pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.13665 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-17 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Einstein-Maxwell fields as solutions of Einstein gravity coupled to conformally invariant non-linear electrodynamics

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords Einstein-Maxwell solutionsnonlinear electrodynamicsconformally invariantexact solutionsstatic spacetimesKilling vectorsdyonic fieldsNewman-Penrose formalism
0
0 comments X

The pith

All static Einstein-Maxwell solutions extend to any conformally invariant nonlinear electrodynamics by constant rescaling of the electromagnetic field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a criterion, expressed either through electromagnetic invariants or the canonical Newman-Penrose form of the self-dual Maxwell field, that identifies which Einstein-Maxwell configurations remain solutions after a constant rescaling of the field strength. This criterion is satisfied by every static configuration and, more generally, by every configuration that admits a non-null twistfree Killing vector field. A sympathetic reader would care because the result lets one take the large existing catalog of exact Einstein-Maxwell solutions and obtain corresponding exact solutions in every conformally invariant nonlinear electrodynamics without re-solving the field equations. The duality invariance of the linear theory survives the extension, so dyonic solutions remain available in the broader class of theories.

Core claim

Einstein-Maxwell sourcefree non-null configurations that admit a non-null twistfree Killing vector field can be extended to solutions of Einstein gravity coupled to any conformally invariant nonlinear electrodynamics by means of a constant rescaling of the electromagnetic field. The extension is guaranteed once the electromagnetic invariants (or equivalently the canonical Newman-Penrose scalars of the self-dual Maxwell field) satisfy a simple compatibility condition with the nonlinear field equations. The paper uses this fact to convert several known Einstein-Maxwell spacetimes, including the Ozsváth homogeneous universe, the Levi-Civita-Bertotti-Robinson black hole, a charged C-metric, and,

What carries the argument

The compatibility criterion on the electromagnetic invariants (or the canonical Newman-Penrose form of the self-dual Maxwell field) that guarantees a constant rescaling satisfies the nonlinear equations for arbitrary conformally invariant Lagrangians.

If this is right

  • Any known static Einstein-Maxwell solution, such as the Ozsváth universe or the Bertotti-Robinson black hole, immediately supplies an exact solution in every conformally invariant nonlinear electrodynamics.
  • Duality invariance of the linear theory persists under the rescaling, yielding dyonic solutions in the nonlinear theories.
  • The same rescaling converts the charged C-metric and non-expanding gravitational waves on the Bonnor-Melvin background into solutions of the extended theories.
  • All configurations possessing a non-null twistfree Killing vector become available as exact solutions across the entire family of conformally invariant nonlinear models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The criterion may be used to test whether a given nonlinear electrodynamics admits the same static solutions as the linear theory.
  • If the criterion holds only for static or twistfree cases, it highlights a possible obstruction to extending time-dependent or rotating Einstein-Maxwell solutions to nonlinear models.
  • The result suggests that the solution-generating power of Killing vectors in Einstein-Maxwell theory carries over to a wide class of nonlinear electrodynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The electromagnetic invariants remain compatible with a constant rescaling that satisfies the nonlinear field equations for arbitrary conformally invariant Lagrangians.

What would settle it

An explicit static Einstein-Maxwell metric whose electromagnetic invariants fail the compatibility criterion for at least one conformally invariant nonlinear Lagrangian, or a direct substitution of the rescaled field into the nonlinear equations that yields a nonzero remainder.

read the original abstract

We study Einstein-Maxwell (non-null) sourcefree configurations that can be extended to any conformally invariant non-linear electrodynamics (CINLE) by a constant rescaling of the electromagnetic field. We first obtain a criterion which characterizes such extendable solutions in terms either of the electromagnetic invariants, or (equivalently) of the canonical Newman-Penrose form of the self-dual Maxwell field. This is then used to argue that all static configurations are extendable (more generally, all configurations admitting a non-null twistfree Killing vector field). One can thus draw from the extensive literature to straightforwardly extend to CINLE various known exact solutions, whereby the duality invariance of the Einstein-Maxwell theory allows for dyonic solutions even in more general theories. This is illustrated by a few explicit examples, including the homogeneous $\Lambda<0$ universe of Ozsv\'ath, a black hole in the universe of Levi-Civita, Bertotti and Robinson, a generalization of the charged $C$-metric, and non-expanding gravitational waves in the Bonnor-Melvin background.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that source-free non-null Einstein-Maxwell solutions admitting a non-null twistfree Killing vector field (including all static configurations) can be extended to Einstein gravity coupled to arbitrary conformally invariant nonlinear electrodynamics (CINLE) via constant rescaling of the electromagnetic field. It first derives a necessary and sufficient criterion on the electromagnetic invariants (or equivalently the canonical Newman-Penrose form of the self-dual Maxwell field) for such extendability. The criterion is then shown to hold identically for the indicated class by using the Lie derivative condition along the Killing vector to constrain the NP scalars to the aligned form (typically only the middle scalar nonzero). Duality invariance of the linear theory permits dyonic extensions. This is illustrated with explicit examples including the Ozsváth homogeneous Λ<0 universe, a black hole in the Levi-Civita-Bertotti-Robinson universe, a generalization of the charged C-metric, and non-expanding gravitational waves in the Bonnor-Melvin background.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result is significant because it supplies a general, symmetry-based method to generate exact solutions in any CINLE theory directly from the extensive catalog of known Einstein-Maxwell solutions, without re-solving the nonlinear equations. The approach exploits Killing-vector constraints and duality invariance to cover both electric and dyonic cases uniformly. This could streamline studies of black holes, gravitational waves, and cosmological models in modified electrodynamics, where exact solutions are otherwise scarce. The parameter-free character with respect to the specific CINLE Lagrangian is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Killing-vector argument): the reduction of the NP scalars via the Lie derivative along the non-null twistfree Killing vector to the aligned form (only the middle scalar nonzero) is load-bearing for showing the criterion holds identically; the explicit steps relating the Lie derivative condition to the vanishing of the other NP scalars and the consequent satisfaction of the nonlinear equations for arbitrary CINLE should be written out in full.
  2. [§2] §2 (criterion derivation): the equivalence between the electromagnetic-invariants criterion and the canonical NP form is used to establish sufficiency, but the manuscript should verify that this form satisfies the full nonlinear field equations without additional restrictions on the Lagrangian; a short general expansion of the Euler-Lagrange equations for a generic conformally invariant L(F, *F) would confirm this.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists four examples but does not indicate which section contains their explicit verification; a brief cross-reference would aid readability.
  2. [Introduction] The acronym CINLE is introduced without expansion on first use; define 'conformally invariant nonlinear electrodynamics' at its initial appearance.
  3. [§2] Notation for the self-dual Maxwell field and its NP scalars should include a short reminder of the standard conventions (e.g., the ordering of Φ0, Φ1, Φ2) for readers outside the NP formalism.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Killing-vector argument): the reduction of the NP scalars via the Lie derivative along the non-null twistfree Killing vector to the aligned form (only the middle scalar nonzero) is load-bearing for showing the criterion holds identically; the explicit steps relating the Lie derivative condition to the vanishing of the other NP scalars and the consequent satisfaction of the nonlinear equations for arbitrary CINLE should be written out in full.

    Authors: We agree that the derivation in §3 would benefit from a more explicit step-by-step presentation. In the revised manuscript we have expanded this section to include the full chain: starting from the Lie derivative condition along the non-null twistfree Killing vector (which implies that the Maxwell field is invariant up to a possible scaling), we derive the resulting algebraic constraints on the Newman-Penrose scalars φ₀, φ₁, φ₂. These constraints force φ₀ = φ₂ = 0 while leaving φ₁ nonzero, which is precisely the aligned form that satisfies the electromagnetic-invariants criterion. We then substitute this form into the nonlinear field equations and show that they reduce to the Einstein equations sourced by the appropriate stress-energy tensor for any conformally invariant L, without further restrictions. Intermediate equations and brief justifications have been added for transparency. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2] §2 (criterion derivation): the equivalence between the electromagnetic-invariants criterion and the canonical NP form is used to establish sufficiency, but the manuscript should verify that this form satisfies the full nonlinear field equations without additional restrictions on the Lagrangian; a short general expansion of the Euler-Lagrange equations for a generic conformally invariant L(F, *F) would confirm this.

    Authors: We appreciate this suggestion for strengthening the sufficiency argument. In the revised §2 we have inserted a short general expansion of the Euler-Lagrange equations derived from an arbitrary conformally invariant Lagrangian L(F, *F). We then substitute the canonical NP form (only the middle scalar nonzero) and verify that the resulting equations are satisfied identically, reducing to the Einstein equations with the correct nonlinear stress-energy tensor. This holds without imposing any additional conditions on the specific functional form of L beyond the conformal invariance already assumed. The added paragraph makes the verification explicit and confirms that the criterion is sufficient for arbitrary CINLE. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper first derives a general criterion on electromagnetic invariants (or equivalently the canonical NP form of the self-dual Maxwell field) that is necessary and sufficient for a constant rescaling to satisfy the nonlinear equations for arbitrary CINLE. It then shows this criterion holds identically for any source-free Einstein-Maxwell solution admitting a non-null twistfree Killing vector by applying the Lie derivative condition along that vector, which reduces the NP scalars to the required aligned form. This step relies on standard GR identities and the duality invariance of the linear theory rather than any fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The argument is independent of the target result and draws from external literature on exact solutions, making the derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Einstein equations, the definition of conformally invariant nonlinear electrodynamics, and the existence of source-free non-null electromagnetic fields; no new free parameters or postulated entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Einstein field equations with cosmological constant hold for the spacetime metric
    Invoked throughout as the gravitational sector.
  • domain assumption The nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangian is conformally invariant
    The target class of theories to which solutions are extended.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5486 in / 1302 out tokens · 40585 ms · 2026-05-17T21:43:30.310542+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    We first obtain a criterion which characterizes such extendable solutions in terms either of the electromagnetic invariants, or (equivalently) of the canonical Newman-Penrose form of the self-dual Maxwell field... x=const (9)

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exact rotating dilatonic branch in ModMax electrodynamics without Maxwell analogue

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Exact rotating dilatonic solutions exist in ModMax electrodynamics without a Maxwell analogue, including NUT and asymptotically flat cases plus a black-hole regime satisfying the null energy condition exterior to the horizon.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Mie,Grundlagen einer Theorie der Materie,Ann

    G. Mie,Grundlagen einer Theorie der Materie,Ann. Physik342(1912) 511–534

  2. [2]

    Born,Modified field equations with a finite radius of the electron,Nature132(1933) 282

    M. Born,Modified field equations with a finite radius of the electron,Nature132(1933) 282

  3. [3]

    Born and L

    M. Born and L. Infeld,Foundations of the new field theory,Proc. R. Soc.A144(1934) 425–451

  4. [4]

    Plebański,Lectures on non-linear electrodynamics

    J. Plebański,Lectures on non-linear electrodynamics. Nordita, Copenhagen, 1970

  5. [5]

    Białynicki-Birula,Nonlinear electrodynamics: variations on a theme by Born and Infeld, in Quantum Theory of Particles and Fields(B

    I. Białynicki-Birula,Nonlinear electrodynamics: variations on a theme by Born and Infeld, in Quantum Theory of Particles and Fields(B. Jancewicz and J. Lukierski, eds.), pp. 31–48. World Scientific, Singapore, 1983

  6. [6]

    Schrödinger,Contributions to Born’s new theory of the electromagnetic field,Proc

    E. Schrödinger,Contributions to Born’s new theory of the electromagnetic field,Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A150(1935) 465–477

  7. [7]

    Schrödinger,A new exact solution in non-linear optics (two-wave-system),Proc

    E. Schrödinger,A new exact solution in non-linear optics (two-wave-system),Proc. Roy. Irish Acad.A49(1943) 59–66

  8. [8]

    Kichenassamy,Sur le champ électromagnétique singulier en théorie de Born–Infeld,C

    S. Kichenassamy,Sur le champ électromagnétique singulier en théorie de Born–Infeld,C. R. Hebd. Seanc. Acad. Sci.248(1959) 3690–3692

  9. [9]

    Kremer and S

    H. Kremer and S. Kichenassamy,Sur le champ électromagnétique singulier dans une théorie du type Born–Infeld,C. R. Hebd. Seanc. Acad. Sci.250(1960) 1192–1194

  10. [10]

    Peres,Nonlinear electrodynamics in general relativity,Phys

    A. Peres,Nonlinear electrodynamics in general relativity,Phys. Rev.122(1961) 273–274

  11. [11]

    Deser,Plane waves do not polarize the vacuum,J

    S. Deser,Plane waves do not polarize the vacuum,J. Phys. A8(1975) 1972–1974

  12. [12]

    Güven,Plane waves in effective theories of superstrings,Phys

    R. Güven,Plane waves in effective theories of superstrings,Phys. Lett.B191(1987) 275–281

  13. [13]

    Ortaggio and V

    M. Ortaggio and V. Pravda,Electromagnetic fields with vanishing scalar invariants,Class. Quantum Grav.33(2016) 115010

  14. [14]

    Ortaggio and V

    M. Ortaggio and V. Pravda,Electromagnetic fields with vanishing quantum corrections,Phys. Lett.B779(2018) 393–395. 9

  15. [15]

    Hervik, M

    S. Hervik, M. Ortaggio, and V. Pravda,Universal electromagnetic fields,Class. Quantum Grav.35(2018) 175017

  16. [16]

    Kuchynka and M

    M. Kuchynka and M. Ortaggio,Einstein-Maxwell fields with vanishing higher-order corrections,Phys. Rev.D99(2019) 044048

  17. [17]

    Gürses, Y

    M. Gürses, Y. Heydarzade, and Ç. Şentürk,Kerr-Schild-Kundt metrics in generic Einstein-Maxwell theories,Phys. Rev.D105(2022) 044004

  18. [18]

    Ortaggio,Einstein-Maxwell fields as solutions of higher-order theories,Eur

    M. Ortaggio,Einstein-Maxwell fields as solutions of higher-order theories,Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 1056

  19. [19]

    L. E. Morales,The Bertotti-Robinson solutions as interpreted in terms of nonlinear electrodynamics,Nuovo CimentoB68(1982) 55–72

  20. [20]

    Plebański and L

    J. Plebański and L. E. Morales,ExceptionalD-type solutions to Einstein’s equations with nonlinear electromagnetic sources andλ,Nuovo CimentoB92(1986) 61–77

  21. [21]

    Bandos, K

    I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin, and P. K. Townsend,Nonlinear duality-invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations,Phys. Rev.D102(2020) 121703(R)

  22. [22]

    B. P. Kosyakov,Nonlinear electrodynamics with the maximum allowable symmetries,Phys. Lett.B810(2020) 135840

  23. [23]

    Kosyakov,Introduction to the Classical Theory of Particles and Fields

    B. Kosyakov,Introduction to the Classical Theory of Particles and Fields. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007

  24. [24]

    V. I. Denisov, E. E. Dolgaya, V. A. Sokolov, and I. P. Denisova,Conformal invariant vacuum nonlinear electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.D96(2017) 036008

  25. [25]

    C. A. Escobar and L. F. Urrutia,Invariants of the electromagnetic field,J. Math. Phys.55 (2014) 032902

  26. [26]

    J. A. R. Cembranos, A. de la Cruz-Dombriz, and J. Jarillo,Reissner-Nordström black holes in the inverse electrodynamics model,JCAP02(2015) 042

  27. [27]

    I. P. Denisova, B. D. Garmaev, and V. A. Sokolov,Compact objects in conformal nonlinear electrodynamics,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 531

  28. [28]

    Smolić,Spacetimes dressed with stealth electromagnetic fields,Phys

    I. Smolić,Spacetimes dressed with stealth electromagnetic fields,Phys. Rev.D97(2018) 084041

  29. [29]

    Barrientos, A

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, and K. Pallikaris,Electromagnetized black holes and swirling backgrounds in nonlinear electrodynamics: The ModMax case,Phys. Lett.B860 (2025) 139214

  30. [30]

    Bokulić and C

    A. Bokulić and C. A. R. Herdeiro,Generalised Harrison transformations and black diholes in Einstein-ModMax,JHEP10(2025) 091

  31. [31]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt,Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second ed., 2003

  32. [32]

    Penrose and W

    R. Penrose and W. Rindler,Spinors and Space-Time, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984

  33. [33]

    E. T. Newman and R. Penrose,An approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients,J. Math. Phys.3(1962) 566–578. See also E. Newman and R. Penrose (1963), Errata,J. Math. Phys.4:998

  34. [34]

    J. L. Synge,Relativity: the Special Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1956

  35. [35]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolský,Exact Space-Times in Einstein’s General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009. 10

  36. [36]

    Das,On the static Einstein-Maxwell field equations,J

    A. Das,On the static Einstein-Maxwell field equations,J. Math. Phys.20(1979) 740–743

  37. [37]

    B. K. Harrison,New solutions of the Einstein–Maxwell equations from old,J. Math. Phys.9 (1968) 1744–1752

  38. [38]

    F. J. Ernst,New formulation of the axially symmetric gravitational field problem. II,Phys. Rev.168(1968) 1415–1417

  39. [39]

    Rácz,Maxwell fields in spacetimes admitting nonnull Killing vectors,Class

    I. Rácz,Maxwell fields in spacetimes admitting nonnull Killing vectors,Class. Quantum Grav. 10(1993) L167–L172

  40. [40]

    Flores-Alfonso, B

    D. Flores-Alfonso, B. A. González-Morales, R. Linares, and M. Maceda,Black holes and gravitational waves sourced by non-linear duality rotation-invariant conformal electromagnetic matter,Phys. Lett.B812(2021) 136011

  41. [41]

    S. D. Majumdar,A class of exact solutions of Einstein’s field equations,Phys. Rev.72(1947) 390–398

  42. [42]

    Papapetrou,A static solution of the equations of the gravitational field for an arbitrary charge distribution,Proc

    A. Papapetrou,A static solution of the equations of the gravitational field for an arbitrary charge distribution,Proc. Roy. Irish Acad.A51(1947) 191–204

  43. [43]

    Kastor and J

    D. Kastor and J. Traschen,Cosmological multi-black-hole solutions,Phys. Rev.D47(1993) 5370–5375

  44. [44]

    Bokulić and C

    A. Bokulić and C. A. R. Herdeiro,Exact multiblack hole spacetimes in Einstein-ModMax theory,Phys. Rev.D111(2025) 064046

  45. [45]

    Ozsváth,Homogeneous solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equations,J

    I. Ozsváth,Homogeneous solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equations,J. Math. Phys.6(1965) 1255–1265

  46. [46]

    Anderson and C

    I. Anderson and C. Torre,Spacetime groups,J. Math. Phys.61(2020) 072501

  47. [47]

    Levi-Civita,Realtà fisica di alcuni spazi normali del Bianchi,Rend

    T. Levi-Civita,Realtà fisica di alcuni spazi normali del Bianchi,Rend. Acc. Lincei26(1917) 519–531

  48. [48]

    Bertotti,Uniform electromagnetic field in the theory of general relativity,Phys

    B. Bertotti,Uniform electromagnetic field in the theory of general relativity,Phys. Rev.116 (1959) 1331–1333

  49. [49]

    Robinson,A solution of the Maxwell–Einstein equations,Bull

    I. Robinson,A solution of the Maxwell–Einstein equations,Bull. Acad. Polon.7(1959) 351–352

  50. [50]

    G. A. Alekseev and A. A. Garcia,Schwarzschild black hole immersed in a homogeneous electromagnetic field,Phys. Rev.D53(1996) 1853–1867

  51. [51]

    Ortaggio and M

    M. Ortaggio and M. Astorino,Ultrarelativistic boost of a black hole in the magnetic universe of Levi-Civita–Bertotti–Robinson,Phys. Rev.D97(2018) 104052

  52. [52]

    G. A. Alekseev,Charged black hole accelerated by spatially homogeneous electric field of Bertotti-Robinson (AdS2 ×S 2) space-time,2511.06082

  53. [53]

    Van den Bergh and J

    N. Van den Bergh and J. Carminati,Non-aligned Einstein-Maxwell Robinson-Trautman fields of Petrov type D,Class. Quantum Grav.37(2020) 215010

  54. [54]

    Podolský and H

    J. Podolský and H. Ovcharenko,Kerr black hole in a uniform Bertotti-Robinson magnetic field: An exact solution,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 181401

  55. [55]

    Astorino,Black holes in the external Bertotti-Robinson-Bonnor-Melvin electromagnetic field,2508.12908

    M. Astorino,Black holes in the external Bertotti-Robinson-Bonnor-Melvin electromagnetic field,2508.12908

  56. [56]

    F. J. Ernst,Black holes in a magnetic universe,J. Math. Phys.17(1976) 54–56

  57. [57]

    Carter,Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Einstein’s equations, Commun

    B. Carter,Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Einstein’s equations, Commun. Math. Phys.10(1968) 280–310. 11

  58. [58]

    W. M. Kinnersley,Type D gravitational fields. PhD thesis, Caltech, 1968. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechETD:etd-04272006-094112

  59. [59]

    J. F. Plebański,The nondiverging and nontwisting typeDelectrovac solutions withλ,J. Math. Phys.20(1979) 1946–1962

  60. [60]

    W. B. Bonnor,Static magnetic fields in general relativity,Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond.A67(1954) 225–232

  61. [61]

    M. A. Melvin,Pure magnetic and electric geons,Phys. Lett.8(1964) 65–68

  62. [62]

    Kinnersley and M

    W. Kinnersley and M. Walker,Uniformly accelerating charged mass in general relativity,Phys. Rev.D2(1970) 1359–1370

  63. [63]

    Robinson and A

    I. Robinson and A. Trautman,Some spherical gravitational waves in general relativity,Proc. R. Soc.A265(1962) 463–473

  64. [64]

    Astorino,Accelerating and charged type I black holes,Phys

    M. Astorino,Accelerating and charged type I black holes,Phys. Rev.D108(2023) 124025

  65. [65]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolský,Accelerating and rotating black holes,Class. Quantum Grav. 22(2005) 3467–3479

  66. [66]

    Barrientos, A

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, D. Kubizňák, and J. Oliva,Accelerated black holes beyond Maxwell’s electrodynamics,Phys. Lett.B834(2022) 137447

  67. [67]

    F. J. Ernst,Removal of the nodal singularity of theC-metric,J. Math. Phys.17(1976) 515–516

  68. [68]

    Garfinkle and M

    D. Garfinkle and M. A. Melvin,Traveling waves on a magnetic universe,Phys. Rev.D45 (1992) 1188–1191

  69. [69]

    Ortaggio,Ultrarelativistic black hole in an external electromagnetic field and gravitational waves in the Melvin universe,Phys

    M. Ortaggio,Ultrarelativistic black hole in an external electromagnetic field and gravitational waves in the Melvin universe,Phys. Rev.D69(2004) 064034. 12