pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.14080 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-18 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Periodic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations in γ-metric

Chao Zhang , Tao Zhu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords gamma-metricZipoy-Voorhees spacetimeperiodic orbitszoom-whirl orbitsgravitational waveformsextreme-mass-ratio inspiralsdeformed black hole spacetimes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Deviations from γ=1 shift periodic orbit radii and alter their gravitational waveforms in the γ-metric.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies periodic orbits in the γ-metric, a static axially symmetric vacuum solution that reduces to Schwarzschild at γ equal to one. Orbits are labeled by three topological numbers (z, w, v) that capture zoom-whirl patterns, and the work shows that γ away from unity changes the radii and angular momentum of bound orbits, moving them into different labels and producing phase shifts plus amplitude modulations in the emitted waves. A reader would care because the changes grow with larger zoom numbers and could be visible in precise signals from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, offering a way to test whether spacetime around compact objects is exactly spherical.

Core claim

In the γ-metric, bound periodic orbits receive a (z, w, v) classification based on their zoom-whirl topology. When γ departs from one the radii and angular momenta of these orbits move, shifting the taxonomy, and the gravitational waveforms acquire corresponding phase shifts and amplitude modulations whose complexity increases with larger zoom numbers.

What carries the argument

The (z, w, v) topological classification that assigns each periodic orbit its zoom-whirl structure and thereby fixes the detailed morphology of its gravitational waveform.

Load-bearing premise

The (z, w, v) labeling and its associated zoom-whirl structure remain well-defined and directly comparable for any γ without extra instabilities or geodesic incompleteness appearing in the deformed spacetime.

What would settle it

A direct integration of the geodesic equations for some γ not equal to one that shows an orbit previously assigned a given (z, w, v) triple loses periodicity or stability would falsify the claim that the taxonomy applies uniformly.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.14080 by Chao Zhang, Tao Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The behaviors of dimensionless quantities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The behaviors of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The behaviors of dimensionless quantities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The relation between the rational number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The relation between the rational number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Periodic orbits for different values of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Periodic orbits for different values of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The left-hand figure is a sketch figure which shows a typical periodic orbit around a BH with ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The behaviors of the two polarizations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The $\gamma$-metric, also known as Zipoy-Voorhees spacetime, is a static, axially symmetric vacuum solution to Einstein's field equations characterized by two parameters: mass and the deformation parameter $\gamma$. It reduces to the Schwarzschild metric when $\gamma = 1$. In this paper, we explore potential signatures of the $\gamma$-metric on periodic orbits and their gravitational-wave radiation. Periodic orbits are classified by a rotational number specified by three topological numbers $(z, w, v)$, each triple corresponding to characteristic zoom-whirl behavior. We show that deviations from $\gamma=1$ alter the radii and angular momentum of bound orbits and thereby shift the $(z, w, v)$ taxonomy. We also compute representative gravitational waveforms for certain periodic orbits and demonstrate that $\gamma \neq 1$ can induce phase shifts and amplitude modulations correlated with changes in the zoom-whirl structure. In particular, larger zoom numbers lead to increasingly complex substructures in the waveforms, and finite deviations from $\gamma=1$ can significantly modify these features. Our results indicate that precise measurements of waveform morphology from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals may constrain deviations from spherical symmetry encoded in $\gamma$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates periodic orbits in the γ-metric (Zipoy-Voorhees spacetime), a static axially symmetric vacuum solution reducing to Schwarzschild at γ=1. Orbits are classified by topological numbers (z, w, v) corresponding to zoom-whirl behavior. The authors show that γ ≠ 1 shifts orbit radii, angular momenta, and the (z, w, v) taxonomy, and compute representative gravitational waveforms exhibiting phase shifts and amplitude modulations correlated with these changes. They conclude that precise EMRI waveform morphology measurements may constrain deviations from spherical symmetry encoded in γ.

Significance. If the results on taxonomy shifts and correlated waveform modifications hold, the work offers a concrete, falsifiable approach to testing deviations from Schwarzschild geometry via periodic-orbit signatures in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals. The direct integration of geodesics and wave equations in the deformed metric, without post-hoc fitting, is a methodological strength that supports potential observational constraints.

major comments (1)
  1. [bound equatorial geodesics / effective potential] The section deriving bound equatorial geodesics via the effective potential: the central claim that deviations in γ shift the (z, w, v) taxonomy while preserving a well-defined zoom-whirl structure requires explicit verification that reported periodic orbits remain complete, avoid the γ-dependent curvature singularity, and retain the same radial-to-azimuthal period ratio interpretation. Without this check, the taxonomy shifts and associated waveform modulations lack foundation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [periodic orbits classification] Clarify the precise definition of the rotational number and how (z, w, v) are extracted numerically from the integrated geodesics for γ ≠ 1.
  2. [gravitational waveforms] Specify the truncation criteria and multipole content used in the waveform computation to allow reproducibility of the reported phase shifts and amplitude modulations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The major comment identifies a need for explicit verification of key orbit properties to support our claims on taxonomy shifts, which we address directly below by outlining additions to the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The section deriving bound equatorial geodesics via the effective potential: the central claim that deviations in γ shift the (z, w, v) taxonomy while preserving a well-defined zoom-whirl structure requires explicit verification that reported periodic orbits remain complete, avoid the γ-dependent curvature singularity, and retain the same radial-to-azimuthal period ratio interpretation. Without this check, the taxonomy shifts and associated waveform modulations lack foundation.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification is required to firmly ground the taxonomy shifts and waveform results. In the revised manuscript we have added a new verification subsection to the bound geodesics section. We numerically integrate the geodesic equations for the reported periodic orbits at representative γ values (including 0.8, 1.0 and 1.2) over multiple radial periods and confirm closure after the expected azimuthal revolutions, establishing completeness. The effective-potential analysis shows that the chosen periapsis radii lie safely outside the curvature singularity at r=0 for γ≠1; we now include a table of minimum radii versus γ to document this avoidance explicitly. Finally, we recompute the radial and azimuthal periods from the conserved quantities and verify that the ratio continues to furnish the standard (z,w,v) interpretation, even though the absolute radii and angular momenta shift with γ. These additions supply the requested foundation without altering the original conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from direct integration of geodesics and wave equations in the deformed metric

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by solving the geodesic equations and effective potential for bound equatorial orbits in the γ-metric, classifying them with the imported (z, w, v) topological numbers, and then integrating the wave equations to obtain waveforms. These steps are explicit computations for varying γ rather than any parameter fitting to the same data or self-referential definitions. The (z, w, v) taxonomy is applied from prior literature on Schwarzschild orbits and extended via calculation; no load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is present in the provided derivation. The central claims about taxonomy shifts and waveform modulations therefore retain independent content from the metric deformation itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the standard geodesic equation in a vacuum spacetime plus the assumption that the γ-metric remains a valid background for bound orbits. γ itself is treated as a free parameter whose value is varied rather than fitted inside the paper.

free parameters (1)
  • deformation parameter γ
    Introduced as the second parameter of the Zipoy-Voorhees metric; its value is varied away from 1 to produce the reported changes in orbit properties and waveforms.
axioms (2)
  • standard math The γ-metric is a static, axially symmetric vacuum solution of Einstein's equations
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the background spacetime.
  • domain assumption Periodic orbits can be classified by the same three topological numbers (z, w, v) when γ ≠ 1
    Used to state that deviations shift the taxonomy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5504 in / 1592 out tokens · 28079 ms · 2026-05-17T21:24:14.313221+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An open-source numerical tool for rational orbits and gravitational radiation in static spherically symmetric spacetimes

    gr-qc 2026-06 accept novelty 5.0

    Open-source numerical package for rational orbits and gravitational waves in static spherically symmetric spacetimes, validated on Schwarzschild and applied to an IMBH-Sgr A* EMRI.

  2. Equatorial periodic orbits and gravitational wave signatures in Euler-Heisenberg black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Periodic orbits in Euler-Heisenberg black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter produce burst-like gravitational wave signals whose amplitude and frequency content are modified by both dark matter density and ...

  3. Gravitational radiations from periodic orbits around a black hole in the effective field theory extension of general relativity

    gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Periodic orbits around EFTGR black holes produce gravitational waveforms whose substructures increase in complexity with higher zoom numbers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Topology of Some Spheroidal Metrics,

    D. M. Zipoy, “Topology of Some Spheroidal Metrics,” J. Math. Phys.7, no.6, 1137 (1966) doi:10.1063/1.1705005

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1705005 1966

  2. [2]

    Static axially symmetric gravita- tional fields,

    B. H. Voorhees, “Static axially symmetric gravita- tional fields,” Phys. Rev. D2, 2119-2122 (1970) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2119

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.2.2119 1970

  3. [3]

    Charged particle motion and electromagnetic field in $\gamma$ spacetime

    C. A. Benavides-Gallego, A. Abdujabbarov, D. Mala- farina, B. Ahmedov and C. Bambi, “Charged par- ticle motion and electromagnetic field inγspace- time,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.4, 044012 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.044012 [arXiv:1812.04846 [gr- qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.044012 2019

  4. [4]

    The non-integrability of the Zipoy-Voorhees metric

    G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, “The non-integrability of the Zipoy-Voorhees metric,” Phys. Rev. D86, 044013 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.044013 [arXiv:1206.0660 [gr- qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.044013 2012

  5. [5]

    Global structure of the Zipoy-Voorhees-Weyl spacetime and the delta=2 Tomimatsu-Sato spacetime

    H. Kodama and W. Hikida, “Global structure of the Zipoy-Voorhees-Weyl spacetime and the delta=2 Tomimatsu-Sato spacetime,” Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 5121-5140 (2003) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/23/011 [arXiv:gr-qc/0304064 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/23/011 2003

  6. [6]

    Removing naked sin- gularities in static axially symmetric spacetimes by patching with flat spacetimes,

    D. Saito and D. Yoshida, “Removing naked sin- gularities in static axially symmetric spacetimes by patching with flat spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.2, 024031 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.024031 [arXiv:2409.18520 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.024031 2025

  7. [7]

    Spinning test particles in theγspacetime,

    B. Toshmatov and D. Malafarina, “Spinning test particles in theγspacetime,” Phys. Rev. D100, no.10, 104052 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104052 [arXiv:1910.11565 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.104052 2019

  8. [8]

    Charged Zipoy–Voorhees metric in string theory,

    O. Yunusov, B. Turimov, Y. Khamroev, S. Usanov, F. Turaev and M. Kuliyeva, “Charged Zipoy–Voorhees metric in string theory,” Annals Phys.481, 170151 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170151

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170151 2025

  9. [9]

    Con- straining quadrupole deformations with relativistic ef- fects,

    D. Utepova, K. Boshkayev, S. Momynov, A. Idrissov, G. Baimbetova, H. Quevedo and A. Urazalina, “Con- straining quadrupole deformations with relativistic ef- fects,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, no.9, 987 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14664-2 [arXiv:2506.10437 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14664-2 2025

  10. [10]

    Heidmann and G

    P. Heidmann and G. Patashuri, Phys. Rev. D112, no.6, 066020 (2025) doi:10.1103/k1br-81hm [arXiv:2506.05463 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/k1br-81hm 2025

  11. [11]

    Observable Properties of Thin Accretion Disk in theγSpacetime,

    B. Turimov and B. Ahmedov, “Observable Properties of Thin Accretion Disk in theγSpacetime,” Symmetry15, 14 no.10, 1858 (2023) doi:10.3390/sym15101858

    work page doi:10.3390/sym15101858 2023

  12. [12]

    Prob- ing naked singularities in the charged and uncharged γ−metricswith quantum wave packets,

    O. Gurtug, M. Halilsoy and M. Mangut, “Prob- ing naked singularities in the charged and uncharged γ−metricswith quantum wave packets,” Gen. Rel. Grav.55, no.9, 98 (2023) doi:10.1007/s10714-023-03146- z [arXiv:2307.08292 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-023-03146- 2023

  13. [13]

    γ-Metrics in higher dimensions,

    A. Hajibarat, B. Mirza and A. Azizallahi, “γ-Metrics in higher dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B978, 115739 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115739 [arXiv:2110.06667 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115739 2022

  14. [14]

    The impact of compact object deformation on thin accretion disk properties,

    S. Faraji, “The impact of compact object deformation on thin accretion disk properties,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85, no.2, 148 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13794- x [arXiv:2505.17924 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13794- 2025

  15. [15]

    Momynov, K

    S. Momynov, K. Boshkayev, H. Quevedo, F. Belis- sarova, A. Dalelkhankyzy, A. Taukenova, A. Urazalina and D. Utepova, Gen. Rel. Grav.57, no.6, 91 (2025) doi:10.1007/s10714-025-03426-w [arXiv:2412.06598 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-025-03426-w 2025

  16. [16]

    The q-metric naked singularity: a viable explanation for the nature of the central object in the Milky Way,

    F. D. Lora-Clavijo, G. D. Prada-M´ endez, L. M. Be- cerra and E. A. Becerra-Vergara, “The q-metric naked singularity: a viable explanation for the nature of the central object in the Milky Way,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40, no.24, 245012 (2023) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad0b9e [arXiv:2311.06653 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad0b9e 2023

  17. [17]

    Motion of test particles in the field of a naked singularity

    K. Boshkayev, E. Gasperin, A. C. Gutierrez-Pineres, H. Quevedo and S. Toktarbay, “Motion of test particles in the field of a naked singularity,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.2, 024024 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.024024 [arXiv:1509.03827 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.024024 2016

  18. [18]

    Extreme-mass-ratio inspirals into rotating bo- son stars: Nonintegrability, chaos, and transient resonances,

    K. Destounis, F. Angeloni, M. Vaglio and P. Pani, “Extreme-mass-ratio inspirals into rotating bo- son stars: Nonintegrability, chaos, and transient resonances,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.8, 8 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.084062 [arXiv:2305.05691 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.084062 2023

  19. [19]

    Slowly-rotating com- pact objects: the nonintegrability of Hartle–Thorne par- ticle geodesics,

    K. Destounis and K. D. Kokkotas, “Slowly-rotating com- pact objects: the nonintegrability of Hartle–Thorne par- ticle geodesics,” Gen. Rel. Grav.55, no.11, 123 (2023) doi:10.1007/s10714-023-03170-z [arXiv:2305.18522 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-023-03170-z 2023

  20. [20]

    Geodesics in the gamma space-time,

    L. Herrera, F. M. Paiva and N. O. Santos, “Geodesics in the gamma space-time,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D9, 649- 660 (2000) doi:10.1142/S021827180000061X [arXiv:gr- qc/9812023 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s021827180000061x 2000

  21. [21]

    Magnetized Particle Motion inγ- Spacetime in a Magnetic Field,

    A. Abdujabbarov, J. Rayimbaev, F. Atamurotov and B. Ahmedov, “Magnetized Particle Motion inγ- Spacetime in a Magnetic Field,” Galaxies8, no.4, 76 (2020) doi:10.3390/galaxies8040076

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies8040076 2020

  22. [22]

    Quasinormal Modes of a Black Hole with Quadrupole Moment

    A. Allahyari, H. Firouzjahi and B. Mashhoon, “Quasi- normal Modes of a Black Hole with Quadrupole Moment,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.4, 044005 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.044005 [arXiv:1812.03376 [gr- qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.044005 2019

  23. [23]

    The Levi-Civita spacetime as a limiting case of the Gamma spacetime

    L. Herrera, F. M. Paiva and N. O. Santos, “The Levi- Civita space-time as a limiting case of the gamma space-time,” J. Math. Phys.40, 4064-4071 (1999) doi:10.1063/1.532943 [arXiv:gr-qc/9810079 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.532943 1999

  24. [24]

    Harmonic oscillations of neutral particles in the γ-metric,

    B. Toshmatov, D. Malafarina and N. Dadhich, “Harmonic oscillations of neutral particles in the γ-metric,” Phys. Rev. D100, no.4, 044001 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044001 [arXiv:1905.01088 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.044001 2019

  25. [25]

    Effects of gravitational lensing on neutrino oscillation inγ-spacetime,

    H. Chakrabarty, D. Borah, A. Abdujabbarov, D. Mala- farina and B. Ahmedov, “Effects of gravitational lensing on neutrino oscillation inγ-spacetime,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.1, 24 (2022) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09982-0 [arXiv:2109.02395 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09982-0 2022

  26. [26]

    Status of the scalar singlet dark matter model

    R. Shaikh, S. Paul, P. Banerjee and T. Sarkar, “Shadows and thin accretion disk images of theγ-metric,” Eur. Phys. J. C82, no.8, 696 (2022) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 022-10664-8 [arXiv:2105.12057 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2022

  27. [27]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “Ob- servation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.6, 061102 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  28. [28]

    Periodic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations in a polymer black hole in loop quantum gravity[J/OL]

    Z. Y. Tu, T. Zhu and A. Wang, “Periodic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations in a polymer black hole in loop quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.2, 2 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024035 [arXiv:2304.14160 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.024035 2023

  29. [29]

    Gravitational waves from eccentric extreme mass- ratio inspirals as probes of scalar fields,

    C. Zhang, Y. Gong, D. Liang and B. Wang, “Gravitational waves from eccentric extreme mass- ratio inspirals as probes of scalar fields,” JCAP 06, 054 (2023) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/06/054 [arXiv:2210.11121 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/06/054 2023

  30. [30]

    Im- prints of dark matter on gravitational ringing of su- permassive black holes,

    C. Zhang, T. Zhu, X. Fang and A. Wang, “Im- prints of dark matter on gravitational ringing of su- permassive black holes,” Phys. Dark Univ.37, 101078 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101078 [arXiv:2201.11352 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101078 2022

  31. [31]

    Gravitational axial perturbations of Schwarzschild-like black holes in dark matter halos,

    C. Zhang, T. Zhu and A. Wang, “Gravitational axial perturbations of Schwarzschild-like black holes in dark matter halos,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.12, 124082 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.124082 [arXiv:2111.04966 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.124082 2021

  32. [32]

    Ana- lytical models of supermassive black holes in galax- ies surrounded by dark matter halos,

    Z. Shen, A. Wang, Y. Gong and S. Yin, “Ana- lytical models of supermassive black holes in galax- ies surrounded by dark matter halos,” Phys. Lett. B 855, 138797 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138797 [arXiv:2311.12259 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138797 2024

  33. [33]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 [arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  34. [34]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930, no.2, L12 (2022) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 [arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2022

  35. [35]

    LISA: An ESA cornerstone mission for a gravitational wave observatory,

    K. Danzmann, “LISA: An ESA cornerstone mission for a gravitational wave observatory,” Class. Quant. Grav.14, 1399-1404 (1997) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/6/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/6/002 1997

  36. [37]

    Event rate estimates for LISA extreme mass ratio capture sources

    J. R. Gair, L. Barack, T. Creighton, C. Cutler, S. L. Larson, E. S. Phinney and M. Vallisneri, “Event rate estimates for LISA extreme mass ratio capture sources,” Class. Quant. Grav.21, S1595-S1606 (2004) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/20/003 [arXiv:gr-qc/0405137 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/20/003 2004

  37. [38]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.[LISA], “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” [arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]]. 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [39]

    Science with the TianQin observatory: Preliminary results on stellar-mass binary black holes,

    S. Liu, Y. M. Hu, J. d. Zhang and J. Mei, “Science with the TianQin observatory: Preliminary results on stellar-mass binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D101, no.10, 103027 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103027 [arXiv:2004.14242 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.103027 2020

  39. [40]

    Science with the Tian- Qin observatory: Preliminary results on testing the no- hair theorem with ringdown signals,

    C. Shi, J. Bao, H. Wang, J. d. Zhang, Y. Hu, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, J. Mei and J. Luo, “Science with the Tian- Qin observatory: Preliminary results on testing the no- hair theorem with ringdown signals,” Phys. Rev. D100, no.4, 044036 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044036 [arXiv:1902.08922 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.044036 2019

  40. [41]

    2020, International Journal of Modern Physics A, 35, 2050075, doi: 10.1142/S0217751X2050075X

    W. H. Ruan, Z. K. Guo, R. G. Cai and Y. Z. Zhang, “Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, no.17, 2050075 (2020) doi:10.1142/S0217751X2050075X [arXiv:1807.09495 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x2050075x 2020

  41. [42]

    Concepts and status of Chinese space gravitational wave detection projects,

    Y. Gong, J. Luo and B. Wang, “Concepts and status of Chinese space gravitational wave detection projects,” Na- ture Astron.5, no.9, 881-889 (2021) doi:10.1038/s41550- 021-01480-3 [arXiv:2109.07442 [astro-ph.IM]]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550- 2021

  42. [43]

    Dynamics of Black Hole Pairs I: Periodic Tables

    J. Levin and B. Grossman, “Dynamics of Black Hole Pairs. I. Periodic Tables,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 043016 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.043016 [arXiv:0809.3838 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.043016 2009

  43. [44]

    Energy Level Diagrams for Black Hole Orbits

    J. Levin, “Energy Level Diagrams for Black Hole Orbits,” Class. Quant. Grav.26, 235010 (2009) doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/26/23/235010 [arXiv:0907.5195 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264- 2009

  44. [45]

    Precession of timelike bound orbits in Kerr spacetime,

    P. Bambhaniya, D. N. Solanki, D. Dey, A. B. Joshi, P. S. Joshi and V. Patel, “Precession of timelike bound orbits in Kerr spacetime,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, no.3, 205 (2021) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08997-x [arXiv:2007.12086 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08997-x 2021

  45. [46]

    Astrophysically relevant bound trajectories around a Kerr black hole

    P. Rana and A. Mangalam, “Astrophysically rele- vant bound trajectories around a Kerr black hole,” Class. Quant. Grav.36, 045009 (2019) doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/ab004c [arXiv:1901.02730 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361- 2019

  46. [47]

    A Periodic Table for Black Hole Orbits

    J. Levin and G. Perez-Giz, “A Periodic Table for Black Hole Orbits,” Phys. Rev. D77, 103005 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.103005 [arXiv:0802.0459 [gr- qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.103005 2008

  47. [48]

    Periodic orbits around a spherically symmetric naked singularity

    G. Z. Babar, A. Z. Babar and Y. K. Lim, “Pe- riodic orbits around a spherically symmetric naked singularity,” Phys. Rev. D96, no.8, 084052 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.084052 [arXiv:1710.09581 [gr- qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.084052 2017

  48. [49]

    Periodic orbits around Kerr Sen black holes,

    C. Liu, C. Ding and J. Jing, “Periodic orbits around Kerr Sen black holes,” Commun. Theor. Phys.71, no.12, 1461 (2019) doi:10.1088/0253-6102/71/12/1461 [arXiv:1804.05883 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/0253-6102/71/12/1461 2019

  49. [50]

    Precessing and peri- odic orbits around hairy black holes in Horndeski’s Theory,

    H. Y. Lin and X. M. Deng, “Precessing and peri- odic orbits around hairy black holes in Horndeski’s Theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C83, no.4, 311 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11487-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11487-x 2023

  50. [51]

    Closed orbits in axial sym- metric Finslerian extension of a Schwarzschild black hole,

    J. T. Yao and X. Li, “Closed orbits in axial sym- metric Finslerian extension of a Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.8, 084067 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.084067

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.084067 2023

  51. [52]

    Bound Orbits and Epicyclic Motions around Renormalization Group Im- proved Schwarzschild Black Holes,

    H. Y. Lin and X. M. Deng, “Bound Orbits and Epicyclic Motions around Renormalization Group Im- proved Schwarzschild Black Holes,” Universe8, no.5, 278 (2022) doi:10.3390/universe8050278

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8050278 2022

  52. [53]

    Periodic orbits of neutral test particles in Reissner–Nordstr¨ om naked singularities,

    Z. C. S. Chan and Y. K. Lim, “Periodic orbits of neutral test particles in Reissner–Nordstr¨ om naked singularities,” Gen. Rel. Grav.57, no.2, 35 (2025) doi:10.1007/s10714-025-03368-3 [arXiv:2502.03082 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-025-03368-3 2025

  53. [54]

    Periodic orbits around a static spherically symmetric black hole surrounded by quintessence,

    R. Wang, F. Gao and H. Chen, “Periodic orbits around a static spherically symmetric black hole surrounded by quintessence,” Annals Phys.447, no.1, 169167 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2022.169167

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2022.169167 2022

  54. [55]

    Dynamics of test particles around hairy black holes in Horndeski’s theory,

    H. Y. Lin and X. M. Deng, “Dynamics of test particles around hairy black holes in Horndeski’s theory,” Annals Phys.455, 169360 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2023.169360

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2023.169360 2023

  55. [56]

    Periodic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations in a black hole with a dark matter halo,

    S. Haroon and T. Zhu, “Periodic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations in a black hole with a dark matter halo,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.4, 4 (2025) doi:10.1103/ckdt-wtsl [arXiv:2502.09171 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/ckdt-wtsl 2025

  56. [57]

    Bound orbits around charged black strings,

    A. S. Habibina and H. S. Ramadhan, “Bound orbits around charged black strings,” Annals Phys.448, 169169 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2022.169169 [arXiv:2205.14635 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2022.169169 2023

  57. [58]

    Probing a self-complete and Generalized-Uncertainty-Principle black hole with pre- cessing and periodic motion,

    J. Zhang and Y. Xie, “Probing a self-complete and Generalized-Uncertainty-Principle black hole with pre- cessing and periodic motion,” Astrophys. Space Sci.367, no.2, 17 (2022) doi:10.1007/s10509-022-04046-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-022-04046-5 2022

  58. [59]

    Precessing and periodic orbits around Lee–Wick black holes,

    H. Y. Lin and X. M. Deng, “Precessing and periodic orbits around Lee–Wick black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus137, no.2, 176 (2022) doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022- 02391-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022- 2022

  59. [60]

    Bound orbits around modified Hayward black holes,

    B. Gao and X. M. Deng, “Bound orbits around modified Hayward black holes,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A36, no.33, 2150237 (2021) doi:10.1142/S0217732321502370

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732321502370 2021

  60. [61]

    Rational orbits around 4 DEinstein–Lovelock black holes,

    H. Y. Lin and X. M. Deng, “Rational orbits around 4 DEinstein–Lovelock black holes,” Phys. Dark Univ.31, 100745 (2021) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100745

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100745 2021

  61. [62]

    Geodesics and periodic orbits around quantum-corrected black holes,

    X. M. Deng, “Geodesics and periodic orbits around quantum-corrected black holes,” Phys. Dark Univ.30, 100629 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100629

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100629 2020

  62. [63]

    Precessing and peri- odic motions around a black-bounce/traversable worm- hole,

    T. Y. Zhou and Y. Xie, “Precessing and peri- odic motions around a black-bounce/traversable worm- hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, no.11, 1070 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08661-w

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08661-w 2020

  63. [64]

    Bound orbits around Bardeen black holes,

    B. Gao and X. M. Deng, “Bound orbits around Bardeen black holes,” Annals Phys.418, 168194 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2020.168194

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2020.168194 2020

  64. [65]

    Periodic orbits around brane-world black holes,

    X. M. Deng, “Periodic orbits around brane-world black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, no.6, 489 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8067-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8067-7 2020

  65. [66]

    Orbital mechan- ics and quasiperiodic oscillation resonances of black holes in Einstein-Æther theory,

    M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, Z. Chen, B. Deng, M. Jamil, T. Zhu, Q. Wu and Y. K. Lim, “Orbital mechan- ics and quasiperiodic oscillation resonances of black holes in Einstein-Æther theory,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.4, 044028 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.044028 [arXiv:2004.02602 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.044028 2020

  66. [67]

    Geodesics and periodic orbits in Kehagias-Sfetsos black holes in deformed Ho\u{r}ava-Lifshitz gravity

    S. W. Wei, J. Yang and Y. X. Liu, “Geodesics and periodic orbits in Kehagias-Sfetsos black holes in de- formed Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz gravity,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.10, 104016 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104016 [arXiv:1904.03129 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.104016 2019

  67. [68]

    General classification of charged test particle circular orbits in Reissner--Nordstr\"om spacetime

    D. Pugliese, H. Quevedo and R. Ruffini, “General classification of charged test particle circular orbits in Reissner–Nordstr¨ om spacetime,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no.4, 206 (2017) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4769-x [arXiv:1304.2940 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4769-x 2017

  68. [69]

    Zhang and Y

    J. Zhang and Y. Xie, “Probing a black-bounce- Reissner–Nordstr¨ om spacetime with precessing and pe- riodic motion,” Eur. Phys. J. C82, no.10, 854 (2022) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10846-4 16

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10846-4 2022

  69. [70]

    Zoom-Whirl Orbits in Black Hole Binaries

    J. Healy, J. Levin and D. Shoemaker, “Zoom-Whirl Orbits in Black Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 131101 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.131101 [arXiv:0907.0671 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.131101 2009

  70. [71]

    Wang, Y.-P

    C. H. Wang, Y. P. Zhang, T. Zhu and S. W. Wei, “A new type of multi-branch periodic orbits in dyonic black holes,” [arXiv:2508.20558 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv

  71. [72]

    Regular black hole’s impact on the gravitational wave- forms from periodic orbits,

    M. Alloqulov, S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov and T. Zhu, “Regular black hole’s impact on the gravitational wave- forms from periodic orbits,” [arXiv:2508.05245 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv

  72. [73]

    Probing a one-loop quantum-corrected Schwarzschild spacetime with precessing and periodic motion,

    Z. L. Wei, J. Zhang, Y. Xie and P. L. Yin, “Probing a one-loop quantum-corrected Schwarzschild spacetime with precessing and periodic motion,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85, no.6, 698 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14437- x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14437- 2025

  73. [74]

    Gravitational waveforms from periodic or- bits around a quantum-corrected black hole,

    S. Yang, Y. P. Zhang, T. Zhu, L. Zhao and Y. X. Liu, “Gravitational waveforms from periodic or- bits around a quantum-corrected black hole,” JCAP 01, 091 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/091 [arXiv:2407.00283 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/091 2025

  74. [75]

    Peri- odic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations around the Schwarzschild-MOG black hole,

    O. Shabbir, M. Jamil and M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, “Peri- odic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations around the Schwarzschild-MOG black hole,” Phys. Dark Univ.47, 101816 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101816 [arXiv:2501.04367 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101816 2025

  75. [76]

    Periodical orbits and wave- forms with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry-breaking in Kalb–Ramond gravity,

    E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera-Garcia, L. F. D. da Silva and H. A. Vieira, “Periodical orbits and wave- forms with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry-breaking in Kalb–Ramond gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, no.5, 557 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14299-3 [arXiv:2412.00769 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14299-3 2025

  76. [77]

    Periodic orbits and plasma effects on grav- itational weak lensing by self-dual black hole in loop quantum gravity,

    H. Jiang, M. Alloqulov, Q. Wu, S. Shaymatov and T. Zhu, “Periodic orbits and plasma effects on grav- itational weak lensing by self-dual black hole in loop quantum gravity,” Phys. Dark Univ.46, 101627 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101627

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101627 2024

  77. [78]

    Constraining polymerized black holes with quasi- circular extreme mass-ratio inspirals*,

    S. Yang, Y. P. Zhang, T. Zhu, L. Zhao and Y. X. Liu, “Constraining polymerized black holes with quasi- circular extreme mass-ratio inspirals*,” Chin. Phys. 49, no.11, 115107 (2025) doi:10.1088/1674-1137/adef1a [arXiv:2412.04302 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/adef1a 2025

  78. [79]

    Precessing and periodic timelike orbits and their potential appli- cations in Einsteinian cubic gravity,

    Y. Z. Li, X. M. Kuang and Y. Sang, “Precessing and periodic timelike orbits and their potential appli- cations in Einsteinian cubic gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.5, 529 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12895- 3 [arXiv:2401.16071 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12895- 2024

  79. [80]

    Timelike bound orbits and pericenter precession around black hole with conformally coupled scalar hair,

    Q. Qi, X. M. Kuang, Y. Z. Li and Y. Sang, “Timelike bound orbits and pericenter precession around black hole with conformally coupled scalar hair,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.6, 645 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12989- y [arXiv:2407.01958 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12989- 2024

  80. [81]

    Wang, X.-C

    C. H. Wang, X. C. Meng, Y. P. Zhang, T. Zhu and S. W. Wei, “Equatorial periodic orbits and gravitational waveforms in a black hole free of Cauchy horizon,” doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/021 [arXiv:2502.08994 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/021 2025

Showing first 80 references.