pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26116 · v1 · pith:IKBUWC5Knew · submitted 2026-05-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

Unifying Early and Late Dark Energy: Dynamical Requirements and Obstructions

William Giar\`e , Jeremy Sakstein This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 20:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords early dark energylate dark energyscalar field potentialHubble tensiontracking dynamicscosmic accelerationunified dark energyconformal coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single scalar field unifying early and late dark energy requires a potential with three distinct slopes in steep-steeper-shallow order.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper checks whether one scalar field can supply both an early dark energy phase before recombination that helps with the Hubble tension and the present-day cosmic acceleration. A bottom-up analysis first lays out the necessary sequence of energy density and equation-of-state behaviors the field must follow. A top-down analysis then converts those behaviors into requirements on the phase-space trajectories of tracking scalar fields. The only potentials that let the field pass through every required regime have three distinct slopes ordered steep, steeper, shallow. The same three-slope structure is still required when the field is allowed conformal couplings to dark matter.

Core claim

Satisfying the dynamical requirements for both early dark energy relevant to pre-recombination Hubble-tension solutions and late-time acceleration necessitates a scalar potential with three distinct slopes arranged in a steep-steeper-shallow hierarchy. This conclusion is unchanged by the addition of conformal couplings to dark matter.

What carries the argument

Phase-space structure of minimally coupled scalar fields obeying tracking-like dynamics, which forces the potential to possess three distinct slopes in steep-steeper-shallow hierarchy to traverse all required regimes.

If this is right

  • Model builders cannot use single-slope or two-slope potentials for unified early-plus-late dark energy.
  • Any viable potential must contain at least three separate slope segments in the specified hierarchy.
  • The three-slope requirement survives the inclusion of conformal couplings between the scalar and dark matter.
  • Attempts to build unified models face narrow constraints on the allowed shape of the scalar potential.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result limits the set of quintessence potentials that can simultaneously address the Hubble tension and late acceleration.
  • Observational bounds on the early dark energy fraction could be combined with late-time equation-of-state measurements to test whether any three-slope potential remains viable.
  • Similar multi-regime requirements may appear in other scalar-field problems that must match both early-universe and late-universe data.

Load-bearing premise

The scalar field must follow tracking-like dynamics throughout its phase-space evolution.

What would settle it

A explicit construction of a scalar potential with only two or fewer distinct slopes that still produces the full sequence of required energy-density and equation-of-state regimes for both early and late dark energy.

read the original abstract

We investigate whether early- and late-time dark energy could arise from a single scalar field. Adopting a bottom-up perspective, we first identify the sequence of dynamical regimes that any unified scenario must traverse to account for both an early dark energy phase relevant for pre-recombination solutions of the Hubble tension and the late-time acceleration of the Universe. We derive the corresponding requirements on the scalar energy density and equation of state. We then adopt a complementary top-down perspective and translate these requirements into constraints on the phase-space structure of minimally coupled scalar fields with tracking-like dynamics. We show that satisfying all requirements necessitates a potential with three distinct slopes, arranged in a steep-steeper-shallow hierarchy. This conclusion remains unchanged in the presence of conformal couplings to dark matter. These results place strong constraints on attempts to construct unified models of early- and late-time dark energy. We discuss implications for model-building.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates whether early dark energy (to address the Hubble tension pre-recombination) and late-time acceleration can arise from a single scalar field. A bottom-up analysis identifies the required sequence of dynamical regimes and derives corresponding conditions on the scalar energy density and equation of state. A complementary top-down analysis then maps these requirements onto the phase-space structure of minimally coupled scalars obeying tracking-like dynamics, concluding that a potential with three distinct slopes in a steep-steeper-shallow hierarchy is necessary; the conclusion is stated to be unchanged under conformal couplings to dark matter.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies concrete dynamical obstructions that constrain attempts to build unified EDE + late-DE scalar models, particularly within the tracking class. The dual bottom-up/top-down framing and the explicit extension to conformal couplings are strengths that could usefully inform model-building efforts aimed at cosmological tensions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (top-down perspective paragraph)] Abstract (top-down perspective paragraph): the necessity of the three-slope hierarchy is derived under the explicit restriction to tracking-like dynamics. The manuscript does not demonstrate that non-tracking trajectories are incapable of satisfying the required ρ_DE(a) and w_DE(a) evolution with a two-slope potential; because the central obstruction claim is framed as applying to unified-model attempts in general, this scoping choice is load-bearing for the strength of the conclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the bottom-up requirements are translated into phase-space constraints, but does not list the explicit conditions on ho_DE and w_DE; adding these (even in summarized form) would improve traceability from the bottom-up to top-down sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and positive assessment of our work. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (top-down perspective paragraph)] Abstract (top-down perspective paragraph): the necessity of the three-slope hierarchy is derived under the explicit restriction to tracking-like dynamics. The manuscript does not demonstrate that non-tracking trajectories are incapable of satisfying the required ρ_DE(a) and w_DE(a) evolution with a two-slope potential; because the central obstruction claim is framed as applying to unified-model attempts in general, this scoping choice is load-bearing for the strength of the conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the top-down analysis and the derived necessity of the three-slope hierarchy are restricted to tracking-like dynamics, as explicitly stated throughout the manuscript (e.g., in the abstract and Section 3). The central obstruction claim is therefore scoped to this class of models. The final sentence of the abstract refers to constraints within this framework. However, to prevent any misinterpretation as applying to all unified models, we will revise the abstract to clarify the scope to 'tracking-like scalar field models'. We note that analyzing non-tracking trajectories would require a different approach and is beyond the current scope, but we do not claim to have excluded them. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: bottom-up requirements mapped to phase-space constraints without self-definition or fitted inputs

full rationale

The paper derives the sequence of dynamical regimes and corresponding requirements on rho_DE(a) and w_DE(a) from the physical goals of EDE pre-recombination plus late acceleration (bottom-up). It then maps these requirements onto the phase-space structure of minimally coupled scalars obeying tracking-like dynamics (top-down), concluding that a steep-steeper-shallow three-slope potential is needed. This mapping is a direct logical translation under an explicitly stated assumption; no equation reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The conformal-coupling claim is an extension of the same framework rather than a circular redefinition. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard domain assumptions in scalar-field cosmology; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Scalar fields with potentials can exhibit tracking-like dynamics in certain regimes of cosmic expansion.
    Invoked when translating requirements into phase-space constraints in the top-down perspective.
  • domain assumption The universe passes through distinct early and late dark energy phases relevant to the Hubble tension and current acceleration.
    Background assumption used to define the sequence of dynamical regimes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5683 in / 1253 out tokens · 35687 ms · 2026-06-29T20:14:53.825931+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

221 extracted references · 47 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Sherwin et al.,Evidence for dark energy from the cosmic microwave background alone using the Atacama Cosmology Telescope lensing measurements,Phys

    B.D. Sherwin et al.,Evidence for dark energy from the cosmic microwave background alone using the Atacama Cosmology Telescope lensing measurements,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 021302 [1105.0419]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    Moresco, L

    M. Moresco, L. Pozzetti, A. Cimatti, R. Jimenez, C. Maraston, L. Verde et al.,A 6% measurement of the Hubble parameter atz∼0.45: direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration,JCAP05(2016) 014 [1601.01701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Rubin and B

    D. Rubin and B. Hayden,Is the expansion of the universe accelerating? All signs point to yes, Astrophys. J. Lett.833(2016) L30 [1610.08972]. – 27 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Haridasu, V.V

    B.S. Haridasu, V.V. Lukovi´ c, R. D’Agostino and N. Vittorio,Strong evidence for an accelerating universe,Astron. Astrophys.600(2017) L1 [1702.08244]. [7]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Yang and Y

    Y. Yang and Y. Gong,The evidence of cosmic acceleration and observational constraints, JCAP06(2020) 059 [1912.07375]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Di Valentino, S

    E. Di Valentino, S. Gariazzo, O. Mena and S. Vagnozzi,Soundness of Dark Energy properties, JCAP07(2020) 045 [2005.02062]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Nadathur, W.J

    S. Nadathur, W.J. Percival, F. Beutler and H. Winther,Testing Low-Redshift Cosmic Acceleration with Large-Scale Structure,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 221301 [2001.11044]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    B.M. Rose, D. Rubin, A. Cikota, S.E. Deustua, S. Dixon, A. Fruchter et al.,Evidence for Cosmic Acceleration is Robust to Observed Correlations Between Type Ia Supernova Luminosity and Stellar Age,Astrophys. J. Lett.896(2020) L4 [2002.12382]. [12]DES, SPTcollaboration,Cosmological constraints from DES Y1 cluster abundances and SPT multiwavelength data,Phys...

    arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Reischke et al.,KiDS-Legacy: Constraining dark energy, neutrino mass, and curvature, 2512.11041

    R. Reischke et al.,KiDS-Legacy: Constraining dark energy, neutrino mass, and curvature, 2512.11041. [19]SPT-3Gcollaboration,SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G main field,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 083504 [2506.20707]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    St¨ olzner et al.,KiDS-Legacy: Consistency of cosmic shear measurements and joint cosmological constraints with external probes,Astron

    B. St¨ olzner et al.,KiDS-Legacy: Consistency of cosmic shear measurements and joint cosmological constraints with external probes,Astron. Astrophys.702(2025) A169 [2503.19442]

    arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Wright et al.,KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey,Astron

    A.H. Wright et al.,KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey,Astron. Astrophys.703(2025) A158 [2503.19441]. [22]DESIcollaboration,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083515 [2503.14738]. [23]DEScollaboration,Dark Energy Surv...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Scolnic et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys

    D. Scolnic et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938(2022) 113 [2112.03863]. – 28 – [26]DEScollaboration,The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration,2511.07517

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    T.J. Hoyt, D. Rubin, G. Aldering, S. Perlmutter, A. Cuceu and R. Gupta,Union3.1: Self-consistent Measurements of Host Galaxy Properties for 2000 Type Ia Supernovae, 2601.19424. [28]DESIcollaboration,Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083511 [2503.14743]

    arXiv 2000

  14. [14]

    Verde, T

    L. Verde, T. Treu and A.G. Riess,Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe,Nature Astron.3(2019) 891 [1907.10625]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Di Valentino et al.,Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension,Astropart

    E. Di Valentino et al.,Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension,Astropart. Phys.131(2021) 102605 [2008.11284]

    arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri et al.,In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 153001 [2103.01183]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara,Challenges forΛCDM: An update,New Astron. Rev.95 (2022) 101659 [2105.05208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Sch¨ oneberg, G

    N. Sch¨ oneberg, G. Franco Abell´ an, A. P´ erez S´ anchez, S.J. Witte, V. Poulin and J. Lesgourgues,The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models,Phys. Rept.984(2022) 1 [2107.10291]

    arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    P. Shah, P. Lemos and O. Lahav,A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant,Astron. Astrophys. Rev.29(2021) 9 [2109.01161]

    arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    E. Abdalla et al.,Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies,JHEAp34(2022) 49 [2203.06142]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Di Valentino,Challenges of the Standard Cosmological Model,Universe8(2022) 399

    E. Di Valentino,Challenges of the Standard Cosmological Model,Universe8(2022) 399

    2022

  22. [22]

    Kamionkowski and A.G

    M. Kamionkowski and A.G. Riess,The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.73(2023) 153 [2211.04492]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Giar` e,CMB Anomalies and the Hubble Tension,2305.16919

    W. Giar` e,CMB Anomalies and the Hubble Tension,2305.16919

    arXiv

  24. [24]

    Hu and F.-Y

    J.-P. Hu and F.-Y. Wang,Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics,Universe9(2023) 94 [2302.05709]

    arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Verde, N

    L. Verde, N. Sch¨ oneberg and H. Gil-Mar´ ın,A Tale of Many H0,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 62(2024) 287 [2311.13305]. [41]CosmoVerse Networkcollaboration,The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics,Phys. Dark Univ.49(2025) 101965 [2504.01669]

    arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Riess et al.,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys

    A.G. Riess et al.,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett.934(2022) L7 [2112.04510]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Efstathiou,A Lockdown Perspective on the Hubble Tension (with comments from the SH0ES team),2007.10716

    G. Efstathiou,A Lockdown Perspective on the Hubble Tension (with comments from the SH0ES team),2007.10716

    arXiv 2007

  28. [28]

    Mortsell, A

    E. Mortsell, A. Goobar, J. Johansson and S. Dhawan,Sensitivity of the Hubble Constant Determination to Cepheid Calibration,Astrophys. J.933(2022) 212 [2105.11461]

    arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Mortsell, A

    E. Mortsell, A. Goobar, J. Johansson and S. Dhawan,The Hubble Tension Revisited: Additional Local Distance Ladder Uncertainties,Astrophys. J.935(2022) 58 [2106.09400]. – 29 –

    arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Sharon, D

    A. Sharon, D. Kushnir, W. Yuan, L. Macri and A. Riess,Reassessing the constraints from SH0ES extragalactic Cepheid amplitudes on systematic blending bias,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528(2024) 6861 [2305.14435]

    arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Murakami, A.G

    Y.S. Murakami, A.G. Riess, B.E. Stahl, W.D. Kenworthy, D.-M.A. Pluck, A. Macoretta et al., Leveraging SN Ia spectroscopic similarity to improve the measurement of H 0,JCAP11 (2023) 046 [2306.00070]

    arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Riess, G.S

    A.G. Riess, G.S. Anand, W. Yuan, S. Casertano, A. Dolphin, L.M. Macri et al.,Crowded No More: The Accuracy of the Hubble Constant Tested with High-resolution Observations of Cepheids by JWST,Astrophys. J. Lett.956(2023) L18 [2307.15806]

    arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Bhardwaj et al.,High-resolution Spectroscopic Metallicities of Milky Way Cepheid Standards and Their Impact on the Leavitt Law and the Hubble Constant,Astrophys

    A. Bhardwaj et al.,High-resolution Spectroscopic Metallicities of Milky Way Cepheid Standards and Their Impact on the Leavitt Law and the Hubble Constant,Astrophys. J. Lett. 955(2023) L13 [2309.03263]

    arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Brout and A

    D. Brout and A. Riess,The Impact of Dust on Cepheid and Type Ia Supernova Distances, 2311.08253

    arXiv

  35. [35]

    Dwomoh, E.R

    A.M. Dwomoh, E.R. Peterson, D. Scolnic, C. Ashall, J.M. DerKacy, A. Do et al.,Evaluating the Consistency of Cosmological Distances Using Supernova Siblings in the Near-infrared, Astrophys. J.965(2024) 90 [2311.06178]

    arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    S.A. Uddin et al.,Carnegie Supernova Project I and II: Measurements of H 0 Using Cepheid, Tip of the Red Giant Branch, and Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distance Calibration to Type Ia Supernovae*,Astrophys. J.970(2024) 72 [2308.01875]

    arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Riess, G.S

    A.G. Riess, G.S. Anand, W. Yuan, S. Casertano, A. Dolphin, L.M. Macri et al.,JWST Observations Reject Unrecognized Crowding of Cepheid Photometry as an Explanation for the Hubble Tension at 8σConfidence,Astrophys. J. Lett.962(2024) L17 [2401.04773]

    arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Freedman, B.F

    W.L. Freedman, B.F. Madore, T.J. Hoyt, I.S. Jang, A.J. Lee and K.A. Owens,Status Report on the Chicago-Carnegie Hubble Program (CCHP): Measurement of the Hubble Constant Using the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes,Astrophys. J.985(2025) 203 [2408.06153]

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Riess et al.,JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0,Astrophys

    A.G. Riess et al.,JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0,Astrophys. J.977(2024) 120 [2408.11770]. [56]H0DNcollaboration,The Local Distance Network: a community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at 1% precision,Astron. Astrophys.708(2026) A166 [...

    arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Wetterich,Phenomenological parameterization of quintessence,Phys

    C. Wetterich,Phenomenological parameterization of quintessence,Phys. Lett. B594(2004) 17 [astro-ph/0403289]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  41. [41]

    Doran and G

    M. Doran and G. Robbers,Early dark energy cosmologies,JCAP06(2006) 026 [astro-ph/0601544]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  42. [42]

    Poulin, T.L

    V. Poulin, T.L. Smith, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski,Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 221301 [1811.04083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Alexander and E

    S. Alexander and E. McDonough,Axion-Dilaton Destabilization and the Hubble Tension, Phys. Lett. B797(2019) 134830 [1904.08912]

    arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Smith, V

    T.L. Smith, V. Poulin and M.A. Amin,Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: a resolution with novel signatures,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 063523 [1908.06995]

    arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Capparelli, R.R

    L.M. Capparelli, R.R. Caldwell and A. Melchiorri,Cosmic birefringence test of the Hubble tension,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123529 [1909.04621]. – 30 –

    arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Sakstein and M

    J. Sakstein and M. Trodden,Early Dark Energy from Massive Neutrinos as a Natural Resolution of the Hubble Tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 161301 [1911.11760]

    arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Ye and Y.-S

    G. Ye and Y.-S. Piao,Is the Hubble tension a hint of AdS phase around recombination?,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 083507 [2001.02451]

    arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Chudaykin, D

    A. Chudaykin, D. Gorbunov and N. Nedelko,Combined analysis of Planck and SPTPol data favors the early dark energy models,JCAP08(2020) 013 [2004.13046]

    arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Gogoi, R.K

    A. Gogoi, R.K. Sharma, P. Chanda and S. Das,Early Mass-varying Neutrino Dark Energy: Nugget Formation and Hubble Anomaly,Astrophys. J.915(2021) 132 [2005.11889]

    arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Braglia, W.T

    M. Braglia, W.T. Emond, F. Finelli, A.E. Gumrukcuoglu and K. Koyama,Unified framework for early dark energy fromα-attractors,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 083513 [2005.14053]

    arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Niedermann and M.S

    F. Niedermann and M.S. Sloth,Resolving the Hubble tension with new early dark energy, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 063527 [2006.06686]

    arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Ivanov, E

    M.M. Ivanov, E. McDonough, J.C. Hill, M. Simonovi´ c, M.W. Toomey, S. Alexander et al., Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 103502 [2006.11235]

    arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    D’Amico, L

    G. D’Amico, L. Senatore, P. Zhang and H. Zheng,The Hubble Tension in Light of the Full-Shape Analysis of Large-Scale Structure Data,JCAP05(2021) 072 [2006.12420]

    arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Weiner, P

    Z.J. Weiner, P. Adshead and J.T. Giblin,Constraining early dark energy with gravitational waves before recombination,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) L021301 [2008.01732]

    arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    M.-X. Lin, W. Hu and M. Raveri,TestingH 0 in Acoustic Dark Energy with Planck and ACT Polarization,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 123523 [2009.08974]

    arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Smith, V

    T.L. Smith, V. Poulin, J.L. Bernal, K.K. Boddy, M. Kamionkowski and R. Murgia,Early dark energy is not excluded by current large-scale structure data,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 123542 [2009.10740]

    arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Murgia, G.F

    R. Murgia, G.F. Abell´ an and V. Poulin,Early dark energy resolution to the Hubble tension in light of weak lensing surveys and lensing anomalies,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 063502 [2009.10733]

    arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Jedamzik, L

    K. Jedamzik, L. Pogosian and G.-B. Zhao,Why reducing the cosmic sound horizon alone can not fully resolve the Hubble tension,Commun. in Phys.4(2021) 123 [2010.04158]

    arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Chudaykin, D

    A. Chudaykin, D. Gorbunov and N. Nedelko,Exploring an early dark energy solution to the Hubble tension with Planck and SPTPol data,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043529 [2011.04682]

    arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Fujita, K

    T. Fujita, K. Murai, H. Nakatsuka and S. Tsujikawa,Detection of isotropic cosmic birefringence and its implications for axionlike particles including dark energy,Phys. Rev. D 103(2021) 043509 [2011.11894]

    arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Adi and E.D

    T. Adi and E.D. Kovetz,Can conformally coupled modified gravity solve the Hubble tension?, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 023530 [2011.13853]

    arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Seto and Y

    O. Seto and Y. Toda,Comparing early dark energy and extra radiation solutions to the Hubble tension with BBN,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 123501 [2101.03740]

    arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Tian and Z.-H

    S.X. Tian and Z.-H. Zhu,Early dark energy ink-essence,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043518 [2102.06399]

    arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Freese and M.W

    K. Freese and M.W. Winkler,Chain early dark energy: A Proposal for solving the Hubble tension and explaining today’s dark energy,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 083533 [2102.13655]

    arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Sabla and R.R

    V.I. Sabla and R.R. Caldwell,NoH 0 assistance from assisted quintessence,Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 103506 [2103.04999]. – 31 –

    arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    Nojiri, S.D

    S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, D. Saez-Chillon Gomez and G.S. Sharov,Modeling and testing the equation of state for (Early) dark energy,Phys. Dark Univ.32(2021) 100837 [2103.05304]

    arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    G. Ye, B. Hu and Y.-S. Piao,Implication of the Hubble tension for the primordial Universe in light of recent cosmological data,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 063510 [2103.09729]

    arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    Boylan-Kolchin and D.R

    M. Boylan-Kolchin and D.R. Weisz,Uncertain times: the redshift–time relation from cosmology and stars,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505(2021) 2764 [2103.15825]

    arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Vagnozzi,Consistency tests ofΛCDM from the early integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect: Implications for early-time new physics and the Hubble tension,Phys

    S. Vagnozzi,Consistency tests ofΛCDM from the early integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect: Implications for early-time new physics and the Hubble tension,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 063524 [2105.10425]

    arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Karwal, M

    T. Karwal, M. Raveri, B. Jain, J. Khoury and M. Trodden,Chameleon early dark energy and the Hubble tension,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 063535 [2106.13290]

    arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    Jiang and Y.-S

    J.-Q. Jiang and Y.-S. Piao,Testing AdS early dark energy with Planck, SPTpol, and LSS data,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 103524 [2107.07128]

    arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Poulin, T.L

    V. Poulin, T.L. Smith and A. Bartlett,Dark energy at early times and ACT data: A larger Hubble constant without late-time priors,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123550 [2109.06229]

    arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Niedermann and M.S

    F. Niedermann and M.S. Sloth,Hot new early dark energy: Towards a unified dark sector of neutrinos, dark energy and dark matter,Phys. Lett. B835(2022) 137555 [2112.00759]

    arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    McDonough, M.-X

    E. McDonough, M.-X. Lin, J.C. Hill, W. Hu and S. Zhou,Early dark sector, the Hubble tension, and the swampland,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 043525 [2112.09128]

    arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    La Posta, T

    A. La Posta, T. Louis, X. Garrido and J.C. Hill,Constraints on prerecombination early dark energy from SPT-3G public data,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 083519 [2112.10754]

    arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Herold, E.G.M

    L. Herold, E.G.M. Ferreira and E. Komatsu,New Constraint on Early Dark Energy from Planck and BOSS Data Using the Profile Likelihood,Astrophys. J. Lett.929(2022) L16 [2112.12140]

    arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Sabla and R.R

    V.I. Sabla and R.R. Caldwell,Microphysics of early dark energy,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063526 [2202.08291]

    arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Ye and Y.-S

    G. Ye and Y.-S. Piao,Improved constraints on primordial gravitational waves in light of the H0 tension and BICEP/Keck data,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 043536 [2202.10055]

    arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Jiang and Y.-S

    J.-Q. Jiang and Y.-S. Piao,Toward early dark energy and ns=1 with Planck, ACT, and SPT observations,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 103514 [2202.13379]

    arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Rudelius,Constraints on early dark energy from the axion weak gravity conjecture,JCAP 01(2023) 014 [2203.05575]

    T. Rudelius,Constraints on early dark energy from the axion weak gravity conjecture,JCAP 01(2023) 014 [2203.05575]

    arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.