arxiv: 2604.14511 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Performance Optimization Method for Laser-Phase-Noise based Quantum Random Number Generation

Jinlu Liu , Jie Yang , Yu Gao , Guowei Zhang , Yan Pan , Heng Wang , Yuyang Ding , Yang Li

show 3 more authors

Wei Huang Bingjie Xu Wei Chen

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords quantum random number generationlaser phase noisephysical modelmin-entropypower spectrumprobability distributionperformance optimizationentropy source bandwidth

0 comments

The pith

A physical model for laser phase noise QRNGs predicts raw data statistics to optimize generation rate or min-entropy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a detailed physical model for quantum random number generators that rely on laser phase noise. The model forecasts the power spectrum and probability distribution of the generated raw data from the underlying physical parameters. With these predictions, the entropy source bandwidth and the extractable quantum min-entropy can be computed to assess overall performance. Experiments and simulations confirm the model's accuracy across different configurations. The framework also supports pre-setting the experimental parameters to achieve targeted statistics that maximize either the bit rate or the entropy content.

Core claim

The central claim is that a comprehensive physical model, incorporating the dynamics of laser phase noise and photodetection, can accurately predict both the power spectral density and the probability distribution function of the raw random sequence. These predictions directly yield the effective bandwidth of the entropy source and the quantum min-entropy per sample. Validation against simulations and laboratory measurements shows close agreement for varied laser and detection parameters. Consequently, the model permits the a priori selection of setup parameters to realize desired spectral and statistical properties, thereby optimizing the random number generation rate or the min-entropy.

What carries the argument

The laser-phase-noise physical model that calculates the power spectrum and probability distribution of raw data from experimental parameters such as laser linewidth and detection bandwidth.

If this is right

Quantitative performance evaluation becomes possible through computed bandwidth and min-entropy values.
Experimental setups can be configured in advance to maximize the generation rate.
Setups can be configured to maximize the min-entropy instead.
The model supports performance optimization without relying solely on post-experiment measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the model holds, it could guide the design of integrated photonic QRNG chips by allowing simulation-based optimization.
Extending the model to account for additional noise sources might improve its applicability in noisy environments.
The approach suggests similar modeling strategies could optimize other quantum noise-based random generators.
A testable extension would be using the model to predict and achieve a specific target min-entropy in a new experimental setup.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that laser phase noise is the primary contributor to randomness and that all significant physical effects and detection parameters are included with sufficient accuracy for reliable predictions.

What would settle it

Measuring the power spectrum and probability distribution in an experiment with known parameters and finding substantial mismatches with the model's predictions would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

The quantum random number generation based on laser phase noise, which is featured with high generation rate and ease for photonic integration, has been extensively investigated and demonstrated. Despite these advancements, a theoretical model to achieve optimal performance in terms of maximizing the generation rate or entropy is still incomplete. In this work, a comprehensive physical model for this scheme is introduced to accurately predict the power spectrum and probability distribution of raw data, based on which the entropy source bandwidth and quantum min-entropy can be accordingly calculated and thus the system performance can be quantitatively evaluated. The model is sufficiently validated through both simulation and experiment with significant agreement under various setups. Furthermore, our proposal enables the priori configuration of experimental setups to achieve designed power spectrum and probability distribution of the raw data, thereby maximizing the generation rate or the min-entropy for system performance optimization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a practical model for predicting and tuning laser-phase-noise QRNG performance ahead of time, but the validation leaves the noise-dominance assumptions unexamined in detail.

read the letter

The core contribution is a physical model that takes laser phase noise parameters and predicts the raw data power spectrum, probability distribution, entropy bandwidth, and min-entropy. From there the authors show how to set experimental knobs in advance to hit a target generation rate or entropy level instead of iterating after the fact. That prior-configuration step is the part that was missing from earlier work on this scheme. They back the model with simulations and experiments that line up under several different setups, which is the right way to demonstrate usefulness for real hardware. For groups building photonic QRNGs this kind of tool reduces blind tuning time. The soft spot is the load-bearing assumption that phase noise is the dominant randomness source and that every relevant detection effect and secondary noise term has been captured with enough fidelity. The abstract reports significant agreement but supplies no residuals, sensitivity plots, or explicit list of omitted terms. If intensity noise or dark counts contribute at the levels that matter for high-speed operation, the calculated min-entropy will be overstated and the optimized configuration will under-deliver. Without those checks the optimization claim stays provisional. This paper is for experimental teams who already run laser-phase-noise QRNGs and need a design aid rather than a fundamental theory paper. A reader who wants to move from proof-of-principle to repeatable high-rate devices will find concrete value. I would send it to peer review because it fills a documented gap with a usable model and some validation data, even though the noise-model completeness needs tighter scrutiny in revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a comprehensive physical model for laser-phase-noise-based quantum random number generation that predicts the power spectrum and probability distribution of raw data. From these predictions, the entropy source bandwidth and quantum min-entropy are calculated to quantitatively evaluate system performance. The model is validated through simulations and experiments showing significant agreement under various setups, and it enables a priori configuration of experimental parameters to optimize either the generation rate or the min-entropy.

Significance. If the model is complete and the validation holds with sufficient quantitative fidelity, the work would supply a practical tool for designing and optimizing high-rate, integrable QRNG systems without exhaustive empirical tuning. The explicit linkage from physical parameters to min-entropy and the dual simulation-experiment validation are strengths that could accelerate photonic QRNG development.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (Physical Model): The central claim that the model enables accurate a-priori prediction and optimization rests on laser phase noise being the dominant randomness source and on all relevant detection/filtering effects being captured. The manuscript does not enumerate omitted noise terms (e.g., residual intensity noise, dark counts) or provide sensitivity bounds, leaving the min-entropy overestimate risk unquantified.
[§5] §5 (Validation): The abstract asserts 'significant agreement' between model, simulation, and experiment, yet no quantitative residuals, RMS errors, or goodness-of-fit metrics for the power-spectrum and probability-distribution predictions are reported. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the model supports reliable prior optimization of bandwidth or min-entropy.

minor comments (2)

[§3] Notation for the phase-noise power spectral density and the subsequent min-entropy formula should be cross-referenced explicitly to the equations used in the optimization procedure.
[§5] Figure captions for the experimental power spectra and histograms should state the exact parameter values used in each 'various setup' so readers can reproduce the claimed agreement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects for strengthening the presentation of our physical model and its validation. We address each major comment point by point below and have prepared revisions to the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: §3 (Physical Model): The central claim that the model enables accurate a-priori prediction and optimization rests on laser phase noise being the dominant randomness source and on all relevant detection/filtering effects being captured. The manuscript does not enumerate omitted noise terms (e.g., residual intensity noise, dark counts) or provide sensitivity bounds, leaving the min-entropy overestimate risk unquantified.

Authors: We agree that explicitly addressing the assumptions regarding noise dominance strengthens the manuscript. In the revised version, we will add a new subsection to §3 that enumerates the primary assumptions of the model, including the conditions under which laser phase noise dominates over residual intensity noise, dark counts, and other terms. We will also incorporate a sensitivity analysis that quantifies the effect of small violations of these assumptions on the predicted min-entropy, thereby bounding the potential overestimate risk. This addition will be supported by brief analytical derivations and numerical examples. revision: yes
Referee: §5 (Validation): The abstract asserts 'significant agreement' between model, simulation, and experiment, yet no quantitative residuals, RMS errors, or goodness-of-fit metrics for the power-spectrum and probability-distribution predictions are reported. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the model supports reliable prior optimization of bandwidth or min-entropy.

Authors: We concur that quantitative metrics are necessary for a rigorous evaluation of the agreement. In the revised manuscript, §5 will be expanded to include RMS error values, residual plots, and goodness-of-fit measures (R² and reduced chi-squared) for both the power-spectrum and probability-distribution comparisons across the simulated and experimental datasets. These metrics will be reported for each experimental setup shown in the figures, allowing readers to assess the fidelity of the model predictions and the reliability of the subsequent bandwidth and min-entropy optimizations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward physical model validated externally

full rationale

The paper presents a physical model derived from laser phase noise properties to predict raw-data power spectrum and probability distribution, from which bandwidth and quantum min-entropy are computed. Validation is claimed via independent simulation and experiment under varied setups, with no quoted equations showing that any prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain. The central claim therefore remains a forward derivation from stated physical assumptions rather than a tautology or renaming of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit details on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The physical model likely incorporates standard laser physics assumptions but may include fitted parameters for phase noise spectrum or detection response; full text required for identification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5462 in / 1287 out tokens · 55394 ms · 2026-05-10T12:01:02.888919+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references

[1]

Despite these advancements, a theoretical model to achieve optimal performance in terms of maximizing the generation rate is still incomplete

and 10Gbps [22], respectively. Despite these advancements, a theoretical model to achieve optimal performance in terms of maximizing the generation rate is still incomplete . Simultaneously, the investigation on the frequency -domain characteristics of the raw data is still absent, which is crucial for the estimation of entropy source bandwidth and the co...
[2]

The experimental results and the corresponding simulations are shown in Fig

𝟓𝒏𝒔, ∆𝒗 = 𝟐𝟐𝑴𝑯𝒛 Furthermore ， the probability distribut ion of measurement results M under both scenarios are also estimated. The experimental results and the corresponding simulations are shown in Fig. 4. Under scenario (a), as shown in Fig .4(a), the probability distribution is consistently sym metry about the zero voltage across the variation range of ...
[3]

5 (b), with fixed 𝜏𝑙 , the 𝐵𝐸𝑆 slightly increase as ∆𝑣 increases

𝟓𝐧𝐬 While in Fig . 5 (b), with fixed 𝜏𝑙 , the 𝐵𝐸𝑆 slightly increase as ∆𝑣 increases. Intuitively, this is because that a large ∆𝑣 accelerates phase diffusion in laser output signal, thereby more high -frequency spectral components exist in measurement results, which accordingly results in a large 𝐵𝐸𝑆. The experimental verification is limited to a range of...

2048
[4]

Quantum random number generation

Based on the preceding derivatio n in the main text , 𝐻𝑚𝑖𝑛 can be determined provided that 𝜎∆𝜃,𝜏𝑙 2 is obtained, as shown in Eqs. (1 ~ 7). Therefore, accurately extracting 𝜎∆𝜃,𝜏𝑙 2 based on known 𝜎𝑄 2 remains the critical theoretical issue. The detail solution is shown in the following. The variance of Q can be expressed as 𝜎𝑄 2 = ⟨𝑄2⟩ − ⟨𝑄⟩2, (10) where ...

2016
[5]

An ultrafast quantum random number generator with provably bounded output bias based on photon arrival time measurements

M. Wahl, M. Leifgen, M. Berlin, T. Röhlicke, H.-J. Rahn, O. Benson. “An ultrafast quantum random number generator with provably bounded output bias based on photon arrival time measurements.” Applied Physics Letters, 2011, 98(17): 171105

2011
[6]

Practical and fast quantum random number generation based on photon arrival time relative to external reference

Y.-Q. Nie, H.-F. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. Wang, X. Ma, J. Zhang, J. -W. Pan. “Practical and fast quantum random number generation based on photon arrival time relative to external reference. ” Applied Physics Letters, 2014, 104(5): 051110

2014
[7]

High-speed quantum-random number generation by continuous measurement of arrival time of photons

Q. Yan, B. Zhao, Z. Hua, Q. Liao, H. Yang. “High-speed quantum-random number generation by continuous measurement of arrival time of photons.” Review of Scientific Instruments , 2015, 86(7): 073113. [ 7 ] M. Stipcevic, J. E. Bowers. “Spatio-temporal optical random number generator. ” Optics Express, 2015, 23(9): 11619-11631

2015
[8]

High-speed quantum random number generation by measuring phase noise of a single -mode laser

B. Qi, Y. M. Chi, H. K. Lo, L. Qian. “High-speed quantum random number generation by measuring phase noise of a single -mode laser. ” Optics Letters, 2010, 35(3): 312-314

2010
[9]

True random numbers from amplified quantum vacuum

M. Jofre, M. Curty, F. Steinlechner, G. Anzolin, J.P . Torres, M.W. Mitchell, V . Pruneri, “True random numbers from amplified quantum vacuum .” Optics Express, 2011, 19: 20665-20672

2011
[10]

Ultrafast quantum random number generation based on quantum phase fluctuations

F. Xu, B. Qi, X. Ma, H. Xu, H. Zheng, H. K. Lo. “Ultrafast quantum random number generation based on quantum phase fluctuations. ” Optics Express, 2012, 20(11): 12366-12377

2012
[11]

Robust random number generation using steady -state emission of gain-switched laser diodes

Z. L. Yuan, M. Lucamarini, J. F. Dynes, B. Fröhlich, A. Plews, A. J. Shields. “Robust random number generation using steady -state emission of gain-switched laser diodes. ” Applied Physics Letters, 2014, 104(26): 261112. [ 12 ] H. Zhou, X. Yuan, X. Ma. “Randomness generation based on spontaneous emissions of lasers.” Physical Review A, 2015, 91(6): 062316

2014
[12]

Strong experimental guarantees in ultrafast quantum random number generation

M. W. Mitchell, C. Abellan, W. Amaya. “Strong experimental guarantees in ultrafast quantum random number generation. ” Physical Review A , 2015, 91(5): 052318

2015
[13]

The generation of 68 Gbps quantum random number by measuring laser phase fluctuations

Y. Q. Nie, L. Huang, Y. Liu, F. Payne, J. Zhang, J. W. Pan. “The generation of 68 Gbps quantum random number by measuring laser phase fluctuations.” Review of Scientific Instruments , 2015, 86(6): 063105

2015
[14]

Quantum entropy source on an InP photonic integrated circuit for random number generation

C. Abellan, W. Amaya, D. Domenech, P. Muñoz, J. Capmany, S. Longhi, M. W. Mitchell, V . Pruneri. “Quantum entropy source on an InP photonic integrated circuit for random number generation.” Optica, 2016, 3(9): 989-994

2016
[15]

Fully integrated 3.2 Gbps quantum random number generator with real-time extraction

X.G. Zhang, Y .Q. Nie, H. Zhou, H. Liang, X. Ma, J. Zhang, J.W. Pan, “Fully integrated 3.2 Gbps quantum random number generator with real-time extraction.” Review of Scientific Instruments, 2016, 87:076102

2016
[16]

5.4 Gbps real time quantum random number generator with simple implementation

J. Yang, J. Liu, Q. Su, Z. Li, F. Fan, B. Xu, H. Guo. “5.4 Gbps real time quantum random number generator with simple implementation. ” Optics Express, 2016, 24(24): 27475-27481

2016
[17]

Experimental study of a quantum random-number generator based on two independent lasers

S. H. Sun, F. Xu. “Experimental study of a quantum random-number generator based on two independent lasers. ” Physical Review A , 2017, 96(6): 062314

2017
[18]

Interferometric photodetection in silicon photonics for phase diffusion quantum entropy sources

M. Rude, C. Abellan, A. Capdevila, D. Domenech, M. W. Mitchell, W. Amaya, V. Pruneri. “Interferometric photodetection in silicon photonics for phase diffusion quantum entropy sources.” Optics Express , 2018, 26(24): 31957-31964. 11 / 12

2018
[19]

Long-Term Test of a Fast and Compact Quantum Random Number Generator

D.G. Marangon, A. Plews, M. Lucamarini, J.F. Dynes, A.W. Sharpe, Z. Yuan, A.J. Shields, “Long-Term Test of a Fast and Compact Quantum Random Number Generator .” Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2018, 36: 3778-3784

2018
[20]

Generation of random numbers by measuring phase fluctuations from a laser diode with a silicon-on-insulator chip

F. Raffaelli, P. Sibson, J . E. Kennard, D . H. Mahler, M. G. Thompson, J. C. F. Matthews , “Generation of random numbers by measuring phase fluctuations from a laser diode with a silicon-on-insulator chip.” Optics Express , 2018, 26(16): 19730-19741

2018
[21]

Real-time interferometric quantum random number generation on chip

T. Roger, T. Paraiso, I. D. Marco, D. G. Marangon, Z. L. Yuan, A. J. Shields , “Real-time interferometric quantum random number generation on chip .” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 2019, 36 (3): B137

2019
[22]

On-chip tunable SOI interferometer for quantum random number generation based on phase diffusion in lasers

M. Imran, V. Sorianello, F. Fresi, B. Jalil, M. Romagnoli, L. Potì . “On-chip tunable SOI interferometer for quantum random number generation based on phase diffusion in lasers. ” Optics Communications, 2021, 485: 126746

2021
[23]

Quantum random number generation based on phase reconstruction

J. Li, Z. Huang, C. Yu, J. Wu, T. Zhao, X. Zhu, S. Sun. “Quantum random number generation based on phase reconstruction. ” Optics Express , 2024, 32(4): 5056-5071

2024
[24]

Hybrid integrated Gbps quantum random number generator based on laser phase fluctuation

Z. Huang, J. Li, Y . Chen, X. Fan, T. Mu, J. Guo, J. Huang, M. Liu, X. Wu, L. Liao, Z. Xie, Z. Tian, S. Sun, “Hybrid integrated Gbps quantum random number generator based on laser phase fluctuation.” Optics Express , 2025 , 33 (5): 11985-11995

2025
[25]

An ultra -fast quantum random number generation scheme based on laser phase noise

J. Yang, M. Wu, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, W. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Pan, Q. Su, Y. Bian, H. Jiang, S. Yu, B. Xu, B. Luo, H. Guo. “An ultra -fast quantum random number generation scheme based on laser phase noise.” Communications Physics, 2026, 9:5

2026
[26]

A generator for unique quantum random numbers based on vacuum states

C. Gabriel, C. Wittmann, D. Sych, R. Dong, W. Mauerer, U. L. Andersen, C. Marquardt, G. Leuchs. “A generator for unique quantum random numbers based on vacuum states. ” Nature Photonics, 2010, 4(10): 711-715

2010
[27]

Practical quantum random number generator based on measuring the shot noise of vacuum states

Y. Shen, L. Tian, H. Zou. “Practical quantum random number generator based on measuring the shot noise of vacuum states. ” Physical Review A , 2010, 81(6): 063814

2010
[28]

Real time demonstration of high bitrate quantum random number generation with coherent laser light

T. Symul, S. M. Assad, P. K. Lam. “Real time demonstration of high bitrate quantum random number generation with coherent laser light. ” Applied Physics Letters, 2011, 98(23): 231103

2011
[29]

Homodyne-based quantum random number generator at 2.9 Gbps secure against quantum side -information

T. Gehring, C. Lupo, A. Kordts, D. Solar Nikolic, N. Jain, T. Rydberg, T. B. Pedersen, S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen. “Homodyne-based quantum random number generator at 2.9 Gbps secure against quantum side -information.” Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 605. [ 31 ] C. Bruynsteen, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, J. Bauwelinck, X. Yin. “100-Gbit/s Integrated Quantum Ra...

2021
[30]

Compact Quantum Random Number Generator Based on a Laser Diode and a Hybrid Chip with Integrated Silicon Photonics

X. Wang, T. Zheng, Y. Jia, J. Huang, X. Zhu, Y. Shi, N. Wang, Z. Lu, J. Zou, Y. Li. “Compact Quantum Random Number Generator Based on a Laser Diode and a Hybrid Chip with Integrated Silicon Photonics.” Photonics, 2024, 11(2): 177

2024
[31]

Fully Integrated Vacuum -Based Quantum Random Number Generator

X. Hua, Y. Bian, Y. Zhu, J. Yang, S. Zhang, J. Yan, M. Liu, D. Chen, S. Yu, B. Xu, Y. Zhang, X. Xiao. “Fully Integrated Vacuum -Based Quantum Random Number Generator. ” Advanced Devices & Instrumentation, 2026, 7

2026
[32]

Fast physical random number generator using amplified spontaneous emission

C. R. Williams, J. C. Salevan, X. Li, R. Roy, T. E. Murphy. “Fast physical random number generator using amplified spontaneous emission. ” Optics Express, 2010, 18(23): 23584-23597

2010
[33]

Randomness quantification for quantum random number generation based on detection of amplified spontaneous emission noise

J. Yang, F. Fan, J. Liu, Q. Su, Y. Li, W. Huang, B. Xu. “Randomness quantification for quantum random number generation based on detection of amplified spontaneous emission noise. ” Quantum Science and Technology, 2021, 6(1): 01500. [ 37 ] C. K. Duda, K. A. Meier, R. T. Newell. “Development of a High Min -Entropy Quantum Random Number Generator Based on A...

2021
[34]

Maximization of Extractable Randomness in a Quantum Random -Number Generator

J. Y . Haw, S. M. Assad, A. M. Lance, N. H. Y . Ng, V . Sharma, P. K. Lam, and T. Symul, “Maximization of Extractable Randomness in a Quantum Random -Number Generator.” Physical Review Applied, (2015), 3(5). [ 39 ] C. H. Henry. “Theory of the linewidth of semiconductor lasers.” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 1982, 18(2): 259–264

2015
[35]

High-speed quantum random -number generation based on frequency-division multiplexing

J. Li, X. Fan, Y . Chen, T. Mu, J. Guo, J. Huang, M. 12 / 12 Liu, Z. Huang, B. Liu, S. Sun, “High-speed quantum random -number generation based on frequency-division multiplexing .” Physical Review Applied, (2026), 25: 014014

2026