Dimensional Highly-Confined CsPbBr3 Nanorods with Enhanced Stability: Synthesis and Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 22, 8355–8362 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Ma, X. et al. Size-Dependent Biexciton Quantum Yields and Carrier Dynamics of Quasi- Two-Dimensional Core/Shell Nanoplatelets. ACS Nano 11, 9119–9127 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Mangum, B. D. et al. Influence of the core size on biexciton quantum yield of giant CdSe/CdS nanocrystals. Nanoscale 6, 3712–3720 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    & Grangier, P

    Brouri, R., Beveratos, A., Poizat, J.-P. & Grangier, P. Photon antibunching in the fluorescence of individual color centers in diamond. Opt. Lett. 25, 1294 (2000)

    2000

  36. [44]

    E., Orrit, M

    Basché, Th., Moerner, W. E., Orrit, M. & Talon, H. Photon antibunching in the fluorescence of a single dye molecule trapped in a solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1516– 1519 (1992)

    1992

  37. [45]

    Tamarat, P. et al. The dark exciton ground state promotes photon-pair emission in individual perovskite nanocrystals. Nat Commun 11, 6001 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    & Wild, U

    Fleury, L., Segura, J.-M., Zumofen, G., Hecht, B. & Wild, U. P. Nonclassical Photon Statistics in Single-Molecule Fluorescence at Room Temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1148–1151 (2000)

    2000

  39. [47]

    Dräbenstedt, A. et al. Low-temperature microscopy and spectroscopy on single defect centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 60, 11503–11508 (1999)

    1999

  40. [48]

    Dicke, R. H. Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes. Phys. Rev. 93, 99–110 (1954)

    1954

  41. [49]

    M., Daggett, E., Walther, V., Huang, L

    Lange, C. M., Daggett, E., Walther, V., Huang, L. & Hood, J. D. Superradiant and subradiant states in lifetime-limited organic molecules through laser-induced tuning. Nat. Phys. 20, 836–842 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    & Lugiato, L

    Bonifacio, R. & Lugiato, L. A. Cooperative radiation processes in two-level systems: Superfluorescence. Phys. Rev. A 11, 1507–1521 (1975)

    1975

  43. [51]

    & Lugiato, L

    Bonifacio, R. & Lugiato, L. A. Cooperative radiation processes in two-level systems: Superfluorescence. II. Phys. Rev. A 12, 587–598 (1975)

    1975

  44. [52]

    P., MacGillivray, J

    Skribanowitz, N., Herman, I. P., MacGillivray, J. C. & Feld, M. S. Observation of Dicke Superradiance in Optically Pumped HF Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 309–312 (1973)

    1973

  45. [53]

    & Wiersma, D

    Fidder, H., Knoester, J. & Wiersma, D. A. Superradiant emission and optical dephasing in J-aggregates. Chemical Physics Letters 171, 529–536 (1990)

    1990

  46. [54]

    G., Spano, F

    Lim, S.-H., Bjorklund, T. G., Spano, F. C. & Bardeen, C. J. Exciton Delocalization and Superradiance in Tetracene Thin Films and Nanoaggregates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 107402 (2004)

    2004

  47. [55]

    & Tubino, R

    Meinardi, F., Cerminara, M., Sassella, A., Bonifacio, R. & Tubino, R. Superradiance in Molecular H Aggregates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 247401 (2003)

    2003

  48. [56]

    Spano, F. C. The Spectral Signatures of Frenkel Polarons in H- and J-Aggregates. Acc. Chem. Res. 43, 429–439 (2010)

    2010

  49. [57]

    Z., Zheng, X

    Wang, H. Z., Zheng, X. G., Zhao, F. L., Gao, Z. L. & Yu, Z. X. Superradiance of High Density Frenkel Excitons at Room Temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4079–4082 (1995)

    1995

  50. [58]

    & van Grondelle, R

    Monshouwer, R., Abrahamsson, M., van Mourik, F. & van Grondelle, R. Superradiance and Exciton Delocalization in Bacterial Photosynthetic Light-Harvesting Systems. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 7241–7248 (1997)

    1997

  51. [59]

    Scheibner, M. et al. Superradiance of quantum dots. Nature Phys 3, 106–110 (2007)

    2007

  52. [60]

    Kim, J.-H., Aghaeimeibodi, S., Richardson, C. J. K., Leavitt, R. P. & Waks, E. Super- Radiant Emission from Quantum Dots in a Nanophotonic Waveguide. Nano Lett. 18, 4734–4740 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Grim, J. Q. et al. Scalable in operando strain tuning in nanophotonic waveguides enabling three-quantum-dot superradiance. Nat. Mater. 18, 963–969 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    Zhang, L. et al. New Insights into the Multiexciton Dynamics in Phase-Pure Thick-Shell CdSe/CdS Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 25059–25066 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    Zhu, C. et al. Single-photon superradiance in individual caesium lead halide quantum dots. Nature 1–7 (2024) doi:10.1038/s41586-023-07001-8

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    Huang, K. et al. Room-temperature upconverted superfluorescence. Nat. Photon. 16, 737–742 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    Sipahigil, A. et al. An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantum-optical networks. Science 354, 847–850 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    Rainò, G. et al. Superfluorescence from lead halide perovskite quantum dot superlattices. Nature 563, 671–675 (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    Findik, G. et al. High-temperature superfluorescence in methyl ammonium lead iodide. Nat. Photon. 15, 676–680 (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    Biliroglu, M. et al. Room-temperature superfluorescence in hybrid perovskites and its origins. Nat. Photon. 16, 324–329 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    Schedlbauer, J. et al. Tracking Exciton Diffusion and Exciton Annihilation in Single Nanoparticles of Conjugated Polymers by Photon Correlation Spectroscopy. Advanced Optical Materials 10, 2200092 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Hofkens, J. et al. Revealing competitive Förster-type resonance energy-transfer pathways in single bichromophoric molecules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 13146–13151 (2003)

    2003

  63. [71]

    & Orrit, M

    Bernard, J., Fleury, L., Talon, H. & Orrit, M. Photon bunching in the fluorescence from single molecules: A probe for intersystem crossing. The Journal of Chemical Physics 98, 850–859 (1993)

    1993

  64. [72]

    Hedley, G. J. et al. Picosecond time-resolved photon antibunching measures nanoscale exciton motion and the true number of chromophores. Nat Commun 12, 1327 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    J., Glancy, S., Nam, S

    Stevens, M. J., Glancy, S., Nam, S. W. & Mirin, R. P. Third-order antibunching from an imperfect single-photon source. Opt. Express 22, 3244 (2014)

    2014

  66. [74]

    Rundquist, A. et al. Nonclassical higher-order photon correlations with a quantum dot strongly coupled to a photonic-crystal nanocavity. Phys. Rev. A 90, 023846 (2014)

    2014

  67. [75]

    & Oron, D

    Amgar, D., Yang, G., Tenne, R. & Oron, D. Higher-Order Photon Correlation as a Tool To Study Exciton Dynamics in Quasi-2D Nanoplatelets. Nano Lett. 19, 8741–8748 (2019)

    2019

  68. [76]

    Frenkel, N. et al. Two Biexciton Types Coexisting in Coupled Quantum Dot Molecules. ACS Nano 17, 14990–15000 (2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    Lubin, G. et al. Resolving the Controversy in Biexciton Binding Energy of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals through Heralded Single-Particle Spectroscopy. ACS Nano 15, 19581–19587 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Wollman, E. E. et al. Kilopixel array of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Opt. Express 27, 35279 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Oripov, B. G. et al. A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels. Nature 622, 730–734 (2023)

    2023

  72. [80]

    Zasedatelev, A. V. et al. Single-photon nonlinearity at room temperature. Nature 597, 493–497 (2021)

    2021

  73. [81]

    Pei, J., Yang, J., Yildirim, T., Zhang, H. & Lu, Y. Many-Body Complexes in 2D Semiconductors. Advanced Materials 31, 1706945 (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    & Mukamel, S

    Gu, B. & Mukamel, S. Photon Correlation Signals in Coupled-Cavity Polaritons Created by Entangled Light. ACS Photonics 9, 938–943 (2022)

    2022

  75. [83]

    & Enderlein, J

    Dertinger, T., Colyer, R., Iyer, G., Weiss, S. & Enderlein, J. Fast, background-free, 3D super-resolution optical fluctuation imaging (SOFI). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 22287–22292 (2009)

    2009

  76. [84]

    & Weiss, S

    Dertinger, T., Colyer, R., Vogel, R., Enderlein, J. & Weiss, S. Achieving increased resolution and more pixels with Superresolution Optical Fluctuation Imaging (SOFI). Opt. Express 18, 18875 (2010)

    2010

  77. [85]

    Sroda, A. et al. SOFISM: Super-resolution optical fluctuation image scanning microscopy. Optica 7, 1308 (2020)

    2020

  78. [86]

    & Liu, X

    Zhao, G., Zheng, C., Kuang, C. & Liu, X. Resolution-enhanced SOFI via structured illumination. Opt. Lett. 42, 3956 (2017)

    2017

  79. [87]

    & Oron, D

    Schwartz, O. & Oron, D. Improved resolution in fluorescence microscopy using quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. A 85, 033812 (2012)

    2012

  80. [88]

    Schwartz, O. et al. Superresolution Microscopy with Quantum Emitters. Nano Lett. 13, 5832–5836 (2013)

    2013

  81. [89]

    Tenne, R. et al. Super-resolution enhancement by quantum image scanning microscopy. Nature Photon 13, 116–122 (2019)

    2019

  82. [90]

    & Utzat, H

    Chen, Y., Tsao, C., Cobb-Bruno, C. & Utzat, H. Stochastic frequency fluctuation super- resolution imaging. Opt. Express, OE 33, 6514–6525 (2025)

    2025

  83. [91]

    Meuret, S. et al. Nanoscale Relative Emission Efficiency Mapping Using Cathodoluminescence g(2) Imaging. Nano Lett. 18, 2288–2293 (2018)

    2018

  84. [92]

    Tizei, L. H. G. & Kociak, M. Spatially Resolved Quantum Nano-Optics of Single Photons Using an Electron Microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 153604 (2013)

    2013

  85. [93]

    Meuret, S. et al. Lifetime Measurements Well below the Optical Diffraction Limit. ACS Photonics 3, 1157–1163 (2016)

    2016

  86. [94]

    Yanagimoto, S. et al. Time-correlated electron and photon counting microscopy. Commun Phys 6, 1–9 (2023)

    2023

  87. [95]

    Rosławska, A. et al. Atomic-Scale Dynamics Probed by Photon Correlations. ACS Nano 14, 6366–6375 (2020)

    2020

  88. [96]

    & Akiba, K

    Yanagimoto, S., Yamamoto, N., Yuge, T., Sannomiya, T. & Akiba, K. Unveiling the nature of cathodoluminescence from photon statistics. Commun Phys 8, 56 (2025)

    2025

  89. [97]

    Meuret, S. et al. Photon Bunching in Cathodoluminescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 197401 (2015)

    2015

  90. [98]

    & Kfir, O

    Kazakevich, E., Aharon, H. & Kfir, O. On spatial electron-photon entanglement. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.18936 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  91. [99]

    P., He, M

    Harper, N., Hickam, B. P., He, M. & Cushing, S. K. Entangled Photon Correlations Allow a Continuous-Wave Laser Diode to Measure Single-Photon, Time-Resolved Fluorescence. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 5805–5811 (2023)

    2023

  92. [100]

    Eshun, A. et al. Fluorescence lifetime measurements using photon pair correlations generated via spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC). Opt. Express 31, 26935 (2023)

    2023

  93. [101]

    Li, Q. et al. Single-photon absorption and emission from a natural photosynthetic complex. Nature 619, 300–304 (2023)

    2023

  94. [102]

    P., Burdick, R

    Eshun, A., Varnavski, O., Villabona-Monsalve, J. P., Burdick, R. K. & Goodson, T. I. Entangled Photon Spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 991–1003 (2022)

    2022

  95. [103]

    P., He, M., Harper, N., Szoke, S

    Hickam, B. P., He, M., Harper, N., Szoke, S. & Cushing, S. K. Single-Photon Scattering Can Account for the Discrepancies among Entangled Two-Photon Measurement Techniques. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 4934–4940 (2022)

    2022

  96. [104]

    & Goodson, T

    Varnavski, O. & Goodson, T. I. Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy at Extremely Low Excitation Intensity: The Power of Quantum Correlations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 12966–12975 (2020)

    2020

  97. [105]

    M., Kwiat, P

    Steinberg, A. M., Kwiat, P. G. & Chiao, R. Y. Dispersion cancellation in a measurement of the single-photon propagation velocity in glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2421–2424 (1992)

    1992

  98. [106]

    (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2007)

    Multi-Photon Quantum Interference. (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2007). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-25554-5

    2007 doi

  99. [107]

    & Kang, H

    Ryu, J., Cho, K., Oh, C.-H. & Kang, H. All-order dispersion cancellation and energy- time entangled state. Opt. Express 25, 1360 (2017)

    2017

  100. [108]

    Okano, M. et al. Dispersion cancellation in high-resolution two-photon interference. Phys. Rev. A 88, 043845 (2013)

    2013

  101. [109]

    Lyons, A. et al. Attosecond-resolution Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometry. Science Advances 4, eaap9416 (2018)

    2018

  102. [110]

    Ndagano, B. et al. Quantum microscopy based on Hong–Ou–Mandel interference. Nat. Photon. 16, 384–389 (2022)

    2022

  103. [111]

    E., Asban, S., Gu, B

    Dorfman, K. E., Asban, S., Gu, B. & Mukamel, S. Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometry and spectroscopy using entangled photons. Commun Phys 4, 49 (2021)

    2021

  104. [112]

    Kalashnikov, D. A. et al. Quantum interference in the presence of a resonant medium. Sci Rep 7, 11444 (2017)

    2017

  105. [113]

    Eshun, A. et al. Investigations of Molecular Optical Properties Using Quantum Light and Hong–Ou–Mandel Interferometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 9070–9081 (2021)

    2021

  106. [114]

    & Padgett, M

    Gregory, T., Moreau, P.-A., Toninelli, E. & Padgett, M. J. Imaging through noise with quantum illumination. Science Advances 6, eaay2652 (2020)

    2020

  107. [115]

    Defienne, H., Reichert, M., Fleischer, J. W. & Faccio, D. Quantum image distillation. Science Advances 5, eaax0307 (2019)

    2019

  108. [116]

    A., Aspden, R

    Morris, P. A., Aspden, R. S., Bell, J. E. C., Boyd, R. W. & Padgett, M. J. Imaging with a small number of photons. Nat Commun 6, 5913 (2015)

    2015

  109. [117]

    & Ruo Berchera, I

    Brida, G., Genovese, M. & Ruo Berchera, I. Experimental realization of sub-shot- noise quantum imaging. Nature Photon 4, 227–230 (2010)

    2010

  110. [118]

    Aspden, R. S. et al. Photon-sparse microscopy: visible light imaging using infrared illumination. Optica 2, 1049 (2015)

    2015

  111. [119]

    Padgett, M. J. & Boyd, R. W. An introduction to ghost imaging: quantum and classical. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 375, 20160233 (2017)

    2017

  112. [120]

    Two-Photon

    Bennink, R. S., Bentley, S. J. & Boyd, R. W. “Two-Photon” Coincidence Imaging with a Classical Source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 113601 (2002)

    2002

  113. [121]

    & Lugiato, L

    Gatti, A., Brambilla, E., Bache, M. & Lugiato, L. A. Correlated imaging, quantum and classical. Phys. Rev. A 70, 013802 (2004)

    2004

  114. [122]

    & Shih, Y

    Karmakar, S. & Shih, Y. Two-color ghost imaging with enhanced angular resolving power. Phys. Rev. A 81, 033845 (2010)

    2010

  115. [123]

    & Shih, Y

    Valencia, A., Scarcelli, G., D’Angelo, M. & Shih, Y. Two-Photon Imaging with Thermal Light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 063601 (2005)

    2005

  116. [124]

    Lopaeva, E. D. et al. Experimental Realization of Quantum Illumination. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 153603 (2013)

    2013

  117. [125]

    Lemos, G. B. et al. Quantum imaging with undetected photons. Nature 512, 409– 412 (2014)

    2014

  118. [126]

    M., Avery, E

    Kviatkovsky, I., Chrzanowski, H. M., Avery, E. G., Bartolomaeus, H. & Ramelow, S. Microscopy with undetected photons in the mid-infrared. Science Advances 6, eabd0264 (2020)

    2020

  119. [127]

    Walther, P. et al. De Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state. Nature 429, 158–161 (2004)

    2004

  120. [128]

    L., Sasaki, K

    Nagata, T., Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K. & Takeuchi, S. Beating the Standard Quantum Limit with Four-Entangled Photons. Science 316, 726–729 (2007)

    2007

  121. [129]

    Dowling, J. P. Quantum optical metrology – the lowdown on high-N00N states. Contemporary Physics 49, 125–143 (2008)

    2008

  122. [130]

    & Takeuchi, S

    Ono, T., Okamoto, R. & Takeuchi, S. An entanglement-enhanced microscope. Nat Commun 4, 2426 (2013)

    2013

  123. [131]

    & Silberberg, Y

    Israel, Y., Rosen, S. & Silberberg, Y. Supersensitive Polarization Microscopy Using NOON States of Light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 103604 (2014)

    2014

  124. [132]

    Boto, A. N. et al. Quantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2733–2736 (2000)

    2000

  125. [133]

    Kok, P. et al. Quantum-interferometric optical lithography: Towards arbitrary two- dimensional patterns. Phys. Rev. A 63, 063407 (2001)

    2001

  126. [134]

    T., Langford, N

    Barreiro, J. T., Langford, N. K., Peters, N. A. & Kwiat, P. G. Generation of Hyperentangled Photon Pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260501 (2005)

    2005

  127. [135]

    Kwiat, P. G. Hyper-entangled states. Journal of Modern Optics 44, 2173–2184 (1997)

    1997

  128. [136]

    Zhang, Y. et al. Quantum imaging of biological organisms through spatial and polarization entanglement. Science Advances 10, eadk1495 (2024)

    2024

  129. [137]

    Camphausen, R. et al. A quantum-enhanced wide-field phase imager. Science Advances 7, eabj2155 (2021)

    2021

  130. [138]

    & Faccio, D

    Defienne, H., Ndagano, B., Lyons, A. & Faccio, D. Polarization entanglement- enabled quantum holography. Nat. Phys. 17, 591–597 (2021)

    2021

  131. [139]

    Aasi, J. et al. Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light. Nature Photon 7, 613–619 (2013)

    2013

  132. [140]

    Casacio, C. A. et al. Quantum-enhanced nonlinear microscopy. Nature 594, 201– 206 (2021)

    2021

  133. [141]

    & Sandoghdar, V

    Chu, X.-L., Götzinger, S. & Sandoghdar, V. A single molecule as a high-fidelity photon gun for producing intensity-squeezed light. Nature Photon 11, 58–62 (2017)

    2017

  134. [142]

    & Orrit, M

    Lounis, B. & Orrit, M. Single-photon sources. Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1129–1179 (2005)

    2005

  135. [143]

    Loredo, J. C. et al. Scalable performance in solid-state single-photon sources. Optica, OPTICA 3, 433–440 (2016)

    2016

  136. [144]

    & Wolf, E

    Mandel, L. & Wolf, E. Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995). doi:10.1017/CBO9781139644105

    1995 doi

  137. [145]

    & Zwiller, V

    Steinhauer, S., Gyger, S. & Zwiller, V. Progress on large-scale superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Applied Physics Letters 118, 100501 (2021)

    2021

  138. [146]

    Mueller, A. S. et al. Free-space coupled superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with low dark counts. Optica, OPTICA 8, 1586–1587 (2021)

    2021

  139. [147]

    Harper, N. A. et al. Highly efficient visible and near-IR photon pair generation with thin-film lithium niobate. Optica Quantum, OPTICAQ 2, 103–109 (2024)

    2024

  140. [148]

    L., Adhikari, S., Ma, X

    Cortes, C. L., Adhikari, S., Ma, X. & Gray, S. K. Accelerating quantum optics experiments with statistical learning. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 184003 (2020)

    2020

  141. [149]

    Kudyshev, Z. A. et al. Machine learning assisted quantum super-resolution microscopy. Nat Commun 14, 4828 (2023)

    2023

  142. [150]

    Proppe, A. H. et al. Time-Resolved Line Shapes of Single Quantum Emitters via Machine Learned Photon Correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 053603 (2023)

    2023

  143. [151]

    Lavoie, J. et al. Phase‐Modulated Interferometry, Spectroscopy, and Refractometry using Entangled Photon Pairs. Adv Quantum Tech 3, 1900114 (2020)

    2020

  144. [152]

    Yin, L. et al. Analysis of the Spatial Properties of Correlated Photon in Collinear Phase-Matching. Photonics 8, 12 (2021)

    2021

  145. [153]

    & Steinlechner, F

    Sansa Perna, A., Ortega, E., Gräfe, M. & Steinlechner, F. Visible-wavelength polarization-entangled photon source for quantum communication and imaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 074001 (2022)

    2022

  146. [154]

    Lu, X. et al. Chip-integrated visible–telecom entangled photon pair source for quantum communication. Nat. Phys. 15, 373–381 (2019)

    2019

  147. [155]

    Wang, H. et al. On-Demand Semiconductor Source of Entangled Photons Which Simultaneously Has High Fidelity, Efficiency, and Indistinguishability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 113602 (2019)

    2019

  148. [156]

    & Trotta, R

    Huber, D., Reindl, M., Aberl, J., Rastelli, A. & Trotta, R. Semiconductor quantum dots as an ideal source of polarization-entangled photon pairs on-demand: a review. J. Opt. 20, 073002 (2018)

    2018

  149. [157]

    Kim, H., Park, H. S. & Choi, S.-K. Three-photon N00N states generated by photon subtraction from double photon pairs. Opt. Express 17, 19720 (2009)

    2009

  150. [158]

    W., Lundeen, J

    Mitchell, M. W., Lundeen, J. S. & Steinberg, A. M. Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state. Nature 429, 161–164 (2004)

    2004

  151. [159]

    W., Ou, Z

    Sun, F. W., Ou, Z. Y. & Guo, G. C. Projection measurement of the maximally entangled $N$-photon state for a demonstration of the $N$-photon de Broglie wavelength. Phys. Rev. A 73, 023808 (2006)

    2006

  152. [160]

    W., Liu, B

    Sun, F. W., Liu, B. H., Huang, Y. F., Ou, Z. Y. & Guo, G. C. Observation of the four- photon de Broglie wavelength by state-projection measurement. Phys. Rev. A 74, 033812 (2006)

    2006

  153. [161]

    Liu, B. H. et al. Demonstration of the three-photon de Broglie wavelength by projection measurement. Phys. Rev. A 77, 023815 (2008)

    2008

  154. [162]

    Resch, K. J. et al. Time-Reversal and Super-Resolving Phase Measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 223601 (2007)

    2007

  155. [163]

    & Silberberg, Y

    Afek, I., Ambar, O. & Silberberg, Y. High-NOON States by Mixing Quantum and Classical Light. Science 328, 879–881 (2010)

    2010

  156. [164]

    Fuenzalida, J. et al. Resolution of Quantum Imaging with Undetected Photons. Quantum 6, 646 (2022)

    2022

  157. [165]

    & Lahiri, M

    Viswanathan, B., Barreto Lemos, G. & Lahiri, M. Resolution limit in quantum imaging with undetected photons using position correlations. Opt. Express 29, 38185 (2021)

    2021

  158. [166]

    E., Schlawin, F

    Dorfman, K. E., Schlawin, F. & Mukamel, S. Nonlinear optical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045008 (2016)

    2016

  159. [167]

    Ko, L., Cook, R. L. & Whaley, K. B. Dynamics of photosynthetic light harvesting systems interacting with N-photon Fock states. The Journal of Chemical Physics 156, 244108 (2022)

    2022

  160. [168]

    Roslyak, O., Marx, C. A. & Mukamel, S. Nonlinear spectroscopy with entangled photons: Manipulating quantum pathways of matter. Phys. Rev. A 79, 033832 (2009)

    2009

  161. [169]

    D., Gestsson, H

    Rodriguez-Camargo, C. D., Gestsson, H. O., Nation, C., Jones, A. R. & Olaya-Castro, A. Perturbation theory scope for predicting vibronic selectivity by entangled two photon absorption. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.12402 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  162. [170]

    Berchera, I. R. & Degiovanni, I. P. Quantum imaging with sub-Poissonian light: challenges and perspectives in optical metrology. Metrologia 56, 024001 (2019)

    2019

  163. [171]

    The Quantum Theory of Light

    Loudon, R. The Quantum Theory of Light. (Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York, 2000)

    2000

  164. [172]

    Quantum Optics: An Introduction

    Fox, M. Quantum Optics: An Introduction. (Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York, 2006)

    2006

  165. [173]

    Feynman, R. P. & Hibbs, A. R. Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals: Emended Edition. (Dover Publications, Mineola, N.Y, 2010)

    2010

  166. [174]

    P., Leighton, R

    Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol

  167. [175]

    (Addison Wesley, Reading/Mass., 1971)

    1971

  168. [176]

    K., Ou, Z

    Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y. & Mandel, L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044–2046 (1987)

    1987

  169. [177]

    Hadfield, R. H. Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications. Nature Photon 3, 696–705 (2009)

    2009

  170. [178]

    McCaughan, A. N. Readout architectures for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 31, 040501 (2018)

    2018

  171. [179]

    McCaughan, A. N. et al. The thermally-coupled imager: A scalable readout architecture for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 102602 (2022). Acknowledgements This work was financially supported by the College of Chemistry at the University ...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.