The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2509.07848 · v1 · pith:3DAGV4PO · submitted 2025-09-09 · astro-ph.CO

Probing the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation via Non-Parametric Reconstruction for High Redshifts

Reviewed by Pithpith:3DAGV4POopen to challenge →

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords distancecddrluminosityangularcosmicdeviationdiameterduality
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We test the validity of the cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR) by combining angular diameter distance and luminosity distance measurements from recent cosmological observations. For the angular diameter distance, we use data from transverse baryon acoustic oscillations and galaxy clusters. On the other hand, the luminosity distance is obtained from Type Ia supernovae in the Pantheon+ sample and from quasar catalogs. To reduce the large dispersion in quasar luminosity distances, we apply a selection criterion based on their deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model and implement a binning procedure to suppress statistical noise. We reconstruct the CDDR using Gaussian Processes, a non-parametric supervised machine learning method. Our results show no significant deviation from the CDDR within the $2\sigma$ confidence level across the redshift range explored, supporting its validity even at high redshifts.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-independent test of the cosmic distance duality relation with recent observational data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Two model-independent methods applied to latest SN and BAO data find the cosmic distance duality relation consistent with observations within 1 sigma and no evidence of violation.

  2. Crosschecking Cosmic Distances from DESI BAO and DES SNe

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0

    Cross-check finds good agreement between DESI BAO and DES SNe distances in transverse measures but a mild, method-dependent decreasing trend in radial distances.