Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 101 references

AI-Powered Sustainable Finance: An Integrative Taxonomy and Framework of AI Applications for Sustainable Investment Decision-Making

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A taxonomy of AI methods organizes their use in ESG analysis and investment decisions.

desk verdict This is a literature synthesis that maps AI methods onto ESG tasks but asserts without evidence that the map solves data barriers. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.26076 v1 pith:YC2GWOTZ submitted 2026-05-25 cs.CE

Eduardo C. Garrido-Merchán , Esther Vaquero Lafuente , Elisa Aracil This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CE
keywords artificialintelligencesustainablefinanceESGtaxonomymachinelearningnaturallanguageprocessinginvestmentdecision-makingdatabarriers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews recent literature to build a taxonomy that groups AI techniques by their algorithms and shows how each group applies to ESG-related financial tasks. It separates machine learning into supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement forms, adds natural language processing and optimization routines, and maps them onto concrete uses such as ESG score prediction, controversy spotting, portfolio construction, and report reading. From this map the authors derive a framework that points to specific technological applications meant to reduce the data problems that currently limit sustainable investing. A sympathetic reader would care because clearer categories could let practitioners choose and combine tools more deliberately when they incorporate environmental, social, and governance factors into capital allocation.

What carries the argument

The AI Taxonomy that groups supervised, unsupervised, reinforcement learning, natural language processing, and optimization methods according to their algorithms and their documented impact on ESG financial processes.

What would settle it

An audit of investment teams that applies the taxonomy and framework yet still encounters the same ESG data gaps or fails to improve decision outcomes relative to teams using no taxonomy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By synthesizing findings from the recent literature, the review produces an AI Taxonomy that places machine learning paradigms, natural language processing techniques, and optimization algorithms into categories based on their underlying methods and their documented effects on ESG financial processes; the taxonomy is then used to construct a framework of AI-powered sustainable finance that identifies technological applications capable of overcoming ESG data barriers.

Load-bearing premise

Synthesizing findings from recent literature is enough to produce a comprehensive taxonomy and an actionable framework that reliably identifies applications capable of overcoming ESG data barriers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Supervised learning can be applied to predict ESG scores from available data.
  • Natural language processing can detect controversies in sustainability reports or news.
  • Optimization algorithms can support portfolio management that incorporates ESG constraints.
  • Unsupervised and reinforcement learning can assist in analyzing unstructured ESG information.
  • The resulting framework supplies practitioners with a menu of AI tools matched to specific ESG process bottlenecks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Practitioners could test the taxonomy by mapping their current ESG tools onto its categories and measuring whether the mapping reveals previously unused methods.
  • Regulators might use the framework to set minimum data-quality standards that AI applications must meet before they are accepted in sustainable-finance reporting.
  • Future empirical work could compare portfolios built with and without the taxonomy-guided AI choices to quantify any reduction in ESG data uncertainty.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that AI integration into sustainable finance constitutes a transformative paradigm shift for analyzing, predicting, and incorporating ESG factors into investment decisions. It offers a taxonomy of AI methods—supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, plus NLP and optimization algorithms—applied to ESG score prediction, controversy detection, portfolio management, and sustainability report analysis. By synthesizing recent literature, the paper asserts that an integrative framework emerges that identifies specific technological applications capable of overcoming ESG data barriers (inconsistency, scarcity, lack of standardization).

Significance. If the taxonomy proves comprehensive and the framework supplies actionable, literature-grounded mappings, the work could serve as a useful organizing reference for researchers and practitioners entering AI-enabled sustainable finance. The integrative scope across multiple AI paradigms is a positive feature of a review paper. However, because the manuscript contains no new derivations, datasets, or empirical tests, its significance rests entirely on the rigor and completeness of the literature synthesis rather than on falsifiable predictions or reproducible results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the framework 'identifies technological applications to overcome ESG data barriers' is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet no section supplies a systematic review protocol, explicit search string, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or any quantitative before/after metrics linking specific techniques to barrier reduction. The synthesis therefore remains classificatory.
  2. [Framework emergence section] Framework emergence section: No falsifiable mapping is provided from individual AI methods (e.g., reinforcement learning or NLP) to measurable reductions in ESG data inconsistency or scarcity; the argument therefore does not demonstrate that the listed applications reliably overcome the stated barriers.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from an explicit statement of the review methodology (or its absence) so readers can assess the completeness of the taxonomy.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback highlighting the scope and claims of our literature synthesis. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the framework 'identifies technological applications to overcome ESG data barriers' is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet no section supplies a systematic review protocol, explicit search string, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or any quantitative before/after metrics linking specific techniques to barrier reduction. The synthesis therefore remains classificatory.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript is a narrative review and does not include a formal systematic review protocol, search strings, or quantitative metrics of barrier reduction. The framework is constructed by organizing applications described across the cited literature as targeting ESG data challenges. We will revise the abstract to state that the framework synthesizes literature on AI applications proposed or used to address ESG data barriers, rather than asserting that it identifies applications proven to overcome them. This adjustment aligns the claim with the classificatory nature of the work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Framework emergence section] Framework emergence section: No falsifiable mapping is provided from individual AI methods (e.g., reinforcement learning or NLP) to measurable reductions in ESG data inconsistency or scarcity; the argument therefore does not demonstrate that the listed applications reliably overcome the stated barriers.

    Authors: As a review paper without new empirical tests, the manuscript does not provide falsifiable mappings or quantitative demonstrations of barrier reduction; the mappings reflect how the synthesized literature describes the application of these methods to ESG processes. We will add an explicit limitations paragraph noting that while the literature indicates potential for addressing data inconsistency and scarcity, rigorous empirical validation of reliable barrier reduction remains an open research need. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: literature synthesis without reduction to inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper is a review that constructs a taxonomy by grouping ML/NLP/optimization methods drawn from existing literature and asserts that a framework emerges from this synthesis. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or uniqueness theorems are present. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation, ansatz, or renamed input; the central claim remains a classificatory summary whose evidentiary strength is separate from circularity. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a descriptive synthesis.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the recent literature is representative enough to support a comprehensive taxonomy and that the identified AI applications can overcome ESG data barriers; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are stated in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Recent literature on AI for ESG analysis is sufficiently complete and unbiased to allow construction of a comprehensive taxonomy.
    The paper states it synthesizes findings from the recent literature without providing selection criteria or bias checks in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AI-Powered Sustainable Finance: An Integrative Taxonomy and Framework of AI Applications for Sustainable Investment Decision-Making." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YC2GWOTZ

@misc{pith2026260526076,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AI-Powered Sustainable Finance: An Integrative Taxonomy and Framework of AI Applications for Sustainable Investment Decision-Making},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YC2GWOTZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.26076}
}
read the original abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence into sustainable finance represents a transformative paradigm shift in how Environmental, Social, and Governance factors are analyzed, predicted, and incorporated into investment decisions. This review provides a comprehensive taxonomy of AI approaches applicable to sustainable investment decision-making, categorizing methodologies based on their underlying algorithms and their impact on ESG-related financial processes. The proposed AI Taxonomy includes machine learning paradigms -- including supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning -- as well as natural language processing techniques and optimization algorithms, examining their specific applications in ESG score prediction, controversy detection, portfolio management, and sustainability report analysis. By synthesizing findings from the recent literature, a framework emerges on AI-powered sustainable finance that identifies technological applications to overcome ESG data barriers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26076 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. ADO framework of AI integration in ESG-driven sustainable finance. Data from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. AI Technologies Taxonomy that are applied for ESG factors during these years. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Big Data Technologies Taxonomy. Data augmentation expands limited datasets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Deep Reinforcement Learning framework for ESG-integrated portfolio manage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Multi-objective optimization for ESG portfolio management. The Pareto fron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Natural Language Processing pipeline for ESG document analysis. Multiple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Agosto, A., Cerchiello, P., and Giudici, P. (2025). Bayesian learning models to measure the relative impact of ESG factors on credit ratings. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics , 20(2):357--368

    2025

  2. [2]

    Agosto, A., Giudici, P., and Tanda, A. (2023). How to combine ESG scores? a proposal based on credit rating prediction. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 30(6):3222--3230

    2023

  3. [3]

    Al-Sartawi, A. M. A., Hussainey, K., and Razzaque, A. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in sustainable finance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment , pages 1--6

    2022

  4. [4]

    Al-Sartawi, A. M. A. M., Abd Wahab, M. H., and Hussainey, K., editors (2024). Global Economic Revolutions: Big Data Governance and Business Analytics for Sustainability , Communications in Computer and Information Science, Cham. Springer Nature Switzerland

    2024

  5. [5]

    Asif, M., Searcy, C., and Castka, P. (2023). ESG and Industry 5.0 : The role of technologies in enhancing ESG disclosure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 195:122806

    2023

  6. [6]

    Bang, J., Ryu, D., and Yu, J. (2023). ESG controversies and investor trading behavior in the Korean market. Finance Research Letters , 54:103750

    2023

  7. [7]

    Annual economic report 2023

    Bank for International Settlements (2023). Annual economic report 2023. Technical report, Bank for International Settlements, Basel

    2023

  8. [8]

    Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Sch \"u tze, F., and Visentin, G. (2017). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change , 7(4):283--288

    2017

Show all 101 references
  1. [9]

    Ben Jabeur, S., Khalfaoui, R., and Ben Arfi, W. (2021). The effect of green energy, global environmental indexes, and stock markets in predicting oil price crashes: Evidence from explainable machine learning. Journal of Environmental Management , 298:113511

    2021

  2. [10]

    F., and Rigobon, R

    Berg, F., K \"o lbel, J. F., and Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance , 26(6):1315--1344

    2022

  3. [11]

    A., Kraus, M., Leippold, M., and Webersinke, N

    Bingler, J. A., Kraus, M., Leippold, M., and Webersinke, N. (2022). Cheap talk and cherry-picking: What ClimateBert has to say on corporate climate risk disclosures. Finance Research Letters , 47:102776

    2022

  4. [12]

    Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning . Springer

    2006

  5. [13]

    and Henri, J.-F

    Boiral, O. and Henri, J.-F. (2017). Is sustainability performance comparable? A study of GRI reports of mining organizations. Business & Society , 56(2):283--317

    2017

  6. [14]

    and Kacperczyk, M

    Bolton, P. and Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics , 142(2):517--549

    2021

  7. [15]

    Burnaev, E., Mironov, E., Shpilman, A., Mironenko, M., and Katalevsky, D. (2023). Practical AI cases for solving ESG challenges. Sustainability , 15(17):12731

    2023

  8. [16]

    Camilleri, M. A. (2015). Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe . Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal , 6(2):224--242

    2015

  9. [17]

    Campiglio, E., Deyris, J., Romelli, D., and Scalisi, G. (2025). Warning words in a warming world: Central bank communication and climate change. European Economic Review , 178:105101

    2025

  10. [18]

    K., Durand, R., Levine, D

    Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., and Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal , 37(8):1597--1614

    2016

  11. [19]

    K., Levine, D

    Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., and Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy , 18(1):125--169

    2009

  12. [20]

    and King, T

    Citterio, A. and King, T. (2023). The role of environmental, social, and governance ( ESG ) in predicting bank financial distress. Finance Research Letters , 51:103411

    2023

  13. [21]

    Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society , 1(1):104--126

    1988

  14. [22]

    D'Amato, V., D'Ecclesia, R., and Levantesi, S. (2021). Fundamental ratios as predictors of ESG scores: A machine learning approach. Decisions in Economics and Finance , 44(2):1087--1110

    2021

  15. [23]

    Day, M.-Y., Yang, C.-Y., and Ni, Y. (2023). Portfolio dynamic trading strategies using deep reinforcement learning. Soft Computing , 27(15-16):8715--8730

    2023

  16. [24]

    C., and Coronado-Vaca, M

    de-la Rica-Escudero, A., Garrido-Merch \'a n, E. C., and Coronado-Vaca, M. (2025). Explainable post hoc portfolio management financial policy of a deep reinforcement learning agent. PLOS ONE , 20(1):e0315528

    2025

  17. [25]

    De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., and Bartlett, M. (2020). Does good ESG lead to better financial performances by firms? machine learning and logistic regression models of public enterprises in Europe . Sustainability , 12(13):5317

    2020

  18. [26]

    Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT : Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language ...

    2019

  19. [27]

    G., Ioannou, I., and Serafeim, G

    Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., and Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science , 60(11):2835--2857

    2014

  20. [28]

    R., and Iannario, M

    Elbouknify, I., Machado, M. R., and Iannario, M. (2026). Designing green artificial intelligence ( Green AI ) models for finance: A novel approach for sustainable and responsible adoption. Financial Innovation , 12(1):96

    2026

  21. [29]

    u ksel, S., Din c er, H., G \

    Eti, S., Y \"u ksel, S., Din c er, H., G \"o kalp, Y., Y ld z, H., Erg \"u n, E., and Acar, M. (2026). Machine learning-enhanced fuzzy framework for prioritizing financial risk management techniques in renewable energy projects. Financial Innovation , 12(1):85

    2026

  22. [30]

    Friede, G., Busch, T., and Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment , 5(4):210--233

    2015

  23. [31]

    Garc \' a Garc \' a, F., Gankova-Ivanova, T., Gonz \'a lez-Bueno, J., Oliver-Muncharaz, J., and Tamosiuniene, R. (2022). What is the cost of maximizing ESG performance in the portfolio selection strategy? the case of the dow jones index average stocks. Entrepreneurship and Sus...

    2022

  24. [32]

    C., Gonz \'a lez-Barthe, C., and Coronado Vaca, M

    Garrido-Merch \'a n, E. C., Gonz \'a lez-Barthe, C., and Coronado Vaca, M. (2023a). Fine-tuning ClimateBert transformer with ClimaText for the disclosure analysis of climate-related financial risks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13373

  25. [33]

    C., Gonz \'a lez Piris, G., and Coronado Vaca, M

    Garrido-Merch \'a n, E. C., Gonz \'a lez Piris, G., and Coronado Vaca, M. (2023b). Bayesian optimization of ESG (environmental social governance) financial investments. Environmental Research Communications , 5(5):055003

  26. [34]

    C., Mora-Figueroa, S., and Coronado-Vaca, M

    Garrido-Merch \'a n, E. C., Mora-Figueroa, S., and Coronado-Vaca, M. (2024). Multi-objective Bayesian optimization of deep reinforcement learning for environmental, social, and governance ( ESG ) financial portfolio management. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Ma...

    2024

  27. [35]

    C., Mora-Figueroa-Cruz-Guzm \'a n, S., and Coronado-Vaca, M

    Garrido-Merch \'a n, E. C., Mora-Figueroa-Cruz-Guzm \'a n, S., and Coronado-Vaca, M. (2023c). Deep reinforcement learning for ESG financial portfolio management. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09631

  28. [36]

    L., Koch, A., and Starks, L

    Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., and Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance , 66:101889

    2021

  29. [37]

    Global sustainable investment review 2020

    Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (2021). Global sustainable investment review 2020. Technical report, Global Sustainable Investment Alliance

    2021

  30. [38]

    Global sustainable investment review 2022

    Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (2022). Global sustainable investment review 2022. Technical report, GSIA

    2022

  31. [39]

    W., Kumar, S., Lim, W

    Goodell, J. W., Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., and Pattnaik, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: Identifying foundations, themes, and research clusters from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance , 32:100577

    2021

  32. [40]

    Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning . MIT Press

    2016

  33. [41]

    and Garrido-Merch \'a n, E

    Gozalo-Brizuela, R. and Garrido-Merch \'a n, E. C. (2023). ChatGPT is not all you need. a state of the art review of large generative AI models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04655

    2023

  34. [42]

    Gupta, A., Chadha, A., and Tewari, V. (2024). A natural language processing model on BERT and YAKE technique for keyword extraction on sustainability reports. IEEE Access

    2024

  35. [43]

    and Yan, H

    Gupta, S. and Yan, H. (2025). Using large language models to estimate novel risk: Impact on volatility. Journal of Portfolio Management , 51(7)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning . Springer

    2009

  37. [45]

    Jaiswal, R., Gupta, S., and Tiwari, A. K. (2024). Decoding mood of the twitterverse on ESG investing: Opinion mining and key themes using machine learning. Management Research Review , 47(8):1221--1252

    2024

  38. [46]

    James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Taylor, J. (2023). An Introduction to Statistical Learning . Springer, 2nd edition

    2023

  39. [47]

    Kazakov, A., Denisova, S., Barsola, I., Kalugina, E., Molchanova, I., Egorov, I., Kosterina, A., Tereshchenko, E., Shutikhina, L., Doroshchenko, I., Sotiriadi, N., and Budennyy, S. (2023). ESGify : Automated classification of environmental, social and corporate governance risk...

    2023

  40. [48]

    F., Heeb, F., Paetzold, F., and Busch, T

    K \"o lbel, J. F., Heeb, F., Paetzold, F., and Busch, T. (2020). Can sustainable investing save the world? R eviewing the mechanisms of investor impact. Organization & Environment , 33(4):554--574

    2020

  41. [49]

    LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature , 521(7553):436--444

    2015

  42. [50]

    H., Park, H., Kim, J

    Lee, H., Lee, S. H., Park, H., Kim, J. H., and Jung, H. S. (2024). ESG2PreEM : Automated ESG grade assessment framework using pre-trained ensemble models. Heliyon , 10(4):e26404

    2024

  43. [51]

    Lheureux, Y. (2023). Predictive insights: Leveraging Twitter sentiments and machine learning for environmental, social and governance controversy prediction. Journal of Computational Social Science , 7:23--44

    2023

  44. [52]

    Liao, C.-F. (2025). ESG disclosure frequency and its association with market performance: Evidence from Taiwan . Sustainability , 17(17):7812

    2025

  45. [53]

    M., Yap, S.-F., and Makkar, M

    Lim, W. M., Yap, S.-F., and Makkar, M. (2021). Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading? Journal of Business Research , 122:534--566

    2021

  46. [54]

    Liu, X.-Y., Yang, H., Chen, Q., Zhang, R., Yang, L., Xiao, B., and Wang, C. D. (2020). FinRL : A deep reinforcement learning library for automated stock trading in quantitative finance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.09607

    2020

  47. [55]

    and McDonald, B

    Loughran, T. and McDonald, B. (2016). Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey. Journal of Accounting Research , 54(4):1187--1230

    2016

  48. [56]

    Lundberg, S. M. and Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 30, pages 4766--4777

    2017

  49. [57]

    Lyon, T. P. and Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment , 28(2):223--249

    2015

  50. [58]

    Malik, M., Mamun, K., and Osman, S. M. I. (2025). Does corruption control enhance ESG -induced firm value? insights from machine learning analysis. Finance Research Letters , 72:106572

    2025

  51. [59]

    and Omlin, C

    Maree, C. and Omlin, C. W. (2022). Balancing profit, risk, and sustainability for portfolio management. In 2022 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering and Economics (CIFEr) , pages 1--8. IEEE

    2022

  52. [60]

    Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance , 7(1):77--91

    1952

  53. [61]

    L., and Hernandez-Perlines, F

    Martin-Melero, I., Gomez-Martinez, R., Medrano-Garcia, M. L., and Hernandez-Perlines, F. (2025). Comparison of sectorial and financial data for ESG scoring of mutual funds with machine learning. Financial Innovation , 11(1):84

    2025

  54. [62]

    McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., and Aguera y Arcas, B. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 1273--1282

    2017

  55. [63]

    H., and Chai, J

    Meng, T., Yahya, M. H., and Chai, J. (2022). Deep learning model for stock excess return prediction based on nonlinear random matrix and ESG factor. Mathematical Problems in Engineering , 2022:5239493

    2022

  56. [64]

    A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M

    Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., Petersen, S., Beattie, C., Sadik, A., Antonoglou, I., King, H., Kumaran, D., Wierstra, D., Legg, S., and Hassabis, D. (2015). Human-le...

    2015

  57. [65]

    Molitor, D., Raghupathi, V., and Saharia, A. (2023). Identifying key issues in climate change litigation: A machine learning text analytic approach. Sustainability , 15(23):16530

    2023

  58. [66]

    Developing sustainable finance definitions and taxonomies

    OECD (2020). Developing sustainable finance definitions and taxonomies. Technical report, OECD Publishing, Paris

    2020

  59. [67]

    Pankratz, N., Bauer, R., and Derwall, J. (2023). Climate change, firm performance, and investor surprises. Management Science , 69(12):7352--7398

    2023

  60. [68]

    and Benito, G

    Paul, J. and Benito, G. R. G. (2018). A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China : what do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? Asia Pacific Business Review , 24(1):90--115

    2018

  61. [69]

    and Criado, A

    Paul, J. and Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review , 29(4):101717

    2020

  62. [70]

    M., O'Cass, A., Hao, A

    Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O'Cass, A., Hao, A. W., and Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews ( SPAR-4-SLR ). International Journal of Consumer Studies , 45(4):O1--O16

    2021

  63. [71]

    Pikatza-Gorrotxategi, N., Borregan-Alvarado, J., and Alvarez-Meaza, I. (2024). News and ESG investment criteria: What's behind it? Social Network Analysis and Mining , 14(1):47

    2024

  64. [72]

    Porter, M. E. and van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives , 9(4):97--118

    1995

  65. [73]

    Rajan, R. G. and Zingales, L. (2003). The great reversals: the politics of financial development in the twentieth century. Journal of Financial Economics , 69(1):5--50

    2003

  66. [74]

    and Aracil, E

    Redondo, H. and Aracil, E. (2024). Climate-related credit risk: Rethinking the credit risk framework. Global Policy , 15(S1):21--33

    2024

  67. [75]

    T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C

    Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016). `` Why should I trust you?'': Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , pages 1135--1144

    2016

  68. [76]

    and Norvig, P

    Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach . Prentice Hall, 3rd edition

    2010

  69. [77]

    Schoenmaker, D. (2017). Investing for the common good: A sustainable finance framework. Technical report, Bruegel, Brussels

    2017

  70. [78]

    and Schramade, W

    Schoenmaker, D. and Schramade, W. (2019). Investing for long-term value creation. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment , 9(4):356--377

    2019

  71. [79]

    Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., and Klimov, O. (2017). Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347

    2017 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Seles, B. M. R. P., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., and de Camargo Fiorini, P. (2018). Business opportunities and challenges as the two sides of the climate change: Corporate responses and potential implications for big data management towards a low carbon socie...

    2018

  73. [81]

    P., and De Freitas, N

    Shahriari, B., Swersky, K., Wang, Z., Adams, R. P., and De Freitas, N. (2016). Taking the human out of the loop: A review of Bayesian optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE , 104(1):148--175

    2016

  74. [82]

    Sustainability accounting research over three decades: A scientometric meta-analysis

    Singhania, M., Chadha, G., and Anisha (2025). Sustainability accounting research over three decades: A scientometric meta-analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 32(2):1698--1734

    2025

  75. [83]

    Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research , 104:333--339

    2019

  76. [84]

    Song, J., Huang, J., Peng, X., Sumran, A., and Wang, Y. (2025). Unveiling internal drivers of corporate greenwashing: A machine learning approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , pages 1--23

    2025

  77. [85]

    Souto, H. G. and Moradi, A. (2026). Enhancing financial risk management: A novel multivariate neural network approach for realized covariance matrix prediction. Financial Innovation , 12(1):25

    2026

  78. [86]

    Sutton, R. S. and Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction . MIT Press, 2nd edition

    2018

  79. [87]

    E., Rana, T., and Danielson, M

    Svanberg, J., Ardeshiri, T., Samsten, I., \"O hman, P., Neidermeyer, P. E., Rana, T., and Danielson, M. (2022). Corporate governance performance ratings with machine learning. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management , 29(1):50--68

    2022

  80. [88]

    Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures

    Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (2017). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures . Technical report, Financial Stability Board

    2017

  81. [89]

    T., Heng, Q

    Teoh, T. T., Heng, Q. K., Chia, J. J., Shie, J. M., Liaw, S. W., Yang, M., and Nguwi, Y. Y. (2019). Machine learning-based corporate social responsibility prediction. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) and IEEE Conference on Robo...

    2019

  82. [90]

    Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review , 15(4):404--428

    2016

  83. [91]

    The future we want: Outcome document of the United Nations conference on sustainable development

    United Nations (2012). The future we want: Outcome document of the United Nations conference on sustainable development. Technical report, United Nations, Rio de Janeiro

    2012

  84. [92]

    Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development

    United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Technical Report A/RES/70/1, United Nations General Assembly

    2015

  85. [93]

    World investment report 2023: Investing in sustainable energy for all

    United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2023). World investment report 2023: Investing in sustainable energy for all. Technical report, UNCTAD, Geneva

    2023

  86. [94]

    The financial system we need: From momentum to transformation

    United Nations Environment Programme (2016). The financial system we need: From momentum to transformation. Technical report, UNEP Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System, Geneva

    2016

  87. [95]

    Adoption of the Paris Agreement

    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement . Technical Report FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1, United Nations

    2015

  88. [96]

    N., Kaiser, ., and Polosukhin, I

    Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, ., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 30, pages 5998--6008

    2017

  89. [97]

    A., and Leippold, M

    Webersinke, N., Kraus, M., Bingler, J. A., and Leippold, M. (2022). ClimateBERT : A pretrained language model for climate-related text. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2022 Fall Symposium: The Role of AI in Responding to Climate Challenges

    2022

  90. [98]

    and Watson, R

    Webster, J. and Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly , 26(2):xiii--xxiii

    2002

  91. [99]

    Sovereign climate and nature reporting: Proposal for a risks and opportunities disclosure framework

    World Bank (2022). Sovereign climate and nature reporting: Proposal for a risks and opportunities disclosure framework. Technical report, World Bank, Washington, DC

    2022

  92. [100]

    Xu, X. (2020). Trust and financial inclusion: A cross-country study. Finance Research Letters , 35:101310

    2020

  93. [101]

    and C ater, T

    Zupic, I. and C ater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods , 18(3):429--472

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.