pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.20242 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Effect of Underlayer Induced Charge Carrier Substitution on the Superconductivity of Ti40V60 Alloy Thin Films

Shekhar Chandra Pandey , Shilpam Sharma , Pooja Gupta , L. S. Sharath Chandra , M.K. Chattopadhyay This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superconductivitythin filmsTi-V alloysunderlayerscharge carriersdisorderspin fluctuations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Silicon under-layers raise the superconducting transition temperature in Ti40V60 thin films by introducing disorder that suppresses spin-fluctuation pair breaking.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies how under-layers of V, Al, and Si alter charge carriers and disorder in Ti40V60 alloy thin films and how those changes affect superconductivity. All films show metallic normal-state behavior and a superconducting transition, with Tc tunable from 4.77 K to 5.73 K. Hall data reveal that higher carrier concentrations lower Tc, yet the Si under-layer produces the highest disorder and the highest Tc. The authors conclude that moderate disorder in this alloy system reduces spin-fluctuation-induced pair breaking and thereby strengthens superconductivity. Comparisons with the pristine film confirm that the under-layers do not introduce significant proximity effects.

Core claim

Under-layer induced charge carrier substitution changes both carrier type and density in Ti40V60 thin films, producing a clear correlation in which increasing carrier concentration lowers the superconducting transition temperature. The Si under-layer, which introduces the largest disorder, nevertheless yields the highest Tc. This indicates that a moderate amount of disorder suppresses the spin-fluctuations inherent to the alloy and thereby reduces pair breaking, enhancing superconductivity. The comparable Tc of the V-under-layer film and the pristine film, together with the short coherence length relative to film thickness, confirm the absence of significant proximity effects.

What carries the argument

Under-layer-induced charge carrier substitution combined with controlled disorder, which modulates carrier density while allowing moderate disorder to suppress spin-fluctuation pair breaking.

If this is right

  • The superconducting transition temperature of Ti40V60 films can be tuned over a 1 K window by choice of under-layer material.
  • Higher carrier concentrations systematically lower Tc in this alloy system.
  • Moderate disorder enhances superconductivity by counteracting the pair-breaking effect of intrinsic spin fluctuations.
  • Under-layer engineering provides a route to optimize film properties without introducing proximity-induced suppression.
  • The short coherence length relative to film thickness allows independent control of superconductivity via the under-layer.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same under-layer strategy could be tested in other transition-metal alloys where spin fluctuations limit Tc.
  • Thin-film devices could incorporate tailored Tc values through simple under-layer deposition steps.
  • Direct probes of spin fluctuations, such as NMR or specific-heat measurements, would test whether the disorder effect is truly the dominant mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

That the rise in Tc with Si-induced disorder is caused by suppression of spin-fluctuation pair breaking rather than by unmeasured changes in electron-phonon coupling or interface scattering.

What would settle it

A measurement of spin susceptibility or the pair-breaking parameter across the same set of under-layers that fails to show reduced spin-fluctuation strength for the Si case despite its higher Tc.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.20242 by L. S. Sharath Chandra, M.K. Chattopadhyay, Pooja Gupta, Shekhar Chandra Pandey, Shilpam Sharma.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) XRR patterns as a function of the scattering vector for four Ti40V60 thin films with different under-layers. The black curves represent the observed experimental data, while the red curves correspond to the fitted patterns. (b) GIXRD patterns of Ti40V60 alloy thin films showing the polycrystalline nature of the films [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Electrical resistivity as a function of temperature for Ti40V60 alloy thin films with different under-layers. (b) Normalized electrical resistivity versus temperature curves showing the signature of TC of the films [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Resistance as a function of temperature, R(T), for Ti40V60 alloy thin film with Si under-layer (highest TC), measured in different applied magnetic fields from 0 to 7 T. (b) Critical magnetic field HC2 as a function of reduced temperature T/TC; the red curve indicates the fitting of the HC2 using equation (2). The systematic variation of TC across different under-layers can be understood as an intrinsi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The influence of metallic and semiconducting (V, Al, and Si) under-layer induced charge carrier substitution on the superconducting properties of the Ti40V60 alloy thin films are studied and also compared with a pristine reference film without any under-layer. All the films exhibit metallic behavior in the normal state and a superconducting transition at low temperatures, where the superconducting transition temperature is tunable between 4.77 K and 5.73 K. Hall measurements on the films reveal that the under-layer strongly affects the charge carrier type and density, leading to a correlation between increasing carrier concentration and decreasing TC. The Si under-layer introduces the highest disorder, yet yields the highest TC. This indicates that in the Ti40V60 alloys, a moderate amount of disorder suppresses the spin-fluctuations (inherent to the alloy system) induced pair breaking, thereby enhancing the superconductivity. The comparable TC of the film with V under-layer and the film without under-layer, and the much smaller coherence length (~6.2 nm) as compared to the film thickness (25 nm), confirm the absence of any significant proximity effects. These findings demonstrate that under-layer engineering provides an effective route to tune the superconducting properties of Ti-V alloy thin films.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript experimentally investigates the effects of V, Al, and Si under-layers on Ti40V60 alloy thin films, reporting metallic normal-state behavior, tunable superconducting transition temperatures between 4.77 K and 5.73 K, and Hall-derived carrier densities that correlate inversely with Tc. The Si under-layer produces the highest Tc despite the highest disorder (evidenced by resistivity upturns), which the authors interpret as moderate disorder suppressing spin-fluctuation pair-breaking inherent to the alloy; proximity effects are ruled out by a coherence length of ~6.2 nm versus 25 nm film thickness.

Significance. The experimental demonstration of under-layer control over Tc and carrier density in Ti-V thin films could offer a practical route for tuning superconductivity in alloy-based devices if the mechanism is validated. However, the current significance is tempered because the central causal attribution to spin-fluctuation suppression rests on correlation alone without direct microscopic probes, limiting immediate impact on the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and discussion of Si under-layer results] The interpretation that Si-induced disorder suppresses spin-fluctuation pair-breaking (stated in the abstract and discussion of results) lacks direct supporting data; no magnetic susceptibility, NMR, or specific-heat measurements are presented to confirm the existence or modulation of spin fluctuations in Ti40V60. The inverse carrier-density–Tc trend and resistivity upturns alone do not establish this mechanism over alternatives such as altered electron-phonon coupling or unaccounted interface scattering.
  2. [Results section on transport and Hall measurements] Experimental robustness is insufficiently documented: the manuscript provides no error bars on reported Tc values (4.77–5.73 K), coherence length (~6.2 nm), or Hall coefficients, nor details on the number of samples, measurement statistics, or fitting procedures for extracting carrier densities and coherence lengths. This undermines assessment of the claimed trends and the conclusion that the Si under-layer yields unambiguously highest Tc.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Clarify whether the under-layers change the dominant carrier type (electrons vs. holes) in addition to density, as this is mentioned qualitatively but not quantified in the Hall data summary.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have revised the abstract and discussion to present the spin-fluctuation interpretation more cautiously as a plausible hypothesis rather than a confirmed mechanism, and we have substantially improved the documentation of experimental statistics, error bars, and analysis procedures.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The interpretation that Si-induced disorder suppresses spin-fluctuation pair-breaking (stated in the abstract and discussion of results) lacks direct supporting data; no magnetic susceptibility, NMR, or specific-heat measurements are presented to confirm the existence or modulation of spin fluctuations in Ti40V60. The inverse carrier-density–Tc trend and resistivity upturns alone do not establish this mechanism over alternatives such as altered electron-phonon coupling or unaccounted interface scattering.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript lacks direct microscopic probes of spin fluctuations. In the revised version we have removed the definitive phrasing from the abstract and discussion, now describing the suppression of spin-fluctuation pair-breaking as a working hypothesis supported by the observed correlation between moderate disorder (resistivity upturn) and elevated Tc. We explicitly note that transport data alone cannot rule out alternative explanations such as changes in electron-phonon coupling or interface scattering, and we have added a short paragraph discussing these possibilities. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Experimental robustness is insufficiently documented: the manuscript provides no error bars on reported Tc values (4.77–5.73 K), coherence length (~6.2 nm), or Hall coefficients, nor details on the number of samples, measurement statistics, or fitting procedures for extracting carrier densities and coherence lengths. This undermines assessment of the claimed trends and the conclusion that the Si under-layer yields unambiguously highest Tc.

    Authors: We have added error bars (standard deviations from repeated measurements) to all Tc values, the coherence length, and Hall coefficients throughout the figures and text. The revised manuscript now states that at least three independent samples were measured for each under-layer type, reports the number of Hall sweeps per sample, and describes the linear fitting procedure used to extract carrier densities from the Hall resistivity. The coherence length was obtained via the Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg formula applied to upper-critical-field data; the fitting details and raw data ranges are provided in the methods section. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct microscopic confirmation of spin fluctuations (via NMR, specific-heat, or susceptibility measurements) cannot be supplied in the present revision, as such experiments require specialized equipment and sample preparation beyond the scope of the current study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental study with interpretive claims unsupported by derivations

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of Tc (4.77–5.73 K), Hall-derived carrier densities, resistivity upturns, and coherence length (~6.2 nm) for Ti40V60 films with different underlayers. The central interpretation—that moderate Si-induced disorder suppresses inherent spin-fluctuation pair-breaking—is presented as an inference from the observed inverse carrier-density–Tc correlation and highest Tc despite highest disorder. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or derivations are used; the claim does not reduce to inputs by construction. The study is self-contained against external benchmarks (measured values), with the mechanism remaining a hypothesis rather than a load-bearing mathematical step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard experimental condensed-matter assumptions about superconductivity in disordered alloys and the role of spin fluctuations in pair breaking. No free parameters are fitted in a derivation sense; the work is data-driven rather than model-derived.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spin fluctuations inherent to the Ti-V alloy system cause pair breaking that can be suppressed by moderate disorder
    Invoked in the abstract to explain why highest-disorder Si underlayer yields highest Tc.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5543 in / 1386 out tokens · 37753 ms · 2026-05-16T20:28:46.449164+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Webb G W, Marsiglio F and Hirsch J E 2015 Superconductivity in the elements, alloys and simple compounds Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 514 17

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Mito M, Matsui H, Tsuruta K, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura K, Deguchi H, Shirakawa N, Adachi H, Yamasaki T, Iwaoka H, Ikoma Y and Horita Z 2016 Large e nhancement of superconducting transition temperature in single -element superconducting rhenium by shear strain Scientific Reports 6 36337

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Cao Z-Y, Jang H, Choi S, Kim J, Kim S, Zhang J-B, Sharbirin A S, Kim J and Park T 2023 Spectroscopic evidence for the superconductivity of elemental metal Y under pressure NPG Asia Materials 15 5 16

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Mito M, Tsuji H, Tajiri T, Nakamura K, Tang Y and Horita Z 2024 Superconductivity of barium with highest transition temperatures in metallic materials at ambient pressure Scientific Reports 14 965

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Zhang C, He X, Liu C, Li Z, Lu K, Zhang S, Feng S, Wang X, Peng Y, Long Y, Yu R, Wang L, Prakapenka V, Chariton S, Li Q, Liu H, Chen C and Jin C 2022 Record high Tc element superconductivity achieved in titanium Nature Communications 13 5411

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Compton V B, Corenzwit E, Maita J P, Matthias B T and Morin F J 1961 Superconductivity of Technetium Alloys and Compounds Physical Review 123 1567

    work page 1961

  7. [7]

    Matthias B T, Geballe T H, Compton V B, Corenzwit E and Hull G W 1962 Superconductivity of Chromium Alloys Physical Review 128 588

    work page 1962

  8. [8]

    Tai M, Inoue K, Kikuchi A, Takeuchi T, Kiyoshi T and Hishinuma Y 2007 Superconducting Properties of V -Ti Alloys IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 17 2542

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    Matin M, Sharath Chandra L S , Chattopadhyay M K, Meena R K, Kaul R, Singh M N, Sinha A K and Roy S B 2015 Critical current and flux pinning properties of the superconducting Ti–V alloys Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 512 32

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Si Q and Hussey N E 2023 Iron -based superconductors: Teenage, complex, challenging Physics Today 76 34

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Stewart G R 2011 Superconductivity in iron compounds Reviews of Modern Physics 83 1589

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Disiena M N, Jha R, Sloan L and Banerjee S K 2025 Effect s of Mo Doping on the Superconducting Properties of NbSe2 ACS Applied Electronic Materials 7 9526

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Bohnenstiehl S D, Susner M A, Yang Y, Collings E W, Sumption M D, Rindfleisch M A and Boone R 2011 Carbon doping of MgB2 by toluene and malic-acid-in-toluene Physica C: Superconductivity 471 108

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Han D, Ming W, Xu H, Chen S, Sun D and Du M -H 2019 Chemical Trend of Transition- Metal Doping in WSe2 Physical Review Applied 12 034038

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Drozdov A P, Eremets M I, Troyan I A, Ksenofontov V and Shylin S I 2015 Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system Nature 525 73

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Lorenz B and Chu C W 2005 Frontiers in Superconducting Materials, ed A V Narlikar (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg) pp 459

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    Ramjan S K, Khandelwal A, Paul S, Chandra L S S, Singh R, Venkatesh R, Kumar K, Rawat R, Dutt S, Sagdeo A, Ganesh P and Chattopadhyay M K 2024 Enhancement of irreversibility field and critical current density of rare earth containing V0.60Ti0.40 alloy superconductor by cold -working and annealing Journal of Alloys and Compounds 976 173321

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Ramjan S K, Sharath Chandra L S, Singh R and Chattopadhyay M K 2023 Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Low Temperature Physics (LT29) : Journal of the Physical Society of Japan)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Ramjan S K, Sharath Chandra L S, Singh R, Ganesh P, Sagdeo A and Chattopadhyay M K 2022 Enhancement of functional properties of V0.6Ti0.4 alloy superconductor by the addition of yttrium Journal of Applied Physics 131 063901

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Matin M, Sharath Chandra L S, Pandey S K, Chattopadhyay M K and Roy S B 2014 The influence of electron -phonon coupling and spin fluctuations on the superconductivity of the Ti-V alloys The European Physical Journal B 87 131 17

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Matin M, Sharath Chandra L S, Meena R, Chattopadhyay M K, Sinha A K, Singh M N and Roy S B 2014 Spin -fluctuations in Ti0.6V0.4 alloy and its influence on the superconductivity Physica B: Condensed Matter 436 20

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Mitra M, Ghosh H and Behera S N 1998 Effect of electron correlation on superconducting pairing symmetry The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 2 371

    work page 1998

  23. [23]

    Jones D, Östlin A, Weh A, Beiuşeanu F, Eckern U, Vitos L and Chioncel L 2024 Superconducting transition temperatures of pure vanadi um and vanadium-titanium alloys in the presence of dynamical electronic correlations Physical Review B 109 165107

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Neverov V D, Lukyanov A E, Krasavin A V, Vagov A, Lvov B G and Croitoru M D 2024 Exploring disorder correlations in superconducting syste ms: spectroscopic insights and matrix element effects Beilstein journal of nanotechnology 15 199

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Guo Y, Qiu D, Shao M, Song J, Wang Y, Xu M, Yang C, Li P, Liu H and Xiong J 2023 Modulations in Superconductors: Probes of Underlying Physics 35 2209457

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Maggiora J, Wang X and Zheng R 2024 Superconductivity and interfaces Physics Reports 1076 1

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Liu Y, Meng Q, Mahmoudi P, Wang Z, Zhang J, Yang J, Li W, Wang D, Li Z, Sorrell C C and Li S 2024 Advancing Superconductivity with Interface Engineering Advanced Materials 36 2405009

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Al-Tawhid A H, Poage S J, Salmani-Rezaie S, Gonzalez A, Chikara S, Muller D A, Kumah D P, Gastiasoro M N, Lorenzana J and Ahadi K 2023 Enhanced Critical Field of Superconductivity at an Oxide Interface Nano Letters 23 6944

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Yang B, Zhao C, Xia B, Ma H, Chen H, Cai J, Yang H, Liu X, Liu L, Guan D, Wang S, Li Y, Liu C, Zheng H and Jia J 2023 Interface-enhanced superconductivity in monolayer 1T′- MoTe2 on SrTiO3(001) Quantum Frontiers 2 9

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Qiao W, Ma Y, Yan J, Xing W, Yao Y, Cai R, Li B, Xiong R, Xie X C, Lin X and Han W 2021 Gate tunability of the superconducting state at the EuOKTaO3 (111) interface Physical Review B 104 184505

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Piatti E 2021 Ionic gating in metallic superconductors: A brief review Nano Express 2 024003

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Liu L, Miao G, Liu B, Nan P, Wang Y, Ge B, Zhu X, Yang F, Wang W and Guo J 2019 Interfacial effects on the superconducting properties of LaSi2 (112) films on Si(111) Physical Review B 100 165308

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Liu Y, Meng Q, Mahmoudi P, Wang Z, Zhang J, Ya ng J, Li W, Wang D, Li Z, Sorrell C C and Li S 2024 Advancing Superconductivity with Interface Engineering 36 2405009

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Mito M, Mokutani N, Tsuji H, Tang Y, Matsumoto K, Murayama M and Horita Z 2022 Achieving superconductivity with higher Tc in lightweight Al –Ti–Mg alloys: Prediction using machine learning and synthesis via high-pressure torsion process Journal of Applied Physics 131 105903

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Pandey S C, Sharma S, Khandelwal A and Chattopadhyay M K 2025 Ambient temperature growth and superconducting properties of Ti -V alloy thin films AIP Conference Proceedings 3198 020113

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Anderson P W and Matthias B T 1964 Superconductivity Science 144 373

    work page 1964

  37. [37]

    Matin M, Chattopadhyay M K, Chandra L S S and Roy S B 2016 High-field paramagnetic Meissner effect and flux creep in low -Tc Ti –V alloy superconductors Superconductor Science and Technology 29 025003 18

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Matin M, Sharath Chandra L S, Chattopadhyay M K, Meena R K, Kaul R, Singh M N, Sinha A K and Roy S B 2013 Magnetic irreversibility and pinning force density in the Ti- V alloys Journal of Applied Physics 113 163903

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Matin M, Sharath Chandra L S, Chattopadhyay M K, Singh M N, Sinha A K and Roy S B 2013 High field paramagnetic effect in the superconducting state of Ti0.8V0.2 alloy Superconductor Science and Technology 26 115005

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Collings E W 1974 Anomalous electrical resistivity, bcc phase stability, a nd superconductivity in titanium-vanadium alloys Physical Review B 9 3989

    work page 1974

  41. [41]

    Paul S, Ramjan S, Venkatesh R, Chandra L S S and Chattopadhyay M K 2021 Grain Refinement and Enhancement of Critical Current Density in the V0.60Ti0.40 Alloy Superconductor With Gd Addition IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 31 1

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Pandey S C, Sharma S, Pandey K K, Gupta P, Rai S, Singh R and Chattopadhyay M K 2025 Sputtering current driven growth and transport characteristics of superconducting Ti40V60 alloy thin films Journal of Applied Physics 137 113902

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Pandey S C, Sharma S and Chattopadhyay M K 2025 Growth Optimization of MoSi Thin Film and Measurement of Transport Critical Current Density of its Meander Structure physica status solidi (b) e202500289

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Vignaud G and Gibaud A 2019 REFLEX: a program for the analysis of specular X-ray and neutron reflectivity data Journal of Applied Crystallography 52 201

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Spaepen F 2000 Interfaces and stresses in thin films Acta Materialia 48 31

    work page 2000

  46. [46]

    Kuvandikov O K, Ha mrayev N S, Rajabov R M and Hamrayeva N N 2023 Anisotropic scattering of charge carriers in double continuous solid solutions of the niobium-vanadium system Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2573 012022

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Bradley J M and Stringer J 1974 Hall effect measurements in aluminium alloys Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 4 839

    work page 1974

  48. [48]

    Huang L-F, Grabowski B, McEniry E, Trinkle D R and Neugebauer J 2015 Importance of coordination number and bond length in titanium revealed by electronic structure investigations 252 1907

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Donachie M J 2000 Titanium: A Technical Guide, 2nd Edition: ASM International)

    work page 2000

  50. [50]

    Ballor J, Shawon A A, Zevalkink A, Sunaoshi T, Misture S and Boehlert C J 2023 The effects of Fe and Al on the phase transformations and mechanical behavior of β -Ti alloy Ti-11at.%Cr Materials Science and Engineering: A 886 145677

    work page 2023