pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04002 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-05 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Features of spherical torus p 11B burning plasmas

Y.-K. M. Peng , A. Ishida , T. Sun , W. Liu , H. Huang , Y. Shi , B. Liu , D. Guo
show 5 more authors
Z. Li D. Luo X. Xiao G. Zhao M. Liu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 17:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords spherical torusp-11B fusionsuprathermal ionstoroidal rotationmulti-magnetofluid balancemagnetic wellaneutronic fusionomnigeneity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A spherical torus p-11B plasma sustains multi-magnetofluid balance with large rotation speed differences between thermal boron ions and suprathermal protons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a model for a spherical torus plasma designed for p-11B fusion that incorporates small fractions of suprathermal ions around 0.5 MeV and suprathermal electrons in the MeV range. These additions, combined with strong toroidal rotation, allow the thermal plasma and suprathermal components to satisfy separate force balances under common electric and magnetic fields. The result is large differences in rotation speeds between thermal boron ions and suprathermal protons, which creates a large outboard magnetic well with omnigeneity affecting transport and turbulence. Suprathermal particles can extend beyond the plasma boundary to influence recycling and stability. This setup is proposed for a compact device with 1.4 meter major radius to achieve sustained aneutronic burn.

Core claim

The paper develops a rotating, thermally un-equilibrated spherical torus p-11B plasma model in which the fluid components experience separate balance under centripetal, electrostatic, and Lorentz forces with common electric and magnetic fields. This leads to large rotation speed differences between thermal boron ions and suprathermal protons. A large outboard region with magnetic well and omnigeneity is formed, impacting neoclassical transport and gradient-driven turbulence. Suprathermal charged particles extend beyond the last closed flux surface, affecting recycling and pedestal conditions. The superposition of these components modifies sources and sinks of free energy, requiring renewed评估

What carries the argument

Multi-magnetofluid force balance model permitting differential toroidal rotation between thermal boron ions and suprathermal protons under shared electromagnetic fields.

Load-bearing premise

Small fractions of 0.5 MeV suprathermal ions and MeV electrons can be maintained in steady state while satisfying the multi-magnetofluid force balance without violating observed limits from existing spherical torus devices.

What would settle it

Direct measurement in an ST plasma with neutral beam injection showing thermal boron ions and 0.5 MeV suprathermal protons rotate at essentially the same toroidal speed rather than large differences under common fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04002 by A. Ishida, B. Liu, D. Guo, D. Luo, G. Zhao, H. Huang, M. Liu, T. Sun, W. Liu, X. Xiao, Y.-K. M. Peng, Y. Shi, Z. Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: summarizes the reconstructed equilibrium structure: (a) poloidal flux contours, and (b) the toroidal current density profile 𝐽. The red curve denotes the LCFS; the black curve marks the boundary of the relativistic-electron population; and the blue curve indicates the limiting wall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mid-plane profiles of (a) toroidal current densities, (b) densities, (c) toroidal rotation velocities, and (d) temperatures of boron, proton, thermal electrons, and relativistic suprathermal electrons identified by subscripts: b, p, el, and eh, respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows representative poloidal cross-section contours: (a) total toroidal current density, (b) total plasma pressure, (c) suprathermal-electron current density, (d) electrostatic potential, and (e) outboard magnetic-well and hill structure in ∣ 𝐵 ∣, indicating an axisymmetric omnigenous region consistent with early calculations of the spherical-torus plasma features [47], consistent with the broader omnigen… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Proton, (b) boron, and (c) electron thermal (blue) and suprathermal (red) toroidal rotation velocities (km s⁻¹) on the mid-plane, and (d) the velocity difference between suprathermal proton and thermal boron (0.5 to 2.50 Mm s⁻¹) over the poloidal cross section. The green dotted line indicates the LCFS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Contours of p–¹¹B fusion power density based on 0D local-parameter ⟨𝜎𝑣⟩ integration in velocity space of (a) suprathermal protons with thermal borons, and (b) the remaining proton and boron component fluid combinations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows representative orbits for 3.5 MeV protons launched near the outboard mid-plane at the LCFS edge, for initial velocity angles of (a) 30°, (b) 60°, (c) 120°, and (d) 150° relative to the local magnetic field. The counter-current orbits drift outward, sampling higher-density thermal boron ions than at their launch point on the mid-plane, and vice versa for the counter-current proton orbits. The effectiv… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: provides an example of a contained co-current passing orbit of a suprathermal proton with energy 2.13 MeV and pitch angle 150°, launched from the outboard mid￾plane at 𝑅 = 2.31m just inside the LCFS. The orbital trajectory is longer in the inboard region, where thermal boron density is higher than at the launch position, thereby increasing the orbit-averaged reaction probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Phase-space region of contained and lost orbits of suprathermal protons starting from the outboard mid-plane: (a)–(b) up to 6 × 107 m s −1(∼ 23 MeV) from 𝑅 = 2.31m; (c)–(d) and (e)–(f) up to 4 × 107 m s −1(∼ 10 MeV) from 𝑅 = 2.26m and 𝑅 = 2.21m, respectively. Approximate phase-space regions of contained orbits are shown over a backdrop of a Maxwellian velocity distribution in (b), (d), and (f) [PITH_FULL_… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A spherical torus (ST) p B11 plasma model that satisfies multi-magnetofluid force balance is developed, which includes small fractions of suprathermal ions with temperatures around 0.5 MeV and suprathermal electrons in the MeV range. Alongside the primary thermal plasma with ion temperatures exceeding 100 keV and densities above 10E20 m-3, these components enhance fusion reaction rates by leveraging the p B11 double-peak fusion cross section. Suprathermal ions and strong toroidal rotation driven by neutral beam injection have been observed in devices such as START, MAST, NSTX, Globus-M2, and ST40. Central-solenoid-free plasma initiation, ramp-up, and sustainment were tested on EXL-50 and replicated on EXL-50U with partial central induction, demonstrating efficient current drive and consistent with the multi-magnetofluid equilibrium model. Motivated by ENN's aneutronic commercial fusion roadmap, this paper presents a rotating, thermally un-equilibrated ST p B11 plasma with unique properties: fluid components experience separate balance under centripetal, electrostatic, and Lorentz forces with common electric and magnetic fields, leading to large rotation speed differences between thermal boron ions and suprathermal protons; a large outboard region with magnetic well and omnigeneity is created, affecting neoclassical transport and gradient-driven turbulence; suprathermal charged particles can extend beyond the last closed flux surface and be limited by plasma-facing components, influencing recycling and pedestal conditions; and the superposition of these plasma components modifies sources and sinks of free energy, prompting renewed evaluation of stability, turbulence, transport, heating, current drive, and flux diffusion. Challenges and opportunities for sustained burn are discussed for a compact p B11 ST with 1.4-meter major radius, 13-MA current, and 3-T toroidal field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a spherical torus (ST) p-11B plasma model satisfying multi-magnetofluid force balance that incorporates thermal ions (Ti > 100 keV, n > 10^20 m^-3), small fractions of suprathermal ions (~0.5 MeV), and suprathermal electrons (MeV range). It claims this configuration produces separate centripetal-electrostatic-Lorentz balances under shared E and B fields, yielding large differential rotation between thermal boron and suprathermal protons, a large outboard magnetic well with omnigeneity, modified neoclassical transport and turbulence, and altered sources/sinks of free energy. The model is motivated by observations in START, MAST, NSTX, Globus-M2, and ST40, with central-solenoid-free operation demonstrated on EXL-50/EXL-50U, and discusses challenges for a compact 1.4 m major-radius, 13 MA, 3 T device aimed at aneutronic fusion.

Significance. If the multi-fluid equilibrium can be sustained in steady state, the approach would offer a distinct pathway for p-11B fusion by exploiting the double-peak cross section with suprathermal components while potentially reducing transport through rotation and omnigeneity. This could advance compact aneutronic concepts in the ENN roadmap, provided the force balance and particle sustainment close quantitatively.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / model section] Abstract and model-development section: the central assertion that small fractions of 0.5 MeV suprathermal protons and MeV electrons can be maintained in steady state while each fluid satisfies its own centripetal-electrostatic-Lorentz balance under identical E and B fields is presented without explicit solution of the coupled multi-fluid equations, without computed source/sink terms, and without numerical comparison of the implied rotation velocities or densities to measured limits in NSTX, MAST, or ST40. This is load-bearing for the claimed equilibrium.
  2. [Device-parameters paragraph] Device-parameters paragraph: the proposed 1.4 m, 13 MA, 3 T compact ST is stated to be consistent with the multi-magnetofluid model, yet no scaling or force-balance calculation is shown that demonstrates how the required suprathermal fractions remain compatible with the observed rotation and confinement limits of the cited ST experiments.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'multi-magnetofluid equilibrium model' and 'separate balance under centripetal, electrostatic, and Lorentz forces' without citing the specific equation set or section where the force-balance relations are written.
  2. [Motivation paragraph] References to observations in START, MAST, NSTX, Globus-M2, and ST40 are listed but not tied to specific data points (e.g., measured rotation speeds or suprathermal fractions) that would anchor the model parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We agree that the multi-fluid equilibrium model is central to the claims and that additional explicit details would strengthen the presentation. We respond point-by-point below and will incorporate revisions to address the concerns while preserving the conceptual focus of the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / model section] Abstract and model-development section: the central assertion that small fractions of 0.5 MeV suprathermal protons and MeV electrons can be maintained in steady state while each fluid satisfies its own centripetal-electrostatic-Lorentz balance under identical E and B fields is presented without explicit solution of the coupled multi-fluid equations, without computed source/sink terms, and without numerical comparison of the implied rotation velocities or densities to measured limits in NSTX, MAST, or ST40. This is load-bearing for the claimed equilibrium.

    Authors: The model is constructed such that each fluid component satisfies its individual force balance (centripetal, electrostatic, and Lorentz) under the shared E and B fields by design, which directly implies the differential rotation between thermal boron and suprathermal protons. We did not include full numerical solutions of the coupled equations or explicit source/sink computations because the manuscript emphasizes the qualitative features, implications for fusion rates via the double-peak cross section, and consistency with observations from START, MAST, NSTX, Globus-M2, ST40, and EXL-50/EXL-50U. We will revise the model-development section to explicitly state the multi-fluid force-balance equations and add order-of-magnitude estimates for rotation velocities and densities, with direct comparisons to the measured limits reported in the cited ST experiments. This addresses the load-bearing aspect without requiring new simulations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Device-parameters paragraph] Device-parameters paragraph: the proposed 1.4 m, 13 MA, 3 T compact ST is stated to be consistent with the multi-magnetofluid model, yet no scaling or force-balance calculation is shown that demonstrates how the required suprathermal fractions remain compatible with the observed rotation and confinement limits of the cited ST experiments.

    Authors: The 1.4 m, 13 MA, 3 T parameters are selected to align with the scaling of existing ST performance and the requirements for maintaining small suprathermal fractions (~0.5 MeV protons and MeV electrons) within the multi-fluid equilibrium. We will add a dedicated paragraph (or short appendix) providing scaling arguments and order-of-magnitude force-balance estimates that demonstrate compatibility of the suprathermal fractions with the rotation speeds and confinement limits observed in the referenced experiments (START, MAST, NSTX, Globus-M2, ST40). This will include rough estimates of the required densities and velocities derived from the shared E/B fields. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Proposed multi-magnetofluid equilibrium configuration for p-B11 ST plasma is self-contained and does not reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper develops a conceptual model of a rotating, thermally unequilibrated ST p-B11 plasma in which fluid components satisfy separate centripetal-electrostatic-Lorentz balance under shared E and B fields. No derivation chain is presented that reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to an input parameter by construction, nor does any central claim rest on a load-bearing self-citation whose validity is presupposed. The model is motivated by existing device observations (START, MAST, NSTX, etc.) and prior experimental results on solenoid-free initiation, but these are treated as external motivation rather than fitted data that the new equilibrium is forced to reproduce. The absence of explicit multi-fluid equation solutions or quantitative closure against device limits is a limitation of verification, not a circularity in the derivation itself. The paper therefore remains a proposed configuration whose internal consistency is asserted independently of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of sustained suprathermal populations and the validity of multi-magnetofluid equilibrium; these are introduced without independent derivation or external benchmark in the abstract.

free parameters (3)
  • suprathermal ion temperature
    Set near 0.5 MeV to align with p-11B cross-section peaks; value chosen to enhance reaction rate.
  • suprathermal electron energy
    Set in MeV range to support the model; no derivation shown.
  • thermal ion temperature
    Exceeding 100 keV; required for the primary plasma component.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Multi-magnetofluid force balance holds for thermal and suprathermal components under shared E and B fields.
    Invoked to allow separate rotation speeds and outboard magnetic well.
  • ad hoc to paper Suprathermal ions and electrons can be maintained by neutral beam injection without destroying equilibrium.
    Assumed based on observations in listed devices but not derived.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5689 in / 1421 out tokens · 38864 ms · 2026-05-13T17:33:38.821831+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fusion 63 086001

    Tentori A and Belloni F 2023 Revisiting p–11B fusion cross section and reactivity, and their analytic approximations Nucl. Fusion 63 086001

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Fusion 40 865

    Nevins W M and Swain R 2000 The thermonuclear fusion rate coefficient for p– 11B reactions Nucl. Fusion 40 865

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Plasmas 4(5) 1665

    Sykes A 1997 High  produced by neutral beam injection in the START (Small Tight Aspect Ratio Tokamak) spherical tokamak Phys. Plasmas 4(5) 1665

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Fusion 39 1271

    Sykes A 1999 The spherical tokamak programme at Culham Nucl. Fusion 39 1271

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Fusion 46 435–644

    Sabbagh S A 2006 Resistive wall stabilized plasmas in rotating high beta NSTX plasmas Nucl. Fusion 46 435–644

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Akers R J et al 2003 Transport and confinement in the Mega-Ampere Spherical Tokamak (MAST) plasma Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45 A175–A204

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Fusion 61 064001

    Kurskiev G S et al 2021 Tenfold increase in the fusion triple product caused by doubling of toroidal magnetic field in the spherical tokamak Globus-M2 Nucl. Fusion 61 064001

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Fusion 64 112020

    McNamara S A M et al 2024 Overview of recent results from the ST40 compact high-field spherical tokamak Nucl. Fusion 64 112020

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Fusion 62 086047

    Shi Y J et al 2022 Solenoid-free current drive via ECRH in EXL-50 spherical torus plasmas Nucl. Fusion 62 086047

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Shi Y et al 2025 Achievement of 1 MA discharges in hydrogen–boron plasmas on EXL-50U arXiv:2505.08815v1

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Plasmas 28 032503

    Ishida A et al 2021 Four-fluid axisymmetric plasma equilibrium model including relativistic electrons: computational method and results Phys. Plasmas 28 032503

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Plasmas 31 062507

    Liu M et al 2024 ENN’s roadmap for proton–boron fusion based on spherical torus Phys. Plasmas 31 062507

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Technol./Fusion 2 9–28

    McNally J R Jr 1982 The physics of fusion fuel cycles Nucl. Technol./Fusion 2 9–28

    work page 1982

  14. [14]

    Plasmas 4 1039

    Rider T R 1997 Fundamental limitations on plasma fusion systems not in thermodynamic equilibrium Phys. Plasmas 4 1039

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    Fusion Energy 17 25

    Nevins W M 1998 A review of confinement requirements for advanced fuels J. Fusion Energy 17 25

    work page 1998

  16. [16]

    Fusion Energy 35 538–543

    Sikora M H and Weller H R 2016 A new evaluation of the 11B(p,α)αα reaction rates J. Fusion Energy 35 538–543

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Fusion 15 453

    Jassby D L 1975 Optimization of fusion power density in the two-energy- component fusion reactor Nucl. Fusion 15 453

    work page 1975

  18. [18]

    Fusion 16 911

    Jassby D L and Towner H H 1976 Fusion reactors and power multiplication factors of beam-driven toroidal reactors with both D and T injection Nucl. Fusion 16 911

    work page 1976

  19. [19]

    Hawryluk R J et al 1987 Experimental results from the TFTR tokamak Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 322 147–162

    work page 1987

  20. [20]

    Rostoker N, Binderbauer M W and Monkhorst H J 1997 Colliding beam fusion and advanced fuels Science 278 1419

    work page 1997

  21. [21]

    Nevins W M 1998 Feasibility of a colliding beam fusion reactor Science 281 307

    work page 1998

  22. [22]

    Fusion 59 076018

    Putvinski S et al 2019 Fusion reactivity of the pB11 plasma revisited Nucl. Fusion 59 076018

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Plasmas 23 050704

    Eliezer S, Hora H, Korn G, Nissim N and Martinez Val J M 2016 Avalanche proton–boron fusion based on elastic nuclear collisions Phys. Plasmas 23 050704

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Avalanche proton–boron fusion based on elastic nuclear collisions

    Shmatov M L 2016 Comment on “Avalanche proton–boron fusion based on elastic nuclear collisions” Phys. Plasmas 23 094703

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Beams Article ID 3952779

    Belloni F 2022 Multiplication processes in high-density H–11B fusion fuel Laser Part. Beams Article ID 3952779

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Belyaev V S et al 2015 On the implementation of a chain nuclear reaction of thermonuclear fusion on the basis of the p+11B process Phys. At. Nucl. 78 537–547

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Vovkivsky E G and Chirkov A Yu 2025 Trends and achievements in the study of the p–11B fusion: a review Plasma Phys. Rep. 51 21–35

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Fusion 64 016026

    Kirov K K et al 2024 Impact of interaction between RF waves and NBI ions on the fusion performance in the JET DTE2 campaign Nucl. Fusion 64 016026

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Plasmas 2 2375–2380

    Fisch N J and Herrmann M C 1995 Alpha power channelling with two waves Phys. Plasmas 2 2375–2380

    work page 1995

  30. [30]

    Ochs I et al Improving the feasibility of economical proton–boron 11 fusion via alpha channeling with a hybrid fast and thermal proton scheme (online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364442523)

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Oliphant M and Rutherford L 1933 First p–11B measurement Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 141 259

    work page 1933

  32. [32]

    Dee P and Gilbert C 1936 The disintegration of boron into three α-particles Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 154 279

    work page 1936

  33. [33]

    Quebert J and Marquez L 1969 Model for p–11B fusion reaction channels Nucl. Phys. A 126 646

    work page 1969

  34. [34]

    Fusion 26 1443

    Kulsrud R M et al 1986 Physics of spin-polarized plasmas Nucl. Fusion 26 1443

    work page 1986

  35. [35]

    Dmitriev V F 2006 Effect of polarization on the cross section for the reaction 11B(p,α)8Be* Phys. At. Nucl. 69 1461–1462

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    Fusion Energy 33 103–107

    Ahmed M W and Weller H R 2014 Nuclear spin-polarized proton and 11B fuel for fusion reactors: advantages of double polarization J. Fusion Energy 33 103–107

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Fusion 63 076009

    Baylor L M et al 2023 Polarized fusion and potential in situ tests of fuel polarization survival in a tokamak plasma Nucl. Fusion 63 076009

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Lao L L et al 2005 MHD equilibrium reconstruction in the DIII-D tokamak Fusion Sci. Technol. 48 968–977

    work page 2005

  39. [39]

    Fusion 47 S128–S202

    Hender T C et al 2007 Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions Nucl. Fusion 47 S128–S202

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Plasmas 10 3240

    Belova E V et al 2003 Self-consistent equilibrium model of low aspect-ratio toroidal plasma with energetic beam ions Phys. Plasmas 10 3240

    work page 2003

  41. [41]

    Fusion 63 076014

    Maekawa T et al 2023 Particle orbit description of cyclotron-driven current- carrying energetic electrons in the EXL-50 spherical torus Nucl. Fusion 63 076014

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Fusion 39 2175–2249

    ITER Physics Expert Groups on Confinement and Transport and Confinement Modelling and Database 1999 ITER physics basis Nucl. Fusion 39 2175–2249

    work page 1999

  43. [43]

    Fusion 47 S18–S127

    Doyle E J et al 2007 Chapter 2: plasma confinement and transport Nucl. Fusion 47 S18–S127

    work page 2007

  44. [44]

    Hinton F L and Hazeltine R D 1976 Theory of plasma transport in toroidal confinement systems Rev. Mod. Phys. 48 239–308

    work page 1976

  45. [45]

    Yang Y M et al 2025 Progress of the EHL-2 spherical torus engineering design IAEA FEC 2025 manuscript

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Liang Y F et al 2025 Overview of the physics design of the EHL-2 spherical torus Plasma Sci. Technol. 27 024001

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Fusion 26 769

    Peng Y-K M and Strickler D J 1986 Features of spherical torus plasmas Nucl. Fusion 26 769

    work page 1986

  48. [48]

    Tessarotto M, Nicolini P and Tessarotto L 1996 Omnigenous transport barriers in MHD equilibria Phys. Lett. A 222 101–106

    work page 1996

  49. [49]

    Plasma Phys

    Dudt D W et al 2024 Magnetic fields with general omnigeneity J. Plasma Phys. 90 905900120

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Peng Y K M et al Toroidal plasma conditions where the p11B fusion Lawson criterion could be eased (Research Square) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs- 93644/v1

    work page doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-

  51. [51]

    Plasmas 11 3726

    Shaing K C et al 2004 Transport theory for potato orbits in an axisymmetric torus with finite toroidal flow speed Phys. Plasmas 11 3726

    work page 2004

  52. [52]

    Fusion 61 096031

    Shaing K C et al 2021 Improved neoclassical plasma confinement and turbulence suppression in a magnetic well in tokamak reactors Nucl. Fusion 61 096031

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Becker H W et al 1987 Low-energy cross sections for ¹¹B(p,3α) Z. Phys. A 327 341–355

    work page 1987

  54. [54]

    Geser F A and Valente M 2020 A theoretical model for the cross section of the proton-boron fusion nuclear reaction Radiat. Phys. Chem. 167 108224

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Xie H S et al 2023 Fusion reactivities with drift bi-Maxwellian ion velocity distributions Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 65 055019

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Fusion 44 R1

    Connor J W and Wilson H R 2006 A review of internal transport barrier physics for steady-state operation of tokamaks Nucl. Fusion 44 R1

    work page 2006

  57. [57]

    Plasmas 23 072301

    Choi G J and Hahm T S 2016 𝐸 × 𝐵 shear and precession shear induced turbulence suppression and its influence on electron thermal internal transport barrier formation Phys. Plasmas 23 072301

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    Fusion 65 086019

    Di Siena A et al 2025 Understanding turbulence suppression in JET D–T plasma with highly energetic fast ions via global gyrokinetic GENE simulations Nucl. Fusion 65 086019

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    [OV/3111] (Chengdu, China, 13-18 October 2025)

    Liu B et al 2025 Progress of proton-boron research for fusion energy in China, 30th IAEA Fusion Energy Conf. [OV/3111] (Chengdu, China, 13-18 October 2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    et al 2025 Overview of EXL-50 research progress, Nucl

    Shi Y.J. et al 2025 Overview of EXL-50 research progress, Nucl. Fusion 65 092004

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    et al 2025 Strategy and experimental progress of the EXL-50U spherical torus in support of the EHL-2 project Plasma Sci

    Shi Y.J. et al 2025 Strategy and experimental progress of the EXL-50U spherical torus in support of the EHL-2 project Plasma Sci. Technol. 27 024003

    work page 2025