pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.17115 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-23 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Effective geometrodynamics for renormalization-group improved black-hole spacetimes in spherical symmetry

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords renormalization group improvementblack hole spacetimesHorndeski theoryspherical symmetryeffective gravitational couplingMisner-Sharp massgeometrodynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

RG-improved black-hole spacetimes with scale-dependent coupling are exact vacuum solutions to two-dimensional Horndeski theories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a systematic operational approach to renormalization-group improvement of the spherically reduced Einstein-Hilbert action and its associated field equations, using a scale-dependent Newton coupling. It employs master field equations constructed from two-dimensional Horndeski theory to retain selected higher-curvature contributions from the effective action while preserving the second-order nature of the dynamics. This procedure produces static black-hole solutions in which the effective gravitational coupling varies with areal radius and Misner-Sharp mass. The same framework embeds earlier RG-improvement constructions and demonstrates that the resulting spacetimes differ according to whether the improvement is imposed at the level of the action, the field equations, or the Schwarzschild metric itself.

Core claim

Static RG-improved black-hole spacetimes with an effective gravitational coupling depending on the areal radius and the Misner-Sharp mass are derived as vacuum solutions to these master field equations, and are thereby identified as solutions to generally covariant two-dimensional Horndeski theories.

What carries the argument

Master field equations for spherically symmetric gravitational fields constructed from two-dimensional Horndeski theory, which retain partial higher-curvature contributions from the effective action while remaining second-order.

If this is right

  • Earlier RG-improved black-hole models can be recovered as particular cases inside the same covariant formalism.
  • Distinct physical metrics arise when the RG improvement is applied at the action, at the field equations, or directly to the Schwarzschild solution.
  • The resulting spacetimes satisfy generally covariant two-dimensional Horndeski theories exactly.
  • Selected higher-curvature terms are kept in the dynamics without introducing higher-order derivatives.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same master-equation technique could be applied to time-dependent or axisymmetric configurations to obtain consistent RG-improved metrics beyond static spherical symmetry.
  • The dependence of the effective coupling on both radius and Misner-Sharp mass suggests a possible route to incorporating mass-dependent quantum corrections into horizon thermodynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The master field equations constructed from two-dimensional Horndeski theory allow retention of partial contributions from higher-curvature truncations of the effective action while preserving the second-order nature of the resulting field equations.

What would settle it

A direct substitution of one of the derived RG-improved metrics into the master field equations that yields a nonzero residual would show the solution does not satisfy the Horndeski dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.17115 by Johanna Borissova, Ra\'ul Carballo-Rubio.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Effective average action Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Schematic representation of interrelations between RG-improvement at the level of solutions, field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Gravitational collapse into a regular black-hole spacetime with time-time component of the metric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the spherically reduced Einstein-Hilbert action, Einstein field equations and Schwarzschild spacetime modified by a renormalization-group (RG) scale-dependent gravitational Newton coupling, and present a systematic and operational approach to such an RG-improvement. The master field equations for spherically symmetric gravitational fields, recently constructed from two-dimensional Horndeski theory, allow us to retain partial contributions from higher-curvature truncations of the effective action, while preserving the second-order nature of the resulting field equations. Static RG-improved black-hole spacetimes with an effective gravitational coupling depending on the areal radius and the Misner-Sharp mass are derived as vacuum solutions to these master field equations, and are thereby identified as solutions to generally covariant two-dimensional Horndeski theories. We discuss explicitly the embedding of previous key works on RG-improvement into the newly developed formalism to illustrate its broad range of applicability. This formalism moreover allows us to establish explicitly the discrepancies in the outcomes of RG-improvement when implemented at the level of the action, in the field equations, or in the Schwarzschild solution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a systematic formalism for renormalization-group improvement of spherically symmetric black-hole spacetimes. It employs master field equations derived from two-dimensional Horndeski theory to retain selected higher-curvature contributions while preserving second-order equations. Static RG-improved solutions are constructed with an effective Newton coupling G depending on areal radius and Misner-Sharp mass; these are shown to solve the master equations and are thereby identified as solutions of generally covariant 2D Horndeski theories. The formalism is used to embed prior RG-improvement studies and to compare outcomes when the improvement is performed at the level of the action, the field equations, or the Schwarzschild solution.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a covariant effective-theory framework that consistently incorporates scale-dependent gravitational couplings into black-hole geometrodynamics. It clarifies ambiguities among different RG-improvement prescriptions and provides an explicit bridge between asymptotic-safety-inspired metrics and second-order Horndeski dynamics, which may facilitate further analytic and numerical studies of quantum-corrected black holes.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the central claim that the RG-improved metrics solve the master equations is stated without a one-sentence indication of the explicit substitution or verification performed in the body; adding this would improve readability.
  2. Section 3 (or equivalent): the dependence of G on both r and M is introduced; a short remark on whether this dependence is uniquely fixed by the RG flow or remains a choice within the formalism would help readers assess the predictive power.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report, so we have no specific points requiring rebuttal or clarification at this stage. We will incorporate any minor suggestions during the revision process.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs master field equations from two-dimensional Horndeski theory that preserve second-order structure while allowing selected higher-curvature terms. It then derives the RG-improved spacetimes (with effective G depending on areal radius and Misner-Sharp mass) as explicit vacuum solutions to those equations, thereby identifying them as Horndeski solutions. This is a direct solving step rather than a reduction of outputs to inputs by definition or fit. No load-bearing self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is evident; the formalism is used to embed prior RG-improvement works without forcing the central claim tautologically. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Ledger extracted from abstract; full paper likely specifies the RG flow function and truncation details.

free parameters (1)
  • scale-dependent Newton coupling G(r, M)
    Effective gravitational coupling taken as function of areal radius and Misner-Sharp mass; specific functional form chosen from RG considerations.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spherically reduced Einstein-Hilbert action with RG-improved Newton coupling
    Starting point for the modification in spherical symmetry.
  • standard math Master field equations from two-dimensional Horndeski theory retain partial higher-curvature contributions while remaining second-order
    Invoked to construct the effective geometrodynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5494 in / 1317 out tokens · 29798 ms · 2026-05-16T11:26:23.301548+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar produces families of regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes in GR, including new closed-form solutions involving hypergeo...

  2. Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar yields a unified framework for regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes satisfying the weak energy condition, recovering kn...

  3. Proca-Maxwell System in an Infinite Tower of Higher-Derivative Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Higher-order terms in an infinite tower of higher-derivative gravity regularize a 5D Proca-Maxwell system, creating frozen regular cores that mimic extremal black holes and satisfy all energy conditions.

  4. All $2D$ generalised dilaton theories from $d\geq 4$ gravities

    hep-th 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    Generic 2D Horndeski theories arise from dimensional reduction of d≥4 gravities, yielding a Birkhoff theorem for quasi-topological gravities where static spherically symmetric solutions satisfy g_tt g_rr = -1 and are ...

  5. $g_{tt}g_{rr} =-1$ black hole thermodynamics in extended quasi-topological gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified framework links the generating function for static black holes satisfying g_tt g_rr=-1 in extended quasi-topological gravity to thermodynamic mass and Wald entropy via an effective 2D dilaton theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 46 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C. M. Will,The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Rev. Rel.17 (2014) 4, [arXiv:1403.7377]. 11 It should be emphasized that this is an onshell statement, regardless of the fact that classical singular black holes may be effectively suppressed offshell in the quantum-gravitational path integral [113, 114]. 27 [2]LIGO Scientific,...

  2. [2]

    Carballo-Rubio et al

    R. Carballo-Rubio et al.,Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics, JCAP05(2025) 003, [arXiv:2501.05505]

  3. [3]

    Buoninfanteet al., Visions in quantum gravity, Sci- Post Phys

    L. Buoninfante et al.,Visions in quantum gravity,arXiv:2412.08696

  4. [4]

    Afshordi et al., Black Holes Inside and Out 2024: visions for the future of black hole physics (2024) arXiv:2410.14414 [gr-qc]

    N. Afshordi et al.,Black Holes Inside and Out 2024: visions for the future of black hole physics, 10, 2024.arXiv:2410.14414

  5. [5]

    Bambi et al., Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation , 5, 2025 [ 2505.09014]

    C. Bambi et al.,Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation, 5, 2025.arXiv:2505.09014

  6. [6]

    Buoninfante, B

    L. Buoninfante, B. L. Giacchini, and T. de Paula Netto, Black Holes in Non-local Gravity. 2024. arXiv:2211.03497

  7. [7]

    Platania, Black Holes in Asymptotically Safe Gravity (2023) arXiv:2302.04272 [gr-qc]

    A. Platania, Black Holes in Asymptotically Safe Gravity. 2023.arXiv:2302.04272

  8. [8]

    Black holes in asymptotically safe gravity and beyond,

    A. Eichhorn and A. Held,Black holes in asymptotically safe gravity and beyond,arXiv:2212.09495

  9. [9]

    Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi,Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP10(2006) 014, [hep-th/0602178]

  10. [10]

    LORIS: a web-based data management system for multi-center studies,

    B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Mir´ o, R. Rattazzi, M. Riembau, and F. Riva,Positive moments for scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 3 036006, [arXiv:2011.00037]

  11. [11]

    A. J. Tolley, Z.-Y. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou,New positivity bounds from full crossing symmetry, JHEP 05(2021) 255, [arXiv:2011.02400]

  12. [12]

    The String Landscape and the Swampland

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

  13. [13]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland, Nucl. Phys. B 766(2007) 21–33, [hep-th/0605264]

  14. [14]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review, Fortsch. Phys.67(2019), no. 6 1900037, [arXiv:1903.06239]

  15. [15]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski, and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications, Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1–50, [arXiv:2102.01111]

  16. [16]

    Basile and A

    I. Basile and A. Platania,Asymptotic Safety: Swampland or Wonderland?, Universe7(2021), no. 10 389, [arXiv:2107.06897]

  17. [17]

    Knorr and A

    B. Knorr and A. Platania,Unearthing the intersections: positivity bounds, weak gravity conjecture, and asymptotic safety landscapes from photon-graviton flows, JHEP03(2025) 003, [arXiv:2405.08860]

  18. [18]

    Eichhorn, M

    A. Eichhorn, M. Schiffer, and A. O. Pedersen,Application of positivity bounds in asymptotically safe gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 7 733, [arXiv:2405.08862]

  19. [19]

    Eichhorn, A

    A. Eichhorn, A. Hebecker, J. M. Pawlowski, and J. Walcher,The absolute swampland, EPL149 (2025), no. 3 39001, [arXiv:2405.20386]

  20. [20]

    Basile, B

    I. Basile, B. Knorr, A. Platania, and M. Schiffer,Asymptotic safety, quantum gravity, and the swampland: a conceptual assessment,arXiv:2502.12290

  21. [21]

    Borissova, A

    J. Borissova, A. Eichhorn, and S. Ray,A non-local way around the no-global-symmetries conjecture in quantum gravity?, Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025), no. 3 037001, [arXiv:2407.09595]

  22. [22]

    Ostrogradsky,M´ emoires sur les ´ equations diff´ erentielles, relatives au probl` eme des isop´ erim` etres, Mem

    M. Ostrogradsky,M´ emoires sur les ´ equations diff´ erentielles, relatives au probl` eme des isop´ erim` etres, Mem. Acad. St. Petersbourg6(1850), no. 4 385–517

  23. [23]

    F. J. de Urries and J. Julve,Ostrogradski formalism for higher derivative scalar field theories, J. Phys. A31(1998) 6949–6964, [hep-th/9802115]

  24. [24]

    R. P. Woodard,Ostrogradsky’s theorem on Hamiltonian instability, Scholarpedia10(2015), no. 8 28 32243, [arXiv:1506.02210]

  25. [25]

    Deffayet, S

    C. Deffayet, S. Mukohyama, and A. Vikman,Ghosts without Runaway Instabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(2022), no. 4 041301, [arXiv:2108.06294]

  26. [26]

    Global and local stability for ghosts coupled to positive energy degrees of freedom,

    C. Deffayet, A. Held, S. Mukohyama, and A. Vikman,Global and local stability for ghosts coupled to positive energy degrees of freedom, JCAP11(2023) 031, [arXiv:2305.09631]

  27. [27]

    Deffayet, A

    C. Deffayet, A. Held, S. Mukohyama, and A. Vikman,Ghostly interactions in (1+1)-dimensional classical field theory, Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 6 065011, [arXiv:2504.11437]

  28. [28]

    Held,Global stability of ghostly field theories: Classical scattering in(N+ 1)dimensions, arXiv:2509.18049

    A. Held,Global stability of ghostly field theories: Classical scattering in(N+ 1)dimensions, arXiv:2509.18049

  29. [29]

    K. S. Stelle,Classical Gravity with Higher Derivatives, Gen. Rel. Grav.9(1978) 353–371

  30. [30]

    H. Lu, A. Perkins, C. N. Pope, and K. S. Stelle,Black Holes in Higher-Derivative Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015), no. 17 171601, [arXiv:1502.01028]

  31. [31]

    H. L¨ u, A. Perkins, C. N. Pope, and K. S. Stelle,Spherically Symmetric Solutions in Higher-Derivative Gravity, Phys. Rev. D92(2015), no. 12 124019, [arXiv:1508.00010]

  32. [32]

    Podolsky, R

    J. Podolsky, R. Svarc, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova,Explicit black hole solutions in higher-derivative gravity, Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 2 021502, [arXiv:1806.08209]

  33. [33]

    Podolsk´ y, R.ˇSvarc, V

    J. Podolsk´ y, R.ˇSvarc, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova,Black holes and other exact spherical solutions in Quadratic Gravity, Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 2 024027, [arXiv:1907.00046]

  34. [34]

    B. L. Giacchini and I. Kol´ aˇ r,Toward regular black holes in sixth-derivative gravity,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024), no. 10 104056, [arXiv:2406.00997]

  35. [35]

    B. L. Giacchini and I. Kol´ aˇ r,Black holes and other exact solutions in six-derivative gravity, Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 2 024051, [arXiv:2503.17318]

  36. [36]

    Borissova, B

    J. Borissova, B. L. Giacchini, and A. Held,Spherically symmetric solutions in quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity,arXiv:2512.14148

  37. [37]

    B. S. DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity. 1. The Canonical Theory, Phys. Rev.160(1967) 1113–1148

  38. [38]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking,Wave Function of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2960–2975

  39. [39]

    Vilenkin,Boundary Conditions in Quantum Cosmology, Phys

    A. Vilenkin,Boundary Conditions in Quantum Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D33(1986) 3560

  40. [40]

    Weinberg,Critical Phenomena for Field Theorists, in 14th International School of Subnuclear Physics: Understanding the Fundamental Constitutents of Matter, 8, 1976

    S. Weinberg,Critical Phenomena for Field Theorists, in 14th International School of Subnuclear Physics: Understanding the Fundamental Constitutents of Matter, 8, 1976

  41. [41]

    An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter

    A. Eichhorn,An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5(2019) 47, [arXiv:1810.07615]

  42. [42]

    Niedermaier and M

    M. Niedermaier and M. Reuter,The Asymptotic Safety Scenario in Quantum Gravity, Living Rev. Rel.9(2006) 5–173

  43. [43]

    J. N. Borissova and A. Platania,Formation and evaporation of quantum black holes from the decoupling mechanism in quantum gravity, JHEP03(2023) 046, [arXiv:2210.01138]

  44. [44]

    Held,Invariant Renormalization-Group improvement,arXiv:2105.11458

    A. Held,Invariant Renormalization-Group improvement,arXiv:2105.11458

  45. [45]

    Renormalization group improved black hole spacetimes

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter,Renormalization group improved black hole space-times, Phys. Rev. D 62(2000) 043008, [hep-th/0002196]

  46. [46]

    Carballo-Rubio,Master field equations for spherically symmetric gravitational fields beyond general relativity,arXiv:2507.15920

    R. Carballo-Rubio,Master field equations for spherically symmetric gravitational fields beyond general relativity,arXiv:2507.15920

  47. [47]

    G. W. Horndeski,Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int. J. Theor. Phys.10(1974) 363–384

  48. [48]

    Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi, and J. Yokoyama,Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations, Prog. Theor. Phys.126(2011) 511–529, [arXiv:1105.5723]. 29

  49. [49]

    Horndeski theory and beyond: a review

    T. Kobayashi,Horndeski theory and beyond: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys.82(2019), no. 8 086901, [arXiv:1901.07183]

  50. [50]

    Exact evolution equation for the effective potential

    C. Wetterich,Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys. Lett. B301(1993) 90–94, [arXiv:1710.05815]

  51. [51]

    Reuter and C

    M. Reuter and C. Wetterich,Average action for the Higgs model with Abelian gauge symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B391(1993) 147–175

  52. [52]

    Reuter and C

    M. Reuter and C. Wetterich,Effective average action for gauge theories and exact evolution equations, Nucl. Phys. B417(1994) 181–214

  53. [53]

    Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, pp

    S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, pp. 790–831. 1980

  54. [54]

    Eichhorn and M

    A. Eichhorn and M. Schiffer,Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter,arXiv:2212.07456

  55. [55]

    Asymptotic Safety

    R. Percacci,Asymptotic Safety,arXiv:0709.3851

  56. [56]

    Renormalization group improved gravitational actions: a Brans-Dicke approach

    M. Reuter and H. Weyer,Renormalization group improved gravitational actions: A Brans-Dicke approach, Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 104022, [hep-th/0311196]

  57. [57]

    Spacetime Structure of an Evaporating Black Hole in Quantum Gravity

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter,Spacetime structure of an evaporating black hole in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 083005, [hep-th/0602159]

  58. [58]

    Black holes and asymptotically safe gravity

    K. Falls, D. F. Litim, and A. Raghuraman,Black Holes and Asymptotically Safe Gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A27(2012) 1250019, [arXiv:1002.0260]

  59. [59]

    Singularity-free gravitational collapse and asymptotic safety

    R. Torres,Singularity-free gravitational collapse and asymptotic safety, Phys. Lett. B733(2014) 21–24, [arXiv:1404.7655]

  60. [60]

    Structural aspects of asymptotically safe black holes

    B. Koch and F. Saueressig,Structural aspects of asymptotically safe black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 31(2014) 015006, [arXiv:1306.1546]

  61. [61]

    Kofinas and V

    G. Kofinas and V. Zarikas,Avoidance of singularities in asymptotically safe Quantum Einstein Gravity, JCAP10(2015) 069, [arXiv:1506.02965]

  62. [62]

    Cosmic Censorship in Quantum Einstein Gravity

    A. Bonanno, B. Koch, and A. Platania,Cosmic Censorship in Quantum Einstein Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017), no. 9 095012, [arXiv:1610.05299]

  63. [63]

    Gravitational collapse in Quantum Einstein Gravity

    A. Bonanno, B. Koch, and A. Platania,Gravitational collapse in Quantum Einstein Gravity, Found. Phys.48(2018), no. 10 1393–1406, [arXiv:1710.10845]

  64. [64]

    Bonanno, B

    A. Bonanno, B. Koch, and A. Platania,Asymptotically Safe gravitational collapse: Kuroda-Papapetrou RG-improved model,PoSCORFU2016(2017) 058

  65. [65]

    J. M. Pawlowski and D. Stock,Quantum-improved Schwarzschild-(A)dS and Kerr-(A)dS spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 10 106008, [arXiv:1807.10512]

  66. [66]

    Towards conditions for black-hole singularity-resolution in asymptotically safe quantum gravity

    A. Adeifeoba, A. Eichhorn, and A. Platania,Towards conditions for black-hole singularity-resolution in asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018), no. 22 225007, [arXiv:1808.03472]

  67. [67]

    A. Held, R. Gold, and A. Eichhorn,Asymptotic safety casts its shadow, JCAP06(2019) 029, [arXiv:1904.07133]

  68. [68]

    Dynamical renormalization of black-hole spacetimes

    A. Platania,Dynamical renormalization of black-hole spacetimes, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019), no. 6 470, [arXiv:1903.10411]

  69. [69]

    J. N. Borissova, A. Held, and N. Afshordi,Scale-invariance at the core of quantum black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023), no. 7 075011, [arXiv:2203.02559]

  70. [70]

    Dust collapse in asymptotic safety: a path to regular black holes

    A. Bonanno, D. Malafarina, and A. Panassiti,Dust Collapse in Asymptotic Safety: A Path to Regular Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 3 031401, [arXiv:2308.10890]

  71. [71]

    Bonanno, K

    A. Bonanno, K. F. Dialektopoulos, and V. Zarikas,Renormalization Group-Improved Gravitational Action: A Lagrangian Framework,arXiv:2407.18883

  72. [72]

    Bonanno, M

    A. Bonanno, M. Cadoni, M. Pitzalis, and A. P. Sanna,Effective quantum spacetimes from functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 6 064031, [arXiv:2410.16866]. 30

  73. [73]

    Running Newton Constant, Improved Gravitational Actions, and Galaxy Rotation Curves

    M. Reuter and H. Weyer,Running Newton constant, improved gravitational actions, and galaxy rotation curves, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 124028, [hep-th/0410117]

  74. [74]

    Cosmological Perturbations in Renormalization Group Derived Cosmologies

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter,Cosmological perturbations in renormalization group derived cosmologies, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D13(2004) 107–122, [astro-ph/0210472]

  75. [75]

    Renormalization-group running cosmologies - a scale-setting procedure

    A. Babic, B. Guberina, R. Horvat, and H. Stefancic,Renormalization-group running cosmologies. A Scale-setting procedure,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 124041, [astro-ph/0407572]

  76. [76]

    R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner,Dynamical Structure and Definition of Energy in General Relativity, Phys. Rev.116(1959) 1322–1330

  77. [77]

    R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner,The Dynamics of general relativity, Gen. Rel. Grav.40 (2008) 1997–2027, [gr-qc/0405109]

  78. [78]

    S. A. Hayward,Formation and evaporation of regular black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 031103, [gr-qc/0506126]

  79. [79]

    Exact solutions for null fluid collapse

    V. Husain,Exact solutions for null fluid collapse, Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 1759–1762, [gr-qc/9511011]

  80. [80]

    Generalized Vaidya Solutions

    A. Wang and Y. Wu,Generalized Vaidya solutions, Gen. Rel. Grav.31(1999) 107, [gr-qc/9803038]

Showing first 80 references.