pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.00864 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-30 · ✦ hep-th

Poly-vector deformations of heterotic supergravity solutions

Kirill Gubarev , Konstantin Sovit This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords heterotic supergravitydouble field theoryvector deformationsF1 string solutionopen/closed mapgauged DFTpoly-vector deformations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bi- and uni-vector deformations of 10d heterotic supergravity solutions are constructed using the gauged double field theory approach.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that bi- and uni-vector deformations of ten-dimensional heterotic supergravity solutions can be systematically built with the gauged double field theory framework. It also generalizes the open/closed map to this heterotic setting and works through concrete examples, especially deformations of the fundamental string solution. A sympathetic reader would care because the method supplies a controlled route for producing new consistent backgrounds starting from known ones in heterotic string theory.

Core claim

Using the gauged double field theory approach, the authors construct bi- and uni-vector deformations of 10d heterotic supergravity solutions, introduce a generalization of the open/closed map appropriate to this case, and exhibit explicit deformed solutions including the F1 string.

What carries the argument

The gauged double field theory approach, which generates the poly-vector deformations of heterotic supergravity solutions while preserving the required structure.

If this is right

  • Deformed solutions can be generated from standard heterotic supergravity backgrounds such as the F1 string.
  • The generalized open/closed map supplies a practical tool for relating descriptions in the deformed heterotic setting.
  • The construction yields new families of solutions that remain within the heterotic supergravity framework.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same gauged double field theory technique might be adapted to deformations in other supergravity theories or with additional fluxes.
  • It could offer a route to generate non-geometric heterotic backgrounds that are otherwise hard to construct directly.
  • Further study of how these deformations affect moduli stabilization or black-hole solutions would be a natural next step.

Load-bearing premise

The gauged double field theory framework applies consistently to heterotic supergravity and produces valid physical deformations without hidden inconsistencies or loss of key symmetries.

What would settle it

An explicit check that the deformed F1 string solution fails to solve the heterotic supergravity equations of motion or breaks supersymmetry would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

We construct bi- and uni-vector deformations of 10d heterotic supergravity solutions with the gauged double field theory approach. We construct a generalization of the "open/closed" map for this case and consider some examples of the deformed solutions, particularly for the F1 string solution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs bi- and uni-vector deformations of 10d heterotic supergravity solutions via the gauged double field theory (DFT) framework. It generalizes the open/closed map to the heterotic case and illustrates the construction with explicit examples, with the F1-string solution serving as the primary check.

Significance. If the resulting fields satisfy the full heterotic equations of motion (including the modified Bianchi identity) and the DFT strong constraint, the work supplies a systematic tool for generating new heterotic backgrounds from known ones. The use of gauged DFT is a strength, as it builds on an established consistency framework rather than ad-hoc deformations.

major comments (2)
  1. [F1-string example] F1-string example: the manuscript verifies the deformed solution at the DFT level but does not explicitly substitute the resulting fields into the heterotic Bianchi identity dH = (1/4)Tr(F∧F) − (1/4)Tr(R∧R) or confirm closure of the gauge algebra. This check is load-bearing for the claim that the output is a valid heterotic supergravity solution.
  2. [Section on the section condition] Section on the section condition: after including the gauge sector, it is not shown that the deformed fields continue to obey the O(10,10) strong constraint (or its heterotic reduction). Violation would invalidate the DFT construction for heterotic supergravity.
minor comments (2)
  1. The generalization of the open/closed map is stated but would benefit from an explicit side-by-side comparison of the original and deformed field transformations.
  2. A few instances of undefined notation appear when the gauge fields are introduced; adding a short table of symbols would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested checks and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [F1-string example] F1-string example: the manuscript verifies the deformed solution at the DFT level but does not explicitly substitute the resulting fields into the heterotic Bianchi identity dH = (1/4)Tr(F∧F) − (1/4)Tr(R∧R) or confirm closure of the gauge algebra. This check is load-bearing for the claim that the output is a valid heterotic supergravity solution.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the presentation. Although the gauged DFT construction encodes the heterotic equations of motion, we will add in the revised manuscript a direct substitution of the deformed F1-string fields into the Bianchi identity dH = (1/4)Tr(F∧F) − (1/4)Tr(R∧R) together with an explicit confirmation that the gauge algebra closes for this example. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on the section condition] Section on the section condition: after including the gauge sector, it is not shown that the deformed fields continue to obey the O(10,10) strong constraint (or its heterotic reduction). Violation would invalidate the DFT construction for heterotic supergravity.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of this explicit demonstration. The deformations are performed inside the gauged DFT framework, which is constructed to preserve the relevant constraints. To address the comment directly, we will expand the relevant section to show explicitly that the deformed fields (including the gauge sector) continue to satisfy the O(10,10) strong constraint and its heterotic reduction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; derivation applies established gauged DFT to heterotic solutions

full rationale

The paper constructs bi- and uni-vector deformations of 10d heterotic supergravity solutions via the gauged double field theory approach, generalizes the open/closed map, and examines explicit examples such as the F1 string. No quoted steps reduce predictions to fitted inputs by construction, invoke self-definitional relations, or rely on load-bearing self-citations whose prior results are themselves unverified within the present work. The central claims rest on applying an external DFT framework to satisfy the heterotic equations of motion and strong constraint, rendering the derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are stated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The gauged double field theory framework consistently describes deformations of heterotic supergravity solutions.
    Invoked as the method for constructing the deformations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5324 in / 1094 out tokens · 31888 ms · 2026-05-17T03:20:43.676358+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uni-vector deformations, D0-bound states and DLCQ

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Uni-vector deformations in Type IIA map D0 backgrounds to themselves and generate F1-D0 and D2-D0 bound states while relating to DLCQ of M-theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Duality in statistical mechanics and string theory,

    B. Sathiapalan, “Duality in statistical mechanics and string theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.58 (Apr, 1987) 1597–1599.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1597

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.58.1597 1987

  2. [3]

    Dualisation of Dualities, I

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, “Dualization of dualities. 1.,”Nucl. Phys. B523(1998) 73–144,arXiv:hep-th/9710119

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [4]

    Dualisation of Dualities, II: Twisted self-duality of doubled fields and superdualities

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, “Dualization of dualities. 2. Twisted self-duality of doubled fields, and superdualities,”Nucl. Phys. B535(1998) 242–292, arXiv:hep-th/9806106

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [5]

    Kajantie, L

    C. Hull and P. Townsend, “Unity of superstring dualities,”Nuclear Physics B438no. 1, (1995) 109–137. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/055032139400559W

    work page arXiv 1995

  5. [6]

    Poisson-Lie T-duality

    C. Klimcik, “Poisson-Lie T duality,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.46(1996) 116–121, arXiv:hep-th/9509095

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  6. [7]

    Yang-Baxterσ-models and dS/AdS T-duality,

    C. Klimc´ ık, “Yang-Baxterσ-models and dS/AdS T-duality,”Journal of High Energy Physics2002no. 12, (Jan, 2003) 051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/12/051

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/12/051 2003

  7. [8]

    Excitation of 4He by inelastic electron scattering at low momentum transfer.Physics Letters B31, 442–444 (1970)

    C. Klimˇ c´ ık and P.ˇSevera, “Dual non-Abelian duality and the Drinfeld double,”Physics Letters B351no. 4, (1995) 455–462. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037026939500451P

    work page arXiv 1995

  8. [9]

    Poisson-Lie T-plurality

    R. Von Unge, “Poisson Lie T plurality,”JHEP07(2002) 014,arXiv:hep-th/0205245

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  9. [10]

    U -duality extension of Drinfel’d double,

    Y. Sakatani, “U -duality extension of Drinfel’d double,”Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2020no. 2, (02, 2020) 023B08, https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article-pdf/2020/2/023B08/40444635/ptz172.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptz172. 18

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptz172 2020

  10. [11]

    Poisson-Lie U-duality in Exceptional Field Theory,

    E. Malek and D. C. Thompson, “Poisson-Lie U-duality in Exceptional Field Theory,” JHEP04(2020) 058,arXiv:1911.07833 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [12]

    Extended Drinfel’d algebras and non-Abelian duality,

    Y. Sakatani, “Extended Drinfel’d algebras and non-Abelian duality,”PTEP2021no. 6, (2021) 063B02,arXiv:2009.04454 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [13]

    E 6(6) exceptional Drinfel’d algebras,

    E. Malek, Y. Sakatani, and D. C. Thompson, “E 6(6) exceptional Drinfel’d algebras,” JHEP01(2021) 020,arXiv:2007.08510 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [14]

    Non-AbelianUduality at work,

    E. T. Musaev and Y. Sakatani, “Non-AbelianUduality at work,”Phys. Rev. D104 (Aug, 2021) 046015.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.046015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.046015 2021

  14. [15]

    On non-abelian U-duality of 11D backgrounds,

    E. T. Musaev, “On non-abelian U-duality of 11D backgrounds,”Universe8(2022) 276, arXiv:2007.01213 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [16]

    Fermionic T-Duality, Dual Superconformal Symmetry, and the Amplitude/Wilson Loop Connection

    N. Berkovits and J. Maldacena, “Fermionic T-Duality, Dual Superconformal Symmetry, and the Amplitude/Wilson Loop Connection,”JHEP09(2008) 062,arXiv:0807.3196 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [17]

    Fermionic T-duality and U-duality in type II supergravity

    I. Bakhmatov,Fermionic T-duality and U-duality in type II supergravity. PhD thesis, Queen Mary, U. of London, 2011.arXiv:1112.1983 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [18]

    Fermionic T-duality in fermionic double space,

    B. Nikoli´ c and B. Sazdovi´ c, “Fermionic T-duality in fermionic double space,”Nuclear Physics B917(2017) 105–121. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321317300482

    work page 2017

  18. [19]

    Non-abelian fermionic T-duality in supergravity,

    L. Astrakhantsev, I. Bakhmatov, and E. T. Musaev, “Non-abelian fermionic T-duality in supergravity,”JHEP09(2021) 135,arXiv:2101.08206 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [20]

    Fermionic T-duality of DFT,

    L. Astrakhantsev, I. Bakhmatov, and E. T. Musaev, “Fermionic T-duality of DFT,” Phys. Rev. D107no. 6, (2023) 066028,arXiv:2212.09312 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [21]

    Abelian Yang-Baxter Deformations and TsT transformations

    D. Osten and S. J. van Tongeren, “Abelian Yang–Baxter deformations and TsT transformations,”Nucl. Phys. B915(2017) 184–205,arXiv:1608.08504 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [22]

    Hidden Symmetries of the AdS_5 x S^5 Superstring

    I. Bena, J. Polchinski, and R. Roiban, “Hidden symmetries of the AdS(5) x S**5 superstring,”Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 046002,arXiv:hep-th/0305116

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  22. [23]

    Yang-Baxter $\sigma$-models and dS/AdS T-duality

    C. Klimˇ c´ ık, “Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality,”JHEP12(2002) 051, arXiv:hep-th/0210095 [hep-th]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  23. [24]

    On integrability of the Yang-Baxter $\si$-model

    C. Klimˇ c´ ık, “On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model,”J. Math. Phys.50 (2009) 043508,arXiv:0802.3518 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [25]

    Marginal deformations of 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ CFTs from AdS$_4$ backgrounds in generalised geometry

    A. Ashmore, “Marginal deformations of 3dN= 2 CFTs from AdS 4 backgrounds in generalised geometry,”JHEP12(2018) 060,arXiv:1809.03503 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [26]

    Deforming field theories with $U(1)\times U(1)$ global symmetry and their gravity duals

    O. Lunin and J. M. Maldacena, “Deforming field theories with U(1) x U(1) global symmetry and their gravity duals,”JHEP05(2005) 033,arXiv:hep-th/0502086 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  26. [27]

    Tri-vector deformations ind= 11supergravity,

    I. Bakhmatov, N. S. Deger, E. T. Musaev, E. ´O Colg´ ain, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Tri-vector deformations ind= 11 supergravity,”JHEP08(2019) 126, arXiv:1906.09052 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  27. [28]

    Non-abelian tri-vector deformations in d= 11supergravity,

    I. Bakhmatov, K. Gubarev, and E. T. Musaev, “Non-abelian tri-vector deformations in d= 11 supergravity,”JHEP05(2020) 113,arXiv:2002.01915 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [29]

    Polyvector deformations in eleven-dimensional supergravity,

    K. Gubarev and E. T. Musaev, “Polyvector deformations in eleven-dimensional supergravity,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 6, (2021) 066021,arXiv:2011.11424 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [30]

    Classical Yang-Baxter Equation from Supergravity

    I. Bakhmatov, O. Kelekci, E. ´O Colg´ ain, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Classical Yang-Baxter Equation from Supergravity,”Phys. Rev.D98no. 2, (2018) 021901, arXiv:1710.06784 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [31]

    Yang-Baxter Deformations Beyond Coset Spaces (a slick way to do TsT)

    I. Bakhmatov, E. ´O Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and H. Yavartanoo, “Yang-Baxter Deformations Beyond Coset Spaces (a slick way to do TsT),”JHEP06(2018) 161, arXiv:1803.07498 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [32]

    Classical Yang-Baxter equation from beta-supergravity

    I. Bakhmatov and E. T. Musaev, “Classical Yang-Baxter equation fromβ-supergravity,” JHEP01(2019) 140,arXiv:1811.09056 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [33]

    String Theory and Noncommutative Geometry

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “String theory and noncommutative geometry,”JHEP09 (1999) 032,arXiv:hep-th/9908142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  33. [34]

    An integrable deformation of the AdS_5 x S^5 superstring action

    F. Delduc, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, “An integrable deformation of the AdS 5×S5 superstring action,”Phys. Rev. Lett.112no. 5, (2014) 051601,arXiv:1309.5850 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [35]

    Puzzles of eta-deformed AdS_5 x S^5

    G. Arutyunov, R. Borsato, and S. Frolov, “Puzzles ofη-deformed AdS5×S5,”JHEP12 (2015) 049,arXiv:1507.04239 [hep-th]. 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [36]

    Scale invariance of theη-deformedAdS5×S5 superstring, T-duality and modified type II equations,

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, B. Hoare, R. Roiban, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Scale invariance of theη-deformedAdS5×S5 superstring, T-duality and modified type II equations,”Nucl. Phys.B903(2016) 262–303,arXiv:1511.05795 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  36. [37]

    Kappa-symmetry of superstring sigma model and generalized 10d supergravity equations

    L. Wulff and A. A. Tseytlin, “Kappa-symmetry of superstring sigma model and generalized 10d supergravity equations,”JHEP06(2016) 174,arXiv:1605.04884 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [38]

    Generalized gravity from modified DFT

    Y. Sakatani, S. Uehara, and K. Yoshida, “Generalized gravity from modified DFT,” JHEP04(2017) 123,arXiv:1611.05856 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [39]

    Mixed Boundary Conditions and Brane-String Bound States

    H. Arfaei and M. M. Sheikh Jabbari, “Mixed boundary conditions and brane, string bound states,”Nucl. Phys. B526(1998) 278–294,arXiv:hep-th/9709054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  39. [40]

    More on Mixed Boundary Conditions and D-branes Bound States

    M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “More on mixed boundary conditions and D-branes bound states,”Phys. Lett. B425(1998) 48–54,arXiv:hep-th/9712199

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  40. [41]

    Brane bound states, deformations and OM,

    S. Barakin, K. Gubarev, and E. T. Musaev, “Brane bound states, deformations and OM,”arXiv:2511.18899 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  41. [42]

    Current algebras, generalised fluxes and non-geometry,

    D. Osten, “Current algebras, generalised fluxes and non-geometry,”J. Phys. A53no. 26, (2020) 265402,arXiv:1910.00029 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [43]

    Exploring Double Field Theory

    D. Geissbuhler, D. Marques, C. Nunez, and V. Penas, “Exploring Double Field Theory,” JHEP06(2013) 101,arXiv:1304.1472 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [44]

    Double Field Theory: A Pedagogical Review

    G. Aldazabal, D. Marques, and C. Nunez, “Double Field Theory: A Pedagogical Review,”Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 163001,arXiv:1305.1907 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  44. [45]

    Tri-vector deformations with external fluxes,

    S. Barakin, K. Gubarev, and E. T. Musaev, “Tri-vector deformations with external fluxes,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 12, (2024) 1312,arXiv:2410.01629 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [46]

    Polyvector deformations of Type IIB backgrounds,

    K. Gubarev, E. T. Musaev, and T. Petrov, “Polyvector deformations of Type IIB backgrounds,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 10, (2024) 1085,arXiv:2408.05004 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [47]

    Yang-Baxter structure of the extended space,

    K. Gubarev and E. T. Musaev, “Yang–Baxter structure of the extended space,”Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 10, (2025) 1155,arXiv:2508.09637 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [48]

    Integrability structures in string theory,

    K. A. Gubarev and E. T. Musaev, “Integrability structures in string theory,”Phys. Usp. 67no. 3, (2024) 219–250,arXiv:2301.06486 [hep-th]. 21

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [49]

    Generalized 11D supergravity equations from tri-vector deformations,

    I. Bakhmatov, A. C ¸ atal-¨Ozer, N. S. Deger, K. Gubarev, and E. T. Musaev, “Generalized 11D supergravity equations from tri-vector deformations,”Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 1, (2023) 37,arXiv:2209.01423 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [50]

    Generalizing eleven-dimensional supergravity,

    I. Bakhmatov, A. Catal-Ozer, N. S. Deger, K. Gubarev, and E. T. Musaev, “Generalizing eleven-dimensional supergravity,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 8, (2022) L081904, arXiv:2203.03372 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [51]

    Generalizing Generalized Supergravity,

    K. A. Gubarev and E. T. Musaev, “Generalizing Generalized Supergravity,”Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett.20no. 3, (2023) 259–262

    work page 2023

  51. [52]

    Exactly Marginal Operators and Duality in Four Dimensional N=1 Supersymmetric Gauge Theory

    R. G. Leigh and M. J. Strassler, “Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory,”Nucl. Phys. B447(1995) 95–136, arXiv:hep-th/9503121

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  52. [53]

    New Phenomena in SU(3) Supersymmetric Gauge Theory

    P. C. Argyres and M. R. Douglas, “New phenomena in SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory,”Nucl. Phys. B448(1995) 93–126,arXiv:hep-th/9505062

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  53. [54]

    Yang-Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and twist-noncommutative gauge theory

    S. J. van Tongeren, “Yang–Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and twist-noncommutative gauge theory,”Nucl. Phys.B904(2016) 148–175,arXiv:1506.01023 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [55]

    On deformed gauge theories and their string/M-theory duals

    E. Imeroni, “On deformed gauge theories and their string/M-theory duals,”JHEP0810 (2008) 026,arXiv:0808.1271 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  55. [56]

    Gauged Double Field Theory

    M. Grana and D. Marques, “Gauged Double Field Theory,”JHEP04(2012) 020, arXiv:1201.2924 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [57]

    A field-theory motivated approach to symbolic computer algebra

    K. Peeters, “A Field-theory motivated approach to symbolic computer algebra,”Comput. Phys. Commun.176(2007) 550–558,arXiv:cs/0608005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  57. [58]

    Cadabra2: computer algebra for field theory revisited,

    K. Peeters, “Cadabra2: computer algebra for field theory revisited,”J. Open Source Softw.3no. 32, (2018) 1118

    work page 2018

  58. [59]

    Heterotic-deformations,

    K. Gubarev and K. Sovit, “Heterotic-deformations,”GitHub(2025) . https://github.com/K1rux4/polyvector-heterotic-supergravity

    work page 2025

  59. [60]

    Strings in Background Electric Field, Space/Time Noncommutativity and A New Noncritical String Theory

    N. Seiberg, L. Susskind, and N. Toumbas, “Strings in background electric field, space / time noncommutativity and a new noncritical string theory,”JHEP06(2000) 021, arXiv:hep-th/0005040. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  60. [61]

    Open membranes, ribbons and deformed Schild strings

    D. S. Berman and B. Pioline, “Open membranes, ribbons and deformed Schild strings,” Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 045007,arXiv:hep-th/0404049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  61. [62]

    Supersymmetric String Solitons

    C. G. Callan, Jr., J. A. Harvey, and A. Strominger, “Supersymmetric string solitons,” arXiv:hep-th/9112030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [63]

    Linear Dilatons, NS5-branes and Holography

    O. Aharony, M. Berkooz, D. Kutasov, and N. Seiberg, “Linear dilatons, NS five-branes and holography,”JHEP10(1998) 004,arXiv:hep-th/9808149

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  63. [64]

    Holographic approach to deformations of NS5-brane distributions and exact CFTs

    A. Fotopoulos, P. M. Petropoulos, N. Prezas, and K. Sfetsos, “Holographic approach to deformations of NS5-brane distributions and exact CFTs,”JHEP02(2008) 087, arXiv:0712.1912 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  64. [65]

    K-Points and Type IIB/Heterotic Duality with NS5-Branes,

    J. Monnee, T. Weigand, and M. Wiesner, “K-Points and Type IIB/Heterotic Duality with NS5-Branes,”arXiv:2510.02435 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  65. [66]

    Matrix Description of M-theory on $T^5$ and $T^5/Z_2$

    N. Seiberg, “New theories in six-dimensions and matrix description of M theory on T**5 and T**5 / Z(2),”Phys. Lett. B408(1997) 98–104,arXiv:hep-th/9705221

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  66. [67]

    NS5-branes, holography and CFT deformations

    A. Fotopoulos, P. M. Petropoulos, N. Prezas, and K. Sfetsos, “NS5-branes, holography and CFT deformations,”Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 888–892,arXiv:1002.4090 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  67. [68]

    Gauged double field theory, current algebras and heterotic sigma models,

    M. Hatsuda, H. Mori, S. Sasaki, and M. Yata, “Gauged double field theory, current algebras and heterotic sigma models,”JHEP05(2023) 220,arXiv:2212.06476 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [69]

    Heterotic integrable deformation of the principal chiral model,

    D. Osten, “Heterotic integrable deformation of the principal chiral model,”Phys. Rev. D 109no. 10, (2024) 106021,arXiv:2312.10149 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [70]

    On integrability of tri-vector deformed Type II string,

    E. T. Musaev and G. Zverev, “On integrability of tri-vector deformed Type II string,” Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 7, (2025) 744,arXiv:2504.16773 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [71]

    Non-relativistic duality andT¯Tdeformations,

    C. D. A. Blair, “Non-relativistic duality andT ¯Tdeformations,”JHEP07(2020) 069, arXiv:2002.12413 [hep-th]. 23

    work page arXiv 2020