pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05583 · v2 · pith:IPX6DS3Knew · submitted 2026-06-04 · ✦ hep-ph

Pion structure in Holographic QCD

Jiali Deng , Defu Hou , Xiaolong Wang , Yang Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 01:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords holographic QCDpion structureelectromagnetic form factorsgravitational form factorslinear confinementgluon condensationmass spectrumQCD observables
0
0 comments X

The pith

A holographic model with modified background describes the pion's mass spectrum, electromagnetic form factors, and gravitational form factors in agreement with data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies a holographic QCD model featuring a modified background geometry to investigate the pion's internal structure. This geometry incorporates effective descriptions of linear confinement and gluon condensation. The model computes the pion mass spectrum along with its electromagnetic and gravitational form factors. It achieves reasonable agreement with experimental measurements and lattice QCD results, indicating that the approach captures key aspects of the pion. This unified description suggests the model could serve as a tool for additional studies of pion properties.

Core claim

Employing a holographic model with a modified background that incorporates linear confinement and gluon condensation, the authors study the pion's mass spectrum, electromagnetic form factors, and gravitational form factors. The model simultaneously describes these observables and shows reasonable agreement with experimental data and lattice QCD calculations, suggesting it captures essential features of the pion's structure.

What carries the argument

The modified background geometry in the holographic model that encodes linear confinement and gluon condensation, used to compute the pion structure observables.

If this is right

  • The model provides a consistent framework for multiple pion observables.
  • It reaches agreement with both experimental measurements and lattice QCD results.
  • The approach has potential as a tool for further investigations of pion properties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the background modification works for the pion, it may apply to other light mesons with similar success.
  • Gravitational form factors from the model could be compared to those derived from the energy-momentum tensor in QCD.
  • Future calculations of additional observables like the pion decay constant could further test the model.

Load-bearing premise

The specific modified background geometry chosen accurately encodes the essential non-perturbative QCD features of linear confinement and gluon condensation for the pion.

What would settle it

Disagreement between the model's predictions for the gravitational form factors and independent lattice QCD results would challenge the model's validity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05583 by Defu Hou, Jiali Deng, Xiaolong Wang, Yang Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The pion electromagnetic form factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The pion gravitational form factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The pion gravitational form factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The pion electromagnetic form factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The pion gravitational form factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We employ a holographic model with a modified background that incorporates effective descriptions of key QCD features, including linear confinement and gluon condensation, to study the pion's internal structure, encompassing its mass spectrum as well as electromagnetic and gravitational form factors. This model is capable of simultaneously describing these diverse observables and reaches reasonable agreement with both experimental measurements and lattice QCD results. Our findings indicate that the model captures essential aspects of the pion. The description of multiple structure observables supports its potential as a useful tool for further investigations of pion properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a holographic QCD model employing a modified background geometry that incorporates effective descriptions of linear confinement and gluon condensation. It computes the pion mass spectrum together with electromagnetic and gravitational form factors, asserting that a single background ansatz simultaneously describes these observables and yields reasonable agreement with experimental data and lattice QCD results.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work supplies a unified holographic framework for multiple pion structure observables. Credit is due for applying the standard holographic dictionary consistently to one background across the spectrum and both classes of form factors, thereby testing the background ansatz non-trivially rather than introducing separate tunings for each observable.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (background construction): the single free parameter controlling the modified warp factor and dilaton profile is stated to be fixed by the confinement scale; the manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that this same value is used without readjustment when computing the electromagnetic and gravitational form factors, so that the reported agreement constitutes a genuine prediction rather than a refit.
  2. [§4] §4 (form-factor results): the comparisons with lattice QCD and experiment for the gravitational form factors report only central values; without tabulated uncertainties propagated from the background parameter or from the numerical solution of the bulk equations, it is impossible to judge whether the claimed 'reasonable agreement' is statistically meaningful or merely qualitative.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract asserts agreement with data but supplies no numerical values, error estimates, or parameter values; a short table or set of benchmark numbers should be added to the abstract or a dedicated results subsection.
  2. [§2] Notation for the modified warp factor and dilaton profile should be collected in a single equation block early in §2 to improve readability when the same functions are reused in the form-factor calculations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation of minor revision. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (background construction): the single free parameter controlling the modified warp factor and dilaton profile is stated to be fixed by the confinement scale; the manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that this same value is used without readjustment when computing the electromagnetic and gravitational form factors, so that the reported agreement constitutes a genuine prediction rather than a refit.

    Authors: The parameter is fixed once by the confinement scale (via matching to the rho-meson mass and the slope of the linear Regge trajectories) and is then held fixed for all subsequent calculations. To make this explicit as requested, we will add a sentence in §2 stating the numerical value obtained from the confinement-scale fit together with a clear statement that this same value is used without readjustment for the electromagnetic and gravitational form factors. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (form-factor results): the comparisons with lattice QCD and experiment for the gravitational form factors report only central values; without tabulated uncertainties propagated from the background parameter or from the numerical solution of the bulk equations, it is impossible to judge whether the claimed 'reasonable agreement' is statistically meaningful or merely qualitative.

    Authors: Because the single background parameter is fixed by a definite matching condition to the confinement scale, it carries no associated uncertainty to propagate. The bulk equations are solved numerically to high precision, with results stable under changes in integration tolerances and grid spacing. We will add a short paragraph in §4 documenting the numerical convergence criteria and noting that the reported central values are the model's unambiguous predictions under the fixed background. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper selects a modified holographic background to encode linear confinement and gluon condensation as an effective ansatz, then applies the standard holographic dictionary to compute the pion mass spectrum along with electromagnetic and gravitational form factors. These quantities are compared directly against independent experimental data and lattice QCD results. No equations or steps are shown that reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work appear in the provided text. The multi-observable agreement with external benchmarks therefore constitutes an independent test of the background choice rather than a self-referential loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the holographic correspondence for a phenomenologically adjusted geometry whose explicit form and parameter count are not stated in the abstract. Standard holographic assumptions plus two effective QCD features are invoked without independent derivation.

free parameters (1)
  • background modification parameters for confinement and gluon condensation
    The model incorporates effective descriptions of linear confinement and gluon condensation; these are introduced by hand to reproduce QCD features and are therefore free parameters.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The holographic duality continues to hold for the chosen modified background geometry when applied to pion observables
    The entire calculation presupposes that the AdS/QCD correspondence remains valid after the background is altered to encode confinement and condensation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5603 in / 1362 out tokens · 47335 ms · 2026-06-28T01:05:27.853755+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    T. Horn, C. D. Roberts, The pion: an enigma within the Standard Model, J. Phys. G 43 (7) (2016) 073001. arXiv:1602.04016, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/7/073001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/7/073001 2016

  2. [2]

    A. C. Aguilar, et al., Pion and Kaon Structure at the Electron-Ion Collider, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (10) (2019) 190. arXiv:1907.08218, doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12885-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12885-0 2019

  3. [3]

    Ananthanarayan, Pions: the original Nambu–Goldstone bosons: An introduction and precision pion physics, Eur

    B. Ananthanarayan, Pions: the original Nambu–Goldstone bosons: An introduction and precision pion physics, Eur. Phys. J. ST 231 (2) (2022) 91–102. doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00443-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00443-7 2022

  4. [4]

    R. J. Holt, C. D. Roberts, Distribution Functions of the Nucleon and Pion in the Valence Region, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 2991–3044. arXiv:1002.4666, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2991

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.2991 2010

  5. [5]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of supercon- formal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252. arXiv:hep-th/9711200, doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 1998

  6. [6]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291. arXiv:hep-th/9802150, doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a2 1998

  7. [7]

    Hard Scattering and Gauge/String Duality

    J. Polchinski, M. J. Strassler, Hard scatter- ing and gauge / string duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 031601. arXiv:hep-th/0109174, 7 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.031601

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.031601 2002

  8. [8]

    Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Soft-Wall AdS/QCD

    T. Gherghetta, J. I. Kapusta, T. M. Kelley, Chiral symmetry breaking in the soft-wall AdS/QCD model, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 076003. arXiv:0902.1998, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.076003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.076003 2009

  9. [9]

    Linear Confinement and AdS/QCD

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son, M. A. Stephanov, Linear confinement and AdS/QCD, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015005. arXiv:hep-ph/0602229, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.015005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.015005 2006

  10. [10]

    Folco Capossoli, M

    E. Folco Capossoli, M. A. Mart ´ ın Contreras, D. Li, A. Vega, H. Boschi-Filho, Hadronic spec- tra from deformed AdS backgrounds, Chin. Phys. C 44 (6) (2020) 064104. arXiv:1903.06269, doi:10.1088/1674-1137/44/6/064104

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/44/6/064104 2020

  11. [11]

    J. Deng, D. Hou, Nucleon structure from an AdS/QCD model in the Veneziano limit, Phys. Rev. D 112 (3) (2025) 036011. arXiv:2502.00771, doi:10.1103/b9p6-pdwh

    work page doi:10.1103/b9p6-pdwh 2025

  12. [12]

    X. Chen, Y. Chen, K. Zhou, Data-driven Einstein-dilato n model for pure Yang-Mills thermodynamics and glue- ball spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 112 (12) (2025) 126025. arXiv:2507.06729, doi:10.1103/wyr3-2kc5

    work page doi:10.1103/wyr3-2kc5 2025

  13. [13]

    Folco Capossoli, M

    E. Folco Capossoli, M. A. Mart ´ ın Contreras, D. Li, A. Vega, H. Boschi-Filho, Proton structure functions from an AdS/QCD model with a deformed background, Phys. Rev. D 102 (8) (2020) 086004. arXiv:2007.09283, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.086004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.086004 2020

  14. [14]

    M. S. Tousi, K. Azizi, H. R. Moshfegh, Investiga- tion of the semileptonic decay Ξcc++ → Ξc+ ℓ/macron.ts1 νℓ within QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 110 (11) (2024) 114001. arXiv:2409.00241, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.114001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.114001 2024

  15. [15]

    T. M. Aliev, S. Bilmis, M. Savci, Analysis of the light JP=3- mesons in QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) (2023) 034020. arXiv:2307.00577, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.034020 2023

  16. [16]

    G. F. de Teramond, S. J. Brodsky, Hadronic spec- trum of a holographic dual of QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 201601. arXiv:hep-th/0501022, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.201601

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.201601 2005

  17. [17]

    S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Teramond, Hadronic spectra and light-front wavefunctions in holographic QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 201601. arXiv:hep-ph/0602252, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.201601

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.201601 2006

  18. [18]

    Mondal, Longitudinal dynamics in light- front holographic QCD and hadron spectroscopy, Rev

    C. Mondal, Longitudinal dynamics in light- front holographic QCD and hadron spectroscopy, Rev. Mex. Fis. Suppl. 3 (3) (2022) 0308091. doi:10.31349/SuplRevMexFis.3.0308091

    work page doi:10.31349/suplrevmexfis.3.0308091 2022

  19. [19]

    Ahmady, S

    M. Ahmady, S. Kaur, C. Mondal, R. Sandapen, Pion spectroscopy and dynamics using the holographic light- front Schr¨ odinger equation and the ’t Hooft equation, Phys. Lett. B 836 (2023) 137628. arXiv:2208.08405, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137628

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137628 2023

  20. [20]

    Ahmady, R

    M. Ahmady, R. Sandapen, Predictions for pion and its excited states using light-front QCD holography and ’t Hooft equation, PoS ICHEP2024 (2025) 540. doi:10.22323/1.476.0540

    work page doi:10.22323/1.476.0540 2025

  21. [21]

    A. P. Bakulev, K. Passek-Kumericki, W. Schroers, N. G. Stefanis, Pion form-factor in QCD: From non- local condensates to NLO analytic perturbation the- ory, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 033014, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 70, 079906 (2004)]. arXiv:hep-ph/0405062, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.033014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.033014 2004

  22. [22]

    S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Teramond, Light-Front Dy- namics and AdS/QCD Correspondence: The Pion Form Factor in the Space- and Time-Like Regions, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 056007. arXiv:0707.3859, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.056007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.056007 2008

  23. [23]

    H. J. Kwee, R. F. Lebed, Pion form-factors in holo- graphic QCD, JHEP 01 (2008) 027. arXiv:0708.4054, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/01/027

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/01/027 2008

  24. [24]

    Pion electromagnetic form factor at spacelike momenta

    L. Chang, I. C. Clo¨ et, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, P. C. Tandy, Pion electromagnetic form factor at spacelike momenta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (14) (2013) 141802. arXiv:1307.0026, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.141802

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.141802 2013

  25. [25]

    Nasibova, X

    N. Nasibova, X. D. Arsiwalla, Pion phenomenology from the thermal soft-wall model of holographic QCD, Phys. Rev. D 112 (11) (2025) 116010. arXiv:2505.23455, doi:10.1103/m327-xs85

    work page doi:10.1103/m327-xs85 2025

  26. [26]

    S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Teramond, H. G. Dosch, J. Erlich, Light-Front Holographic QCD and Emerging Confine- ment, Phys. Rept. 584 (2015) 1–105. arXiv:1407.8131, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.05.001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.05.001 2015

  27. [27]

    X. Gao, N. Karthik, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, S. Syritsyn, Y. Zhao, Pion form factor and charge ra- dius from lattice QCD at the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) (2021) 114515. arXiv:2102.06047, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114515

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.114515 2021

  28. [28]

    Goharipour, M

    M. Goharipour, M. H. Amiri, F. Irani, H. Hashamipour, K. Azizi, Determination of the pion generalized parton distributions at zero skewness, Phys. Rev. D 112 (11) (2025) 114046. arXiv:2508.15073, doi:10.1103/lyh6-727b

    work page doi:10.1103/lyh6-727b 2025

  29. [29]

    L.-B. Chen, W. Chen, F. Feng, Y. Jia, Next- to-Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Corrections to Pion Electromagnetic Form Factors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (20) (2024) 201901, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 134, 229901 (2025)]. arXiv:2312.17228, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.201901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.201901 2024

  30. [30]

    Puhan, H

    S. Puhan, H. Dahiya, Scalar, vector, and tensor form factors of pion and kaon, Phys. Rev. D 111 (11) (2025) 114039. arXiv:2505.02507, doi:10.1103/2wpb-jgkc

    work page doi:10.1103/2wpb-jgkc 2025

  31. [31]

    Wang, Z.-F

    S.-Q. Wang, Z.-F. Liao, J.-M. Shen, H. Zhou, J.- W. Zhang, J. Yan, X.-G. Wu, L. Di Giustino, Anal- ysis of the pion electromagnetic form factor with next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (12) (2025) 1435. arXiv:2507.20479, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15174-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15174-x 2025

  32. [32]

    S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Teramond, Light-Front Dynamics and AdS/QCD Correspondence: Grav- itational Form Factors of Composite Hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 025032. arXiv:0804.0452, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.025032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.025032 2008

  33. [33]

    Y.-Z. Xu, M. Ding, K. Raya, C. D. Roberts, J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Quintero, S. M. Schmidt, Pion and kaon electromagnetic and gravitational form factors, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2) (2024) 191. arXiv:2311.14832, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12518-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12518-x 2024

  34. [34]

    M. V. Polyakov, P. Schweitzer, Forces inside hadrons: pressure, surface tension, mechanical radius, and all that, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 (26) (2018) 1830025. arXiv:1805.06596, doi:10.1142/S0217751X18300259

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x18300259 2018

  35. [35]

    Broniowski, E

    W. Broniowski, E. Ruiz Arriola, Gravitational form factors of the pion and meson dominance, Phys. Lett. B 859 (2024) 139138. arXiv:2405.07815, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139138

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139138 2024

  36. [36]

    Cao, F.-K

    X.-H. Cao, F.-K. Guo, Q.-Z. Li, B.-W. Wu, D.-L. Yao, Gravitational form factors of pions, kaons and nucleons from dispersion relations (7 2025). arXiv:2507.05375, doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-02025-9 . 8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-02025-9 2025

  37. [37]

    Hatta, J

    Y. Hatta, J. Schoenleber, Sullivan Process near Thresh - old and the Pion Gravitational Form Factors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (25) (2025) 251901. arXiv:2502.12061, doi:10.1103/y9fq-y84c

    work page doi:10.1103/y9fq-y84c 2025

  38. [38]

    Choi, H.-D

    Y. Choi, H.-D. Son, H.-M. Choi, Gravitational form factors of the pion in the self-consistent light-front quark model, Phys. Rev. D 112 (1) (2025) 014043. arXiv:2504.14997, doi:10.1103/h7gf-f7p4

    work page doi:10.1103/h7gf-f7p4 2025

  39. [39]

    K. K. Seth, S. Dobbs, Z. Metreveli, A. Tomaradze, T. Xiao, G. Bonvicini, Electromagnetic Struc- ture of the Proton, Pion, and Kaon by High- Precision Form Factor Measurements at Large Timelike Momentum Transfers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2) (2013) 022002. arXiv:1210.1596, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.022002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.022002 2013

  40. [40]

    D. Li, M. Huang, Dynamical holographic QCD model for glueball and light meson spectra, JHEP 11 (2013) 088. arXiv:1303.6929, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2013)088

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2013)088 2013

  41. [41]

    A. Vega, M. A. Martin Contreras, Melt- ing of scalar hadrons in an AdS/QCD model modified by a thermal dilaton, Nucl. Phys. B 942 (2019) 410–418. arXiv:1808.09096, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.03.014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.03.014 2019

  42. [42]

    A. Vega, M. A. Martin Contreras, Two-body light front wave functions from general AdS/QCD models, Phys. Rev. D 102 (3) (2020) 036017. arXiv:2005.04501, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.036017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.036017 2020

  43. [43]

    M. ´A. Mart ´ ın Contreras, A. Vega, S. Cort´ es, Light pseu- doscalar and axial spectroscopy using AdS/QCD modi- fied soft wall model, Chin. J. Phys. 66 (2020) 715–723. arXiv:1811.10731, doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2020.06.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2020.06.018 2020

  44. [44]

    G. F. de Teramond, H. G. Dosch, S. J. Brodsky, Kinematical and Dynamical Aspects of Higher-Spin Bound-State Equations in Holographic QCD, Phys. Rev. D 87 (7) (2013) 075005. arXiv:1301.1651, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.075005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.075005 2013

  45. [45]

    H. G. Dosch, G. F. de Teramond, S. J. Brod- sky, Holographic light-front QCD, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 5 (2026) 100339. arXiv:2510.20180, doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2026.100339

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2026.100339 2026

  46. [46]

    R. L. Workman, et al., Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097 2022

  47. [47]

    Rinaldi, F

    M. Rinaldi, F. A. Ceccopieri, V. Vento, The pion in the graviton soft-wall model: phenomenological applications , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (7) (2022) 626. arXiv:2204.09974, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10538-z

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10538-z 2022

  48. [48]

    Y. Li, J. P. Vary, Light-front holography with chiral symmetry breaking, Phys. Lett. B 825 (2022) 136860. arXiv:2103.09993, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136860

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136860 2022

  49. [49]

    H.-T. Ding, X. Gao, A. D. Hanlon, S. Mukher- jee, P. Petreczky, Q. Shi, S. Syritsyn, R. Zhang, Y. Zhao, QCD Predictions for Meson Electromag- netic Form Factors at High Momenta: Testing Factorization in Exclusive Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (18) (2024) 181902. arXiv:2404.04412, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.181902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.181902 2024

  50. [50]

    S. R. Amendolia, et al., A Measurement of the Space - Like Pion Electromagnetic Form-Factor, Nucl. Phys. B 277 (1986) 168. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90437-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90437-2 1986

  51. [51]

    C. L. Arnold, B. P. Roe, D. Sinclair, Measurement of the form-factors in the decay k+ — > pi mu nu, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 1221–1229. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1221

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.1221 1974

  52. [52]

    Measurement of the Charged Pion Electromagnetic Form Factor

    J. Volmer, et al., Measurement of the Charged Pion Electromagnetic Form-Factor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 1713–1716. arXiv:nucl-ex/0010009, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1713

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.1713 2001

  53. [53]

    Dehghan, F

    Z. Dehghan, F. Almaksusi, K. Azizi, Mechanical prop- erties of proton using flavor-decomposed gravitational form factors, JHEP 06 (2025) 025. arXiv:2502.16689, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2025)025

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2025)025 2025

  54. [54]

    The pion form factor from lattice QCD with two dynamical flavours

    D. Br¨ ommel, et al., The Pion form-factor from lat- tice QCD with two dynamical flavours, Eur. Phys. J. C 51 (2007) 335–345. arXiv:hep-lat/0608021, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0295-6

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0295-6 2007

  55. [55]

    Electromagnetic form factor of the pion from twisted-mass lattice QCD at Nf=2

    R. Frezzotti, V. Lubicz, S. Simula, Electromagnetic fo rm factor of the pion from twisted-mass lattice QCD at N(f) = 2, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 074506. arXiv:0812.4042, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.074506

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.074506 2009

  56. [56]

    B. B. Brandt, A. J¨ uttner, H. Wittig, The pion vector form factor from lattice QCD and NNLO chiral pertur- bation theory, JHEP 11 (2013) 034. arXiv:1306.2916, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2013)034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2013)034 2013

  57. [57]

    Nakamura, et al., Review of parti- cle physics, J

    K. Nakamura, et al., Review of parti- cle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/7A/075021

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/7a/075021 2010

  58. [58]

    D. C. Hackett, P. R. Oare, D. A. Pefkou, P. E. Shanahan, Gravitational form factors of the pion from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 108 (11) (2023) 114504. arXiv:2307.11707, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.114504 2023