pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.14854 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-18 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph

The Penrose Transform and the Kerr-Schild double copy

Emma Albertini , Michael L. Graesser , Gabriel Herczeg This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 20:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-ph
keywords double copyKerr-Schildtwistorial double copyself-dual solutionsPenrose transformTaub-NUT spacetimevacuum gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

For a broad class of self-dual vacuum Kerr-Schild spacetimes, the Kerr-Schild double copy and the twistorial double copy are equivalent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that two prescriptions for generating solutions to the Maxwell and scalar wave equations from Einstein gravity coincide exactly on a defined class of solutions. One prescription uses the Kerr-Schild form of the metric, while the other relies on twistor space. For self-dual vacuum solutions in this class, which the authors name twistorial Kerr-Schild spacetimes, an elementary construction based on null Lorentz transformations shows the outputs match. Homogeneous functions on twistor space are central to the argument. The equivalence is checked explicitly on the self-dual (Kerr)-Taub-NUT spacetime.

Core claim

We argue that for a broad class of self-dual vacuum solutions of the Kerr-Schild form, which we refer to as twistorial Kerr-Schild spacetimes, these two prescriptions are in fact equivalent. The approach is elementary, utilizing null Lorentz transformations, with homogenous functions on twistor space playing a central role. The equivalence is illustrated explicitly for the example of the self-dual (Kerr)-Taub-NUT spacetime.

What carries the argument

Twistorial Kerr-Schild spacetimes, the subclass of self-dual vacuum Kerr-Schild solutions for which null Lorentz transformations equate the Kerr-Schild and twistorial double copies through homogeneous functions on twistor space.

If this is right

  • The two double copy prescriptions can be used interchangeably without changing the resulting Maxwell or scalar fields.
  • Any calculation performed with one method translates directly to the other for these spacetimes.
  • The Penrose transform supplies the explicit map between the two prescriptions.
  • The same equivalence applies to additional examples beyond Taub-NUT that fit the twistorial Kerr-Schild class.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result suggests twistor space may supply a unifying language for classical double copies in symmetric gravitational backgrounds.
  • Similar equivalences could be tested by relaxing the self-dual or vacuum conditions to see where the two prescriptions begin to diverge.
  • This connection might help generate new exact solutions by moving freely between metric-based and twistor-based constructions.

Load-bearing premise

The gravitational solutions must be self-dual, vacuum, and of Kerr-Schild form for the two copying prescriptions to always produce the same electromagnetic fields.

What would settle it

A concrete self-dual vacuum Kerr-Schild spacetime in which the Maxwell field obtained from the Kerr-Schild double copy differs from the one obtained from the twistorial double copy would disprove the equivalence.

read the original abstract

There are a number of classical double copies, each providing a prescription for generating solutions to the Maxwell and scalar wave equations from exact solutions of Einstein's equations. Two such prescriptions are the Kerr-Schild and twistorial double copies. We argue that for a broad class of self-dual vacuum solutions of the Kerr-Schild form, which we refer to as twistorial Kerr-Schild spacetimes, these two prescriptions are in fact equivalent. The approach is elementary, utilizing null Lorentz transformations, with homogenous functions on twistor space playing a central role. The equivalence is illustrated explicitly for the example of the self-dual (Kerr)-Taub-NUT spacetime. A detailed proof and several more examples will be presented in a long-form companion to this letter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the Kerr-Schild and twistorial double-copy prescriptions are equivalent for a broad class of self-dual vacuum Kerr-Schild solutions termed twistorial Kerr-Schild spacetimes. The argument relies on an elementary construction using null Lorentz transformations and homogeneous functions on twistor space; the equivalence is illustrated explicitly for the self-dual (Kerr)-Taub-NUT spacetime, while the full derivation and additional examples are deferred to a companion paper.

Significance. If the claimed equivalence holds, the result would unify two distinct classical double-copy constructions in the self-dual sector, potentially simplifying the generation of Maxwell and scalar solutions from Einstein gravity via twistor methods. The elementary character of the proposed approach, if substantiated without hidden assumptions, would be a notable strength.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and main text: the central claim that the two prescriptions are equivalent for the entire class of twistorial Kerr-Schild spacetimes is asserted on the basis of an elementary approach, yet the manuscript supplies neither the derivation steps nor explicit checks beyond a single example; the full argument is deferred to a companion paper. This leaves the load-bearing equivalence without visible support in the present letter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for their positive assessment of its potential significance in unifying the Kerr-Schild and twistorial double-copy constructions. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and main text: the central claim that the two prescriptions are equivalent for the entire class of twistorial Kerr-Schild spacetimes is asserted on the basis of an elementary approach, yet the manuscript supplies neither the derivation steps nor explicit checks beyond a single example; the full argument is deferred to a companion paper. This leaves the load-bearing equivalence without visible support in the present letter.

    Authors: We agree that the complete derivation establishing the equivalence for the full class of twistorial Kerr-Schild spacetimes appears in the companion paper. The present letter is intentionally concise and focuses on announcing the result, describing the elementary approach via null Lorentz transformations with homogeneous functions on twistor space playing a central role, and providing an explicit verification for the self-dual (Kerr)-Taub-NUT spacetime as an illustrative check. This structure is standard for letters, where the detailed proof and additional examples are reserved for the longer companion work. The claim is not left unsupported, as the outlined method and concrete example demonstrate the equivalence in a representative case. To strengthen the letter, we can incorporate a short sketch of the key steps of the argument in a revised version without expanding it into a full proof. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; equivalence asserted via elementary construction without reduction to inputs by definition

full rationale

The paper outlines an elementary approach based on null Lorentz transformations and homogeneous functions on twistor space to argue that the Kerr-Schild and twistorial double-copy prescriptions coincide for the defined class of twistorial Kerr-Schild spacetimes. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are presented in the abstract or outline that reduce the claimed equivalence to a tautology or input by construction. The detailed proof and further examples are deferred to a companion paper, but the current text exhibits no self-definitional, fitted-input, or load-bearing self-citation patterns. The derivation therefore remains independent of the target result and is scored 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The argument rests on standard domain assumptions from general relativity and twistor theory for self-dual vacuum solutions; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Self-dual vacuum solutions of the Kerr-Schild form exist and admit a description via homogeneous functions on twistor space.
    Invoked to define the twistorial Kerr-Schild class and enable the equivalence argument.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5427 in / 1277 out tokens · 81624 ms · 2026-05-17T20:23:09.465489+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Untwisting the double copy: the zeroth copy as an optical seed

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A single complex optical seed built from expansion and twist organizes stationary Kerr-Schild geometries, reconstructs the congruence, and encodes the zeroth-copy data that generates both the gravitational profile and...

  2. Self-dual classical higher-spin multicopy

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Self-dual double copy extends to higher-spin fields via light-cone prepotentials, enabling higher-spin solutions and multicopy Weyl patterns for Kerr-Schild self-dual backgrounds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Kawai, D

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S. H. H. Tye, Nucl. Phys. B269, 1 (1986)

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    ’t Hooft, Conf

    G. ’t Hooft, Conf. Proc. C930308, 284 (1993), arXiv:gr- qc/9310026

    work page arXiv 1993

  3. [3]

    Susskind, J

    L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys.36, 6377 (1995), arXiv:hep- th/9409089

    work page arXiv 1995

  4. [4]

    J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B428, 105 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, Phys. Rev.D78, 085011 (2008), arXiv:0805.3993 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 061602 (2010), arXiv:1004.0476 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    Z. Bern, T. Dennen, Y.-t. Huang, and M. Kiermaier, Phys. Rev.D82, 065003 (2010), arXiv:1004.0693 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Z. Bern, S. Davies, T. Dennen, Y.-t. Huang, and J. Nohle, Phys. Rev.D92, 045041 (2015), arXiv:1303.6605 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory(Princeton University Press,

    A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory(Princeton University Press,

    work page

  12. [12]

    arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Black holes and the double copy

    R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, JHEP12, 056 (2014), arXiv:1410.0239 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    A. Luna, R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, Phys. Lett.B750, 272 (2015), arXiv:1507.01869 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    A. Luna, R. Monteiro, I. Nicholson, and D. O’Connell, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 065003 (2019), arXiv:1810.08183 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Borsten, Riv

    L. Borsten, Riv. Nuovo Cim.43, 97 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and R. Roiban, (2019), arXiv:1909.01358 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    C. D. White, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B38, 3319 (2021), arXiv:2105.06809 [physics.optics]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johans- son, and R. Roiban, J. Phys. A55, 443003 (2022), arXiv:2203.13013 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Adamo, J.J.M

    T. Adamo, J. J. M. Carrasco, M. Carrillo-Gonz´ alez, M. Chiodaroli, H. Elvang, H. Johansson, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, and O. Schlotterer, inSnowmass 2021(2022) arXiv:2204.06547 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt,Exact solutions of Ein- stein’s field equations, Cambridge Monographs on Math- ematical Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003)

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(Oxford, UK: Clarendon (1992) 646 p., OXFORD, UK: CLARENDON (1985) 646 P., 1985)

    S. Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(Oxford, UK: Clarendon (1992) 646 p., OXFORD, UK: CLARENDON (1985) 646 P., 1985)

    work page 1992

  23. [23]

    A. Luna, R. Monteiro, I. Nicholson, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, JHEP06, 023 (2016), arXiv:1603.05737 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    G. Elor, K. Farnsworth, M. L. Graesser, and G. Herczeg, JHEP12, 121 (2020), arXiv:2006.08630 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Farnsworth, M.L

    K. Farnsworth, M. L. Graesser, and G. Herczeg, SciPost Phys.13, 099 (2022), arXiv:2104.09525 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Farnsworth, M.L

    K. Farnsworth, M. L. Graesser, and G. Herczeg, JHEP 10, 010 (2023), arXiv:2306.16445 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    The Kerr-Schild double copy in curved spacetime

    N. Bahjat-Abbas, A. Luna, and C. D. White, JHEP12, 004 (2017), arXiv:1710.01953 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    The classical double copy in maximally symmetric spacetimes

    M. Carrillo-Gonz´ alez, R. Penco, and M. Trodden, JHEP 04, 028 (2018), arXiv:1711.01296 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    J. J. M. Carrasco and Y. Chen, (2025), arXiv:2511.01832 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Hawking Radiation meets the Double Copy

    R. Aoude, D. O’Connell, M. Sergola, and C. D. White, (2025), arXiv:2510.25866 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Moynihan, M.L.R

    N. Moynihan, M. L. R. Ashby, and C. D. White, (2025), arXiv:2509.22350 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Garc´ ıa-Compe´ an and C

    H. Garc´ ıa-Compe´ an and C. I. Ramos, JHEP06, 079 (2025), arXiv:2412.17191 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    W. T. Emond, L. Engelbrecht, N. Moynihan, and C. D. White, JHEP06, 231 (2025), arXiv:2503.05653 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Beetar, M

    C. Beetar, M. Carrillo Gonz´ alez, S. Jaitly, and T. Kese- man, JHEP03, 125 (2025), arXiv:2410.23342 [hep-th]. 5

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Chawla, K

    S. Chawla, K. Fransen, and C. Keeler, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 175008 (2025), arXiv:2504.07224 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Chawla, K

    S. Chawla, K. Fransen, and C. Keeler, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 245015 (2024), arXiv:2406.14601 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Holton,Limits of symmetry in Schwarzschild: CKVs and BRST triviality in the Kerr-Schild double copy(2025) [arXiv:2509.25801]

    B. Holton, (2025), arXiv:2509.25801 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Holton,Residual symmetries and BRST cohomology of Schwarzschild in the Kerr-Schild double copy(2025) [arXiv:2509.24112]

    B. Holton, (2025), arXiv:2509.24112 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Kent and A

    B. Kent and A. Zimmerman, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 141501 (2025), arXiv:2505.03887 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    C´ aceres, B

    E. C´ aceres, B. Kent, and H. P. Balaji, JHEP05, 016 (2025), arXiv:2503.02949 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Chac´ on, H

    E. Chac´ on, H. Garc´ ıa-Compe´ an, and G. Robles, JHEP 05, 202 (2025), arXiv:2410.21610 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Weyl double copy in type D spacetime in four and five dimensions,

    W. Zhao, P.-J. Mao, and J.-B. Wu, Phys. Rev. D111, 066005 (2025), arXiv:2411.04774 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Five dimensional Weyl double copy,

    W. Zhao, P.-J. Mao, and J.-B. Wu, Phys. Rev. D111, L081902 (2025), arXiv:2409.06786 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Armstrong-Williams, N

    K. Armstrong-Williams, N. Moynihan, and C. D. White, JHEP03, 121 (2025), arXiv:2407.18107 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Lopes Cardoso, S

    G. Lopes Cardoso, S. Mahapatra, and S. Nagy, JHEP 10, 030 (2024), arXiv:2407.14392 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Carrillo Gonz´ alez, A

    M. Carrillo Gonz´ alez, A. Lipstein, and S. Nagy, JHEP 10, 183 (2024), arXiv:2407.12905 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Ilderton and W

    A. Ilderton and W. Lindved, JHEP11, 100 (2024), arXiv:2405.10016 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Liu, J.-R

    Y.-R. Liu, J.-R. Zhang, and Y.-L. Zhang, Commun. Theor. Phys.76, 085405 (2024), arXiv:2404.07888 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Garc´ ıa-Compe´ an and C

    H. Garc´ ıa-Compe´ an and C. Ramos, JHEP07, 074 (2024), arXiv:2403.19608 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Asymptotic Weyl double copy in Newman-Penrose formalism,

    P. Mao and W. Zhao, JHEP02, 171 (2024), arXiv:2312.17160 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Chen and Y.-G

    W.-X. Chen and Y.-G. Zheng, (2023), arXiv:2312.11552 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Ortaggio, V

    M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, JHEP2024, 069 (2024), arXiv:2312.00706 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Liang and S

    Q. Liang and S. Nagy, JHEP04, 139 (2024), arXiv:2311.14319 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    G. R. Brown, J. Gowdy, and B. Spence, (2023), arXiv:2307.11063 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Borsten, B

    L. Borsten, B. Jurco, H. Kim, T. Macrelli, C. Saemann, and M. Wolf, (2023), arXiv:2307.10383 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    D´ ıaz-Jaramillo, S

    F. D´ ıaz-Jaramillo, S. Nagy, and G. Pizzolo, Phys. Rev. D112, 086002 (2025), arXiv:2503.21035 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Bonezzi, F

    R. Bonezzi, F. Diaz-Jaramillo, and S. Nagy, (2023), arXiv:2306.08558 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Lipstein and S

    A. Lipstein and S. Nagy, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 081501 (2023), arXiv:2304.07141 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Carrillo Gonz´ alez, W

    M. Carrillo Gonz´ alez, W. T. Emond, N. Moynihan, J. Rumbutis, and C. D. White, JHEP03, 177 (2023), arXiv:2212.04783 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Nagy and J

    S. Nagy and J. Peraza, JHEP02, 202 (2023), arXiv:2211.12991 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    W. D. Goldberger and A. K. Ridgway, Phys. Rev. D95, 125010 (2017), arXiv:1611.03493 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Scattering on plane waves and the double copy

    T. Adamo, E. Casali, L. Mason, and S. Nekovar, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 015004 (2018), arXiv:1706.08925 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    D. S. Berman, E. Chac´ on, A. Luna, and C. D. White, JHEP01, 107 (2019), arXiv:1809.04063 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Kerr-Schild Double Field Theory and Classical Double Copy

    K. Lee, JHEP10, 027 (2018), arXiv:1807.08443 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Alawadhi, D

    R. Alawadhi, D. S. Berman, B. Spence, and D. Peinador Veiga, JHEP03, 059 (2020), arXiv:1911.06797 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  66. [66]

    Huang, U

    Y.-T. Huang, U. Kol, and D. O’Connell, Phys. Rev. D 102, 046005 (2020), arXiv:1911.06318 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, and D. O’Connell, JHEP 01, 046 (2020), arXiv:1906.10100 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Campiglia and S

    M. Campiglia and S. Nagy, JHEP03, 262 (2021), arXiv:2102.01680 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Classical double copy at null infinity,

    T. Adamo and U. Kol, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 105007 (2022), arXiv:2109.07832 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    Asymptotic Weyl double copy,

    H. Godazgar, M. Godazgar, R. Monteiro, D. Peinador Veiga, and C. N. Pope, JHEP11, 126 (2021), arXiv:2109.07866 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    C. D. White, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 061602 (2021), arXiv:2012.02479 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Chac´ on, S

    E. Chac´ on, S. Nagy, and C. D. White, JHEP05, 2239 (2021), arXiv:2103.16441 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Chac´ on, S

    E. Chac´ on, S. Nagy, and C. D. White, JHEP03, 180 (2022), arXiv:2112.06764 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Penrose, Proc

    R. Penrose, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A284, 159 (1965)

    work page 1965

  75. [75]

    Penrose, J

    R. Penrose, J. Math. Phys.8, 345 (1967)

    work page 1967

  76. [76]

    Penrose, Int

    R. Penrose, Int. J. Theor. Phys.1, 61 (1968)

    work page 1968

  77. [77]

    J. N. Goldberg and R. K. Sachs, General Relativity and Gravitation41, 433 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    Witten, Physics Letters B77, 394 (1978)

    E. Witten, Physics Letters B77, 394 (1978)

    work page 1978

  79. [79]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Physics Letters B 78, 430 (1978)

    work page 1978

  80. [80]

    M. F. Atiyah, N. J. Hitchin, and I. M. Singer, Proceed- ings of the Royal Society A362, 425 (1978)

    work page 1978

Showing first 80 references.