pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28756 · v1 · pith:65A76YHZnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ✦ hep-ph

Critique of Breit-Wigner resonance scattering

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords energygammascatteringamplitudephysicalresonanceapproachbreit-wigner
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In the standard Breit-Wigner approach to scattering the phase shift is to have a form $\tan\delta_{\rm BW} =\Gamma_1/(E_1-E)$ at a real energy resonance. This leads to complex energy poles in the scattering amplitude at $E_{\rm BW}=E_1-i\Gamma_1$, poles that are identified with unstable physical particles. By solving the square well scattering problem we identify some challenges to this approach. We find that setting $\tan\delta_{\rm BW} =\Gamma_1/(E_1-E)$ is not always a good description of the real energy scattering amplitude, that $\Gamma_1$ can be negative, that $E_{\rm BW}$ is not in fact an energy eigenvalue (and thus not a physical particle), and that states that decay in energy possess spatial wave functions that unacceptably grow exponentially. All of this is resolved by noting that because of its antilinear $PT$ symmetry solutions to the square well Schr\"odinger equation appear in complex conjugate energy pairs $E_{\mp}=E_2\mp i \Gamma_2$ with $E_- \neq E_{\rm BW}$, doing so in a way that gives a time independent probability amplitude that neither grows nor decays in time or space, and leads to just one now observable physical resonance not two.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.