Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 77 references

Phonon-Assisted Photoluminescence and Ultrafast Exciton Dynamics in Two-Dimensional Silicon Carbide

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Monolayer hexagonal silicon carbide is predicted to emit phonon-assisted photoluminescence as strong as that of boron nitride, through TO/LO phonon coupling to an intervalley exciton, with a femtosecond bright-exciton lifetime.

desk verdict Competent first-principles prediction of phonon-assisted PL in monolayer h-SiC, worth refereeing; the frozen-lattice BSE is the weakest link and a few internal inconsistencies need fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.23925 v3 pith:EGT4L6OA submitted 2026-02-27 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Afreen Anamul Haque , Rishabh Saraswat , Aniket Singha , Rekha Verma , Sitangshu Bhattacharya This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hexagonalsiliconcarbidephonon-assistedphotoluminescenceexciton-phononcouplingfinite-momentumBethe-Salpeterequationintervalleyexcitonsexcitondynamicstwo-dimensionalsemiconductorsGWapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that two-dimensional hexagonal silicon carbide (h-SiC) emits phonon-assisted photoluminescence with intensity comparable to that of 2D h-BN, but at much lower photon energies, without any strain or external symmetry breaking. Using first-principles many-body perturbation theory with finite-momentum Bethe-Salpeter calculations, the authors identify the microscopic mechanism: a bright K-K exciton produces zero-phonon emission near 3.0 eV, while an intervalley K-M exciton, dark by momentum conservation, gains radiative character by coupling to high-energy optical TO and LO phonons. The sidebands appear only from phonons energetic enough to bridge the 124 meV separation between direct and indirect excitons, giving a strictly energy-selective spectrum. The same calculation yields phonon-limited exciton lifetimes, predicting an ultrashort ~300 fs bright-exciton relaxation time at 10 K. If correct, these results make monolayer SiC a symmetry-activated platform for strain-free near-UV to visible light emission and provide concrete predictions for time-resolved photoluminescence experiments.

What carries the argument

The central object is the finite-momentum exciton-phonon coupling matrix element G^{βλ,ν}(Q,q), constructed from GW/BSE exciton wavefunctions and DFPT electron-phonon matrix elements. This matrix element enters a first-order expansion of the finite-momentum exciton propagator through a Dyson-like equation, yielding both the phonon-assisted photoluminescence spectrum and the exciton self-energy whose imaginary part gives phonon-limited scattering rates. The key mechanism is energy-selective matching: the 124 meV offset between the bright K-K exciton at Q=0 and the intervalley K-M exciton sets a threshold, and only TO/LO phonons with sufficient energy and strong coupling activate the radiative

What would settle it

A low-temperature (10 K) photoluminescence spectrum of monolayer h-SiC: if the expected sideband does not appear roughly 124 meV below the zero-phonon line, or if acoustic phonon replicas appear with comparable intensity, the energy-selective TO/LO dominance claim is falsified. Likewise, a measured bright-exciton lifetime much longer than ~300 fs at 10 K would contradict the predicted phonon-limited relaxation rate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that 2D h-SiC intrinsically supports phonon-assisted radiative recombination through a symmetry-allowed exciton-phonon channel. The bright K-K exciton at the Brillouin zone center is the lowest-energy state and governs zero-phonon emission at about 3.013 eV. A momentum-indirect exciton (e3, K-M) lies 124 meV higher in energy, and only the high-energy optical TO (mode 5) and LO (mode 6) phonons can bridge this gap. The computed exciton-phonon matrix elements show that these modes couple strongly to the in-layer-localized intervalley exciton along the Gamma-K direction, producing a distinct phonon sideband just below the zero-phonon line with

Load-bearing premise

The calculation fixes the lattice at its equilibrium geometry when solving the finite-momentum exciton problem, so phonon-induced renormalization of exciton energies and wavefunctions is neglected; if that renormalization is large, the 124 meV energy offset that decides which phonons are allowed could shift, and the predicted dominance of the TO/LO sideband could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, monolayer SiC becomes a strain-free, symmetry-activated 2D emitter with phonon-assisted PL extending from UV-A into the visible range, at intensities comparable to h-BN.
  • The predicted ~300 fs bright-exciton lifetime at 10 K is a concrete, testable number for time-resolved PL or pump-probe experiments.
  • The mode-resolved analysis predicts that the sideband is carried exclusively by high-energy TO/LO phonons; measuring the sideband lineshape and temperature dependence would directly test this assignment.
  • The framework links exciton dispersion, phonon coupling, and temperature-dependent scattering into a single picture, allowing quantitative predictions for other wide-bandgap 2D semiconductors.
  • The energy-selective threshold implies that tuning the direct-indirect exciton offset via small strain or alloying could switch phonon-assisted emission on or off.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: If the lattice-frozen approximation were relaxed, phonon-induced renormalization of excitonic energies could shift the 124 meV offset, potentially bringing lower-energy acoustic phonons into play and adding replicas; this is a natural next calculation.
  • Extension: The predicted sideband position (~124 meV below the zero-phonon line) is a sharp fingerprint; any PL experiment on recently synthesized monolayer SiC should look for a single dominant replica at that offset.
  • Extension: The same finite-momentum exciton-phonon formalism could screen other group-IV/III-V honeycomb monolayers (e.g., GeC, SiGe) for intrinsic phonon-assisted emission without strain.
  • Extension: Because the bright exciton is the lowest-energy state (unlike h-BN, where a dark exciton lies lower), the PL spectrum should show a strong zero-phonon line with a single dominant sideband, a distinctive signature that distinguishes SiC from h-BN.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a first-principles study of phonon-assisted photoluminescence and exciton dynamics in monolayer hexagonal SiC. The authors perform G0W0 and finite-momentum BSE calculations, combine them with DFPT electron-phonon matrix elements to construct exciton-phonon couplings and phonon-assisted PL spectra, and compare the results with monolayer h-BN. The central claim is that 2D h-SiC shows a pronounced TO/LO-phonon sideband below the bright K–K zero-phonon line at 3.013 eV, arising from the e3 (K–M) intervalley exciton that lies 124 meV higher and couples to high-energy optical phonons. They also report temperature-dependent exciton scattering rates and linewidths, with a bright-exciton relaxation time of ~300 fs at 10 K, and conclude that h-SiC is an intrinsic, strain-free platform for phonon-assisted UV emission.

Significance. The strength of the paper is that the phonon sidebands are computed from parameter-free many-body matrix elements; the only fitted parameters (γ0, γac) are used to describe the already-computed linewidths, not to target the spectrum. The mode-resolved exciton-phonon couplings and the symmetry analysis provide a clear mechanistic picture. If the central result holds, it would establish a new material for phonon-assisted emission in the near-UV/visible range and a benchmark for exciton-phonon dynamics. However, I find two quantitative inconsistencies in the reported lifetimes/linewidths and an unquantified sensitivity of the sideband selection to the frozen-lattice approximation, which need to be addressed before the conclusions are fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (4), Fig. 4, and Fig. 3(c)] The reported relaxation times and fitted linewidths are mutually inconsistent. For exciton 1, the fit γ0=10 meV and γac=0.50 meV/K gives γ(T=10 K)=15 meV, corresponding to τ=ħ/γ≈44 fs, not the ~300 fs shown in Fig. 3(c). For exciton 5, γ(T=10 K)=170+2.55×10=195.5 meV gives τ≈3.4 fs, whereas Fig. 3(c) reports a relaxation time of ~25 fs or less. Please clarify what Eq. (3) computes versus what Eq. (4) fits; if these are different quantities (e.g., dephasing vs population relaxation), define them and explain why the numerical values differ by a factor of ~5–7. The abstract's 'lifetime' claim is particularly affected.
  2. [Section II and Section III (124 meV offset)] The central selection of TO/LO modes rests on the 124 meV separation between the bright Γ exciton and the e3 intervalley exciton (Section III: 'The energy offset ... amounts to 124 meV'). The finite-Q BSE is solved with the lattice fixed at equilibrium and, as stated in Section II, 'the electronic band renormalization induced by phonons does not enter the finite-momentum excitonic BSE Hamiltonian.' Given that the computed exciton linewidths are tens to hundreds of meV (Fig. 4), the omitted real part of the exciton-phonon self-energy could plausibly shift e3−e1 by tens of meV, which is comparable to the 124 meV energy denominator and could change which phonon branch satisfies the matching condition. Please provide an explicit estimate of the Fan/Migdal renormalization of the relevant exciton energies, or otherwise justify that the frozen-lattice offset is robust to phonon renormalization.
  3. [Abstract and Section III] The abstract states 'ultrashort bright exciton lifetime of approximately 300 fs at 10 K,' but the text reports a 'phonon-limited relaxation time ∼300 fs' obtained from the imaginary part of the excitonic self-energy (Eq. (3)). A self-energy linewidth is not a radiative lifetime, and the 300 fs value appears to be a phonon-scattering relaxation time. Please correct the terminology and specify the initial and final exciton states for the claimed relaxation process; otherwise the reader cannot tell whether this is a non-radiative dephasing, a population relaxation, or a radiative lifetime.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The notation '⟨mk|,|∆Vνq,|,|n(k−q)⟩' contains stray commas and is hard to parse; please use standard Dirac notation for the electron-phonon matrix element.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption says 'In both panels' but only one PL spectrum panel appears to be displayed. Please clarify whether the main panel and inset are meant, or whether a second temperature panel is intended.
  3. [Fig. 6 and abstract] The comparison with h-BN in Fig. 6 uses normalized PL spectra. The abstract's phrase 'emission intensities comparable' should be qualified as a relative sideband ratio rather than an absolute intensity comparison, since the absolute radiative efficiency is not quantified.
  4. [Table I] The header 'irrep Γph' is ambiguous; please define the little group at K and specify the phonon irreducible representations explicitly in the table or its caption.
  5. [Introduction, MoS2 comparison] The sentence contrasting 2D h-SiC with monolayer MoS2 under biaxial strain could be misread as comparing intrinsic h-SiC with strained MoS2. Please clarify the comparison group (strained MoS2 vs unstrained h-SiC) for the symmetry-allowed phonon-assisted channel.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: first-principles derivation chain with no fitted target spectrum and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained and parameter-free with respect to the central claims. The chain is: DFT/GW gives quasiparticle bands; finite-momentum BSE gives the exciton dispersion and the 124 meV offset between the bright Gamma exciton and the e3 intervalley exciton; DFPT gives phonons; Eq. (2) constructs exciton-phonon couplings from first-principles electron-phonon matrix elements and exciton coefficients; Eqs. (3) and (5) propagate these couplings into scattering rates and phonon-assisted PL. No parameter in Eqs. (1)-(5) is fitted to reproduce a target PL spectrum, and the 124 meV phonon-selection offset is a computed BSE result, not an input. The only explicit fit, Eq. (4) with gamma0 and gamma_ac, is a phenomenological description of already-computed linewidths and is not used to construct the sideband spectrum. The h-BN benchmark is computed with the same formalism rather than fitted to experimental h-BN PL. Self-citations [73,75] are prior applications of similar methods to AlN and MoS2, cited as context, not as uniqueness theorems or as the load-bearing justification for the SiC result. The frozen-lattice approximation is explicitly disclosed in Sec. II: 'Consequently, the electronic band renormalization induced by phonons does not enter the finite-momentum excitonic BSE Hamiltonian.' This is a genuine approximation that could affect the mode-selection if phonon-induced renormalization shifts the 124 meV offset, but it is an assumption with stated scope, not a circular reduction of the output to the input. No self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, self-citation-load-bearing, or renaming step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation is a first-principles prediction with no new particles or forces. The free parameters are mostly numerical regularizers and phenomenological fits; the only truncation choice is the five-state BSE window, justified by SI convergence tests not provided in the submission.

free parameters (7)
  • Number of excitonic states retained in finite-Q BSE = 5
    Five initial (β) and final (λ) states chosen; convergence shown only in SI Fig. S13.
  • Damping parameter η in exciton-phonon self-energy = 2 meV
    Introduced for numerical stability in Eq. (3); not fitted to experiment.
  • Fan denominator energy threshold = 0.1 meV
    Applied in the self-energy evaluation to avoid divergences.
  • Residual linewidth γ0 (exciton 1) = 10 meV
    Fitted to the computed linewidth-temperature data; corresponds to ~66 fs if interpreted as ℏ/γ.
  • Acoustic coupling γac (exciton 1) = 0.50 meV/K
    Fitted slope of the computed linewidth.
  • Residual linewidth γ0 (exciton 5) = 170 meV
    Fitted to the computed linewidth of exciton 5.
  • Acoustic coupling γac (exciton 5) = 2.55 meV/K
    Fitted slope.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The GW and BSE approximations describe excitons in 2D h-SiC with sufficient accuracy.
    Used throughout; convergence of parameters only referenced in SI.
  • standard math The generalized Roosbroeck–Shockley relation (Eq. 5) gives the PL spectrum for excitonic systems.
    Adopted from Ref. [68]; standard in the field.
  • domain assumption The lattice is fixed at equilibrium geometry when solving the finite-Q BSE; phonon-induced renormalization of the excitonic Hamiltonian is neglected.
    Explicitly stated in Section II; load-bearing for the sideband positions.
  • domain assumption First-order expansion of the Dyson-like exciton propagator is sufficient for phonon-assisted PL.
    Used to avoid full diagonalization; stated in Section II.
  • domain assumption Exciton populations follow a Boltzmann distribution at temperature T_exc.
    Enter Eq. (5) through the exponential factors.
  • domain assumption DFPT electron-phonon matrix elements combined with BSE wavefunctions give accurate exciton-phonon couplings.
    Core ingredient for G matrix in Eq. (2).
  • standard math Group-theoretic compatibility relations for C_3v and C_s correctly classify exciton and phonon irreps.
    Used in Table I and SI Tables S2-S4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phonon-Assisted Photoluminescence and Ultrafast Exciton Dynamics in Two-Dimensional Silicon Carbide." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EGT4L6OA

@misc{pith2026260223925,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phonon-Assisted Photoluminescence and Ultrafast Exciton Dynamics in Two-Dimensional Silicon Carbide},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EGT4L6OA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.23925}
}
abstract

Phonon assisted photoluminescence provides a direct window into exciton phonon interactions in semiconductors. Using fully ab initio many-body perturbation theory, including finite momentum Bethe Salpeter calculations, we investigate phonon-assisted emission and exciton dynamics in two dimensional (2D) hexagonal silicon carbide (hSiC) and benchmark its response against 2D h boron nitride (hBN). By explicitly resolving exciton phonon matrix elements, we identify an electron-phonon scattering channel mediated by A$^\prime$ high energy longitudinal and transverse optical phonons as the dominant contributors to sideband formation and quantify their spectral weights. We find that h SiC exhibits pronounced phonon-assisted sidebands comparable to hBN, despite a smaller exciton phonon energy separation and fewer resolved replicas. The bright \textbf{K}\textbf{K} exciton governs near UV zero phonon emission, while intervalley excitons acquire radiative character through symmetry allowed optical phonon coupling. Temperature dependent scattering rates reveal an ultrashort bright exciton lifetime of approximately 300 fs at 10 K, highlighting rapid exciton relaxation driven by intrinsic phonon channels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.23925 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Quasiparticle band structure of 2D h-SiC computed within the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a)-(f): Phonon mode resolved [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) and (b) Phonon-mode-resolved normalized scatter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Excitonic temperature (T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Phonon-assisted PL plotted on a logarithmic scale. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Normalised PL emission intensity of 2D (a) h-SiC and (b) h-BN, over temperatures ranging from 10 to 300 K. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Knox,Theory of Excitons, Sup, 5 (1963) p

    R. Knox,Theory of Excitons, Sup, 5 (1963) p. 100

    1963

  2. [2]

    Kira and S

    M. Kira and S. W. Koch, Many-body correlations and excitonic effects in semiconductor spectroscopy, Prog. Quantum Elec- tron.30, 155 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    E. Poem, Y . Kodriano, C. Tradonsky, N. Lindner, B. Gerardot, P. Petroff, and D. Gershoni, Accessing the dark exciton with light, Nat. Phys.6, 993 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    K. He, N. Kumar, L. Zhao, Z. Wang, K. F. Mak, H. Zhao, and J. Shan, Tightly bound excitons in monolayer WSe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 026803 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    P. Dey, J. Paul, Z. Wang, C. Stevens, C. Liu, A. Romero, J. Shan, D. Hilton, and D. Karaiskaj, Optical coherence in atomic-monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides limited by electron-phonon interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 127402 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Colloquium: Excitons in atom- ically thin transition metal dichalcogenides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 021001 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Koperski, K

    M. Koperski, K. Nogajewski, A. Arora, V . Cherkez, P. Mallet, J.-Y . Veuillen, J. Marcus, P. Kossacki, and M. Potemski, Single photon emitters in exfoliated WSe 2 structures, Nat. Nanotech- nol.10, 503 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    Aharonovich, D

    I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Solid-state single- photon emitters, Nat. Photonics10, 631 (2016)

    2016

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    M. M. Furchi, F. Höller, L. Dobusch, D. K. Polyushkin, S. Schuler, and T. Mueller, Device physics of van der waals heterojunction solar cells, npj 2D Mater. Appl.2(2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    J. Gu, B. Chakraborty, M. Khatoniar, and V . M. Menon, A room-temperature polariton light-emitting diode based on monolayer WSe2, Nat. Nanotechnol.14, 1024 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Sortino, P

    L. Sortino, P. G. Zotev, C. L. Phillips, A. J. Brash, J. Cambiasso, E. Marensi, A. M. Fox, S. A. Maier, R. Sapienza, and A. I. Tar- takovskii, Bright single photon emitters with enhanced quantum efficiency in a two-dimensional semiconductor coupled with di- electric nano-anten...

    2021

  4. [12]

    Cassabois, P

    G. Cassabois, P. Valvin, and B. Gil, Hexagonal boron nitride is an indirect bandgap semiconductor, Nat. Photon.10, 262 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Shima, T

    K. Shima, T. S. Cheng, C. J. Mellor, P. H. Beton, C. Elias, P. Valvin, B. Gil, G. Cassabois, S. V . Novikov, and S. F. Chichibu, Cathodoluminescence spectroscopy of monolayer hexagonal boron nitride, Sci. Rep.14, 169 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Splendiani, L

    A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y . Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, C.-Y . Chim, G. Galli, and F. Wang, Emerging photoluminescence in mono- layer MoS2, Nano Lett.10, 1271 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS 2 by optical helicity, Nat. Nan- otechnol.7, 494 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    A. M. Jones, H. Yu, N. J. Ghimire, S. Wu, G. Aivazian, J. S. Ross, B. Zhao, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, D. Xiao,et al., Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer WSe 2, Nat. Nanotechnol.8, 634 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Zeng, G.-B

    H. Zeng, G.-B. Liu, J. Dai, Y . Yan, B. Zhu, R. He, L. Xie, S. Xu, X. Chen, W. Yao,et al., Optical signature of symmetry variations and spin-valley coupling in atomically thin tungsten dichalcogenides, Sci. Rep.3, 1608 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Tonndorf, R

    P. Tonndorf, R. Schmidt, P. Böttger, X. Zhang, J. Börner, A. Liebig, M. Albrecht, C. Kloc, O. Gordan, D. R. T. Zahn, S. M. de Vasconcellos, and R. Bratschitsch, Photoluminescence emission and raman response of monolayer MoS2, MoSe2, and WSe2, Opt. Express21, 4908 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    T. Yan, X. Qiao, X. Liu, P. Tan, and X. Zhang, Photolumi- nescence properties and exciton dynamics in monolayer WSe2, Appl. Phys. Lett.105, 101901 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Y . Li, A. Chernikov, X. Zhang, A. Rigosi, H. M. Hill, A. M. Van Der Zande, D. A. Chenet, E.-M. Shih, J. Hone, and T. F. Heinz, Measurement of the optical dielectric function of mono- layer transition-metal dichalcogenides: MoS 2, MoSe 2, WS 2, and WSe2, Phys. Rev. B90, 205422 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    G. Wang, E. Palleau, T. Amand, S. Tongay, X. Marie, and B. Urbaszek, Polarization and time-resolved photolumines- cence spectroscopy of excitons in MoSe 2 monolayers, Appl. Phys. Lett.106(2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    C. M. Chow, H. Yu, A. M. Jones, J. R. Schaibley, M. Koehler, D. G. Mandrus, R. Merlin, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Phonon-assisted oscillatory exciton dynamics in monolayer MoSe 2, npj 2D Mater. Appl.1, 33 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Mueller and E

    T. Mueller and E. Malic, Exciton physics and device applica- tion of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semi- conductors, npj 2D Mater. Appl.2, 29 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Robert, B

    C. Robert, B. Han, P. Kapuscinski, A. Delhomme, C. Faugeras, T. Amand, M. R. Molas, M. Bartos, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Measurement of the spin-forbidden dark excitons in MoS2 and MoSe2 monolayers, Nat. Commun.11, 4037 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    V . Funk, K. Wagner, E. Wietek, J. D. Ziegler, J. Förste, J. Lindlau, M. Förg, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Chernikov, et al., Spectral asymmetry of phonon sideband luminescence in monolayer and bilayer WSe 2, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L042019 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    S. Roy, X. Yang, and J. Gao, Biaxial strain tuned upconver- sion photoluminescence of monolayer WS2, Sci. Rep.14, 3860 9 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    H. R. Gutiérrez, N. Perea-López, A. L. Elías, A. Berkdemir, B. Wang, R. Lv, F. López-Urías, V . H. Crespi, H. Terrones, and M. Terrones, Extraordinary room-temperature photolumines- cence in triangular WS2 monolayers, Nano Lett.13, 3447–3454 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Palummo, M

    M. Palummo, M. Bernardi, and J. C. Grossman, Exciton ra- diative lifetimes in two-dimensional transition metal dichalco- genides, Nano Lett.5, 2794 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Robert, D

    C. Robert, D. Lagarde, F. Cadiz, G. Wang, B. Lassagne, T. Amand, A. Balocchi, P. Renucci, S. Tongay, B. Urbaszek, and X. Marie, Exciton radiative lifetime in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Phys. Rev. B93, 205423 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    M. R. Molas, K. Nogajewski, A. O. Slobodeniuk, M. Bartos, and M. Potemski, Brightening of dark excitons in monolayers of semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides, 2D Mater. 4, 021003 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Robert, T

    C. Robert, T. Amand, F. Cadiz, D. Lagarde, E. Courtade, M. Manca, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, B. Urbaszek, and X. Marie, Fine structure and lifetime of dark excitons in transi- tion metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Phys. Rev. B96, 155423 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    Malic, M

    E. Malic, M. Selig, M. Feierabend, S. Brem, D. Christiansen, F. Wendler, A. Knorr, and G. Berghäuser, Dark excitons in transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Mater.2, 014002 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Thomas, K

    A. Thomas, K. Vikram, D. Muthu, and A. Sood, Structural phase transition from 1H to 1T / primeat low pressure in sup- ported monolayer WS 2: Raman study, Solid State Commun. 336, 114412 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    P. H. López, S. Heeg, C. Schattauer, S. Kovalchuk, A. Kumar, D. J. Bock, J. N. Kirchhof, B. Höfer, K. Greben, D. Yagodkin, L. Linhart, F. Libisch, and K. I. Bolotin, Strain control of hy- bridization between dark and localized excitons in a 2D semi- conductor, Nat. Commun.13, ...

    2022

  27. [35]

    H.-Y . Chen, D. Sangalli, and M. Bernardi, First-principles ultra- fast exciton dynamics and time-domain spectroscopies: Dark- exciton mediated valley depolarization in monolayer WSe 2, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043203 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    S. Brem, A. Ekman, D. Christiansen, F. Katsch, M. Selig, C. Robert, X. Marie, B. Urbaszek, A. Knorr, and E. Malic, Phonon-assisted photoluminescence from indirect excitons in monolayers of transition-metal dichalcogenides, Nano Lett.20, 2849 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Zhang, T.-R

    Y . Zhang, T.-R. Chang, B. Zhou, Y .-T. Cui, H. Yan, Z. Liu, F. Schmitt, J. Lee, R. Moore, and Y . C.et al., Direct observation of the transition from indirect to direct bandgap in atomically thin epitaxial MoSe2, Nat. Nanotechnol.9, 111 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    Huang, J

    Q. Huang, J. Shen, Y . Lu, R. Ye, and S. Gong, Insights into the Structural Evolution of MoS 2 from the Semiconductive 2H to metallic 1T Phase, J. Phys. Chem. C127, 17406 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Schue, B

    L. Schue, B. Berini, A. C. Betz, B. Plaçais, F. Ducastelle, and J. Barjon, Bright luminescence from indirect and strongly bound excitons in hBN, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 067401 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Sponza, H

    L. Sponza, H. Amara, C. Attaccalite, S. Latil, T. Galvani, F. Paleari, L. Wirtz, and F. m. c. Ducastelle, Direct and indirect excitons in boron nitride polymorphs: A story of atomic con- figuration and electronic correlation, Phys. Rev. B98, 125206 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Paleari, H

    F. Paleari, H. PC Miranda, A. Molina-Sánchez, and L. Wirtz, Exciton-phonon coupling in the ultraviolet absorption and emission spectra of bulk hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 187401 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Shen, X.-W

    T. Shen, X.-W. Zhang, H. Shang, M.-Y . Zhang, X. Wang, E.- G. Wang, H. Jiang, and X.-Z. Li, Influence of high-energy lo- cal orbitals and electron-phonon interactions on the band gaps and optical absorption spectra of hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. B102, 045117 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    H.-Y . Chen, D. Sangalli, and M. Bernardi, Exciton-phonon in- teraction and relaxation times from first principles, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 107401 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    C. M. Polley, H. Fedderwitz, T. Balasubramanian,et al., Bottom-up growth of monolayer honeycomb SiC, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 076203 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    L. Sun, Y . Li, Z. Li, Q. Li, Z. Zhou, Z. Chen, J. Yang, and J. Hou, Electronic structures of SiC nanoribbons, J. Chem. Phys.129(2008)

    2008

  38. [46]

    A. O. Elvarsson,Growth and characterization of honeycomb SiC monolayer on a TaC(111) surface, Ph.D. thesis, Lund Uni- versity (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    ¸ Sahin, S

    H. ¸ Sahin, S. Cahangirov, M. Topsakal, E. Bekaroglu, E. Ak- turk, R. T. Senger, and S. Ciraci, Monolayer honeycomb struc- tures of group-IV elements and III-V binary compounds: First- principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B80, 155453 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Bekaroglu, M

    E. Bekaroglu, M. Topsakal, S. Cahangirov, and S. Ciraci, First- principles study of defects and adatoms in silicon carbide hon- eycomb structures, Phys. Rev. B81, 075433 (2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    S.-D. Guo, J. Dong, and J.-T. Liu, Nonmonotonic strain depen- dence of lattice thermal conductivity in monolayer SiC: a first- principles study, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.20, 22038 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    See Supplemental Information

  43. [51]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, and M. C.et al., Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    Sangalli, A

    D. Sangalli, A. Ferretti, H. Miranda, C. Attaccalite, I. Marri, E. Cannuccia, P. Melo, M. Marsili, F. Paleari, A. Marrazzo, et al., Many-body perturbation theory calculations using the Y AMBO code, J. Condens. Matter Phys.31, 325902 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseu- dopotentials, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    H. Y . Fan, Temperature dependence of the energy gap in monatomic semiconductors, Phys. Rev.6, 808 (1950)

    1950

  47. [55]

    Cannuccia and A

    E. Cannuccia and A. Marini, Effect of the quantum zero-point atomic motion on the optical and electronic properties of di- amond and trans-polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. lett.107, 255501 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    van Schilfgaarde, T

    M. van Schilfgaarde, T. Kotani, and S. Faleev, Quasiparticle self-consistentGWtheory, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 226402 (2006)

    2006

  49. [57]

    Pulci, G

    O. Pulci, G. Onida, R. D. Sole, and L. Reining, Ab initio calcu- lation of self-energy effects on optical properties of GaAs(110), Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5374 (1998)

    1998

  50. [58]

    C. A. Rozzi, D. Varsano, A. Marini, E. K. U. Gross, and A. Ru- bio, Exact coulomb cutofftechnique for supercell calculations, Phys. Rev. B73, 205119 (2006)

    2006

  51. [59]

    Guandalini, P

    A. Guandalini, P. D’Amico, A. Ferretti, and D. Varsano, Ef- ficient GW calculations in two dimensional materials through a stochastic integration of the screened potential, npj Comput. Mater.9, 44 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    R. W. Godby and R. J. Needs, Metal-insulator transition in kohn-sham theory and quasiparticle theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1169 (1989)

    1989

  53. [61]

    G. D. Mahan,Many-Particle Physics, 3rd ed. (Springer Interna- tional Edition, New York, United States of America, 2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group the- ory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter, 1st ed. 10 (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2008)

    2008

  55. [63]

    Wirtz, A

    L. Wirtz, A. Marini, and A. Rubio, Excitonic effects in opti- cal absorption spectra of hexagonal boron nitride, arXiv:cond- mat/0508421 (2006)

    2006

  56. [64]

    Galvani, F

    T. Galvani, F. Paleari, H. P. C. Miranda, A. Molina-Sánchez, L. Wirtz, S. Latil, H. Amara, and F. Ducastelle, Excitons in boron nitride single layer, 2D Mater.3, 021003 (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    Arnaud, S

    B. Arnaud, S. Lebègue, P. Rabiller, and M. Alouani, Huge ex- citonic effects in layered hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 026402 (2006)

    2006

  58. [66]

    P. Y . Yu and M. Cardona,Fundamentals of Semiconductors: Physics and Materials Properties, 4th ed. (Springer, 2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Rev

    F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015003 (2017)

    2017

  60. [68]

    Lechifflart, F

    P. Lechifflart, F. Paleari, D. Sangalli, and C. Attaccalite, First- principles study of luminescence in hexagonal boron nitride single layer: Exciton-phonon coupling and the role of substrate, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 024006 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Paleari,First-principles approaches to the description of indirect absorption and luminescence spectroscopy: exciton- phonon coupling in hexagonal boron nitride, Ph.D

    F. Paleari,First-principles approaches to the description of indirect absorption and luminescence spectroscopy: exciton- phonon coupling in hexagonal boron nitride, Ph.D. thesis, Uni- versité du Luxembourg (2019)

    2019

  62. [70]

    Marini, M

    G. Marini, M. Calandra, and P. Cudazzo, Optical absorption and photoluminescence of single-layer boron nitride from a first- principles cumulant approach, Nano Lett.24, 6017 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Lechifflart, F

    P. Lechifflart, F. Paleari, and C. Attaccalite, Excitons under strain: Light absorption and emission in strained hexagonal boron nitride, SciPost Phys.12, 145 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    Z. Ye, T. Cao, K. O’brien, H. Zhu, X. Yin, Y . Wang, S. G. Louie, and X. Zhang, Probing excitonic dark states in single- layer tungsten disulphide, Nat.513, 214 (2014)

    2014

  65. [73]

    Yadav, A

    P. Yadav, A. Agarwal, and S. Bhattacharya, Phonon-assisted photoluminescence and exciton recombination in monolayer aluminum nitride, 2D Mater.12, 025022 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    Cannuccia, B

    E. Cannuccia, B. Monserrat, and C. Attaccalite, Theory of phonon-assisted luminescence in solids: Application to hexag- onal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. B99, 081109 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    Saraswat, R

    R. Saraswat, R. Verma, and S. Bhattacharya, Strain-induced ac- tivation of symmetry-forbidden exciton-phonon couplings for enhanced phonon-assisted photoluminescence in MoS 2 mono- layers, Phys. Rev. B111, 205131 (2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Lyu and W

    S. Lyu and W. R. L. Lambrecht, First-principles study of the phonon replicas in the photoluminescence spectrum of 4H− SiC, Phys. Rev. B101, 045203 (2020)

    2020

  69. [77]

    I. G. Ivanov, U. Lindefelt, A. Henry, O. Kordina, C. Hallin, M. Aroyo, T. Egilsson, and E. Janzén, Phonon replicas at the m point in 4H−SiC : a theoretical and experimental study, Phys. Rev. B58, 13634 (1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.