Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Joint Visible Light and Backscatter Communications for Proximity-Based Indoor Asset Tracking Enabled by Energy-Neutral Devices

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A batteryless indoor tag can report its location by harvesting LED light and backscattering ambient radio signals, achieving submeter tracking accuracy.

desk verdict A genuine battery-free VLC-backscatter tracking demo with honest measurements; the 0.318 m median is real but only for an upward-oriented tag in a controlled room, and the PF has a hole for empty ID reports. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.27217 v2 pith:7HOGNOYQ submitted 2025-10-31 eess.SP cs.ET

Boxuan Xie , Lauri Mela , Alexis A. Dowhuszko , Yu Bai , Zehui Xiong , Zhu Han , Riku Jäntti This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SPcs.ET
keywords ambientbackscattervisiblelightpositioningenergyharvestingindoorassettrackingparticlefiltersimultaneouslightwaveinformationandpowertransferfrequencydivisionmultiplexingbatterylessIoT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that an energy-neutral IoT tag—with no battery, no photodetector amplifier, and no active RF transmitter—can support submeter indoor asset tracking by combining visible light and backscatter communication. The tag harvests power from ceiling LEDs, receives its location code as a light signal, and reflects an ambient RF carrier to an edge reader, which fuses the light-derived proximity reports with the backscatter signal strength in a particle filter. Experimental results show a median positioning error of 0.318 m and a 90th percentile of 0.634 m across straight and zigzag paths. If correct, this offers a path to large-scale, low-cost, maintenance-free indoor tracking of assets.

What carries the argument

The central object is the energy-neutral backscatter device (BD): a PV cell used as both photodetector and energy harvester, with an AC/DC splitter feeding the DC to power a comparator and the AC to switch an RF antenna termination between two loads, thereby modulating the reflection coefficient and backscattering the ambient carrier. The tracking algorithm is a particle filter that fuses the discrete set of detected LED IDs (proximity) with continuous backscatter RSS, using a cell radius r_cell = (h_LED - h_BD) tan(Psi) to predict which LEDs cover a candidate position.

What would settle it

Tilt the same BD by 45 degrees or attach a small opaque patch to part of the PV cell, then repeat the path-tracking experiment; if the LED-ID detection fails or the 90th-percentile error rises well beyond 0.634 m, the orientation-controlled, unobstructed-LoS assumption is a load-bearing constraint. Alternatively, run a trajectory through a dark gap between cells and check whether the particle filter loses track and cannot recover.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that a backscatter device (BD) with only a photovoltaic cell, a comparator, and an RF switch can act as a light-to-RF relay for indoor positioning. Each LED luminaire broadcasts a unique ID using BFSK tones on distinct frequency pairs, allocated via a four-color mapping so adjacent cells do not interfere. The BD's PV cell converts the optical signal into an AC component that toggles the RF switch, reflecting the 2.4 GHz carrier with the LED ID encoded; the DC component powers the circuitry. An edge reader decodes the IDs, measures the backscatter RSS, and runs a particle filter that matches predicted versus measured LED-ID sets and penalizes RSS deviations. The result i

Load-bearing premise

The BD must remain oriented toward the ceiling with its field of view centered on the LEDs and with nothing blocking the light; the paper assumes upward orientation, and the experimenter deliberately moved it in a bent posture to avoid shadowing it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Warehouse and logistics assets could carry tags that cost under a dollar, never need battery replacement, and still report position at submeter accuracy.
  • The reader-side particle filter keeps the tag computationally passive, so energy and processing stay at the edge while the tag remains simple.
  • The four-color frequency-pair schedule means large light deployments can reuse the same optical frequencies with spatial separation, and adding luminaires does not require extra spectrum.
  • Accuracy on zigzag paths drops to about 0.44 m RMSE because the constant-velocity motion model in the filter lags frequent turns, indicating that the tracking algorithm—not the physical link—bounds dynamic performance.
  • Because the tag reports which LED cells it sees, the system inherently provides a coarse location (the cell ID) even when the RF RSS is noisy or blocked.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported accuracy depends on the tag keeping its photovoltaic cell pointed at the ceiling with an unobstructed field of view; any real asset that tilts or is covered would lose VLC proximity reports and likely degrade the particle filter. Adding multiple PV cells or explicitly modeling tag orientation could extend the system to arbitrary object poses.
  • The experiments use a dedicated signal generator as the RF source, so the system is validated with a stable, known carrier; a truly ambient deployment would need to handle fluctuating Wi-Fi carrier power and unknown source positions, which the paper does not test.
  • The measured BER and light-intensity maps confirm the circular-cell model, so the proximity report itself is reliable inside the cell; this could be exploited to output a coarse confidence bound alongside each position estimate, which may be valuable for asset-triage decisions.
  • The four-color scheduling caps the number of simultaneous distinguishable optical channels at four per cluster, but larger rooms can reuse those pairs with spatial separation, so the marginal cost of covering more area is low and the approach should scale to open-plan environments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a hybrid visible light communication (VLC) and backscatter communication (BC) system for indoor asset tracking. A battery-free backscatter device (BD) harvests light energy from LED luminaires, receives LED identification (ID) signals via a photovoltaic cell, and modulates ambient RF carriers to report the received IDs to an edge reader. The reader decodes the LED-ID set and the backscatter RSS, and a particle filter fuses these measurements to estimate the BD position. The authors design a four-color frequency-division multiplexing scheme for the LED cells, implement a proof-of-concept with six LEDs, a signal generator, and a USRP, and report experimental median and 90th-percentile positioning errors of 0.318 m and 0.634 m across four trajectories.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a meaningful step toward energy-neutral indoor tracking: a µW-level, batteryless tag that avoids active RF synthesis and complex photodetectors may still achieve submeter accuracy by combining VLC proximity reports with backscatter RSS. The experimental core is a genuine strength: end-to-end BER measurements on a 99-point grid, honest per-path statistics with standard deviations, and physical positioning trials with five repetitions per trajectory. The simulations are less persuasive as independent evidence because they reuse the same analytic RSS model that feeds the particle-filter likelihood, making them self-consistent rather than externally validating. The central accuracy claim is nevertheless grounded in physical measurements, not in the simulations alone.

major comments (5)
  1. [III-D3, Eq. (19), Algorithm 1] The match-or-penalty term assigns weight zero when no measured LED ID matches any predicted ID. If the BD is in a dark outage zone (mapped in Fig. 11), I_mea is empty, every particle receives zero weight, and normalization at Algorithm 1 line 15 fails. The manuscript never specifies how the PF handles I_mea=∅, and Section V-B reports that the operator moved the BD manually to avoid blocking the light. The reported accuracy therefore does not cover outage behavior. Please specify a fallback (e.g., RSS-only update, reinitialization, or outage detection) and test on trajectories that cross the dark regions shown in Fig. 11.
  2. [V-A vs Table II vs Fig. 12] The LED height is internally inconsistent. Section V-A states h_LED=1.9 m, Table II lists h_LED=2.0 m, and Fig. 12 uses r_cell=0.572 m, which matches h_LED=1.9 m (with h_BD=1.57 m and Ψ=60°). The inconsistent value changes the nominal cell radius from 0.744 m to 0.572 m and affects the coverage analysis. Please align the text, table, and figures.
  3. [Eq. (8) and Table II] The backscatter-efficiency expression ξ=(χ_f χ_b M)/Θ² is undefined when Θ=0, yet Table II sets Θ=0 as the 'on-object penalty.' Since ξ enters Eq. (13), the RSS model used in the particle-filter likelihood is not well-defined under the stated parameters. Please correct the equation or the parameter value (e.g., Θ=1 for no object) and verify that the simulations and experiments are consistent with the corrected definition.
  4. [III-B and V-B] The reported accuracy is conditional on controlled orientation and unobstructed LoS. Eq. (14) assumes the BD is oriented upward with its FoV centered on the LEDs, and Section V-B states the operator moved the BD in a bent posture to avoid blocking the light. Real assets will tilt, rotate, or be partially covered, which will shrink or drop VLC cells; the PF has no orientation state and no mechanism for empty LED sets. Please scope the conclusions to this controlled condition or add experiments that quantify sensitivity to orientation and occlusion.
  5. [V-A and III-D2] The simulations use the same analytic RSS model (Eq. (13)) that the particle-filter likelihood uses, so the simulation results are self-consistent rather than independent validation of the RSS model. The experimental measurements are the main independent evidence, but the paper does not report a calibration of the RSS model against measured backscatter RSS (e.g., reader gain, cable/switch losses, antenna installation offsets). Please report a calibration procedure or a sensitivity analysis showing that the experimental accuracy is not driven by unmodeled RSS biases.
minor comments (5)
  1. [IV-B] The reader signal-processing paragraph refers to 'MA TLAB' with a spacing artifact; please fix the typo.
  2. [Fig. 13, Table III] The notation 'Exp 1'–'Exp 5' is used for experimental repetitions; consider using 'Run' or 'Trial' for consistency with the repeated-trajectory description.
  3. [II-B] The system is described as using 'ambient RF carriers,' but the experimental RFS is a dedicated signal generator (Section IV-A), not an ambient WLAN AP. This distinction should be stated explicitly in the experimental section, since it affects the interpretation of 'ambient backscatter.'
  4. [Table IV] The comparison with state-of-the-art systems uses reported accuracies from different testbeds and conditions; a short caveat that these numbers are not directly comparable would be useful.
  5. [III-D3] The phrase 'neutral weight one' for a matched ID and 'penalty weight zero' otherwise is binary; the paper does not exploit the number of matched IDs or the number of extra/missing IDs. This is fine, but please state explicitly that the ID update is purely binary so that the RSS term carries the continuous refinement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the headline accuracy is a measured result, and the model reuse in simulations is self-consistency, not circular.

full rationale

The central claim—0.318 m median / 0.634 m 90th-percentile positioning error—is an empirical result reported in Section V-B and Fig. 14 from physical measurements of the implemented system; it is not derived from the PF equations or from a fitted parameter. The particle filter in Section III-D only fuses decoded LED-ID proximity reports and backscatter RSS, and the experiments use real decoded IDs and RSS values, so the accuracy claim is not forced by the algorithm's own likelihood. The simulations in Section V-A reuse the same channel model that defines the PF measurement model—Eq. (13) for backscatter RSS and Eq. (14) for the VLC cell radius—making the Monte Carlo results self-consistency checks rather than independent evidence, but this does not fabricate the experimental result. The VLC cell radius r_cell = (h_LED − h_BD) tan(Ψ) is a geometric consequence of the LoS/FoV model, and it is independently corroborated by end-to-end BER heatmaps in Fig. 12, so Eq. (14) is not circularly validated by the PF. Self-citations [37], [38] support the BD circuit design ('The BD in this setup consists of a photodetector, an energy harvester, a backscatter modulator, and an RF antenna [37], [38]') and [40] is a standard Lambertian channel/cell reference; none of these citations force the positioning result. The genuine limitations are scoping/robustness concerns, not circularity: Section III-B states 'for simplicity, this paper considers an upward orientation of the BD,' and Section V-B reports that the operator moved the BD 'maintaining a bent posture to avoid blocking the light'; Fig. 11 maps outage zones, and Algorithm 1 with Section III-D3 assigns zero weight when no LED ID matches, so an empty measured ID set can collapse the filter. These are validity limits for arbitrary asset orientations, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs. No specific circular reduction (e.g., Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or fitted parameter renamed as prediction) is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The system is a synthesis of standard models and existing hardware concepts; no new physical entity is introduced. The main costs are the upward-orientation and LoS assumptions, the uncalibrated RSS model constants, and hand-set PF noise and particle-count values. These assumptions are individually reasonable but are not independently verified.

free parameters (6)
  • BD height h_BD = 1.57 m
    Headline accuracy is reported at this height; the simulation sweep in Fig. 9 shows error varies with height, and 1.57 m is near the optimum. No aggregate over heights is reported.
  • RSS measurement noise std dev sigma_v = 5 dB
    Used in the Gaussian RSS likelihood (Eq. 19) and in simulations; no calibration or sensitivity analysis is presented.
  • Process noise std dev sigma_w = 1
    White-noise acceleration model (Eqs. 15-16); chosen without sensitivity study, although particle-filter trajectory quality depends on it.
  • Particle count N_p = 5000
    Algorithm 1 and Table II; accuracy vs. complexity trade-off is not explored.
  • Backscatter modulation factor M and polarization mismatches chi_f, chi_b = M = 0.5, chi_f = chi_b = 0.5
    Listed in Table II and used in the RSS model (Eqs. 8 and 13); assumed rather than measured for the prototype.
  • Implicit RSS offset (reader gain, cable/switch losses, antenna installation) = not reported
    The PF uses absolute RSS from Eq. (13), but no calibration against measured backscatter power is reported, so any unknown constant offset would bias the RSS likelihood.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Direct LoS Lambertian VLC channel; reflections neglected
    Section II-A, Eq. (3). Standard for VLP but excludes multipath and partial blockage.
  • domain assumption BD orientation fixed upward with FoV semi-angle Psi
    Section III-B, Eq. (14). The paper explicitly assumes no rotation or tilting; realistic asset tilt breaks VLC cell coverage.
  • domain assumption 3GPP Indoor Hotspot path-loss model for forward and backscatter RF links
    Section II-B, Eqs. (9)-(12). Standard model but parameters are taken from 3GPP rather than measured in the test room.
  • domain assumption PV cell can simultaneously harvest DC energy and convey AC data via the comparator
    Section IV-A. The power budget uses datasheet currents rather than a direct measurement of the operating prototype's total consumption.
  • standard math White-noise acceleration kinematic motion model
    Section III-D1, Eqs. (15)-(16). Standard tracking model.
  • standard math Bayesian particle filter with matched measurement likelihood
    Section III-D, Eqs. (19)-(21). Standard sequential Monte Carlo machinery.
  • standard math Four-color theorem guarantees a valid frequency-pair assignment for adjacent VLC cells
    Section III-C. The theorem is proven, but the practical constraint of only four frequency pairs for more than four cells is handled by reuse at non-adjacent positions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Joint Visible Light and Backscatter Communications for Proximity-Based Indoor Asset Tracking Enabled by Energy-Neutral Devices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7HOGNOYQ

@misc{pith2026251027217,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Joint Visible Light and Backscatter Communications for Proximity-Based Indoor Asset Tracking Enabled by Energy-Neutral Devices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7HOGNOYQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.27217}
}
read the original abstract

In next-generation wireless systems, providing location-based mobile computing services for energy-neutral devices has become a crucial objective for the provision of sustainable Internet of Things (IoT). Visible light positioning (VLP) has gained great research attention as a complementary method to radio frequency (RF) solutions since it can leverage ubiquitous lighting infrastructure. However, conventional VLP receivers often rely on photodetectors or cameras that are power-hungry, complex, and expensive. To address this challenge, we propose a hybrid indoor asset tracking system that integrates visible light communication (VLC) and backscatter communication (BC) within a simultaneous lightwave information and power transfer (SLIPT) framework. We design a low-complexity and energy-neutral IoT node, namely backscatter device (BD) which harvests energy from light-emitting diode (LED) access points, and then modulates and reflects ambient RF carriers to indicate its location within particular VLC cells. We present a multi-cell VLC deployment with frequency division multiplexing (FDM) method that mitigates interference among LED access points by assigning them distinct frequency pairs based on a four-color map scheduling principle. We develop a lightweight particle filter (PF) tracking algorithm at an edge RF reader, where the fusion of proximity reports and the received backscatter signal strength are employed to track the BD. Experimental results show that this approach achieves the positioning error of 0.318 m at 50th percentile and 0.634 m at 90th percentile, while avoiding the use of complex photodetectors and active RF synthesizing components at the energy-neutral IoT node. By demonstrating robust performance in multiple indoor trajectories, the proposed solution enables scalable, cost-effective, and energy-neutral indoor tracking for pervasive and edge-assisted IoT applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.27217 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the joint VLC-BC system proposed for indo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A schematic diagram of the joint VLC-BC system. LED AP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An example of VLC deployment based on FDM. A VLC cluste [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Implementation of the proof of concept. Six LED lumin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Prototype of the BD with its schematic. A 2-euro coin i [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Signal processing flow of the received backscatter si [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Heatmap of the simulated VLC signal power at the BD ove [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Tracking error evaluation of the simulations with 50 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Empirical CDF of the positioning errors among simul [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Heatmap of the measured light intensity at the BD ove [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Spatial distribution of end-to-end communication [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Experimental results of tracking the BD on path 1-4 w [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Empirical CDF of the positioning errors among measu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Zero-energy devices for 6G: Technical enablers at a glance,

    O. L ´ opez, R. K. Singh, D.-T. Phan-Huy, E. Katranaras, N. Mazloum, K. Ruttik, R. J¨ antti, H. Khan, O. Rosabal, P . Alexias, P . Rag huwanshi, D. Ruiz-Guirola, B. Singh, A. H¨ oglund, D. P . V an, A. Azarbahram, and J. Famaey, “Zero-energy devices for 6G: Technical enablers at a glance,” IEEE Internet Things Mag. , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 14–22, Apr. 2025

    2025

  2. [2]

    A vision of 6G wireless sy stems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research pro blems,

    W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “A vision of 6G wireless sy stems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research pro blems,” IEEE Network, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 134–142, May 2020

    2020

  3. [3]

    A survey on indoor positioning systems for IoT-based applications,

    P . S. Farahsari, A. Farahzadi, J. Rezazadeh, and A. Baghe ri, “A survey on indoor positioning systems for IoT-based applications, ” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 7680–7699, May 2022

    2022

  4. [4]

    Study on Ambient IoT in RAN,

    3GPP , “Study on Ambient IoT in RAN,” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TS 38 .848, Jun. 2023, Ver. 18.0.0

    2023

  5. [5]

    Ambie nt IoT: A missing link in 3GPP IoT devices landscape,

    M. M. Butt, N. R. Mangalvedhe, N. K. Pratas, J. Harrebek, J . Kimionis, M. Tayyab, O.-E. Barbu, R. Ratasuk, and B. V ejlgaard, “Ambie nt IoT: A missing link in 3GPP IoT devices landscape,” IEEE Internet Things Mag., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 85–92, Mar. 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    A survey on low- power GNSS,

    A. Grenier, E. S. Lohan, A. Ometov, and J. Nurmi, “A survey on low- power GNSS,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor . , vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1482– 1509, Apr. 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Easitrack: Deci meter- level indoor tracking with graph-based particle filtering,

    C. Wu, F. Zhang, B. Wang, and K. J. R. Liu, “Easitrack: Deci meter- level indoor tracking with graph-based particle filtering, ” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2397–2411, Mar. 2020

    2020

  8. [8]

    Location fingerprinting with b luetooth low energy beacons,

    R. Faragher and R. Harle, “Location fingerprinting with b luetooth low energy beacons,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2418–2428, Nov. 2015

    2015

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    LTrack: A LoRa-based indoor tra cking system for mobile robots,

    K. Hu, C. Gu, and J. Chen, “LTrack: A LoRa-based indoor tra cking system for mobile robots,” IEEE Trans. V ehic. Technol., vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 4264–4276, Apr. 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Indoor localizat ion with multi-beam of 5G new radio signals,

    X. Zhou, L. Chen, Y . Ruan, and R. Chen, “Indoor localizat ion with multi-beam of 5G new radio signals,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 260–11 275, Sep. 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    The principle, methods and recent progress in RFID positioning techniques: A review,

    J. Xu, Z. Li, K. Zhang, J. Y ang, N. Gao, Z. Zhang, and Z. Men g, “The principle, methods and recent progress in RFID positioning techniques: A review,” IEEE J. Radio Freq. Identif. , vol. 7, pp. 50–63, Jan. 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    UWTracking: Passive human tracking under LOS/NLOS scenar ios using IR-UWB radar,

    Z. Guo, D. Wang, L. Gui, B. Sheng, H. Cai, F. Xiao, and J. Ha n, “UWTracking: Passive human tracking under LOS/NLOS scenar ios using IR-UWB radar,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. , vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 11 853–11 870, Dec. 2024. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 14

    2024

  5. [13]

    Powering the Internet of Things through light c ommuni- cation,

    I. Demirkol, D. Camps-Mur, J. Paradells, M. Combalia, W . Popoola, and H. Haas, “Powering the Internet of Things through light c ommuni- cation,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 107–113, Jun. 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    A survey of positioning systems using visible L ED lights,

    Y . Zhuang, L. Hua, L. Qi, J. Y ang, P . Cao, Y . Cao, Y . Wu, J. Thompson, and H. Haas, “A survey of positioning systems using visible L ED lights,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. , vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1963–1988, Q3 2018

    1963

  7. [15]

    A su rvey on indoor visible light positioning systems: Fundamentals, a pplications, and challenges,

    Z. Zhu, Y . Y ang, M. Chen, C. Guo, J. Cheng, and S. Cui, “A su rvey on indoor visible light positioning systems: Fundamentals, a pplications, and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1656–1686, Jun. 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Visi ble light posi- tioning as a next-generation indoor positioning technolog y: A tutorial,

    S. Bastiaens, M. Alijani, W. Joseph, and D. Plets, “Visi ble light posi- tioning as a next-generation indoor positioning technolog y: A tutorial,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. , vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2867–2913, Q4 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Integra tion of visible light communication and positioning within 5G networks for Internet of Things,

    H. Y ang, W.-D. Zhong, C. Chen, and A. Alphones, “Integra tion of visible light communication and positioning within 5G networks for Internet of Things,” IEEE Network , vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 134–140, Sep. 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    An advanced integrated visible light communi cation and localization system,

    H. Y ang, S. Zhang, A. Alphones, C. Chen, K.-Y . Lam, Z. Xio ng, L. Xiao, and Y . Zhang, “An advanced integrated visible light communi cation and localization system,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 7149– 7162, Dec. 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Coordinated resource allocation-based integrate d visible light communication and positioning systems for indoor IoT,

    H. Y ang, W.-D. Zhong, C. Chen, A. Alphones, P . Du, S. Zhan g, and X. Xie, “Coordinated resource allocation-based integrate d visible light communication and positioning systems for indoor IoT,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 4671–4684, Jul. 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Qo s- driven optimized design-based integrated visible light co mmunication and positioning for indoor IoT networks,

    H. Y ang, W.-D. Zhong, C. Chen, A. Alphones, and P . Du, “Qo s- driven optimized design-based integrated visible light co mmunication and positioning for indoor IoT networks,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 269–283, Jan. 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    A VLC-based beacon location system for mobile application s,

    G. del Campo-Jimenez, J. M. Perandones, and F. J. Lopez- Hernandez, “A VLC-based beacon location system for mobile application s,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Localization GNSS , Aug. 2013

    2013

  14. [22]

    Indoor local ization system using visible light communication,

    P . Cherntanomwong and W. Chantharasena, “Indoor local ization system using visible light communication,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Electr . Eng., Chiang Mai, Thailand, Feb. 2015, pp. 480–483

    2015

  15. [23]

    The LED-ID det ec- tion and recognition method based on visible light position ing using proximity method,

    C. Xie, W. Guan, Y . Wu, L. Fang, and Y . Cai, “The LED-ID det ec- tion and recognition method based on visible light position ing using proximity method,” IEEE Photonics J. , vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–16, Apr. 2018

    2018

  16. [24]

    Access frameworks and application scenarios for hybrid VLC and RF systems: State o f the art, challenges, and trends,

    F. Wang, F. Y ang, J. Song, and Z. Han, “Access frameworks and application scenarios for hybrid VLC and RF systems: State o f the art, challenges, and trends,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 55–61, Mar. 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Hybrid RF/VLC systems: A comprehensiv e survey on network topologies, performance analyses, application s, and future directions,

    H. Abuella, M. Elamassie, M. Uysal, Z. Xu, E. Serpedin, K . A. Qaraqe, and S. Ekin, “Hybrid RF/VLC systems: A comprehensiv e survey on network topologies, performance analyses, application s, and future directions,” IEEE Access , vol. 9, pp. 160 402–160 436, Nov. 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Achievable information rate in hybrid VLC-RF networks with lighting en ergy harvesting,

    Y . Guo, K. Xiong, Y . Lu, D. Wang, P . Fan, and K. B. Letaief,“Achievable information rate in hybrid VLC-RF networks with lighting en ergy harvesting,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 6852–6864, Oct. 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    En d-to-end performance optimization of a dual-hop hybrid VLC/RF IoT sy stem based on SLIPT,

    H. Peng, Q. Li, A. Pandharipande, X. Ge, and J. Zhang, “En d-to-end performance optimization of a dual-hop hybrid VLC/RF IoT sy stem based on SLIPT,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 8, no. 24, pp. 17 356– 17 371, Dec. 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Simultaneous lightwave information and power transfer (SLIPT),

    P . D. Diamantoulakis, G. K. Karagiannidis, and Z. Ding, “Simultaneous lightwave information and power transfer (SLIPT),” IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 764–773, Sep. 2018

    2018

  21. [29]

    Cooperative hybrid VLC/RF systems with SL IPT,

    Y . Xiao, P . D. Diamantoulakis, Z. Fang, L. Hao, Z. Ma, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Cooperative hybrid VLC/RF systems with SL IPT,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 2532–2545, Jan. 2021

    2021

  22. [30]

    Sustainability-dr iven resource allocation for slipt-assisted hybrid VLC/RF IoT systems,

    T. Tang, L. Shi, Q. Li, and Z. Xiong, “Sustainability-dr iven resource allocation for slipt-assisted hybrid VLC/RF IoT systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1765–1769, Jun. 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Ambient backscatter: Wireless communication out of thin a ir,

    V . Liu, A. Parks, V . Talla, S. Gollakota, D. Wetherall, a nd J. R. Smith, “Ambient backscatter: Wireless communication out of thin a ir,” ACM Comput. Commun. Rev. , vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 39–50, Aug. 2013

    2013

  24. [32]

    Ambient backscatter communications: A contemporary surv ey,

    N. V an Huynh, D. T. Hoang, X. Lu, D. Niyato, P . Wang, and D. I. Kim, “Ambient backscatter communications: A contemporary surv ey,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor ., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2889–2922, May 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    Backscatter communication meets practical battery-free Internet of Things: A survey and outlook,

    T. Jiang, Y . Zhang, W. Ma, M. Peng, Y . Peng, M. Feng, and G. Liu, “Backscatter communication meets practical battery-free Internet of Things: A survey and outlook,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. , vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 2021–2051, May 2023

    2021

  26. [34]

    Connecting battery-free IoT tags using LED bulbs,

    D. Giustiniano, A. V arshney, and T. V oigt, “Connecting battery-free IoT tags using LED bulbs,” in Proc. ACM W orkshop on Hot Topics in Networks , New Y ork, NY , Nov. 2018, p. 99–105

    2018

  27. [35]

    Tunnel- LiFi: Bringing LiFi to commodity Internet of Things devices ,

    M. S. Mir, W. Y an, P . Dutta, D. Giustiniano, and A. V arshn ey, “Tunnel- LiFi: Bringing LiFi to commodity Internet of Things devices ,” in Proc. Int. W orkshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications , New Y ork, NY , Feb. 2023, p. 1–7

    2023

  28. [36]

    LiFi for low-power and long-range RF backscatter,

    M. S. Mir, B. G. Guzman, A. V arshney, and D. Giustiniano, “LiFi for low-power and long-range RF backscatter,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. , vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 2237–2252, Dec. 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Integration of visible light and backscatter communications for ambient Internet of Things,

    B. Xie, A. Dowhuszko, K. Koskinen, L. Mela, J. Lietz´ en, K. Ruttik, R. J¨ antti, and J. H¨ am¨ al¨ ainen, “Integration of visible light and backscatter communications for ambient Internet of Things,” in Proc. IEEE V eh. Technol. Conf., Singapore, Singapore, Sep. 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Light-controlled thin film backscatter device using addit ive manufac- turing,

    B. Xie, L. Mela, J. Lietz´ en, K. Ruttik, A. Dowhuszko, an d R. J¨ antti, “Light-controlled thin film backscatter device using addit ive manufac- turing,” IEEE Sens. Lett. , vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1–4, May 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Li2BC: F rom visible light communication to ambient RF backscatter,

    K. Koskinen, B. Xie, K. Ruttik, and R. J¨ antti, “Li2BC: F rom visible light communication to ambient RF backscatter,” in Proc. 16th Ger . Microw. Conf., Dresden, Germany, Mar. 2025, pp. 346–349

    2025

  32. [40]

    Indoor plann ing of optical wireless networks for line-of-sight condition i n access and backhauling,

    M. Abedi, A. A. Dowhuszko, and R. Wichman, “Indoor plann ing of optical wireless networks for line-of-sight condition i n access and backhauling,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 2538–2553, Sep. 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Complete link budgets for backscatter- radio and RFID systems,

    J. D. Griffin and G. D. Durgin, “Complete link budgets for backscatter- radio and RFID systems,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. , vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 11–25, Jul. 2009

    2009

  34. [42]

    Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 t o 100 GHz,

    3GPP , “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 t o 100 GHz,” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TS 38.901, Jun. 2024, Ver. 18.0.0

    2024

  35. [43]

    Optimizi ng energy- harvesting hybrid VLC/RF networks with random receiver ori entation,

    A. H. F. Raouf, C. K. Anjinappa, and I. Guvenc, “Optimizi ng energy- harvesting hybrid VLC/RF networks with random receiver ori entation,” IEEE Access , vol. 12, pp. 147 574–147 588, Oct. 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    Th e four-colour theorem,

    N. Robertson, D. Sanders, P . Seymour, and R. Thomas, “Th e four-colour theorem,” Journal of combinatorial theory, Series B , vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 2–44, May 1997

    1997

  37. [45]

    Tse and P

    D. Tse and P . Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication . Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  38. [46]

    Bar-Shalom, X

    Y . Bar-Shalom, X. R. Li, and T. Kirubarajan, Estimation with Appli- cations to Tracking and Navigation: Theory Algorithms and S oftware. John Wiley & Sons, 2004

    2004

  39. [47]

    Goldsmith, Wireless Communications

    A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications. Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  40. [48]

    Posi tioning using visible light communications: A perspective arcs app roach,

    Z. Zhu, R. Bao, Y . Y ang, C. Guo, M. Chen, and W. Saad, “Posi tioning using visible light communications: A perspective arcs app roach,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , Oct. 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Epsilon: A vis ible light based positioning system,

    L. Li, P . Hu, C. Peng, G. Shen, and F. Zhao, “Epsilon: A vis ible light based positioning system,” in Proc. USENIX Symp. Netw. Syst. Des. Implement., Seattle, US, Apr. 2014, pp. 331–343

    2014

  42. [50]

    A hybrid indoor positionin g system based on visible light communication and bluetooth RSS trilatera tion,

    L. Albraheem and S. Alawad, “A hybrid indoor positionin g system based on visible light communication and bluetooth RSS trilatera tion,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 16, Jul. 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.