pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22376 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

No-Go Theorem for Quantum Heat Engines Powered Purely by Quantum Measurements in the Steady Regime

Kenta Koshihara , Kazuya Yuasa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quantum thermodynamicsmeasurement-powered enginesno-go theoremsquantum channelssteady stateswork extractionmeasurement backaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum engines powered only by measurements cannot extract work once they reach steady operation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves that a finite-dimensional quantum engine driven solely by repeated bare measurements, without feedback or thermal contact, cannot extract net work in the steady regime. It applies a Poincaré-like recurrence theorem to quantum channels to show that the system eventually reaches a fixed point where each measurement becomes nondisturbing and supplies no energy input. A reader would care because this identifies why pure measurement driving fails for steady cycles and why an entropy-reducing step must be added. The result applies to any such engine that settles into repeated identical operations.

Core claim

On the basis of a Poincaré-like recurrence theorem for general quantum channels, we prove a no-go result for work extraction from such an engine in the steady regime. In the steady regime, quantum measurements become nondisturbing and do not inject energy into the working substance. Consequently, no work can be extracted. This result reveals the necessity of an entropy-decreasing process, such as feedback control or thermal contact, for work extraction in steady-cycle measurement-powered engines.

What carries the argument

The Poincaré-like recurrence theorem for general quantum channels, which shows that repeated measurements drive the system to a fixed point at which backaction and energy injection both vanish.

If this is right

  • No net work can be extracted in the steady regime without an added entropy-decreasing mechanism.
  • Bare measurements cease to inject energy once the quantum channel reaches its fixed point.
  • Any steady-cycle measurement-powered engine requires feedback control or thermal contact to produce work.
  • The no-go holds for arbitrary finite-dimensional working substances under pure measurement driving.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Work extraction might still occur during the transient approach to steady state before the fixed point is reached.
  • The same recurrence argument could rule out work extraction in other steady quantum thermodynamic cycles that lack an entropy sink.
  • An experiment could monitor the long-time energy input from measurements on a trapped ion or superconducting qubit to check whether it drops to zero.

Load-bearing premise

The engine truly reaches and stays in a steady regime under repeated bare measurements alone, so the describing quantum channel attains a fixed point where backaction disappears.

What would settle it

Demonstrating sustained positive net work output over many full cycles from a finite-dimensional system driven only by bare measurements that have settled into a steady state without feedback or thermal contact.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22376 by Kazuya Yuasa, Kenta Koshihara.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Quantum measurement-powered heat engines. (a) Feedback-assisted measurement-powered engine [12]. A quantum view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The cycle (2.1) of a quantum engine powered view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the thermodynamics of a quantum measurement-powered engine that converts energy injected by measurement backaction into work. We consider an engine with a finite-dimensional working substance, driven purely by quantum measurements, i.e., by bare quantum measurements, without feedback control or thermal contact in the thermodynamic cycle. On the basis of a Poincar\'e-like recurrence theorem for general quantum channels, we prove a no-go result for work extraction from such an engine in the steady regime. In the steady regime, quantum measurements become nondisturbing and do not inject energy into the working substance. Consequently, no work can be extracted. This result reveals the necessity of an entropy-decreasing process, such as feedback control or thermal contact, for work extraction in steady-cycle measurement-powered engines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to prove a no-go theorem for work extraction in quantum heat engines powered purely by bare quantum measurements (no feedback or thermal contact) in the steady regime. For a finite-dimensional working substance, a Poincaré-like recurrence theorem for general quantum channels is invoked to show that repeated measurements drive the system to a fixed point of the measurement channel; at this point the state is invariant, measurements are nondisturbing, and no net energy is injected, so no work can be extracted. The result is presented as demonstrating the necessity of an entropy-decreasing process for steady-cycle operation.

Significance. If the central derivation is gap-free, the result is significant for quantum thermodynamics: it supplies a parameter-free, channel-theoretic argument that measurement back-action alone cannot sustain work extraction in steady state. The explicit use of recurrence theorems on quantum channels, rather than ad-hoc assumptions, is a methodological strength that makes the no-go falsifiable and general within the stated scope (finite dimension, bare measurements, no external driving).

minor comments (2)
  1. [Main text, proof of the no-go result] The abstract states that the recurrence theorem implies measurements become nondisturbing at the fixed point, but the main text should include an explicit step showing that the average energy change vanishes identically once the state lies in the support of the fixed point (rather than leaving this as an immediate corollary).
  2. [Introduction and model definition] The assumption that the cycle consists solely of repeated bare measurements without any intermediate unitary or thermal step is load-bearing; a short paragraph clarifying why this excludes all standard engine cycles would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment, accurate summary of our central result, and recommendation of minor revision. The referee's description correctly captures the scope and the Poincaré-recurrence argument for the no-go theorem in the steady regime. No specific technical objections or requested modifications were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central derivation applies an external Poincaré-like recurrence theorem for general quantum channels to establish that repeated bare measurements drive the finite-dimensional working substance to a fixed point of the measurement channel. At this fixed point the state is invariant, backaction vanishes on average, and no net energy is injected, precluding work extraction in the steady regime. The theorem is invoked as an independent mathematical result rather than derived from or defined in terms of the engine's work output or fitted parameters. The steady regime is characterized directly by the channel's fixed-point property under the paper's assumptions (no feedback, no thermal contact, bare measurements only), without circular reduction. No self-citations are load-bearing for the no-go claim, no ansatzes are smuggled, and no empirical patterns are renamed as derivations. The argument remains self-contained against the stated external theorem and assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and applicability of a Poincaré-like recurrence theorem for general quantum channels to the measurement-driven engine; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Poincaré-like recurrence theorem for general quantum channels
    Invoked to establish that repeated measurements drive the system to a fixed point where the channel acts nondisturbingly.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5430 in / 1205 out tokens · 62211 ms · 2026-05-08T11:52:28.878279+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Optimal work extraction in measurement-based quantum Otto engines: Non-adiabaticity and generalized measurements can be beneficial

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Measurement-based quantum Otto engines with POVMs and non-adiabatic operation extract more net work than conventional or PVM-based engines in specific regimes, even after reset costs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    We do not retain the outcome of the measurement

    We perform a measurement on the working sub- stance to inject energy through the backaction of the measurement. We do not retain the outcome of the measurement. Such a nonselective quan- tum measurement is described by a completely pos- itive and trace-preserving (CPTP) mapρ→˜ρ (1) = M(1)(ρ)

    work page

  2. [2]

    Under this control, the working substance evolves unitarily as ˜ρ(1) →ρ (1) =U (1)(˜ρ(1))

    We drive the HamiltonianH→H (1) by an external force to extract work from the engine. Under this control, the working substance evolves unitarily as ˜ρ(1) →ρ (1) =U (1)(˜ρ(1))

    work page

  3. [3]

    At thekth step, we perform a measurementM (k) onρ (k−1), followed by a drivingH (k−1) →H (k) inducing a unitaryU (k)

    We repeat these operationsKtimes, with a fixed sequence of measurement and driving. At thekth step, we perform a measurementM (k) onρ (k−1), followed by a drivingH (k−1) →H (k) inducing a unitaryU (k). 3 ω(n,0) ω(n,1) ω(n,K→1)ω(n→1,K→1) ω(n+1,0) FIG. 2. The cycle (2.1) of a quantum engine poweredpurelyby quantum measurements. In each cycle,Kpairs of nonse...

    work page

  4. [4]

    activate

    To close the cycle, we bring the Hamiltonian back to its initial oneH (K) =Hby the lastKth driving. The evolution of the working substance per cycle is de- scribed by the CPTP map E=U (K) ◦ M(K) ◦ · · · ◦ U (1) ◦ M(1).(2.1) Repeated application of this cycle is described byE n with n= 1,2, . . . Here, we restrictM (k) (k= 1, . . . , K) tobarequan- tum mea...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Maruyama, F

    K. Maruyama, F. Nori, and V. Vedral, The physics of Maxwell’s demon and information, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    J. M. R. Parrondo, J. M. Horowitz, and T. Sagawa, Ther- modynamics of information, Nat. Phys.11, 131 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Goold, M

    J. Goold, M. Huber, A. Riera, L. del Rio, and P. Skrzypczyk, The role of quantum information in ther- modynamics: a topical review, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 143001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Abreu and U

    D. Abreu and U. Seifert, Extracting work from a single heat bath through feedback, Europhys. Lett.94, 10001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Sagawa and M

    T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Second Law of Thermodynamics with Discrete Quantum Feedback Control, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 080403 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    Morikuni and H

    Y. Morikuni and H. Tasaki, Quantum Jarzynski-Sagawa- Ueda Relations, J. Stat. Phys.143, 1 (2011)

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    K. Funo, Y. Watanabe, and M. Ueda, Integral quantum fluctuation theorems under measurement and feedback control, Phys. Rev. E88, 052121 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Strasberg, G

    P. Strasberg, G. Schaller, T. Brandes, and M. Esposito, Quantum and Information Thermodynamics: A Unifying Framework Based on Repeated Interactions, Phys. Rev. X7, 021003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Koshihara and K

    K. Koshihara and K. Yuasa, Necessity of feedback control for the quantum Maxwell demon in a finite-time steady feedback cycle, Phys. Rev. E106, 024134 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    T. Fu, Y. Wang, J. Chen, J. Du, J. Chen, C. Uchiyama, and S. Su, Finite-time quantum measurement cooling beyond the Carnot limit, J. Appl. Phys.134, 024402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Elouard, D

    C. Elouard, D. A. Herrera-Mart´ ı, M. Clusel, and A. Auff` eves, The role of quantum measurement in stochastic thermodynamics, npj Quant. Inf.3, 9 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Elouard, D

    C. Elouard, D. Herrera-Mart´ ı, B. Huard, and A. Auff` eves, Extracting Work from Quantum Measurement in Maxwell’s Demon Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 260603 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    M. H. Mohammady and J. Anders, A quantum Szilard engine without heat from a thermal reservoir, New J. Phys.19, 113026 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Elouard and A

    C. Elouard and A. N. Jordan, Efficient Quantum Mea- surement Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 260601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Bresque, P

    L. Bresque, P. A. Camati, S. Rogers, K. Murch, A. N. Jordan, and A. Auff` eves, Two-Qubit Engine Fueled by Entanglement and Local Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 120605 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    S. K. Manikandan, C. Elouard, K. W. Murch, A. Auff` eves, and A. N. Jordan, Efficiently fueling a quan- tum engine with incompatible measurements, Phys. Rev. 9 E105, 044137 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    K. Wang, R. Xia, L. Bresque, and P. Xue, Experimental demonstration of a quantum engine driven by entangle- ment and local measurements, Phys. Rev. Research4, L032042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Rodin, Advantages of non-Hookean coupling in a measurement-fueled two-oscillator engine, arXiv:2311.04446 [quant-ph] (2023)

    A. Rodin, Advantages of non-Hookean coupling in a measurement-fueled two-oscillator engine, arXiv:2311.04446 [quant-ph] (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    J. Yi, P. Talkner, and Y. W. Kim, Single-temperature quantum engine without feedback control, Phys. Rev. E 96, 022108 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    X. Ding, J. Yi, Y. W. Kim, and P. Talkner, Measurement- driven single temperature engine, Phys. Rev. E98, 042122 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Das and S

    A. Das and S. Ghosh, Measurement Based Quantum Heat Engine with Coupled Working Medium, Entropy 21, 1131 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    S. Su, Z. Lin, and J. Chen, Thermal divergences of quan- tum measurement engine, arXiv:2109.10796 [quant-ph] (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    M. F. Anka, T. R. de Oliveira, and D. Jonathan, Measurement-based quantum heat engine in a multilevel system, Phys. Rev. E104, 054128 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Z. Lin, S. Su, J. Chen, J. Chen, and J. F. G. Santos, Suppressing coherence effects in quantum-measurement- based engines, Phys. Rev. A104, 062210 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    M. S. Alam and B. P. Venkatesh, Two-stroke Quantum Measurement Heat Engine, arXiv:2201.06303 [quant-ph] (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Purkait and A

    C. Purkait and A. Biswas, Measurement-based quan- tum Otto engine with a two-spin system coupled by anisotropic interaction: Enhanced efficiency at finite times, Phys. Rev. E107, 054110 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Bhandari, R

    B. Bhandari, R. Czupryniak, P. A. Erdman, and A. N. Jordan, Measurement-Based Quantum Thermal Ma- chines with Feedback Control, Entropy25, 204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Jussiau, L

    ´E. Jussiau, L. Bresque, A. Auff` eves, K. W. Murch, and A. N. Jordan, Many-body quantum vacuum fluctuation engines, Phys. Rev. Research5, 033122 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    El Makouri, A

    A. El Makouri, A. Slaoui, and R. Ahl Laamara, Moni- tored nonadiabatic and coherent-controlled quantum uni- tal Otto heat engines: First four cumulants, Phys. Rev. E108, 044114 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Behzadi, Quantum engine based on general measure- ments, J

    N. Behzadi, Quantum engine based on general measure- ments, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.54, 015304 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    V. F. Lisboa, P. R. Dieguez, J. R. Guimar˜ aes, J. F. G. Santos, and R. M. Serra, Experimental investigation of a quantum heat engine powered by generalized measure- ments, Phys. Rev. A106, 022436 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    P. R. Dieguez, V. F. Lisboa, and R. M. Serra, Thermal devices powered by generalized measurements with in- definite causal order, Phys. Rev. A107, 012423 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Since no feedback control is applied, the standard Clausius in- equalityβQ≤0 holds for the heatQand the inverse temperatureβof the reservoir

    This engine works even with a single reservoir, which effectively acts as a cold bath that absorbs heat. Since no feedback control is applied, the standard Clausius in- equalityβQ≤0 holds for the heatQand the inverse temperatureβof the reservoir. See Ref. [9]

    work page

  38. [38]

    A. N. Jordan, C. Elouard, and A. Auff` eves, Quantum measurement engines and their relevance for quantum interpretations, Quantum Stud. Math. Found.7, 203 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    H. M. Wiseman, Using feedback to eliminate back-action in quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. A51, 2459 (1995)

    work page 1995

  40. [40]

    C. A. Fuchs and K. Jacobs, Information-tradeoff relations for finite-strength quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. A 63, 062305 (2001)

    work page 2001

  41. [41]

    Jacobs, Second law of thermodynamics and quantum feedback control: Maxwell’s demon with weak measure- ments, Phys

    K. Jacobs, Second law of thermodynamics and quantum feedback control: Maxwell’s demon with weak measure- ments, Phys. Rev. A80, 012322 (2009)

    work page 2009

  42. [42]

    M. M. Wolf, Quantum Channels & Op- erations: Guided Tour, 2012, URL: https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/node?id=1701036

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Amato, P

    D. Amato, P. Facchi, and A. Konderak, Asymptotics of quantum channels, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.56, 265304 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Banaszek, Fidelity Balance in Quantum Operations, Phys

    K. Banaszek, Fidelity Balance in Quantum Operations, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1366 (2001)

    work page 2001

  45. [45]

    Barnum, Information-disturbance tradeoff in quantum measurement on the uniform ensemble and on the mutu- ally unbiased bases, arXiv:quant-ph/0205155 (2002)

    H. Barnum, Information-disturbance tradeoff in quantum measurement on the uniform ensemble and on the mutu- ally unbiased bases, arXiv:quant-ph/0205155 (2002)

    work page arXiv 2002

  46. [46]

    A. E. Rastegin, Non-equilibrium equalities with unital quantum channels, J. Stat. Mech.2013, P06016 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    Goold and K

    J. Goold and K. Modi, Fluctuation theorem for nonunital dynamics, AVS Quant. Sci.3, 045001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Solfanelli, L

    A. Solfanelli, L. Buffoni, A. Cuccoli, and M. Campisi, Maximal energy extraction via quantum measurement, J. Stat. Mech.2019, 094003 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Koshihara and K

    K. Koshihara and K. Yuasa, Quantum ergotropy and quantum feedback control, Phys. Rev. E107, 064109 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Buffoni, A

    L. Buffoni, A. Solfanelli, P. Verrucchi, A. Cuccoli, and M. Campisi, Quantum Measurement Cooling, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 070603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Jacobs,Quantum Measurement Theory and Its Appli- cations(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

    K. Jacobs,Quantum Measurement Theory and Its Appli- cations(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Measure- ment and Control(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    Ozawa, Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables, J

    M. Ozawa, Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables, J. Math. Phys.25, 79 (1984)

    work page 1984

  54. [54]

    Hayashi, S

    M. Hayashi, S. Ishizaka, A. Kawachi, G. Kimura, and T. Ogawa,Introduction to Quantum Information Science (Springer, Berlin, 2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Burgarth, P

    D. Burgarth, P. Facchi, H. Nakazato, S. Pascazio, and K. Yuasa, Quantum Zeno Dynamics from General Quantum Operations, Quantum4, 289 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    This is because every CPTP map is, as a consequence of the Russo-Dye theorem, contractive with respect to the trace norm [77–79]

    work page

  57. [57]

    Pusz and S

    W. Pusz and S. L. Woronowicz, Passive states and KMS states for general quantum systems, Commun. Math. Phys.58, 273 (1978)

    work page 1978

  58. [58]

    Lenard, Thermodynamical proof of the Gibbs formula for elementary quantum systems, J

    A. Lenard, Thermodynamical proof of the Gibbs formula for elementary quantum systems, J. Stat. Phys.19, 575 (1978)

    work page 1978

  59. [59]

    Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine, J

    R. Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.12, L103 (1979)

    work page 1979

  60. [60]

    Anders and V

    J. Anders and V. Giovannetti, Thermodynamics of dis- crete quantum processes, New J. Phys.15, 033022 (2013)

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    In general, any unital CPTP map Φ, satisfying the uni- tality condition Φ(11) = 11, does not decrease the von Neumann entropyS(ρ). See e.g. Refs. [58, 62, 80]

    work page

  62. [62]

    Alicki and M

    R. Alicki and M. Fannes,Quantum Dynamical Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001)

    work page 2001

  63. [63]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th anniversary ed. (Cam- 10 bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    work page 2010

  64. [64]

    M. M. Wilde,Quantum Information Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    correlation) between the measured system and a “memory” system [9]

    The quantityχ ms is the quantum mutual information (i.e. correlation) between the measured system and a “memory” system [9]. For classical systems, it is just the acquired information [81]. For quantum systems, on the other hand, the backaction of quantum measurement re- duces the acquired information, and the total informa- tion gain is given byI ms =χ m...

    work page

  66. [66]

    Sagawa,Entropy, Divergence, and Majorization in Classical and Quantum Thermodynamics(Springer, Sin- gapore, 2022)

    T. Sagawa,Entropy, Divergence, and Majorization in Classical and Quantum Thermodynamics(Springer, Sin- gapore, 2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Note that this holds for bare quantum measurements, but not for all unital quantum measurements. Consider, for instance, a unital (but not bare) quantum measure- mentM unital(ρ) =P 0ρP0 +σ (12) x (11−P 0)ρ(11−P 0)σ(12) x for a three-level system, whereP 0 =|0⟩⟨0|andσ (12) x = |1⟩⟨2|+|2⟩⟨1|. This measurementM unital disturbs pure statesρ=|1⟩⟨1|andρ=|2⟩⟨2|w...

    work page

  68. [68]

    Bhandari and A

    B. Bhandari and A. N. Jordan, Continuous measurement boosted adiabatic quantum thermal machines, Phys. Rev. Research4, 033103 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Yamamoto, Y

    T. Yamamoto, Y. Tokura, and T. Kato, Heat transport through a two-level system under continuous quantum measurement, Phys. Rev. B106, 205419 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    Yan and J

    J.-s. Yan and J. Jing, Charging by Quantum Measure- ment, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 064069 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    T. F. Havel, Robust procedures for converting among Lindblad, Kraus and matrix representations of quantum dynamical semigroups, J. Math. Phys.44, 534 (2003)

    work page 2003

  72. [72]

    Vectorization of quantum operations and its use

    A. Gilchrist, D. R. Terno, and C. J. Wood, Vectoriza- tion of quantum operations and its use, arXiv:0911.2539 [quant-ph] (2009)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  73. [73]

    C. J. Wood, J. D. Biamonte, and D. G. Cory, Tensor net- works and graphical calculus for open quantum systems, Quant. Inf. Comp.15, 0759 (2015)

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    Watrous,The Theory of Quantum Information(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018)

    J. Watrous,The Theory of Quantum Information(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    A. Hahn, D. Burgarth, and K. Yuasa, Unification of ran- dom dynamical decoupling and the quantum Zeno effect, New J. Phys.24, 063027 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    We haveM 2(X) = M(X) =p 0|0⟩⟨0|+p 1|1⟩⟨1| ̸=X, while∥M(X)∥ 2 HS = (X|M 2(X)) = (X|M(X))

    Consider, for instance, a projective measurement M(X) =P 0XP 0 +P 1XP 1 for a two-level system, with P0 =|0⟩⟨0|andP 1 =|1⟩⟨1|, and apply it toX= p0|0⟩⟨0|+p 1|1⟩⟨1|+c|0⟩⟨1|+c ∗|1⟩⟨0|. We haveM 2(X) = M(X) =p 0|0⟩⟨0|+p 1|1⟩⟨1| ̸=X, while∥M(X)∥ 2 HS = (X|M 2(X)) = (X|M(X)). Equality in the first inequal- ity in (A5) holds, whileXis not a fixed point ofMand e...

    work page

  77. [77]

    J. Wen, Z. Gong, and T. Sagawa, Symmetry and Topol- ogy of Successive Quantum Feedback Control, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 090802 (2026)

    work page 2026

  78. [78]

    P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, M

    D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, M. M. Wolf, D. Petz, and M. B. Ruskai, Contractivity of positive and trace-preserving maps un- derL p norms, J. Math. Phys.47, 083506 (2006)

    work page 2006

  79. [79]

    Li and P

    Y. Li and P. Busch, Von Neumann entropy and majoriza- tion, J. Math. Anal. Appl.408, 384 (2013)

    work page 2013

  80. [80]

    O’Meara and R

    C. O’Meara and R. Pereira, Self-dual maps and symmet- ric bistochastic matrices, Linear Multilinear Algebra61, 23 (2013)

    work page 2013

Showing first 80 references.