pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02936 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 📡 eess.SP

Exploiting Out-of-Band Information for Millimeter-Wave MIMO Channel Estimation: Performance in Static and Dynamic Scenarios

Faruk Pasic , Mariam Mussbah , Stefan Schwarz , Markus Rupp , Christoph F. Mecklenbr\"auker This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords mmWave MIMOchannel estimationout-of-band informationspectral efficiencysub-6 GHzstatic scenariosdynamic scenarios
0
0 comments X

The pith

Incorporating out-of-band sub-6 GHz information improves spectral efficiency for mmWave MIMO channel estimation in static and dynamic scenarios.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the use of channel information from sub-6 GHz frequencies to enhance pilot-aided channel estimation at millimeter-wave frequencies in MIMO systems. It evaluates performance in terms of spectral efficiency for various pilot configurations under line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight conditions in both static and dynamic environments. Simulation results indicate that this out-of-band information provides notable gains in spectral efficiency across these scenarios. A reader would care because future wireless systems will rely on mmWave for high data rates while coexisting with sub-6 GHz systems, making efficient channel estimation critical for latency-critical applications.

Core claim

By exploiting out-of-band sub-6 GHz channel information, mmWave MIMO systems achieve improved pilot-aided channel estimation performance, leading to notable spectral efficiency gains in both static and dynamic scenarios for line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight propagation.

What carries the argument

The mapping and incorporation of out-of-band sub-6 GHz information into mmWave channel estimation to reduce estimation errors.

If this is right

  • Enhanced spectral efficiency in mmWave deployments that coexist with sub-6 GHz systems.
  • Improved channel estimation accuracy using fewer pilots at mmWave frequencies.
  • Better system performance in both unchanging static setups and time-varying dynamic ones.
  • Applicability to both line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight propagation conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Systems could potentially lower pilot overhead at mmWave by leveraging sub-6 GHz data, freeing resources for data transmission.
  • This technique might extend to other frequency bands or multi-band systems beyond the tested conditions.
  • Real-world implementations would need robust mapping algorithms to handle propagation differences between bands.

Load-bearing premise

That accurate sub-6 GHz channel information is available and can be reliably translated to mmWave channels without significant mapping errors.

What would settle it

A measurement campaign or simulation where adding sub-6 GHz information produces no spectral efficiency improvement or degradation under realistic channel mapping conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02936 by Christoph F. Mecklenbr\"auker, Faruk Pasic, Mariam Mussbah, Markus Rupp, Stefan Schwarz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pilot symbols at each antenna occupy a certain number of subcarriers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: At a lower SNR of 0 dB, increasing the number of pilot symbols does not yield a significant improvement in SE (left), whereas at a higher SNR of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: At a low K-factor of −20 dB, the OOBA-MRC method provides no gain in achievable SE compared to the conventional method (left) and at a high K-factor, its relative gain increases with the number of pilot symbols (right). provide additional benefit. For an SNR of 0 dB and low K￾factor, the SE improves from 2.7 bit/s/Hz (1-symbol pattern) to 3.4 bit/s/Hz (2-symbol pattern), and only slightly further to 3.5 bi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

To support the high data rates for latency-critical applications, future wireless systems will employ fully digital beamforming multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) architectures at millimeter wave (mmWave) frequencies. Moreover, mmWave MIMO deployments will coexist with conventional sub-6 GHz MIMO systems, creating opportunities to exploit out-of-band sub-6 GHz information to enhance channel estimation at mmWave frequencies. In this work, we analyze the pilot-aided channel estimation performance of mmWave MIMO systems under various pilot configurations in both static and dynamic environments. We evaluate the system performance in terms of spectral efficiency (SE) for line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight propagation conditions. Simulation results show that incorporating out-of-band sub-6 GHz information yields notable SE gains in both static and dynamic scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes pilot-aided channel estimation for fully digital mmWave MIMO systems that coexist with sub-6 GHz MIMO. It evaluates spectral efficiency under various pilot configurations in static and dynamic environments for both LOS and NLOS conditions, claiming that incorporating out-of-band sub-6 GHz channel information produces notable SE gains.

Significance. If the mapping from sub-6 GHz estimates to mmWave parameters can be shown to remain accurate under realistic frequency-dependent propagation, the work would offer a practical route to lower pilot overhead in mmWave deployments. The inclusion of dynamic scenarios and explicit LOS/NLOS comparisons strengthens its relevance to 5G/6G coexistence studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation Results] Simulation setup and results sections: the reported SE gains rest on an implicit assumption that sub-6 GHz channel estimates can be mapped to mmWave angles, delays, and gains with negligible error. No quantification of frequency-dependent mismatch (e.g., differing scattering or array responses between 3–6 GHz and 28–60 GHz) is provided; this directly affects the effective pilot quality and could erase the claimed gains, especially in NLOS and dynamic cases.
  2. [Channel Estimation] Channel model and mapping procedure: the paper does not report the exact pilot overhead, number of sub-6 GHz antennas, or error statistics of the out-of-band mapping step. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the SE improvements are robust or sensitive to post-hoc parameter choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the carrier frequencies, bandwidths, and mobility parameters used in each scenario.
  2. [System Model] Notation for the out-of-band mapping function is introduced without a clear equation reference; adding an explicit definition would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the assumptions and details in our work on out-of-band mmWave channel estimation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation Results] Simulation setup and results sections: the reported SE gains rest on an implicit assumption that sub-6 GHz channel estimates can be mapped to mmWave angles, delays, and gains with negligible error. No quantification of frequency-dependent mismatch (e.g., differing scattering or array responses between 3–6 GHz and 28–60 GHz) is provided; this directly affects the effective pilot quality and could erase the claimed gains, especially in NLOS and dynamic cases.

    Authors: We agree that frequency-dependent mismatch between sub-6 GHz and mmWave bands is a key factor that should be quantified rather than assumed negligible. The original simulations used an idealized mapping to isolate the potential benefits of out-of-band information under the stated LOS/NLOS and static/dynamic conditions. In the revision we will add a dedicated sensitivity analysis subsection that introduces controlled mismatch in angles, delays, and path gains (drawing on established propagation models for the two bands) and recompute the SE curves. This will explicitly show how the reported gains degrade or persist as a function of mismatch level, with particular attention to NLOS and dynamic scenarios. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Channel Estimation] Channel model and mapping procedure: the paper does not report the exact pilot overhead, number of sub-6 GHz antennas, or error statistics of the out-of-band mapping step. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the SE improvements are robust or sensitive to post-hoc parameter choices.

    Authors: We acknowledge that these implementation details were omitted and are necessary for reproducibility and robustness assessment. The revised manuscript will explicitly list the pilot overhead (number of pilots per coherence interval), the number of sub-6 GHz antennas employed, and the error statistics (mean and variance or RMSE) of the out-of-band mapping step. We will also include a parameter-sensitivity study that varies these quantities around the nominal values and reports the resulting SE gains, thereby demonstrating that the improvements are not artifacts of specific post-hoc choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: simulation-based performance comparison is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports simulation results for mmWave MIMO channel estimation with and without out-of-band sub-6 GHz information under static/dynamic and LOS/NLOS conditions. No derivations, equations, or first-principles claims are present that reduce the reported SE gains to fitted parameters defined by the same data, self-citations, or ansatzes. The evaluation compares against standard baselines using assumed channel models, making the central claims independent and externally falsifiable via the described simulation setup.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim implicitly rests on standard wireless channel models and the assumption that sub-6 GHz information is usable at mmWave frequencies.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Out-of-band sub-6 GHz channel information can be exploited to enhance mmWave MIMO channel estimation
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the basis for the performance gains

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5452 in / 1096 out tokens · 28513 ms · 2026-05-13T18:16:36.566116+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Millimeter-wave V2X channel mea- surements in urban environments,

    A. F. Molisch, C. F. Mecklenbr ¨auker, T. Zemen, A. Prokes, M. Hofer, F. Pasic, and H. Hammoud, “Millimeter-wave V2X channel mea- surements in urban environments,”IEEE Open Journal of V ehicular Technology, vol. 6, pp. 520–541, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Double-directional V2V channel measurement using ReRoMA at 60 GHz,

    H. Hammoud, Y . Zhang, Z. Cheng, S. Sangodoyin, M. Hofer, F. Pasic, T. M. Pohl, R. Z ´avorka, A. Prokes, T. Zemen, C. F. Mecklenbr ¨auker, and A. F. Molisch, “Double-directional V2V channel measurement using ReRoMA at 60 GHz,”IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, pp. 1–14, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Multi-band measurements for deep learning-based dynamic channel prediction and simulation,

    F. Pasic, N. Di Cicco, M. Skocaj, M. Tornatore, S. Schwarz, C. F. Mecklenbr¨auker, and V . Degli-Esposti, “Multi-band measurements for deep learning-based dynamic channel prediction and simulation,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 98–104, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,

    R. W. Heath, N. Gonz ´alez-Prelcic, S. Rangan, W. Roh, and A. M. Sayeed, “An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 436–453, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Digital beamforming-based massive MIMO transceiver for 5G millimeter-wave communications,

    B. Yang, Z. Yu, J. Lan, R. Zhang, J. Zhou, and W. Hong, “Digital beamforming-based massive MIMO transceiver for 5G millimeter-wave communications,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech- niques, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 3403–3418, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Performance analysis of digital beamforming mmWave MIMO with low-resolution DACs/ADCs,

    F. Pasic, M. Mussbah, S. Schwarz, M. Rupp, F. Tufvesson, and C. F. Mecklenbr ¨auker, “Performance analysis of digital beamforming mmWave MIMO with low-resolution DACs/ADCs,” in2025 IEEE Radio and Antenna Days of the Indian Ocean (RADIO), 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Millimeter-wave beam search with iterative deactivation and beam shifting,

    C. Liu, M. Li, L. Zhao, P. Whiting, S. V . Hanly, and I. B. Collings, “Millimeter-wave beam search with iterative deactivation and beam shifting,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 5117–5131, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Enabling vehicular mmWave communication links using cmWave information,

    M. Hofer, F. Pasic, B. Rainer, J. Blumenstein, A. Prokes, C. F. Meck- lenbr¨auker, A. F. Molisch, and T. Zemen, “Enabling vehicular mmWave communication links using cmWave information,” in19th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    From sub-6 GHz to millimeter- wave: Dynamic indoor measurements, channel characteristics and per- formance evaluation,

    F. Pasic, M. Mussbah, M. Hofer, S. Caban, S. Schwarz, T. Zemen, M. Rupp, and C. F. Mecklenbr ¨auker, “From sub-6 GHz to millimeter- wave: Dynamic indoor measurements, channel characteristics and per- formance evaluation,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications So- ciety, vol. 6, pp. 8190–8208, 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Real-time deployment aspects of C-band and millimeter-wave 5G- NR systems,

    M. Shafi, H. Tataria, A. F. Molisch, F. Tufvesson, and G. Tunnicliffe, “Real-time deployment aspects of C-band and millimeter-wave 5G- NR systems,” inICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Channel estimation for mmWave MIMO using sub-6 GHz out-of-band information,

    F. Pasic, M. Hofer, M. Mussbah, S. Caban, S. Schwarz, T. Zemen, and C. F. Mecklenbr ¨auker, “Channel estimation for mmWave MIMO using sub-6 GHz out-of-band information,” in2024 International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets)

    work page

  12. [12]

    Mil- limeter wave MIMO channel estimation using sub-6 GHz out-of-band information,

    F. Pasic, M. Hofer, M. Mussbah, S. Sangodoyin, S. Caban, S. Schwarz, T. Zemen, M. Rupp, A. F. Molisch, and C. F. Mecklenbr ¨auker, “Mil- limeter wave MIMO channel estimation using sub-6 GHz out-of-band information,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 10 692–10 708, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    5G millimeter wave cellular system capacity with fully digital beamforming,

    S. Dutta, C. N. Barati, A. Dhananjay, and S. Rangan, “5G millimeter wave cellular system capacity with fully digital beamforming,” in2017 51st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, 2017, pp. 1224–1228

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Hybrid analog and digital beamforming for mmWave OFDM large-scale antenna arrays,

    F. Sohrabi and W. Yu, “Hybrid analog and digital beamforming for mmWave OFDM large-scale antenna arrays,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1432–1443, 2017

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    A fourier analysis of digital beamform- ing with severely quantized mmWave arrays,

    C. Cebeci and U. Madhow, “A fourier analysis of digital beamform- ing with severely quantized mmWave arrays,” in2023 57th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, 2023, pp. 433–437

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Impact of spatially consistent channels on digital beamforming for millimeter-wave systems,

    H. Tataria and F. Tufvesson, “Impact of spatially consistent channels on digital beamforming for millimeter-wave systems,” in2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2020

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Channel- coherence-adaptive two-stage fully digital combining for mmWave MIMO systems,

    Y . Khorsandmanesh, E. Bj ¨ornson, J. Jald ´en, and B. Lindoff, “Channel- coherence-adaptive two-stage fully digital combining for mmWave MIMO systems,” in2025 IEEE 36th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Outdoor experimental trials of millimeter-wave base station cooperation with digital beamforming in high-mobility environments for 5G evolution,

    T. Okuyama, S. Suyama, N. Nonaka, Y . Okumura, and T. Asai, “Outdoor experimental trials of millimeter-wave base station cooperation with digital beamforming in high-mobility environments for 5G evolution,” inIEEE 92nd V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Fall), 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Outage-analysis-based receiver digital beamforming for deep-fading suppression in millimetre-wave railway communications,

    Y . Tian, H. Yang, T. Li, S. Yi, and N. Li, “Outage-analysis-based receiver digital beamforming for deep-fading suppression in millimetre-wave railway communications,” in2024 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and INC/USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (AP-S/INC-USNC-URSI), 2024, pp. 1867–1868

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Estimating millimeter wave channels using out-of-band measurements,

    A. Ali, N. Gonz ´alez-Prelcic, and R. W. Heath, “Estimating millimeter wave channels using out-of-band measurements,” in2016 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA), 2016

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Deep learning-based mmWave MIMO channel estimation using sub- 6 GHz channel information: CNN and UNet approaches,

    F. Pasic, L. Eller, S. Schwarz, M. Rupp, and C. F. Mecklenbr ¨auker, “Deep learning-based mmWave MIMO channel estimation using sub- 6 GHz channel information: CNN and UNet approaches,” inIEEE INFOCOM 2025 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Deep learning assisted mmWave beam prediction with prior low-frequency information,

    K. Ma, D. He, H. Sun, and Z. Wang, “Deep learning assisted mmWave beam prediction with prior low-frequency information,” inICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Analysis and simulation of a digital mobile channel using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing,

    L. Cimini, “Analysis and simulation of a digital mobile channel using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 665–675, 1985

    work page 1985

  24. [24]

    A technique for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing frequency offset correction,

    P. Moose, “A technique for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing frequency offset correction,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2908–2914, 1994

    work page 1994

  25. [25]

    Y . S. Cho, J. Kim, W. Y . Yang, and C. G. Kang,MIMO-OFDM wireless communications with MATLAB. John Wiley & Sons, 2010

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    A. F. Molisch,Wireless communications: From Fundamentals to Beyond 5G, 3rd ed. IEEE Press - Wiley, 2023

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,

    3GPP, “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical report (TR) 38.901, 2022, version 17.0.0

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    W. C. Jakes and D. C. Cox,Microwave mobile communications. Wiley- IEEE press, 1994

    work page 1994

  29. [29]

    Time-variant channel estimation using discrete prolate spheroidal sequences,

    T. Zemen and C. Mecklenbrauker, “Time-variant channel estimation using discrete prolate spheroidal sequences,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 3597–3607, 2005

    work page 2005

  30. [30]

    Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; Physical channels and modulation,

    3GPP, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; Physical channels and modulation,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical Specification (TS) 38.211, 2021, version 17.0.0

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Moment-method estimation of the Ricean K-factor,

    L. Greenstein, D. Michelson, and V . Erceg, “Moment-method estimation of the Ricean K-factor,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 175–176, 1999

    work page 1999

  32. [32]

    Time-varying Rician K-factor in measured vehicular channels at cmWave and mmWave bands,

    F. Pasic, M. Hofer, T. Zemen, A. F. Molisch, and C. F. Mecklen- brauker, “Time-varying Rician K-factor in measured vehicular channels at cmWave and mmWave bands,” in2025 19th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2025

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Linear pre- coding based on polynomial expansion: Large-scale multi-cell MIMO systems,

    A. Kammoun, A. M ¨uller, E. Bj ¨ornson, and M. Debbah, “Linear pre- coding based on polynomial expansion: Large-scale multi-cell MIMO systems,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 861–875, 2014

    work page 2014