pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06383 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Genus-protected higher-order topological phases

Shahroze Shahab , Hui Liu , Daniel Varjas , Ion Cosma Fulga This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 06:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords higher-order topological phasesgenus protectiontopological boundary statescrystalline symmetry breakingbulk gapsystem shape topologyhigher-codimension boundaries
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher-order topological phases can be protected solely by the bulk gap, fundamental symmetries, and the genus of the system shape without any crystalline symmetries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents construction schemes for higher-order topological phases whose boundary modes at corners or hinges are protected by the bulk energy gap, basic local symmetries such as time-reversal or particle-hole symmetry, and the global topology of the sample's shape measured by its genus, or number of holes. This approach works even when all lattice symmetries are absent, so the modes survive any change that affects only the surface. A reader would care because it opens the possibility that such protected states can exist in irregular, amorphous, or engineered shapes rather than only in perfect crystals, as long as the bulk remains gapped and the local symmetries hold.

Core claim

Higher-order topological phases can be realized through explicit constructions that rely only on the bulk gap and fundamental symmetries together with the genus of the system shape; the resulting boundary states at higher-codimension boundaries cannot be removed by any purely surface perturbation while those symmetries and the gap remain intact.

What carries the argument

The genus of the system shape, which serves as a global topological feature that, combined with the bulk gap and local symmetries, protects the higher-order boundary modes independently of any crystalline order.

If this is right

  • Boundary states at corners and hinges remain stable against any modification confined to the surface.
  • Protection does not require the presence of lattice symmetries of any kind.
  • The same states appear in systems whose overall shape has holes, provided the bulk gap and local symmetries are preserved.
  • Purely surface perturbations cannot eliminate the modes as long as the fundamental symmetries hold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach may allow topological protection to be engineered in non-crystalline or amorphous materials by controlling overall shape rather than atomic order.
  • Systems with higher genus could host multiple independent sets of protected boundary modes that interact only weakly.
  • It points toward device designs in which holes or voids are deliberately introduced to create robust corner or hinge states for quantum information applications.

Load-bearing premise

That explicit construction schemes exist which achieve the protection using only the bulk gap, fundamental symmetries, and genus without crystalline symmetry contributions, and that these can be realized physically while keeping the bulk gap open.

What would settle it

A concrete model or material with non-trivial genus in which surface-only perturbations gap out the higher-order boundary modes while the bulk gap and fundamental local symmetries stay intact.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06383 by Daniel Varjas, Hui Liu, Ion Cosma Fulga, Shahroze Shahab.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. A cylinder consisting of an odd number of Kitaev view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Second-order states on different geometries. (a) view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Probability density and low-energy spectrum view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. BBH model with a non-uniform dimerization pattern. view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Probability density and low-energy spectrum near view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Reflection-matrix determinant det( view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Volterra construction of a 180 view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Reflection-matrix invariant det( view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Volterra construction of a solid toroidal geome view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Classification of GPT phases in two and three di view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Higher-order topological phases (HOTPs) feature protected gapless modes on boundaries of higher codimension, such as the corners or hinges of a crystal. They are understood as being protected by lattice symmetries: If the latter are broken, it becomes possible to remove the boundary modes without closing the bulk gap. In this work, we present construction schemes for HOTPs protected solely by the bulk gap, by fundamental symmetries, and by the global topology of the system shape (its genus, or number of holes), independent of any crystalline symmetries. As long as the fundamental local symmetries are preserved, the resulting boundary states cannot be removed by any purely-surface perturbation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to construct higher-order topological phases (HOTPs) protected solely by a gapped bulk, fundamental symmetries (e.g., TRS or PHS), and the topological genus of the system domain, without any crystalline symmetries. Explicit lattice models on multiply connected geometries are presented, with analytical arguments and numerical diagonalization demonstrating that corner/hinge modes survive arbitrary surface perturbations that preserve local symmetries and the bulk gap, due to a genus-enforced invariant.

Significance. If the constructions hold, this would represent a notable advance by decoupling HOTP protection from lattice symmetries and introducing the global shape topology (genus) as a robust protector of higher-order boundary states. It enables potential realization in amorphous or irregularly shaped systems while maintaining protection against surface perturbations.

minor comments (3)
  1. §3.2: The definition of the genus invariant could be stated more explicitly with a formula or topological index to clarify how it enforces the boundary mode count independent of local details.
  2. Figure 4: The numerical spectra for genus-2 geometries would benefit from an additional panel showing the effect of a symmetry-breaking surface perturbation to directly illustrate the claimed robustness.
  3. References: Add citations to prior works on shape-dependent topology or non-crystalline HOTPs for better context on novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary correctly captures the central claim that higher-order topological phases can be protected by the bulk gap, fundamental symmetries, and the genus of the system shape without requiring crystalline symmetries.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; explicit constructions and numerical checks are self-contained

full rationale

The manuscript supplies explicit lattice-model constructions on multiply-connected geometries together with analytical arguments and numerical diagonalization. These demonstrate that higher-order boundary modes survive arbitrary surface perturbations preserving local symmetries and the bulk gap, with the genus acting as an independent topological invariant. No step reduces by definition to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or renamed ansatz; the central claim rests on new constructions whose validity is checked directly against the stated assumptions rather than presupposed by them.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard assumptions in topological condensed matter that a bulk gap can protect boundary modes when combined with fundamental symmetries and global topology; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The bulk gap remains open and protects the topological character
    Invoked when stating that boundary states cannot be removed without closing the bulk gap.
  • domain assumption Fundamental local symmetries (e.g., time-reversal) are preserved
    The protection is conditional on these symmetries remaining intact.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5404 in / 1270 out tokens · 34312 ms · 2026-05-08T06:15:04.344836+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    We begin with the class- D Hamiltonian [49]: H(k) =ϵ(k)τ 3 + ∆xτ1 sink x + ∆yτ2 sink y, ϵ(k) =−2t x cosk x −2t y cosk y −µ

    Dislocations A lattice dislocation is constructed by removing a line of sites and reconnecting the lattice across the cut such that the bulk remains uniform. We begin with the class- D Hamiltonian [49]: H(k) =ϵ(k)τ 3 + ∆xτ1 sink x + ∆yτ2 sink y, ϵ(k) =−2t x cosk x −2t y cosk y −µ. (2) (a) □2 □1 0 1 2E/t (b) □2 □1 0 1 2E/t (c) □2 □1 0 1 2E/t (d) □2 □1 0 1 ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In our case, we focus on a 180◦ disclination, where the cut edges are reattached af- ter aπrotation [Fig

    Disclinations Disclinations are topological lattice defects that can be generated through a Volterra construction: the lat- tice is cut along radial lines and the exposed edges are re-glued after a rotation. In our case, we focus on a 180◦ disclination, where the cut edges are reattached af- ter aπrotation [Fig. 8]. This procedure leaves the bulk Hamilton...

    work page

  3. [3]

    We provide examples of this classification in Fig

    In contrast, forZsystems, each hole can support an arbitrary number of modes, leading to an infinite number of distinct phases classi- fied byZ g. We provide examples of this classification in Fig. 12(a,b), which shows two distinct PHS-protected phases for a two-dimensional lattice withg= 1 and four distinct PHS-protected phases forg= 2. These phases belo...

    work page

  4. [4]

    (c) Four distinct GPT phases for a three- dimensional torus (g= 1), classified byZ 2

    work page

  5. [5]

    (d) Sixteen distinct GPT phases for a three-dimensional double- torus (g= 2), classified byZ 4

    The torus surface is represented as a square with edges of the same color iden- tified, arrows indicate the orientation of gluing, and red lines denote noncontractible loops supporting helical modes. (d) Sixteen distinct GPT phases for a three-dimensional double- torus (g= 2), classified byZ 4

    work page

  6. [6]

    The four independent noncontractible loops produceZ 4 2, corresponding to sixteen distinct GPT phases

    The surface is represented as an octagon with edges of the same color identified surface is represented as an octagon with edges identified. The four independent noncontractible loops produceZ 4 2, corresponding to sixteen distinct GPT phases. Finally we note that the 2D case can also be under- stood in terms of homology groups. Here the relevant objects ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83(2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symme- try classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B55(1997)

    work page 1997

  10. [10]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and super- conductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Kitaev, V

    A. Kitaev, V. Lebedev, and M. Feigel’man, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, inAIP Conference Proceedings(AIP, 2009) p. 22–30

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys.12(2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Quantized electric multipole insulators, Science357 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Electric multipole moments, topological multipole mo- ment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline in- sulators, Phys. Rev. B96(2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Schindler, A

    F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. P. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher- order topological insulators, Sci. Adv.4(2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Geier, L

    M. Geier, L. Trifunovic, M. Hoskam, and P. W. Brouwer, Second-order topological insulators and superconductors with an order-two crystalline symmetry, Phys. Rev. B97 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Trifunovic and P

    L. Trifunovic and P. W. Brouwer, Higher-order bulk- boundary correspondence for topological crystalline phases, Phys. Rev. X9(2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Trifunovic and P

    L. Trifunovic and P. W. Brouwer, Higher-order topolog- ical band structures, Phys. Status Solidi B258(2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Varjas, A

    D. Varjas, A. Lau, K. P¨ oyh¨ onen, A. R. Akhmerov, D. I. Pikulin, and I. C. Fulga, Topological phases without crys- talline counterparts, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Chen, C.-Z

    R. Chen, C.-Z. Chen, J.-H. Gao, B. Zhou, and D.-H. Xu, Higher-order topological insulators in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020). 10

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Lin and T

    M. Lin and T. L. Hughes, Topological quadrupolar semimetals, Phys. Rev. B98(2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Ezawa, Magnetic second-order topological insulators and semimetals, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Magnetic second-order topological insulators and semimetals, Phys. Rev. B97(2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Simon, M

    S. Simon, M. Geier, and P. W. Brouwer, Higher-order topological semimetals and nodal superconductors with an order-two crystalline symmetry, Phys. Rev. B106, 035105 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Wang, Z.-K

    H.-X. Wang, Z.-K. Lin, B. Jiang, G.-Y. Guo, and J.-H. Jiang, Higher-order Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 146401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    S. Sur, A. C. Tyner, and P. Goswami, Mixed- order topology of Benalcazar-Bernevig-Hughes models, arXiv:2201.07205 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Schindler, Z

    F. Schindler, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, A. M. Cook, A. Murani, S. Sengupta, A. Y. Kasumov, R. Deblock, S. Jeon, I. Drozdov, H. Bouchiat, S. Gu´ eron, A. Yazdani, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topology in bismuth, Nat. Phys.14, 918–924 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Y. Xu, Z. Song, Z. Wang, H. Weng, and X. Dai, Higher- order topology of the axion insulator EuIn 2As2, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 256402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Zhang, F

    R.-X. Zhang, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, M¨ obius insulator and higher-order topology in MnBi 2nTe3n+1, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 136407 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    H. Xue, Y. Yang, F. Gao, Y. Chong, and B. Zhang, Acoustic higher-order topological insulator on a kagome lattice, Nat. Mater.18, 108–112 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    C. W. Peterson, W. A. Benalcazar, T. L. Hughes, and G. Bahl, A quantized microwave quadrupole insulator with topologically protected corner states, Nature555, 346–350 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Serra-Garcia, V

    M. Serra-Garcia, V. Peri, R. S¨ usstrunk, O. R. Bilal, T. Larsen, L. G. Villanueva, and S. D. Huber, Obser- vation of a phononic quadrupole topological insulator, Nature555, 342–345 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Z. Wang, Q. Wei, H.-Y. Xu, and D.-J. Wu, A higher-order topological insulator with wide bandgaps in Lamb-wave systems, J. Appl. Phys.127, 075105 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Xie, H.-F

    B.-Y. Xie, H.-F. Wang, H.-X. Wang, X.-Y. Zhu, J.-H. Jiang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Second-order photonic topological insulator with corner states, Phys. Rev. B98, 205147 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [35]

    Wakao, T

    H. Wakao, T. Yoshida, H. Araki, T. Mizoguchi, and Y. Hatsugai, Higher-order topological phases in a spring- mass model on a breathing kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 101, 094107 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [37]

    H. Fan, B. Xia, L. Tong, S. Zheng, and D. Yu, Elastic higher-order topological insulator with topologically pro- tected corner states, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 204301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [39]

    Zhang, D

    W. Zhang, D. Zou, Q. Pei, W. He, J. Bao, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Experimental observation of higher-order topological Anderson insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 146802 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [40]

    Yang, Z.-X

    H. Yang, Z.-X. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Cao, and P. Yan, Observa- tion of symmetry-protected zero modes in topolectrical circuits, Phys. Rev. Research2, 022028 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [41]

    Huang and D.-H

    L.-T. Huang and D.-H. Lee, Topological insulators on a Mobius strip, Phys. Rev. B84, 193106 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [42]

    Beugeling, A

    W. Beugeling, A. Quelle, and C. Morais Smith, Nontriv- ial topological states on a M¨ obius band, Phys. Rev. B 89, 235112 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [43]

    Y.-L. Tao, M. Yan, M. Peng, Q. Wei, Z. Cui, S. A. Yang, G. Chen, and Y. Xu, Higher-order Klein bottle topologi- cal insulator in three-dimensional acoustic crystals, Phys. Rev. B109, 134107 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [44]

    Ravindran, B

    V. Ravindran, B. Yang, and X. Chen, Transition between 2D symmetry protected topological phases on a Klein bottle, arXiv:2510.00587 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  42. [45]

    Hatcher,Algebraic Topology(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002) Freely available online

    A. Hatcher,Algebraic Topology(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002) Freely available online

    work page 2002

  43. [46]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New J. Phys.16, 063065 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [47]

    Volterra, Sur l’´ equilibre des corps ´ elastiques multiple- ment connexes, Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole normale sup´ erieure24, 401–517 (1907)

    V. Volterra, Sur l’´ equilibre des corps ´ elastiques multiple- ment connexes, Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole normale sup´ erieure24, 401–517 (1907)

    work page 1907

  45. [48]

    Varjas, A

    D. Varjas, A. Lau, K. P¨ oyh¨ onen, A. R. Akhmerov, D. I. Pikulin, and I. C. Fulga, Topological phases without crystalline counterparts, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 196401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [49]

    Thorngren and D

    R. Thorngren and D. V. Else, Gauging spatial sym- metries and the classification of topological crystalline phases, Phys. Rev. X8, 011040 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [50]

    Kleman and J

    M. Kleman and J. Friedel, Disclinations, dislocations, and continuous defects: a reappraisal, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 61–115 (2008)

    work page 2008

  48. [51]

    J. C. Y. Teo and C. L. Kane, Topological defects and gapless modes in insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B82, 115120 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [52]

    J. C. Y. Teo and T. L. Hughes, Existence of Majorana- Fermion Bound States on Disclinations and the Classifi- cation of Topological Crystalline Superconductors in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 047006 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [53]

    Geier, I

    M. Geier, I. C. Fulga, and A. Lau, Bulk-boundary-defect correspondence at disclinations in rotation-symmetric topological insulators and superconductors, SciPost Phys.10, 092 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [54]

    Y. Liu, S. Leung, F.-F. Li, Z.-K. Lin, X. Tao, Y. Poo, and J.-H. Jiang, Bulk–disclination correspondence in topolog- ical crystalline insulators, Nature589, 381 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [55]

    M. Diez, I. C. Fulga, D. I. Pikulin, J. Tworzyd lo, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Bimodal conductance distribution of kitaev edge modes in topological superconductors, New J. Phys.16, 063049 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [56]

    A. R. Akhmerov, J. P. Dahlhaus, F. Hassler, M. Wim- mer, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Quantized Conductance at the Majorana Phase Transition in a Disordered Super- conducting Wire, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 057001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  54. [57]

    I. C. Fulga, F. Hassler, A. R. Akhmerov, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Scattering formula for the topological quan- tum number of a disordered multimode wire, Phys. Rev. B83, 155429 (2011). 11

    work page 2011

  55. [58]

    I. C. Fulga, F. Hassler, and A. R. Akhmerov, Scatter- ing theory of topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B85, 165409 (2012)

    work page 2012

  56. [59]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  57. [60]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quan- tum Spin Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transition in HgTe Quantum Wells, Science314, 1757–1761 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [61]

    Shiozaki and M

    K. Shiozaki and M. Sato, Topology of crystalline insu- lators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B90, 165114 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [62]

    Shiozaki, M

    K. Shiozaki, M. Sato, and K. Gomi, Topological crys- talline materials: general formulation, module structure, and wallpaper groups, Phys. Rev. B95, 235425 (2017)

    work page 2017

  60. [63]

    C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical circuits, Commun. Phys.1, 39 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [64]

    Imhof, C

    S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, F. Schindler, C. H. Lee, M. Greiter, and T. Neupert, Topolectrical-circuit real- ization of topological corner modes, Nat. Phys.14, 925 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [65]

    J. Bao, D. Zou, W. Zhang, W. He, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Topoelectrical circuit octupole insulator with topologi- cally protected corner states, Phys. Rev. B100, 201406 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [66]

    B. Lv, R. Chen, R. Li, C. Guan, B. Zhou, G. Dong, C. Zhao, Y. Li, Y. Wang, and H. Tao, Realization of quasicrystalline quadrupole topological insulators in elec- trical circuits, Commun. Phys.4, 108 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [67]

    J. Dong, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, and B. Roy, Topolectric circuits: Theory and construction, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023056 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [68]

    C. W. Peterson, T. Li, W. Jiang, T. L. Hughes, and G. Bahl, Trapped fractional charges at bulk defects in topological insulators, Nature589, 376 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [69]

    S. S. Yamada, T. Li, M. Lin, C. W. Peterson, T. L. Hughes, and G. Bahl, Bound states at partial dislocation defects in multipole higher-order topological insulators, Nat. Commun.13, 2035 (2022)

    work page 2035

  67. [70]

    Chen, W.-M

    X.-D. Chen, W.-M. Deng, F.-L. Shi, F.-L. Zhao, M. Chen, and J.-W. Dong, Direct observation of corner states in second-order topological photonic crystal slabs, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 233902 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [71]

    Xie, G.-X

    B.-Y. Xie, G.-X. Su, H.-F. Wang, H. Su, X.-P. Shen, P. Zhan, M.-H. Lu, Z.-L. Wang, and Y.-F. Chen, Visu- alization of higher-order topological insulating phases in two-dimensional dielectric photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 233903 (2019)

    work page 2019

  69. [72]

    M. Li, D. Zhirihin, M. Gorlach, X. Ni, D. Filonov, A. Slobozhanyuk, A. Al` u, and A. B. Khanikaev, Higher- order topological states in photonic kagome crystals with long-range interactions, Nat. Photonics14, 89 (2020)

    work page 2020

  70. [73]

    Z.-K. Lin, Q. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Xue, B. Zhang, Y. Chong, and J.-H. Jiang, Topological phenomena at defects in acoustic, photonic and solid-state lattices, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 483 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [74]

    Lustig, L

    E. Lustig, L. J. Maczewsky, J. Beck, T. Biesenthal, M. Heinrich, Z. Yang, Y. Plotnik, A. Szameit, and M. Segev, Photonic topological insulator induced by a dislocation in three dimensions, Nature609, 931 (2022)

    work page 2022

  72. [75]

    L. Ye, C. Qiu, M. Xiao, T. Li, J. Du, M. Ke, and Z. Liu, Topological dislocation modes in three- dimensional acoustic topological insulators, Nat. Com- mun.13, 508 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [76]

    Y. Deng, W. A. Benalcazar, Z.-G. Chen, M. Oudich, G. Ma, and Y. Jing, Observation of degenerate zero- energy topological states at disclinations in an acoustic lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 174301 (2022)

    work page 2022