pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02069 · v1 · pith:XEKL4624new · submitted 2026-06-01 · ✦ hep-ph

Interpreting Light Scalar Excesses and Heavy Scalar Cascades in the μ-Term Extended NMSSM

Jingwei Lian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords NMSSM95 GeV scalarHiggs cascadessupersymmetrydiphoton excessLEP excessCP-odd scalars
0
0 comments X

The pith

The μ-term extended NMSSM accommodates the 95 GeV scalar excesses within 2σ after all constraints while predicting reachable heavy cascades.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates whether the μNMSSM can account for the persistent 95 GeV hints in LEP bb and LHC diphoton channels. It applies Higgs data, extra Higgs limits, flavor constraints, electroweak precision observables, and direct SUSY search bounds to locate viable parameter space. In these regions a singlet-like CP-even scalar sits near 95 GeV and heavier doublet-like states appear in the mass range probed by recent CMS searches. Two characteristic patterns emerge: one with a suppressed hs bb coupling that boosts the diphoton rate, and another with stronger doublet mixing that raises the LEP rate. The heavy CP-even scalar produces H to h hs and H to hs hs cascades below the original CMS best-fit value yet close to present reach, while the CP-odd sector supplies an additional A2 to h A1 to 4b channel that can populate the (600,400) GeV region below current limits.

Core claim

After all constraints the μNMSSM contains viable points with a CP-even scalar near 95 GeV that reproduces the observed diphoton and bb rates within 2σ. These points split into two patterns distinguished by the size of the hs bb coupling. The heavier CP-even scalar generates cascade decays H to h hs and H to hs hs whose rates lie below the CMS best-fit value in the γγbb channel but remain accessible to ongoing and future searches. The CP-odd sector adds the channel A2 to h A1 to 4b that can occupy the mass region around (600,400) GeV where the latest CMS 4b analysis shows its largest local deviation while staying below the reported limits. For positive μ the same setup permits a gravitino LSP

What carries the argument

The singlet superfield of the μNMSSM, which mixes with the two Higgs doublets to produce a light singlet-like CP-even scalar hs near 95 GeV together with additional heavy CP-even and CP-odd states.

If this is right

  • The heavy CP-even scalar produces H to h hs and H to hs hs cascades whose rates remain below the original CMS best-fit value yet lie within reach of present and future searches.
  • The CP-odd sector supplies A2 to h A1 to 4b decays that can populate the (600,400) GeV region below current CMS limits.
  • For positive μ the framework admits a gravitino as the lightest supersymmetric particle with a long-lived neutralino next-to-LSP at collider scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 95 GeV signal is confirmed, the model predicts that any discovered light scalar will have a measurable admixture of doublet and singlet components that can be tested through its branching ratios.
  • The same parameter space that fits the light excess naturally places heavier scalars in regions where dedicated cascade searches in γγbb and 4b final states could yield signals with modest additional luminosity.
  • The long-lived neutralino possibility for positive μ offers a distinct collider signature that could be pursued independently of the scalar sector.

Load-bearing premise

The 95 GeV excesses are assumed to be genuine signals from a new CP-even scalar rather than statistical fluctuations or background mismodeling.

What would settle it

A future analysis that excludes a scalar resonance near 95 GeV in both the diphoton and bb channels at the 3σ level, or that finds no evidence for the predicted H to h hs or A2 to h A1 cascade rates in the relevant mass windows.

read the original abstract

The hints for a scalar resonance near $95~{\rm GeV}$ in the LEP $b\bar b$ channel and in the LHC diphoton searches remain among the most persistent small deviations in the Higgs sector. At the same time, searches for a heavier resonance decaying into the observed Higgs boson and an additional scalar have become more restrictive, especially after the recent CMS analysis of the $b\bar b b\bar b$ final state. We study these observations in the $\mu$-term extended Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model ($\mu$NMSSM), where a singlet-like CP-even scalar can lie near $95~{\rm GeV}$ and the heavier doublet states can appear around the mass range probed by the CMS searches. After imposing Higgs data, extra Higgs limits, flavor constraints, electroweak precision observables and direct SUSY search bounds, we find viable regions that can accommodate the $95~{\rm GeV}$ diphoton and $b\bar b$ rates within the $2\sigma$ ranges. The viable points fall into two characteristic patterns. One gives a larger diphoton signal through a suppressed $h_s b\bar b$ coupling, while the other gives a larger LEP rate through stronger doublet mixing. The heavy CP-even scalar can generate $H\to h h_s$ and $H\to h_s h_s$ cascades with rates below the original CMS best-fit value in $\gamma\gamma b\bar b$, but close to the reach of present and future searches. The CP-odd sector provides an additional channel, $A_2\to h A_1\to 4b$, which can populate the mass region around $(600,400)~{\rm GeV}$ where the latest CMS $4b$ analysis finds its largest local deviation, while remaining below its current limits. For the positive-$\mu$ subset, the same framework admits a gravitino as the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP), with a neutralino next-to-LSP that is typically long-lived at collider scales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the μ-term extended NMSSM as a framework for the persistent 95 GeV scalar hints in LEP b b-bar and LHC diphoton data. After applying Higgs measurements, additional Higgs limits, flavor constraints, electroweak precision observables and direct SUSY searches, it identifies viable parameter regions that accommodate the 95 GeV rates within 2σ. These regions fall into two patterns distinguished by the degree of singlet-doublet mixing. The heavy CP-even scalar produces H → h h_s and H → h_s h_s cascades with rates below the original CMS best-fit but potentially accessible; the CP-odd sector yields an A2 → h A1 → 4b channel that can populate the (600,400) GeV region while remaining below current CMS 4b limits. For positive μ the model also allows a gravitino LSP with a long-lived neutralino NLSP.

Significance. If the 95 GeV excesses are genuine signals, the work supplies a concrete, constrained SUSY realization with two characteristic mixing patterns and falsifiable predictions for heavy-scalar cascades and the 4b final state. The systematic imposition of multiple orthogonal constraints and the explicit discussion of both CP-even and CP-odd sectors constitute clear strengths. The gravitino-LSP option for positive μ further broadens the phenomenological reach. The result is an existence proof under the stated assumption rather than a model-independent prediction.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / viable regions] Abstract and viable-region discussion: the central claim that viable points accommodate the 95 GeV diphoton and b b-bar rates within 2σ is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit tabulation of the computed signal strengths, the precise definition of the 2σ interval, or the relative weight given to the LEP versus LHC data in the selection. Without these, it is impossible to verify that the subsequent cascade-rate statements are independent outputs rather than quantities adjusted to the same input excesses.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Results] The two characteristic patterns (suppressed h_s b b-bar versus stronger doublet mixing) are described qualitatively; a short table or scatter plot of the relevant mixing angles or reduced couplings for representative points would make the distinction quantitative and easier to reproduce.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the light singlet-like state (h_s), the heavy CP-even state (H), and the CP-odd states (A1, A2) is introduced without an explicit definition paragraph; a brief nomenclature table or sentence in the introduction would improve readability.
  3. [Cascade discussion] The statement that cascade rates lie “below the original CMS best-fit value” would benefit from a direct numerical comparison (e.g., predicted σ × BR versus the CMS central value and uncertainty) rather than a qualitative remark.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and for highlighting the strengths of the work. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and verifiability.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / viable regions] Abstract and viable-region discussion: the central claim that viable points accommodate the 95 GeV diphoton and b b-bar rates within 2σ is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit tabulation of the computed signal strengths, the precise definition of the 2σ interval, or the relative weight given to the LEP versus LHC data in the selection. Without these, it is impossible to verify that the subsequent cascade-rate statements are independent outputs rather than quantities adjusted to the same input excesses.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the signal strengths and selection criteria will strengthen the presentation. In the revised version we will insert a dedicated table (in the viable-regions section) that reports the computed μ_γγ and μ_bb values for representative points from both mixing patterns, together with the precise 2σ intervals taken from the LEP and CMS publications. The text will also state that the 95 GeV rates are not used as fit inputs; the parameter points are selected solely by the orthogonal constraints listed in the paper, after which the 95 GeV rates are verified to lie inside the 2σ bands. The cascade branching ratios and cross sections are then computed from the same points and are therefore independent outputs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard phenomenological scan

full rationale

The paper performs a numerical scan over μNMSSM parameters, imposing external constraints (Higgs data, flavor bounds, EWPO, SUSY searches) and identifying regions where a singlet-like h_s can reproduce the 95 GeV LEP bb and LHC γγ rates inside 2σ. Cascade rates (H→hh_s, A2→h A1→4b) are then computed as additional observables in those regions. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported via self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled. The study is self-contained against external benchmarks; treating the excesses as targets is the explicit phenomenological goal rather than a hidden definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central claim rests on the assumption that the 95 GeV excesses are real signals, on multiple mixing and mass parameters adjusted to fit those signals, and on the domain assumption that standard Higgs and SUSY constraints are applied without hidden inconsistencies. No independent evidence or machine-checked elements are mentioned.

free parameters (2)
  • Singlet-doublet mixing parameters
    Adjusted to produce the two characteristic patterns that fit the 95 GeV rates.
  • Heavy scalar masses and couplings
    Tuned so that cascade rates lie below but near CMS sensitivity.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The 95 GeV excesses are genuine signals from a new CP-even scalar
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the target the model must accommodate.
  • standard math Standard Higgs signal strengths and direct-search limits are correctly implemented
    Background assumption required to define the viable regions.
invented entities (1)
  • Singlet-like CP-even scalar h_s near 95 GeV no independent evidence
    purpose: To explain the light scalar excesses
    Postulated within the μNMSSM to fit the data; no independent falsifiable handle supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5906 in / 1827 out tokens · 33280 ms · 2026-06-28T13:46:58.487082+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Azatov, R

    A. Azatov, R. Contino and J. Galloway,Model-Independent Bounds on a Light Higgs, JHEP04(2012) 127 [1202.3415]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Search for new resonances in the diphoton final state in the mass range between 80 and 115 GeV in pp collisions at √s= 8 TeV

    J. Cao, X. Guo, Y. He, P. Wu and Y. Zhang,Diphoton signal of the light Higgs boson in natural NMSSM,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 116001 [1612.08522]. [4]CMScollaboration, “Search for new resonances in the diphoton final state in the mass range between 80 and 115 GeV in pp collisions at √s= 8 TeV.” CMS-PAS-HIG-14-037, 2015. [5]CMScollaboration, “Search for a stand...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Arcangeletti

    C. Arcangeletti. on behalf of ATLAS collaboration, LHC Seminar https://indico.cern.ch/event/1281604/attachments/2660420/4608571/ LHCSeminarArcangeletti_final.pdf, 7th of June, 2023. – 28 –

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Biek¨ otter, S

    T. Biek¨ otter, S. Heinemeyer and G. Weiglein,95.4 GeV diphoton excess at ATLAS and CMS,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 035005 [2306.03889]. [8]CMScollaboration, A. Tumasyan et al.,Searches for additional Higgs bosons and for vector leptoquarks inτ τfinal states in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,JHEP07(2023) 073 [2208.02717]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Coloretti, A

    G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, S. Bhattacharya and B. Mellado,Searching for low-mass resonances decaying into W bosons,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 035026 [2302.07276]. [10]CMScollaboration, A. Tumasyan et al.,Search for a new resonance decaying into two spin-0 bosons in a final state with two photons and two bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,...

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Ellwanger and C

    U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie,Additional Higgs Bosons near 95 and 650 GeV in the NMSSM,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1138 [2309.07838]. [16]CMScollaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al.,Search for a new heavy scalar resonance decaying into the Higgs boson and a new scalar particle in theb ¯bb¯bfinal state using proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,2605.02848

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Fan, J.-Q

    J.-W. Fan, J.-Q. Tao, Y.-Q. Shen, G.-M. Chen, H.-S. Chen, S. Gascon-Shotkin et al.,Study of diphoton decays of the lightest scalar Higgs boson in the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model,Chin. Phys. C38(2014) 073101 [1309.6394]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Biek¨ otter, S

    T. Biek¨ otter, S. Heinemeyer and C. Mu˜ noz,Precise prediction for the Higgs-boson masses in theµνSSM,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 504 [1712.07475]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Beskidt, W

    C. Beskidt, W. de Boer and D. I. Kazakov,Can we discover a light singlet-like NMSSM Higgs boson at the LHC?,Phys. Lett. B782(2018) 69 [1712.02531]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    P. J. Fox and N. Weiner,Light Signals from a Lighter Higgs,JHEP08(2018) 025 [1710.07649]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Haisch and A

    U. Haisch and A. Malinauskas,Let there be light from a second light Higgs doublet,JHEP 03(2018) 135 [1712.06599]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Heinemeyer and T

    S. Heinemeyer and T. Stefaniak,A Higgs Boson at 96 GeV?!,PoSCHARGED2018 (2019) 016 [1812.05864]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Heinemeyer,A Higgs boson below 125 GeV?!,Int

    S. Heinemeyer,A Higgs boson below 125 GeV?!,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33(2018) 1844006. – 29 –

    2018

  14. [14]

    K. Wang, F. Wang, J. Zhu and Q. Jie,The semi-constrained NMSSM in light of muon g-2, LHC, and dark matter constraints,Chin. Phys. C42(2018) 103109 [1811.04435]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Domingo, S

    F. Domingo, S. Heinemeyer, S. Paßehr and G. Weiglein,Decays of the neutral Higgs bosons into SM fermions and gauge bosons in theCP-violating NMSSM,Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 942 [1807.06322]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    R. Vega, R. Vega-Morales and K. Xie,Light (and darkness) from a light hidden Higgs, JHEP06(2018) 137 [1805.01970]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    J. Cao, X. Jia, Y. Yue, H. Zhou and P. Zhu,96 GeV diphoton excess in seesaw extensions of the natural NMSSM,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 055008 [1908.07206]

    arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Biek¨ otter, S

    T. Biek¨ otter, S. Heinemeyer and C. Mu˜ noz,Precise prediction for the Higgs-Boson masses in theµνSSM with three right-handed neutrino superfields,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 667 [1906.06173]

    arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    K. Choi, S. H. Im, K. S. Jeong and C. B. Park,Light Higgs bosons in the general NMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 956 [1906.03389]

    arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Kundu, S

    A. Kundu, S. Maharana and P. Mondal,A 96 GeV scalar tagged to dark matter models, Nucl. Phys. B955(2020) 115057 [1907.12808]

    arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Biek¨ otter, M

    T. Biek¨ otter, M. Chakraborti and S. Heinemeyer,An N2HDM Solution for the possible 96 GeV Excess,PoSCORFU2018(2019) 015 [1905.03280]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Biek¨ otter, M

    T. Biek¨ otter, M. Chakraborti and S. Heinemeyer,A 96 GeV Higgs boson in the N2HDM, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 2 [1903.11661]

    arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Sachdeva and S

    D. Sachdeva and S. Sadhukhan,Discussing 125 GeV and 95 GeV excess in light radion model,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 055045 [1908.01668]

    arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    96 GeV excess

    T. Biek¨ otter, M. Chakraborti and S. Heinemeyer,The “96 GeV excess” at the LHC,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A36(2021) 2142018 [2003.05422]

    arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    A. A. Abdelalim, B. Das, S. Khalil and S. Moretti,Di-photon decay of a light Higgs state in the BLSSM,Nucl. Phys. B985(2022) 116013 [2012.04952]

    arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    W. G. Hollik, C. Li, G. Moortgat-Pick and S. Paasch,Phenomenology of a Supersymmetric Model Inspired by Inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 141 [2004.14852]

    arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and F. R. Joaquim,Multiphoton signals of a (96 GeV?) stealth boson,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 403 [2002.07697]

    arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Biek¨ otter, A

    T. Biek¨ otter, A. Grohsjean, S. Heinemeyer, C. Schwanenberger and G. Weiglein,Possible indications for new Higgs bosons in the reach of the LHC: N2HDM and NMSSM interpretations,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 178 [2109.01128]

    arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Biek¨ otter and M

    T. Biek¨ otter and M. O. Olea-Romacho,Reconciling Higgs physics and pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter in the S2HDM using a genetic algorithm,JHEP10 (2021) 215 [2108.10864]

    arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Heinemeyer, C

    S. Heinemeyer, C. Li, F. Lika, G. Moortgat-Pick and S. Paasch,Phenomenology of a 96 GeV Higgs boson in the 2HDM with an additional singlet,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 075003 [2112.11958]

    arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Biek¨ otter, S

    T. Biek¨ otter, S. Heinemeyer and G. Weiglein,Mounting evidence for a 95 GeV Higgs boson, JHEP08(2022) 201 [2203.13180]. – 30 –

    arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    W. Li, H. Qiao and J. Zhu,Light Higgs boson in the NMSSM confronted with the CMS di-photon and di-tau excesses*,Chin. Phys. C47(2023) 123102 [2212.11739]

    arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Benbrik, M

    R. Benbrik, M. Boukidi and B. Manaut,Interpreting the W-mass and muon(g µ −2) anomalies within a 2-Higgs doublet model,Nucl. Phys. B1005(2024) 116593 [2204.11755]

    arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Benbrik, M

    R. Benbrik, M. Boukidi, S. Moretti and S. Semlali,Explaining the 96 GeV Di-photon anomaly in a generic 2HDM Type-III,Phys. Lett. B832(2022) 137245 [2204.07470]

    arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Li,Phenomenology of extended Two-Higgs-Doublets models, Ph.D

    C. Li,Phenomenology of extended Two-Higgs-Doublets models, Ph.D. thesis, Hamburg U.,

  36. [36]

    10.3204/PUBDB-2023-03151

    work page doi:10.3204/pubdb-2023-03151 2023

  37. [37]

    Biek¨ otter, S

    T. Biek¨ otter, S. Heinemeyer and G. Weiglein,The CMS di-photon excess at 95 GeV in view of the LHC Run 2 results,Phys. Lett. B846(2023) 138217 [2303.12018]

    arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, H. B. Cˆ amara, F. R. Joaquim and J. F. Seabra,Confronting the 95 GeV excesses within the UN2HDM,2307.03768

    arXiv

  39. [39]

    Banik, A

    S. Banik, A. Crivellin, S. Iguro and T. Kitahara,Asymmetric di-Higgs signals of the next-to-minimal 2HDM with a U(1) symmetry,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 075011 [2303.11351]

    arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Dutta, J

    J. Dutta, J. Lahiri, C. Li, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. F. Tabira and J. A. Ziegler,Dark matter phenomenology in 2HDMS in light of the 95 GeV excess,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 926 [2308.05653]

    arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, P. K. Paul and N. Sahu,Scotogenic U(1)Lµ-Lτorigin of (g-2)µ, W-mass anomaly and 95 GeV excess,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 055021 [2310.11953]

    arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Arcadi, G

    G. Arcadi, G. Busoni, D. Cabo-Almeida and N. Krishnan,Is there a scalar or pseudoscalar at 95 GeV?,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115028 [2311.14486]

    arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Ahriche,95 GeV excess in the Georgi-Machacek model: Single or twin peak resonance, Phys

    A. Ahriche,95 GeV excess in the Georgi-Machacek model: Single or twin peak resonance, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 035010 [2312.10484]

    arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Chen, C.-W

    T.-K. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, S. Heinemeyer and G. Weiglein,95 GeV Higgs boson in the Georgi-Machacek model,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075043 [2312.13239]

    arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    P. S. B. Dev, R. N. Mohapatra and Y. Zhang,Explanation of the 95 GeVγγand bb¯ excesses in the minimal left-right symmetric model,Phys. Lett. B849(2024) 138481 [2312.17733]

    arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    J. Cao, X. Jia, J. Lian and L. Meng,95 GeV diphoton and bb¯excesses in the general next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075001 [2310.08436]

    arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Ahriche, M

    A. Ahriche, M. L. Bellilet, M. O. Khojali, M. Kumar and A.-T. Mulaudzi,Scale invariant scotogenic model: CDF-II W-boson mass and the 95 GeV excesses,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 015025 [2311.08297]

    arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Belyaev, R

    A. Belyaev, R. Benbrik, M. Boukidi, M. Chakraborti, S. Moretti and S. Semlali, Explanation of the hints for a 95 GeV Higgs boson within a 2-Higgs Doublet Model,JHEP 05(2024) 209 [2306.09029]

    arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Azevedo, T

    D. Azevedo, T. Biek¨ otter and P. M. Ferreira,2HDM interpretations of the CMS diphoton excess at 95 GeV,JHEP11(2023) 017 [2305.19716]

    arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Ashanujjaman, S

    S. Ashanujjaman, S. Banik, G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, B. Mellado and A.-T. Mulaudzi, – 31 – SU(2)L triplet scalar as the origin of the 95 GeV excess?,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) L091704 [2306.15722]

    arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Wang and J

    K. Wang and J. Zhu,95 GeV light Higgs in the top-pair-associated diphoton channel at the LHC in the minimal dilaton model*,Chin. Phys. C48(2024) 073105 [2402.11232]

    arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Ellwanger and C

    U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie,Nmssm with correct relic density and an additional 95 GeV Higgs boson,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 526 [2403.16884]

    arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Lian,95 GeV excesses in the Z3-symmetric next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model,Phys

    J. Lian,95 GeV excesses in the Z3-symmetric next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115018 [2406.10969]

    arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    J. Cao, X. Jia and J. Lian,Unified interpretation of the muon g-2 anomaly, the 95 GeV diphoton, and bb¯excesses in the general next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115039 [2402.15847]

    arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    C.-X. Liu, Y. Zhou, X.-Y. Zheng, J. Ma, T.-F. Feng and H.-B. Zhang,95 GeV excess in a CP-violatingµ-from-νSSM,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 056001 [2402.00727]

    arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Ellwanger, C

    U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, S. F. King and S. Moretti,NMSSM explanation for excesses in the search for neutralinos and charginos and a 95 GeV Higgs boson,Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 788 [2404.19338]

    arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Yaser Ayazi, M

    S. Yaser Ayazi, M. Hosseini, S. Paktinat Mehdiabadi and R. Rouzbehi,Vector dark matter and LHC constraints, including a 95 GeV light Higgs boson,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 055004 [2405.01132]

    arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Gao, S.-M

    S. Gao, S.-M. Zhao, S. Di, X.-X. Dong and T.-F. Feng,A 95 GeV Higgs boson in the U(1)XSSM,Nucl. Phys. B1018(2025) 117026 [2411.13261]

    arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Gao, X.-F

    J. Gao, X.-F. Han, J. Ma, L. Wang and H. Xu,95 GeV Higgs boson and spontaneous CP-violation at the finite temperature,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115045 [2408.03705]

    arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Mondal, S

    T. Mondal, S. Moretti and P. Sanyal,On the CP Nature of the ‘95 GeV’ Anomalies, 2412.00474

    arXiv

  61. [61]

    Khanna, S

    A. Khanna, S. Moretti and A. Sarkar,Explaining 95 (or so) GeV Anomalies in the 2-Higgs Doublet Model Type-I,2409.02587

    arXiv

  62. [62]

    S. Baek, P. Ko, Y. Omura and C. Yu,96 GeV scalar boson in the 2HDM with U(1) H gauge symmetry,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 908 [2412.02178]

    arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Y. Dong, K. Wang and J. Zhu,Probing a type I 2HDM light Higgs boson in the top-pair-associated diphoton channel,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 055013 [2410.13636]

    arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Kalinowski and W

    J. Kalinowski and W. Kotlarski,Interpreting 95 GeV di-photon/b bexcesses as a lightest Higgs boson of the MRSSM,JHEP07(2024) 037 [2403.08720]

    arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    H. Xu, Y. Wang, X.-F. Han and L. Wang,95 GeV Higgs boson and nano-Hertz gravitational waves from domain walls in the N2HDM,2505.03592

    arXiv

  66. [66]

    Abbas, V

    G. Abbas, V. Singh and N. Singh,Dark-technicolour at colliders,2504.21593

    arXiv

  67. [67]

    Z. Li, N. Liu and B. Zhu,Interplay of95GeV Diphoton Excess and Dark Matter in Supersymmetric Triplet Model,2504.21273

    arXiv

  68. [68]

    X. Du, H. Liu and Q. Chang,Interpretation of 95 GeV excess within the Georgi-Machacek model in light of positive definiteness constraints,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015019 [2502.06444]. – 32 –

    arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Benbrik, M

    R. Benbrik, M. Boukidi, K. Kahime, S. Moretti, L. Rahili and B. Taki,Exploring potential Higgs resonances at 650 GeV and 95 GeV in the 2HDM Type III,Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139688 [2505.07811]

    arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Benbrik, M

    R. Benbrik, M. Boukidi, K. Kahime, S. Moretti, L. Rahili and B. Taki,Interpreting the 650 GeV and 95 GeV Higgs Anomalies in the N2HDM,2510.19605

    arXiv

  71. [71]

    Khanna, S

    A. Khanna, S. Moretti and A. Sarkar,Explaining 650 GeV and 95 GeV Anomalies in the 2-Higgs Doublet Model Type-I,2509.06017

    arXiv

  72. [72]

    Chang, X

    Q. Chang, X. Du and P. Zhu,Unified interpretation of 95 GeV di-photon and di-tau Excesses in the Georgi-Machacek Model,2509.26155

    arXiv

  73. [73]

    Hmissou, S

    A. Hmissou, S. Moretti and L. Rahili,Could the 650 GeV excess be a pseudoscalar of a three-Higgs-doublet model?,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 075049 [2509.06232]

    arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Y. Dong, M. Ruan, K. Wang, H. Yang and J. Zhu,Prospects for a 95 GeV Higgs Boson at Future Higgs Factories with Transformer Networks,2510.24662

    arXiv

  75. [75]

    Chen, C.-W

    T.-K. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, S. Heinemeyer and G. Weiglein,Interpretation of LHC excesses at 95 GeV and 152 GeV in an extended Georgi-Machacek model,2511.04796

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [76]

    Bhatnagar, D

    A. Bhatnagar, D. Croon and P. Schicho,Interpreting the 95 GeV resonance in the Two Higgs Doublet Model. Implications for the electroweak phase transition,JHEP03(2026) 014 [2506.20716]

    arXiv 2026

  77. [77]

    Lian and Y.-B

    J. Lian and Y.-B. Liu,Scalar resonances near 650 and 95 GeV in the GNMSSM with correct dark matter relic abundance,JHEP03(2026) 103 [2511.04968]

    arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    Dutta, P

    J. Dutta, P. M. Ferreira and S. Heinemeyer,Pseudoscalar contributions to Zh production at the LHC at 95 GeV and above,2603.22494

    arXiv

  79. [79]

    Arcadi and A

    G. Arcadi and A. Djouadi,Interpreting the current Higgs excesses at the LHC in the 2HD+a framework,2512.08807

    arXiv

  80. [80]

    Fayet,Supergauge Invariant Extension of the Higgs Mechanism and a Model for the electron and Its Neutrino,Nucl

    P. Fayet,Supergauge Invariant Extension of the Higgs Mechanism and a Model for the electron and Its Neutrino,Nucl. Phys. B90(1975) 104

    1975

Showing first 80 references.