pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.11607 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-15 · 📡 eess.SP

Low-Altitude Wireless Networks: A Comprehensive Survey

Jun Wu , Yaoqi Yang , Weijie Yuan , Wenchao Liu , Jiacheng Wang , Tianqi Mao , Lin Zhou , Yuanhao Cui
show 20 more authors
Fan Liu Geng Sun Yiyan Ma Nan Wu Dezhi Zheng Jindan Xu Nan Ma Zhiyong Feng Wei Xu Dusit Niyato Chau Yuen Xiaojun Jing Zhiguo Shi Bo Ai Shi Jin Dong In Kim Jiangzhou Wang Ping Zhang Hao Yin Jun Zhang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords low-altitude wireless networksLAWNdrone networksairspace managementintegrated sensing and communicationair traffic managementlow-altitude economywireless infrastructure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Low-altitude wireless networks combine communication, sensing, computation, control and air traffic management to support large-scale drone operations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper surveys low-altitude wireless networks as a framework that addresses the demands of the growing low-altitude economy by handling large numbers of drones in dynamic airspace. Traditional aerial systems focus narrowly on communication and overlook integrated sensing, computation, control, and energy functions, which limits their ability to meet varied mission needs. The survey reviews LAWN system basics, performance metrics, privacy and security issues in open environments, and recent progress in airspace structuring to guide practical use. A reader would care because effective integration could make reliable intelligent drone services possible despite challenges like three-dimensional interference and unstable coverage. The central argument is that a unified LAWN design overcomes these problems where separate systems and poor airspace planning fall short.

Core claim

The paper states that to overcome the limitations of traditional aerial systems and the problems caused by missing systematic low-altitude airspace planning, a comprehensive framework called low-altitude wireless network (LAWN) has emerged that seamlessly integrates communication, sensing, computation, control, and air traffic management into a single design, enabling better support for large-scale drone deployments and intelligent services.

What carries the argument

The low-altitude wireless network (LAWN) framework, which unifies communication, sensing, computation, control, and air traffic management functions for drone operations in dynamic airspace.

If this is right

  • Performance metrics defined for LAWN systems can be applied to evaluate real deployments across communication, sensing, and control tasks.
  • Privacy and security protocols must be developed specifically for the open-air environment of LAWN to protect data and operations.
  • Advances in airspace structuring and air traffic management directly support scalable drone traffic without excessive interference.
  • The evolution of functional designs within LAWN allows the network to meet diverse mission-critical demands beyond basic communication.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • LAWN-style integration could extend to energy-efficient routing that jointly optimizes computation offloading and flight paths in drone swarms.
  • The framework may connect to broader aerial network standards by providing a template for handling three-dimensional resource allocation.
  • Testing LAWN in mixed urban and rural airspace could expose new requirements for real-time control loops that the survey leaves open.

Load-bearing premise

The absence of systematic low-altitude airspace planning and management is a primary cause of dynamic interference, coverage instability, and scalability issues in drone deployments.

What would settle it

A field deployment comparing interference levels, coverage stability, and scalability in drone fleets using separate traditional functions versus an integrated LAWN design would show whether the unified approach delivers measurable improvements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.11607 by Bo Ai, Chau Yuen, Dezhi Zheng, Dong In Kim, Dusit Niyato, Fan Liu, Geng Sun, Hao Yin, Jiacheng Wang, Jiangzhou Wang, Jindan Xu, Jun Wu, Jun Zhang, Lin Zhou, Nan Ma, Nan Wu, Ping Zhang, Shi Jin, Tianqi Mao, Weijie Yuan, Wei Xu, Wenchao Liu, Xiaojun Jing, Yaoqi Yang, Yiyan Ma, Yuanhao Cui, Zhiguo Shi, Zhiyong Feng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: LAWN-enabled scenarios across rural, urban, and offshore environments with satellites and low-altitude platforms collaboratively providing ubiquitous communication, sensing, and service coverage to diverse applications. ture to enable dynamic deployment of security mechanisms [8]. These include adaptive jamming resistance, secure multi-drone collaboration for threat detection, cutting-edge encryption proto… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The structure of the survey. close up the above research gap, this article provides an overview of LAWN from functionality and perfor￾mance evaluation, as well as air traffic management (ATM), offering a more comprehensive and broader perspective on the design, deployment, and manage￾ment of LAWN systems. The main contributions of the paper can be summarized as follows: • We demonstrate the necessity of LA… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Classification of drones under various criteria. veying mission planning. In addition, the environ￾mental services, including geofencing, high-definition maps, and weather forecasts, provide crucial inputs for predictive designs. 3) Low-Altitude Airspace Management System: The airspace management system is critical for ensuring efficient operations within LAWNs by coordinating flight paths, altitude assign… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: LAWN architectures, including star networks with direct A2G links, multi-group mesh networks with intra￾group cooperation, and hierarchical mesh networks with multi-layer A2A connections for scalable coverage. a decentralized communication architecture. In a mesh network, each LAWN node can communicate directly with other nodes via air-to-air (A2A) links, either via direct communication or through multiple… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The evolution perspective of LAWNs, highlighting the transition from separated designs toward cooperative and ultimately intelligent integration across various functionalities. thereby achieving high-resolution wide-area sens￾ing and robust communication coverage. This networked ISAC paradigm represents a funda￾mental shift toward scalable, resilient, and persis￾tent UAV operations. This evolutionary traje… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The framework of the proposed SEAL defense scheme in UAV offloading scenario [132]. fairness when offloading UAV computation tasks to ground vehicles. Their proposed framework over￾comes issues of manipulation and privacy leakage by using a strategy-proof reverse combinatorial auction. In addition, fairness is managed through smart con￾tracts and hash-chain micropayments, complemented by a privacy-preservi… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The supported various LAWN services associated with different U-space stages based on [11]. and uncrewed operations under relatively low traffic density. At this level, operations are typi￾cally confined to restricted or predesignated areas, and the service set remains intentionally limited. The key functions consist of basic registration of unmanned aircraft and geo-awareness capabili￾ties, enabling opera… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Several representative LAA structures. area for aircraft to temporarily wait and change direc￾tions, and thus effectively reducing the collision risk. 3) Layered Airspace: Layered airspace refers to the division of LAA into several separate layers, each with the same or varying vertical intervals. Since layered airspace is primarily divided in the vertical direction, the operational rules of aircraft in ea… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: MFD results for the relationship between nor￾malized flow and aircraft density. A machine learning-based decision support system for ATM was further developed by integrating explain￾able AI (XAI) in [195]. By employing learning-based algorithms to predict risks, this approach can assist controllers in managing air traffic effectively. The in￾corporation of XAI ensures that the reasoning behind AI decisions… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The typical UAV delivery workflow of Ref. [198]. approach to managing LAA [199]. UAVs are cat￾egorized based on their weight and operational risk level, with all UAVs, except the smallest, required to be equipped with unique electronic identification and registered under a real-name system. In addition, LAWNs are required to integrate geofencing capabili￾ties and enforce remote flight restrictions accordi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The rapid development of the low-altitude economy has imposed unprecedented demands on wireless infrastructure to accommodate large-scale drone deployments and facilitate intelligent services in dynamic airspace environments. However, unlocking its full potential in practical applications presents significant challenges. Traditional aerial systems predominantly focus on air-ground communication services, often neglecting the integration of sensing, computation, control, and energy-delivering functions, which hinders the ability to meet diverse mission-critical demands. Besides, the absence of systematic low-altitude airspace planning and management exacerbates issues regarding dynamic interference in three-dimensional space, coverage instability, and scalability. To overcome these challenges, a comprehensive framework, termed low-altitude wireless network (LAWN), has emerged to seamlessly integrate communication, sensing, computation, control, and air traffic management into a unified design. This article provides a comprehensive overview of LAWN systems, introducing LAWN system fundamentals and the evolution of functional designs. Subsequently, we delve into performance evaluation metrics and review critical concerns surrounding privacy and security in the open-air network environment. Finally, we present the cutting-edge developments in airspace structuring and air traffic management, providing insights to facilitate the practical deployment of LAWNs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper is a comprehensive survey on Low-Altitude Wireless Networks (LAWN). It describes the challenges posed by large-scale drone deployments in the low-altitude economy, including dynamic interference, coverage instability, and scalability issues exacerbated by the lack of systematic airspace planning. The authors introduce the LAWN framework as a unified design integrating communication, sensing, computation, control, and air traffic management. The survey covers LAWN system fundamentals and the evolution of functional designs, performance evaluation metrics, privacy and security concerns in open-air environments, and cutting-edge developments in airspace structuring and air traffic management to facilitate practical deployment.

Significance. This survey has the potential to be significant in organizing the rapidly growing literature on integrated wireless systems for low-altitude applications. By framing the integration of multiple functions into LAWN, it provides a structured overview that could guide researchers and practitioners. The inclusion of air traffic management alongside traditional wireless aspects is a strength, as it addresses a key practical barrier. However, the significance hinges on the thoroughness of the literature review and balance of citations.

major comments (2)
  1. The statement that the absence of systematic low-altitude airspace planning exacerbates dynamic interference and scalability issues is presented as a key challenge. While plausible, this should be backed by specific references or quantitative evidence from prior studies in the relevant section to avoid appearing as an unsubstantiated assumption.
  2. The claim that LAWN 'seamlessly integrate[s]' the various functions is central to the paper's narrative. The survey should provide more concrete examples or case studies from the literature demonstrating successful integration rather than treating it as an emerging given, to strengthen the framework's conceptual foundation.
minor comments (2)
  1. Ensure that all acronyms are defined at first use, particularly LAWN and any others introduced in the fundamentals section.
  2. Verify that the reference list includes recent works up to 2024 or 2025 to reflect the 'cutting-edge developments' mentioned.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and the recommendation for minor revision. The comments help strengthen the manuscript, and we address each point below with plans for revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The statement that the absence of systematic low-altitude airspace planning exacerbates dynamic interference and scalability issues is presented as a key challenge. While plausible, this should be backed by specific references or quantitative evidence from prior studies in the relevant section to avoid appearing as an unsubstantiated assumption.

    Authors: We agree that the statement would be strengthened by explicit citations and quantitative evidence. In the revised manuscript, we will add references to prior studies in the introduction and fundamentals sections that quantify dynamic interference in 3D drone networks and document scalability limitations arising from the lack of systematic airspace planning. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The claim that LAWN 'seamlessly integrate[s]' the various functions is central to the paper's narrative. The survey should provide more concrete examples or case studies from the literature demonstrating successful integration rather than treating it as an emerging given, to strengthen the framework's conceptual foundation.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of concrete illustrations. In the sections on the evolution of functional designs and the LAWN framework, we will add specific examples and case studies drawn from the literature that show practical integration of communication, sensing, computation, control, and air traffic management. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this survey paper

full rationale

This paper is a comprehensive survey reviewing literature on low-altitude wireless networks (LAWN). It organizes existing work around the emergence of a unified framework integrating communication, sensing, computation, control, and air traffic management, without presenting original derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or predictions. The central claims about challenges and the LAWN framework are drawn from prior literature as context rather than constructed internally. No self-citation chains, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems reduce any load-bearing step to the paper's own inputs by construction. The paper is self-contained as a descriptive review against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

The survey introduces LAWN as an emerging conceptual framework but does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or independently evidenced entities; it relies on synthesis of existing domain literature.

invented entities (1)
  • LAWN framework no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide a unified design integrating communication, sensing, computation, control, and air traffic management
    Described in the abstract as an emerged framework to address identified challenges in low-altitude drone systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5823 in / 1204 out tokens · 59194 ms · 2026-05-18T17:02:30.681737+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bridging Visual and Wireless Sensing via a Unified Radiation Field for 3D Radio Map Construction

    cs.NI 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    URF-GS creates a single radiation field from visual and wireless observations via 3D Gaussian splatting to predict radio signals at any location and configuration with higher accuracy and fewer samples than prior NeRF...

  2. 6DMA-Enabled ISAC for Low-Altitude Economy

    eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A hierarchical TD3-based DRL algorithm jointly optimizes infrequent 6DMA position/rotation and per-slot UAV direction plus base station beamforming to maximize UAV data rates while meeting sensing intensity requirements.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

210 extracted references · 210 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A survey on device- to-device communication in cellular networks,

    A. Asadi, Q. Wang, and V . Mancuso, “A survey on device- to-device communication in cellular networks,”IEEE Com- munications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1801– 1819, 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Convergence of satellite and terrestrial net- works: A comprehensive survey,

    P. Wang, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Yan, B. G. Evans, and W. Wang, “Convergence of satellite and terrestrial net- works: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE access, vol. 8, pp. 5550–5588, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Bridging terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks: A novel architecture for space-air-ground-sea integration sys- tem,

    X. Wang, B. Yi, S. Kumari, C.-M. Chen, S. Rani, K. Li, and J. Lv, “Bridging terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks: A novel architecture for space-air-ground-sea integration sys- tem,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 20–27, 2025

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Analysis and evaluation of secure solutions for terrestrial networks,

    A. Mahmood, S. M. M. Gilani, M. J. Iqbal, Z. Haider, and S. Daud, “Analysis and evaluation of secure solutions for terrestrial networks,”Technical Journal, vol. 24, no. 04, pp. 63–71, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Toward realization of low-altitude economy networks: Core architecture, integrated technologies, and future direc- tions,

    Y . Wang, G. Sun, Z. Sun, J. Wang, J. Li, C. Zhao, J. Wu, S. Liang, M. Yin, P. Wanget al., “Toward realization of low-altitude economy networks: Core architecture, inte- grated technologies, and future directions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21583, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Benefits and challenges of constructing low-altitude air route network infrastructure for developing low-altitude economy,

    X. Liao, C. Xu, and H. Ye, “Benefits and challenges of constructing low-altitude air route network infrastructure for developing low-altitude economy,”Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1966–1981, 2024

    work page 1966

  7. [7]

    Embodied AI- empowered low altitude economy: Integrated sensing, communications, computation, and control (ISC3),

    Y . Yang, Y . Chen, J. Wang, G. Sun, and D. Niyato, “Em- bodied ai-empowered low altitude economy: Integrated sensing, communications, computation, and control (isc3),” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19996, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Secure physical layer communications for low-altitude economy network- ing: A survey,

    L. Cai, J. Wang, R. Zhang, Y . Zhang, T. Jiang, D. Niyato, X. Wang, A. Jamalipour, and X. Shen, “Secure physical layer communications for low-altitude economy network- ing: A survey,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09153, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Ad- vancing the control of low-altitude wireless networks: Ar- chitecture, design principles, and future directions,

    H. Jin, W. Yuan, J. Wu, J. Wang, D. Niyato, X. Wang, G. K. Karagiannidis, Z. Lin, Y . Gong, D. I. Kimet al., “Ad- vancing the control of low-altitude wireless networks: Ar- chitecture, design principles, and future directions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07967, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Convex formulations of air traffic flow optimization problems,

    D. B. Work and A. M. Bayen, “Convex formulations of air traffic flow optimization problems,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 2096–2108, 2009

    work page 2096

  11. [11]

    Advances in low-altitude airspace man- agement for uncrewed aircraft and advanced air mobility,

    N. Pongsakornsathien, N. E.-D. Safwat, Y . Xie, A. Gardi, and R. Sabatini, “Advances in low-altitude airspace man- agement for uncrewed aircraft and advanced air mobility,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, p. 101085, 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Machine learning-aided operations and communica- tions of unmanned aerial vehicles: A contemporary survey,

    H. Kurunathan, H. Huang, K. Li, W. Ni, and E. Hos- sain, “Machine learning-aided operations and communica- tions of unmanned aerial vehicles: A contemporary survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 496–533, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    A comprehensive survey of security and privacy in UA V systems,

    B. Cordill, D. Fang, and S. Xu, “A comprehensive survey of security and privacy in UA V systems,”IEEE Access, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Privacy and security challenges in federated learning for uav systems: A systematic review,

    A. Al Farsi, A. Khan, M. R. Mughal, and M. M. Bait- Suwailam, “Privacy and security challenges in federated learning for uav systems: A systematic review,”IEEE Ac- cess, 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Security and privacy issues and solutions for UA Vs in b5G networks: A review,

    M. A. Khan, N. Kumar, S. H. Alsamhi, G. Barb, J. Zy- wiołek, I. Ullah, F. Noor, J. A. Shah, and A. M. Al- muhaideb, “Security and privacy issues and solutions for UA Vs in b5G networks: A review,”IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    UA V-assisted communications with rf energy harvesting: A comprehensive survey,

    G. K. Pandey, D. S. Gurjar, S. Yadav, Y . Jiang, and C. Yuen, “UA V-assisted communications with rf energy harvesting: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 782–838, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    UA V-assisted RIS for future wireless communications: A survey on optimization and performance analysis,

    A. C. Pogaku, D.-T. Do, B. M. Lee, and N. D. Nguyen, “UA V-assisted RIS for future wireless communications: A survey on optimization and performance analysis,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 16 320–16 336, 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    UA V-enabled integrated sensing and communication: Opportunities and challenges,

    K. Meng, Q. Wu, J. Xu, W. Chen, Z. Feng, R. Schober, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “UA V-enabled integrated sensing and communication: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    UA Vs as an intelligent service: Boosting edge intel- ligence for air-ground integrated networks,

    C. Dong, Y . Shen, Y . Qu, K. Wang, J. Zheng, Q. Wu, and F. Wu, “UA Vs as an intelligent service: Boosting edge intel- ligence for air-ground integrated networks,”IEEE Network, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 167–175, 2021

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Communication architec- tures and protocols for networking unmanned aerial vehi- cles,

    J. Li, Y . Zhou, and L. Lamont, “Communication architec- tures and protocols for networking unmanned aerial vehi- cles,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 514–517, 2016

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Survey of important issues in UA V communi- cation networks,

    L. G. et al., “Survey of important issues in UA V communi- cation networks,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutori- als, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1123–1136, 2016

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    A mini unmanned aerial vehicle (UA V): system overview and image acquisition,

    H. Eisenbeisset al., “A mini unmanned aerial vehicle (UA V): system overview and image acquisition,”Interna- tional Archives of Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 36, no. 5/W1, pp. 1–7, 2004

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    Recent Developments in Aerial Robotics: A Survey and Prototypes Overview

    C. F. Liew, D. DeLatte, N. Takeishi, and T. Yairi, “Recent developments in aerial robotics: A survey and prototypes overview,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.10085, 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    A survey of UA V hardware selection,

    E. Sdoukou, A. Milidonis, K. Efstathiou, and I. V oyiatzis, 34 China Communications “A survey of UA V hardware selection,”Journal of Engi- neering and Applied Science, vol. 72, no. 1, p. 88, 2025

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Deep learning techniques to classify agricultural crops through UA V imagery: A review,

    A. Bouguettaya, H. Zarzour, A. Kechida, and A. M. Taberkit, “Deep learning techniques to classify agricultural crops through UA V imagery: A review,”Neural computing and applications, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 9511–9536, 2022

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Unmanned- aerial-vehicle-assisted wireless networks: Advancements, challenges, and solutions,

    M. Dai, N. Huang, Y . Wu, J. Gao, and Z. Su, “Unmanned- aerial-vehicle-assisted wireless networks: Advancements, challenges, and solutions,”IEEE internet of things journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 4117–4147, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Toward autonomous multi-UA V wireless network: A sur- vey of reinforcement learning-based approaches,

    Y . Bai, H. Zhao, X. Zhang, Z. Chang, R. J¨antti, and K. Yang, “Toward autonomous multi-UA V wireless network: A sur- vey of reinforcement learning-based approaches,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 3038–3067, 2023

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Commercial low- altitude uas operations in population centers,

    E. Atkins, A. Khalsa, and M. Groden, “Commercial low- altitude uas operations in population centers,” in9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Confer- ence (ATIO) and Aircraft Noise and Emissions Reduction Symposium (ANERS), 2009, p. 7070

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    On un- manned aircraft systems issues, challenges and operational restrictions preventing integration into the national airspace system,

    K. Dalamagkidis, K. P. Valavanis, and L. A. Piegl, “On un- manned aircraft systems issues, challenges and operational restrictions preventing integration into the national airspace system,”Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 44, no. 7-8, pp. 503–519, 2008

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    From ground to sky: Architectur es, applications, and challenges shaping low-altitude wirele ss networks,

    W. Yuan, Y . Cui, J. Wang, F. Liu, G. Sun, T. Xi- ang, J. Xu, S. Jin, D. Niyato, S. Coleriet al., “From ground to sky: Architectures, applications, and challenges shaping low-altitude wireless networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12308, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    A survey on resource management in joint communication and computing-embedded SAGIN,

    Q. Chen, Z. Guo, W. Meng, S. Han, C. Li, and T. Q. Quek, “A survey on resource management in joint communication and computing-embedded SAGIN,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1911–1954, 2024

    work page 1911

  32. [32]

    Wireless mesh net- works: a survey,

    I. F. Akyildiz, X. Wang, and W. Wang, “Wireless mesh net- works: a survey,”Computer networks, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 445–487, 2005

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    UA V communication networks issues: A re- view,

    H. N. et al., “UA V communication networks issues: A re- view,”Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    A survey of channel modeling for UA V com- munications,

    A. A. Khuwaja, Y . Chen, N. Zhao, M.-S. Alouini, and P. Dobbins, “A survey of channel modeling for UA V com- munications,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2804–2821, 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Novel multiband/broadband horizontally polarized omnidirectional antennas,

    P. Luo, Y . Cui, and R. Li, “Novel multiband/broadband horizontally polarized omnidirectional antennas,” in2016 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propaga- tion (APSURSI), 2016, pp. 1795–1796

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Aeronautical channel characterization,

    P. Bello, “Aeronautical channel characterization,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. COM-21, no. 5, pp. 548–563, May 1973

    work page 1973

  37. [37]

    Aeronautical channel modeling,

    E. Haas, “Aeronautical channel modeling,”IEEE Transac- tions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 254–264, Mar 2002

    work page 2002

  38. [38]

    Requirements, challenges and analysis of alternatives for wireless datalinks for unmanned aircraft systems,

    R. Jain and F. Templin, “Requirements, challenges and analysis of alternatives for wireless datalinks for unmanned aircraft systems,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Com- munications, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 852–860, Jun 2012

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    The UA V low elevation propagation channel in urban areas: Statistical analysis and time-series generator,

    M. Simunek, F. P. Font ´an, and P. Pechac, “The UA V low elevation propagation channel in urban areas: Statistical analysis and time-series generator,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 3850–3858, 2013

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    A 3-D space-time-frequency non-stationary model for low-altitude uav mmwave and massive MIMO aerial fading channels,

    J. Xu, X. Cheng, and L. Bai, “A 3-D space-time-frequency non-stationary model for low-altitude uav mmwave and massive MIMO aerial fading channels,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 10 936– 10 950, 2022

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Elevation dependent shadowing model for mobile communications via high altitude plat- forms in built-up areas,

    J. Holis and P. Pechac, “Elevation dependent shadowing model for mobile communications via high altitude plat- forms in built-up areas,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1078–1084, 2008

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    Model- ing air-to-ground path loss for low altitude platforms in ur- ban environments,

    A. Al-Hourani, S. Kandeepan, and A. Jamalipour, “Model- ing air-to-ground path loss for low altitude platforms in ur- ban environments,” in2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2014, pp. 2898–2904

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    A hybrid approach of learning and model-based channel prediction for communication relay UA Vs in dynamic urban envi- ronments,

    P. Ladosz, H. Oh, G. Zheng, and W.-H. Chen, “A hybrid approach of learning and model-based channel prediction for communication relay UA Vs in dynamic urban envi- ronments,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 2370–2377, 2019

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Modeling cellular-to-UA V path-loss for suburban environments,

    A. Al-Hourani and K. Gomez, “Modeling cellular-to-UA V path-loss for suburban environments,”IEEE Wireless Com- munications Letters, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 82–85, 2018

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Multipath channel model for over-water aeronautical telemetry,

    Q. Lei and M. Rice, “Multipath channel model for over-water aeronautical telemetry,”IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 735– 742, 2009

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    Measurements and characteri- zations of air-to-ground channel over sea surface at c-band with low airborne altitudes,

    Y . S. Meng and Y . H. Lee, “Measurements and characteri- zations of air-to-ground channel over sea surface at c-band with low airborne altitudes,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicu- lar Technology, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1943–1948, 2011

    work page 1943

  47. [47]

    Radio channel modeling for UA V communication over cellular networks,

    R. Amorim, H. Nguyen, P. Mogensen, I. Z. Kov ´acs, J. Wigard, and T. B. Sørensen, “Radio channel modeling for UA V communication over cellular networks,”IEEE Wire- less Communications Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 514–517, 2017

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Radio chan- nel characterization of mid-band 5G service delivery for ultra-low altitude aerial base stations,

    P. A. Catherwood, B. Black, E. Bedeer Mohamed, A. A. Cheema, J. Rafferty, and J. A. D. Mclaughlin, “Radio chan- nel characterization of mid-band 5G service delivery for ultra-low altitude aerial base stations,”IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 8283–8299, 2019

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Air-ground channel charac- terization for unmanned aircraft systems—part i: Methods, measurements, and models for over-water settings,

    D. W. Matolak and R. Sun, “Air-ground channel charac- terization for unmanned aircraft systems—part i: Methods, measurements, and models for over-water settings,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 26–44, Jan 2017

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Air-ground channel charac- terization for unmanned aircraft systems—part ii: Hilly and mountainous settings,

    R. Sun and D. W. Matolak, “Air-ground channel charac- terization for unmanned aircraft systems—part ii: Hilly and mountainous settings,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicu- lar Technology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1913–1925, Mar 2017

    work page 1913

  51. [51]

    Air-ground channel character- ization for unmanned aircraft systems—part iii: The subur- ban and near-urban environments,

    D. W. Matolak and R. Sun, “Air-ground channel character- ization for unmanned aircraft systems—part iii: The subur- ban and near-urban environments,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 6607–6618, Aug 2017

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Field experimentation of cots-based UA V networking,

    D. Hague, H. T. Kung, and B. Suter, “Field experimentation of cots-based UA V networking,” inMILCOM 2006 - 2006 IEEE Military Communications conference, 2006, pp. 1–7

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    Measurements on c-band air-to-air channel for coexis- tence among multiple unmanned aircraft systems,

    F. Ono, T. Kagawa, H. Tsuji, R. Miura, and F. Kojima, China Communications 35 “Measurements on c-band air-to-air channel for coexis- tence among multiple unmanned aircraft systems,” in2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2017, pp. 1160–1164

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Performance analysis of cooperative multi-carrier relay-based UA V networks over generalized fading channels,

    I. Y . Abualhaol and M. M. Matalgah, “Performance analysis of cooperative multi-carrier relay-based UA V networks over generalized fading channels,”International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1049–1064, 2011. [Online]. Available: https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/dac.1212

    work page doi:10.1002/dac.1212 2011

  55. [55]

    On the importance of link characterization for aerial wireless sensor networks,

    N. Ahmed, S. S. Kanhere, and S. Jha, “On the importance of link characterization for aerial wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 52–57, 2016

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    Finite blocklength lossy source coding for discrete memoryless sources,

    L. Zhou, M. Motaniet al., “Finite blocklength lossy source coding for discrete memoryless sources,”Founda- tions and Trends® in Communications and Information Theory, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 157–389, 2023

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Second-order and moderate deviations asymptotics for successive refine- ment,

    L. Zhou, V . Y . Tan, and M. Motani, “Second-order and moderate deviations asymptotics for successive refine- ment,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 2896–2921, 2017

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    Non-asymptotic converse bounds and refined asymptotics for two source coding problems,

    L. Zhou and M. Motani, “Non-asymptotic converse bounds and refined asymptotics for two source coding problems,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 6414–6440, 2019

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Latency-aware iot service pro- visioning in UA V-aided mobile-edge computing networks,

    L. Zhang and N. Ansari, “Latency-aware iot service pro- visioning in UA V-aided mobile-edge computing networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 10 573– 10 580, 2020

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    Co-design of sensing, communications, and control for low-altitude wire- less networks,

    H. Jin, J. Wu, W. Yuan, F. Liu, and Y . Cui, “Co-design of sensing, communications, and control for low-altitude wire- less networks,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, pp. 1–13, 2025

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Predictive precoder design for OTFS-enabled URLLC: A deep learn- ing approach,

    C. Liu, S. Li, W. Yuan, X. Liu, and D. W. K. Ng, “Predictive precoder design for OTFS-enabled URLLC: A deep learn- ing approach,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Commu- nications, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 2245–2260, 2023

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Resource allocation for URLLC-oriented two-way UA V relaying,

    Y . Cai, X. Jiang, M. Liu, N. Zhao, Y . Chen, and X. Wang, “Resource allocation for URLLC-oriented two-way UA V relaying,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 3344–3349, 2022

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Aoi-minimal trajectory planning and data collection in UA V-assisted wireless powered iot networks,

    H. Hu, K. Xiong, G. Qu, Q. Ni, P. Fan, and K. B. Letaief, “Aoi-minimal trajectory planning and data collection in UA V-assisted wireless powered iot networks,”IEEE Inter- net of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1211–1223, 2021

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Aoi-sensitive data collec- tion in multi-UA V-assisted wireless sensor networks,

    X. Gao, X. Zhu, and L. Zhai, “Aoi-sensitive data collec- tion in multi-UA V-assisted wireless sensor networks,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 5185–5197, 2023

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    OTFS-assisted wireless control in UA V networks with finite blocklength transmission,

    H. Jin, J. Wu, W. Yuan, Y . Shi, F. Liu, L. Zheng, and Y . Gong, “OTFS-assisted wireless control in UA V networks with finite blocklength transmission,” in2025 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Confer- ence (WCNC), 2025, pp. 01–06

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Energy-saving deployment algo- rithms of UA V swarm for sustainable wireless coverage,

    X. Zhang and L. Duan, “Energy-saving deployment algo- rithms of UA V swarm for sustainable wireless coverage,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 10 320–10 335, 2020

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    Fast deployment of UA V networks for optimal wire- less coverage,

    ——, “Fast deployment of UA V networks for optimal wire- less coverage,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 588–601, 2019

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Joint trajectory and power optimization for UA V relay networks,

    S. Zhang, H. Zhang, Q. He, K. Bian, and L. Song, “Joint trajectory and power optimization for UA V relay networks,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 161–164, 2018

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    En- ergy efficiency optimization for UA V-assisted backscatter communications,

    S. Yang, Y . Deng, X. Tang, Y . Ding, and J. Zhou, “En- ergy efficiency optimization for UA V-assisted backscatter communications,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 2041–2045, 2019

    work page 2041

  70. [70]

    Energy-efficient joint beamforming and trajectory optimization for uav-enabled integrated sensing and com- munication,

    B. He, W. Mao, Y . Liu, W. Huangfu, Y . Xiao, F. Wang, and Y . Ji, “Energy-efficient joint beamforming and trajectory optimization for uav-enabled integrated sensing and com- munication,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    Sensing fairness-based energy efficiency optimization for uav en- abled integrated sensing and communication,

    Y . Liu, S. Liu, X. Liu, Z. Liu, and T. S. Durrani, “Sensing fairness-based energy efficiency optimization for uav en- abled integrated sensing and communication,”IEEE Wire- less Communications Letters, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1702– 1706, 2023

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Energy saving in flight formation,

    H. Weimerskirch, J. Martin, Y . Clerquin, P. Alexandre, and S. Jiraskova, “Energy saving in flight formation,”Nature, vol. 413, no. 6857, pp. 697–698, 2001

    work page 2001

  73. [73]

    Toward dual-functional LAWN: Control-aware system design for aerodynamics-aided UA V formations,

    J. Wu, W. Yuan, Q. Cheng, and H. Jin, “Toward dual-functional LAWN: Control-aware system design for aerodynamics-aided UA V formations,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.19910, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Performance improvement in UA V communication systems with uncertain solar energy sup- ply,

    G. Yang and C. Luo, “Performance improvement in UA V communication systems with uncertain solar energy sup- ply,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 19 607–19 616, 2023

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Energy efficient UA V communication with energy harvesting,

    Z. Yang, W. Xu, and M. Shikh-Bahaei, “Energy efficient UA V communication with energy harvesting,”IEEE Trans- actions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 1913– 1927, 2020

    work page 1913

  76. [76]

    Resolution limits for the noisy non-adaptive 20 questions problem,

    L. Zhou and A. O. Hero, “Resolution limits for the noisy non-adaptive 20 questions problem,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 2055–2073, 2021

    work page 2055

  77. [77]

    Resolution limits of non- adaptive 20 questions search for multiple targets,

    L. Zhou, L. Bai, and A. O. Hero, “Resolution limits of non- adaptive 20 questions search for multiple targets,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 4964–4982, 2022

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Wireless localization and for- mation control with asynchronous agents,

    W. Yuan, Z. Yang, L. Chen, R. Zhang, Y . Yao, Y . Cui, H. Zhang, and D. W. K. Ng, “Wireless localization and for- mation control with asynchronous agents,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2890–2904, 2024

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    UA V-assisted heterogeneous networks for capacity enhancement,

    V . Sharma, M. Bennis, and R. Kumar, “UA V-assisted heterogeneous networks for capacity enhancement,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1207–1210, 2016

    work page 2016

  80. [80]

    Mobility in the sky: Performance and mobility analysis for cellular-connected UA Vs,

    R. Amer, W. Saad, and N. Marchetti, “Mobility in the sky: Performance and mobility analysis for cellular-connected UA Vs,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 3229–3246, 2020

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.