pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08509 · v1 · pith:EMSD3CLCnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

What Is a Pattern in Statistical Mechanics? Formalizing Structure and Patterns in One-Dimensional Spin Lattice Models with Computational Mechanics

Omar Aguilar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 18:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords computational mechanicsstatistical mechanicsspin lattice modelsexcess entropystatistical complexityepsilon-machineBoltzmann distributionone-dimensional Ising model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Recasting Boltzmann distributions of one-dimensional spin models as stochastic processes allows computational mechanics to formalize their structure and patterns.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the Boltzmann distribution for finite spin configurations embedded in infinite lattices for three models: finite-range Ising, solid-on-solid, and three-body interactions. It then treats these distributions as stochastic processes to apply computational mechanics, where excess entropy measures predictable information and statistical complexity measures stored information, with the epsilon-machine specifying the structure-generating mechanism. By comparing the configurations selected by these measures and machines to typical samples from the Boltzmann distribution, the work finds agreement, establishing compatibility between the two frameworks. This approach provides a way to identify what constitutes a pattern in statistical mechanics models.

Core claim

By deriving a novel expression for the Boltzmann distribution on finite one-dimensional spin configurations and recasting it as a stochastic process, the structure of each model is quantified by its excess entropy and statistical complexity, while its structure-generating mechanism is given by its epsilon-machine; these jointly determine configurations that agree with those typical under the Boltzmann distribution.

What carries the argument

The epsilon-machine of the stochastic process obtained from the Boltzmann distribution, which encodes the minimal finite-state machine that generates the spin configurations while quantifying structure via excess entropy and statistical complexity.

Load-bearing premise

That recasting the Boltzmann distribution for finite spin configurations as a stochastic process enables valid analysis of structure within computational mechanics while preserving compatibility with statistical mechanics.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the configurations determined by the epsilon-machines and information measures and the typical configurations sampled from the Boltzmann distribution would falsify the agreement claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08509 by Omar Aguilar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Depiction of a finite spin configuration embedded within an infinite spin configuration with periodic boundary conditions. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28010123 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Graphical representation of coarsegrained Ising phase space. Only the purple spins are assigned fixed indices. For clarity, down spins ↓ are represented as 0 instead of −1. To formalize this, we introduce the concept of a sigma algebra, denoted by A. This is a collection of all subsets of ΩC that can be consistently assigned probabilities or measured, meaning they are physically relevant. The sigma algebra… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Graphical representation of configuration and ensemble pattern concepts. Based on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of spin interactions in Ising models with neighboring radii R = 1 (top), R = 2 (middle), and R = 3 (bottom). The spin block method expresses the Hamiltonian of two interacting spin blocks ηj and ηj+1 of the finite-range Ising model as the sum of three contributions, shown in Equa￾tion (37). The first is the energy within block ηj , encompassing the interactions among spins within the block as … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) hµ, E and Cµ vs. J1 for nnn Ising model with J2 = −1.2, B = 0.05 and T = 1. (b) hµ, E and Cµ vs. B for 3-range Ising model with J1 = −2.8, J2 = −1.3, J3 = −0.45 and T = 0.2. For a strongly positive nearest-neighbor coupling J1 ∈ [6, 8], all information measures approach zero, implying a period-1 typical configuration. The resulting “all-ups” pattern observed at these values is consistent with these mea… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: b shows fewer recurrent states compared to Figure 6a. This is due to the stronger magnetic field B and lower temperature in Figure 6b, which bias typical configu￾rations toward a period-1 pattern. Consequently, the variety of possible typical spin con￾figurations is reduced, limiting the range of possible futures. Moreover, Figure 6b exhibits only 3 transient states. This can also be attributed to the bias… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of spin interactions in a 2D spin lattice with the leftmost and rightmost spins fixed to opposite values. The dashed black lines highlight the induced 1D spin chain interface. In what follows, we restrict ny ∈ {0, 1}, so that under sy = 2ny − 1 the SOS Hamil￾tonian is equivalent to a nearest-neighbor 1D Ising chain. We compute the probabilities needed for the information measures and ϵ-machine… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) hµ, E and Cµ vs. U for SOS model with W = 0, V = e −ny and T = 1. (b) hµ, E and Cµ vs. U for SOS model with W = 1, V = e −ny and T = 1. In both panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) ϵ-machine for SOS model with U = 2, W = 0, V = e −ny , T = 1 and Cµ ≈ 0.61. (b) ϵ-machine for SOS model with U = 1, W = 1, V = e −ny , T = 1 and Cµ ≈ 0.33. Lastly, note that the machines for the SOS model in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Illustration of spin interactions in three-body models: nearest-neighbor (purple), next￾nearest neighbor (green), and three-body (orange) couplings. The purpose of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: b, they are period-3. This difference can be attributed to the fact that Figure 11b involves competing couplings, whereas Figure 11a does not, as it only includes the three￾body coupling. In particular, in both Figure 11a and Figure 11b, the three-body coupling Jtb biases configurations toward a period-4 pattern. However, in Figure 11b, the ferro￾magnetic coupling J1 also biases configurations toward a pe… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: aims to illustrate the structural changes in the ϵ-machine of a three-body model with competing couplings as the temperature increases. The plots in Figure 12a and Figure 12b depict the ϵ-machines corresponding to Figure 11b at a very low temperature T = 0.025 and a low temperature T = 2, respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work formalizes the notions of structure and pattern for three distinct one-dimensional spin-lattice models (finite-range Ising, solid-on-solid, and three-body), using information-theoretic and computation-theoretic methods. We begin by presenting a novel derivation of the Boltzmann distribution for finite one-dimensional spin configurations embedded in infinite ones. We next recast this distribution as a stochastic process, thereby enabling us to analyze each spin-lattice model within the theory of computational mechanics. In this framework, the process's structure is quantified by excess entropy (predictable information) and statistical complexity (stored information), and the process's structure-generating mechanism is specified by its epsilon-machine. To assess compatibility with statistical mechanics, we compare the configurations jointly determined by the information measures and epsilon-machines to typical configurations drawn from the Boltzmann distribution, and we find agreement. We also include a self-contained primer on computational mechanics and provide code implementing the information measures and spin-model distributions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to formalize notions of structure and pattern in three one-dimensional spin-lattice models (finite-range Ising, solid-on-solid, three-body) via a novel derivation of the Boltzmann distribution for finite embedded configurations in infinite chains, followed by recasting the distribution as a stationary stochastic process. Computational mechanics is then applied to compute excess entropy, statistical complexity, and epsilon-machines; compatibility with statistical mechanics is assessed by comparing configurations jointly determined by these quantities against typical samples from the original Boltzmann measure, with reported agreement. A self-contained primer on computational mechanics and implementing code are included.

Significance. If the embedding derivation and recasting hold, the work supplies a concrete information-theoretic and computation-theoretic definition of 'pattern' for these models, with the reported agreement serving as an internal consistency check. The provision of code supports reproducibility, and the primer lowers the barrier for readers from statistical mechanics.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and results section] The abstract states agreement between the information-theoretic configurations and Boltzmann samples but does not specify the quantitative metric or tolerance used for 'agreement'; this should be stated explicitly in the results section.
  2. [Section introducing the stochastic process] Notation for the embedded finite configurations and the induced stochastic process should be introduced with a clear table or diagram showing the mapping from spin configurations to symbols in the epsilon-machine alphabet.
  3. [Primer section] The primer on computational mechanics is useful, but cross-references to the specific excess-entropy and statistical-complexity formulas used for the three models would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary correctly captures our contributions: the embedding derivation of the Boltzmann distribution, its recasting as a stationary process, the application of computational mechanics to quantify structure via excess entropy and statistical complexity, the specification of mechanisms via epsilon-machines, and the consistency check against typical samples. We also appreciate the recognition of the primer and code for lowering barriers and supporting reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation presented as independent.

full rationale

The abstract describes a novel derivation of the Boltzmann distribution for finite embedded spin configurations, followed by recasting as a stochastic process and application of computational mechanics quantities, with a subsequent comparison to typical Boltzmann samples offered as compatibility check. No equations, sections, or self-citations are supplied that would allow exhibition of any reduction by construction (e.g., a fitted parameter renamed as prediction or a self-citation chain bearing the central claim). The comparison step is framed as external validation rather than tautological, and the work includes a self-contained primer plus code, indicating the derivation chain is treated as self-contained against external benchmarks. Absent specific quotes demonstrating equivalence of output to input, no circular steps are identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are mentioned. Relies on standard information theory and statistical mechanics concepts.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Boltzmann distribution governs probabilities of spin configurations in the models
    Central to deriving distributions and performing comparisons.
  • standard math Excess entropy, statistical complexity, and epsilon-machines from computational mechanics quantify structure and generating mechanisms
    Used to formalize patterns; assumed valid for stochastic processes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5692 in / 1389 out tokens · 24383 ms · 2026-06-27T18:01:54.309864+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Quantifying the Rise and Fall of Complexity in Closed Systems: The Coffee Automaton

    Aaronson, S.; Carroll, S.M.; Ouellette, L. Quantifying the Rise and Fall of Complexity in Closed Systems: The Coffee Automaton. arXiv 2014, arXiv:1405.6903

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    Discovering Noncritical Organization: Statistical Mechanical, Information Theoretic, and Com- putational Views of Patterns in One-Dimensional Spin Systems

    Feldman, D.P .; Crutchfield, J.P . Discovering Noncritical Organization: Statistical Mechanical, Information Theoretic, and Com- putational Views of Patterns in One-Dimensional Spin Systems. Entropy 2022, 24, 1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24091282

    work page doi:10.3390/e24091282 2022

  3. [3]

    Bak, P .How Nature Works: The Science of Self-organized Criticality , ebook ed.; Springer: New York, NY , USA, 2013

    2013

  4. [4]

    URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science

    Rothstein, J. Information, Measurement, and Quantum Mechanics. Science 1951, 114, 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 114.2955.171

    work page doi:10.1126/science 1951

  5. [5]

    Five degrees of randomness

    Eliazar, I. Five degrees of randomness. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2021, 568, 125662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.1 25662

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2020.1 2021

  6. [6]

    Sethna, J.P .Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, and Complexity ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2006

    2006

  7. [7]

    Lectures on Phase T ransitions and the Renormalization Group; Frontiers in Physics; Westview Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1992; V olume 85

    Goldenfeld, N. Lectures on Phase T ransitions and the Renormalization Group; Frontiers in Physics; Westview Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1992; V olume 85. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429493492

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429493492 1992

  8. [8]

    Chaikin, P .M.; Lubensky , T.C.Principles of Condensed Matter Physics ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995

    1995

  9. [9]

    Scaling Laws for Ising Models Near Tc

    Kadanoff, L.P . Scaling Laws for Ising Models Near Tc. Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1966, 2, 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.2.263

    1966

  10. [10]

    Statistical Mechanics of Phase T ransitions; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1992

    Yeomans, J.M. Statistical Mechanics of Phase T ransitions; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1992

    1992

  11. [11]

    Exact renormalization-group exhibiting tricritical fixed point for a spin-one Ising model in one dimen- sion

    Krinsky , S.; Furman, D. Exact renormalization-group exhibiting tricritical fixed point for a spin-one Ising model in one dimen- sion. Phys. Rev. B 1975, 11, 2602–2613. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.11.2602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.11.2602 1975

  12. [12]

    Ising Model: Local Spin Correlations and Conformal Invariance

    Gheissari, R.; Hongler, C.; Park, S.C. Ising Model: Local Spin Correlations and Conformal Invariance. Commun. Math. Phys. 2019, 367, 771–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03312-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-019-03312-y 2019

  13. [13]

    Analytical and Numerical Studies of the One-Dimensional Spin Facilitated Kinetic Ising Model

    Schulz, M.; Trimper, S. Analytical and Numerical Studies of the One-Dimensional Spin Facilitated Kinetic Ising Model. J. Stat. Phys. 1999, 94, 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004560416939

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1004560416939 1999

  14. [14]

    One-dimensional Ising model: Kinetic studies

    Lacombe, R.H.; Simha, R. One-dimensional Ising model: Kinetic studies. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 61, 1899–1911. https://doi.org/ 10.1063/1.1682190. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28010123 Entropy 2026, 28, 123 40 of 42

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1682190 1974

  15. [15]

    Some necessary background

    Landau, D.P .; Binder, K. Some necessary background. In A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics , 4th ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 7–46

    2015

  16. [17]

    Exact Distribution of Energies in the Two-Dimensional Ising Model

    Beale, P .D. Exact Distribution of Energies in the Two-Dimensional Ising Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 76, 78–81. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.78

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.78 1996

  17. [18]

    Single-file water as a one-dimensional Ising model

    Köfinger, J.; Dellago, C. Single-file water as a one-dimensional Ising model. New J. Phys. 2010, 12, 093044. https://doi.org/10.1 088/1367-2630/12/9/093044

    2010

  18. [19]

    Probability distribution of the order parameter for the three-dimensional Ising-model universality class: A high-precision Monte Carlo study

    Tsypin, M.M.; Blote, H.W.J. Probability distribution of the order parameter for the three-dimensional Ising-model universality class: A high-precision Monte Carlo study . Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.73

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.62.73 2000

  19. [20]

    Probability distributions of the work in the two-dimensional Ising model

    Chatelain, C.; Karevski, D. Probability distributions of the work in the two-dimensional Ising model. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2006, 2006, P06005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2006/06/P06005

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2006/06/p06005 2006

  20. [21]

    Statistical Mechanics, 3rd ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2011

    Pathria, R.K.; Beale, P .D. Statistical Mechanics, 3rd ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2011

    2011

  21. [22]

    Random-Energy Model: Limit of a Family of Disordered Models

    Derrida, B. Random-Energy Model: Limit of a Family of Disordered Models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980, 45, 79–82. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.79

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.45.79 1980

  22. [23]

    Thermostatics and Thermodynamics: An Introduction to Energy, Information and States of Matter, with Engineering Applica- tions; D

    Tribus, M. Thermostatics and Thermodynamics: An Introduction to Energy, Information and States of Matter, with Engineering Applica- tions; D. Van Nostrand Company , Inc.: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1961

    1961

  23. [24]

    Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology ; Jason Aronson Inc.: Northvale, NJ, USA; London, UK, 1987

    Bateson, G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology ; Jason Aronson Inc.: Northvale, NJ, USA; London, UK, 1987

    1987

  24. [25]

    Elements of Information Theory , 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006

    Cover, T.M.; Thomas, J.A. Elements of Information Theory , 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006

    2006

  25. [26]

    The Dripping Faucet as a Model Chaotic System ; Aerial Press: Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 1984

    Shaw, R. The Dripping Faucet as a Model Chaotic System ; Aerial Press: Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 1984

    1984

  26. [27]

    Symbolic dynamics of noisy chaos

    Crutchfield, J.P .; Packard, N.H. Symbolic dynamics of noisy chaos. Phys. D 1983, 7, 201–223

    1983

  27. [28]

    Toward a quantitative theory of self-generated complexity .Int

    Grassberger, P . Toward a quantitative theory of self-generated complexity .Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1986, 25, 907–938

    1986

  28. [29]

    Complexity measures and cellular automata

    Lindgren, K.; Nordhal, M.G. Complexity measures and cellular automata. Complex Syst. 1988, 2, 409–440

    1988

  29. [30]

    Inferring statistical complexity

    Crutchfield, J.P .; Young, K. Inferring statistical complexity . Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 63, 105–108

    1989

  30. [31]

    The calculi of emergence: Computation, dynamics, and induction

    Crutchfield, J.P . The calculi of emergence: Computation, dynamics, and induction. Phys. D 1994, 75, 11–54

    1994

  31. [32]

    Between order and chaos

    Crutchfield, J.P . Between order and chaos. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2190

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys2190 2012

  32. [33]

    Computational Mechanics: Pattern and Prediction, Structure and Simplicity

    Shalizi, C.R.; Crutchfield, J.P . Computational Mechanics: Pattern and Prediction, Structure and Simplicity . J. Stat. Phys. 2001, 104, 817–879. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010388907793

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1010388907793 2001

  33. [34]

    Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation , 2nd ed.; Addison-Wesley: Carrollton, TX, USA, 2001

    Hopcroft, J.E.; Ullman, J.D. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation , 2nd ed.; Addison-Wesley: Carrollton, TX, USA, 2001

    2001

  34. [35]

    Thermodynamic depth of causal states: Objective complexity via minimal representations

    Crutchfield, J.P .; Shalizi, C.R. Thermodynamic depth of causal states: Objective complexity via minimal representations. Phys. Rev. E 1999, 59, 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.59.275

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.59.275 1999

  35. [36]

    Optimal causal inference: Estimating stored information and approximating causal archi- tecture

    Still, S.; Crutchfield, J.P .; Ellison, C.J. Optimal causal inference: Estimating stored information and approximating causal archi- tecture. Chaos 2010, 20, 037111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3489885

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3489885 2010

  36. [37]

    Bayesian structural inference for hidden processes

    Streloff, C.C.; Crutchfield, J.P . Bayesian structural inference for hidden processes. Phys. Rev. E 2014, 89, 042119. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042119

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.89.042119 2014

  37. [38]

    Predictive Rate–Distortion for Infinite-Order Markov Processes

    Marzen, S.E.; Crutchfield, J.P . Predictive Rate–Distortion for Infinite-Order Markov Processes. J. Stat. Phys. 2016, 163, 1312–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-016-1520-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10955-016-1520-1 2016

  38. [39]

    Disco: Physics-based unsupervised discovery of coherent structures in spatiotemporal systems

    Rupe, A.; Kumar, N.; Epifanov , V .; Kashinath, K.; Pavlyk, O.; Schimbach, F.; Patwary , M.; Maidanov , S.; Lee, V .; Prabhat.; et al. Disco: Physics-based unsupervised discovery of coherent structures in spatiotemporal systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM Workshop on Machine Learning in High Performance Computing Environments (MLHPC), Denver, CO,...

    work page doi:10.1109/mlhpc49564.2019.00013 2019

  39. [40]

    An inertial minimal-deformation-rate framework for shape optimization

    Rupe, A.; Crutchfield, J.P . Spacetime Autoencoders Using Local Causal States. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.05451. https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv .2010.05451

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv 2020

  40. [41]

    Discovering causal structure with reproducing-kernel Hilbert space ϵ-machines

    Brodu, N.; Crutchfield, J.P . Discovering causal structure with reproducing-kernel Hilbert space ϵ-machines. Chaos: Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2022, 32, 023103. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0062829

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0062829 2022

  41. [42]

    Inferring kernel epsilon-machines: Discovering structure in complex systems

    Jurgens, A.M.; Brodu, N. Inferring kernel epsilon-machines: Discovering structure in complex systems. Chaos: Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2025, 35, 033162. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142981

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0142981 2025

  42. [43]

    Structural information in two-dimensional patterns: Entropy convergence and excess entropy

    Feldman, D.P .; Crutchfield, J.P . Structural information in two-dimensional patterns: Entropy convergence and excess entropy . Phys. Rev. E 2003, 67, 051104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.67.051104

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.67.051104 2003

  43. [44]

    Anatomy of a Spin: The Information-Theoretic Structure of Classical Spin Systems

    Vijayaraghavan, V .S.; James, R.G.; Crutchfield, J.P . Anatomy of a Spin: The Information-Theoretic Structure of Classical Spin Systems. Entropy 2017, 19, 214

    2017

  44. [45]

    Extreme Quantum Advantage when Simulating Classical Systems with Long-Range Interaction

    Aghamohammadi, C.; Mahoney , J.R.; Crutchfield, J.P . Extreme Quantum Advantage when Simulating Classical Systems with Long-Range Interaction. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6735. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04928-7 . https://doi.org/10.3390/e28010123 Entropy 2026, 28, 123 41 of 42

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04928-7 2017

  45. [46]

    The ambiguity of simplicity in quantum and classical simulation

    Aghamohammadi, C.; Mahoney , J.R.; Crutchfield, J.P . The ambiguity of simplicity in quantum and classical simulation. Phys. Lett. A 2017, 381, 1223–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2016.12.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2016.12.036 2017

  46. [47]

    Revisiting thermodynamics in computation and information theory .arXiv 2024, arXiv:2102.09981

    Chattopadhyay , P .; Paul, G. Revisiting thermodynamics in computation and information theory .arXiv 2024, arXiv:2102.09981

    arXiv 2024

  47. [48]

    A thermodynamically consistent model of finite-state machines

    Chu, D.; Spinney , R.E. A thermodynamically consistent model of finite-state machines. Interface Focus 2018, 8, 20180037. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2018.0037

    work page doi:10.1098/rsfs.2018.0037 2018

  48. [49]

    Thermodynamics of stochastic Turing machines

    Strasberg, P .; Cerrillo, J.; Schaller, G.; Brandes, T. Thermodynamics of stochastic Turing machines. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1506.00894

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [50]

    Stochastic Process Turing Machines

    Wolpert, D.H.; Scharnhorst, J. Stochastic Process Turing Machines. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.07131

    arXiv 2024

  50. [51]

    The Quantum Abstract Machine

    Li, L.; Chang, L.; Cleaveland, R.; Zhu, M.; Wu, X. The Quantum Abstract Machine. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.13469

    arXiv 2024

  51. [52]

    Quantum finite automata: Survey , status and research directions

    Bhatia, A.S.; Kumar, A. Quantum finite automata: Survey , status and research directions. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1901.07992

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [53]

    A local model of quantum Turing machines

    Wang, D.S. A local model of quantum Turing machines. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1912.03767

    arXiv 2019

  53. [54]

    Revisiting the simulation of quantum Turing machines by quantum circuits

    Molina, A.; Watrous, J. Revisiting the simulation of quantum Turing machines by quantum circuits. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2019, 475, 20180767. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0767

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2018.0767 2019

  54. [55]

    Ising-model Monte Carlo simulations: Density of states and mass gap

    Alves, N.A.; Berg, B.A.; Villanova, R. Ising-model Monte Carlo simulations: Density of states and mass gap. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 41, 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.383

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.41.383 1990

  55. [56]

    Monte Carlo simulation of the Ising model on FPGA

    Lin, Y .; Wang, F.; Zheng, X.; Gao, H.; Zhang, L. Monte Carlo simulation of the Ising model on FPGA. J. Comput. Phys. 2013, 237, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.12.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2012.12.005 2013

  56. [57]

    Pushing the limits of Monte Carlo simulations for the three-dimensional Ising model

    Ferrenberg, A.M.; Xu, J.; Landau, D.P . Pushing the limits of Monte Carlo simulations for the three-dimensional Ising model. Phys. Rev. E 2018, 97, 043301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.043301

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.97.043301 2018

  57. [58]

    MacKay , D.J.Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003

    2003

  58. [59]

    Surface Diffusion Modelling: Transfer Matrix Approach

    Myshlyavtsev , A.V . Surface Diffusion Modelling: Transfer Matrix Approach. InStudies in Surface Science and Catalysis ; Guerrero- Ruiz, A., Rodríguez-Ramos, I., Eds.; Elsevier Science B.V .: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; V olume 138, pp. 173–190. https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(01)80375-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167-2991(01)80375-7 2001

  59. [60]

    Coarse-graining as a downward causation mechanism

    Flack, J.C. Coarse-graining as a downward causation mechanism. Philos. T rans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2017, 375, 20160338. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0338

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0338 2017

  60. [61]

    What Is a Macrostate? Subjective Observations and Objective Dynamics

    Shalizi, C.R.; Moore, C. What Is a Macrostate? Subjective Observations and Objective Dynamics. Found. Phys. 2025, 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-024-00814-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10701-024-00814-1 2025

  61. [62]

    Introduction to (generalized) Gibbs measures

    Ny , A.L. Introduction to (generalized) Gibbs measures. arXiv 2007, arXiv:0712.1171

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  62. [63]

    A new characterization of Gibbs measures on NZd

    Muir, S. A new characterization of Gibbs measures on NZd . Nonlinearity 2011, 24, 2933–2952. https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7 715/24/10/014

    work page doi:10.1088/0951-7 2011

  63. [64]

    Limiting Gibbs measures of Potts model with countable set of spin values

    Ganikhodjaev , N. Limiting Gibbs measures of Potts model with countable set of spin values. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 336, 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.013 2007

  64. [65]

    An Introduction to Symbolic Dynamics and Coding , 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021

    Lind, D.; Marcus, B. An Introduction to Symbolic Dynamics and Coding , 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021

    2021

  65. [66]

    Regularities Unseen, Randomness Observed: Levels of Entropy Convergence

    Crutchfield, J.P .; Feldman, D.P . Regularities Unseen, Randomness Observed: Levels of Entropy Convergence. arXiv 2001, arXiv:cond-mat/0102181

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  66. [67]

    The Mathematical Theory of Communication ; University of Illinois Press: Champaign-Urbana, IL, USA, 1963

    Shannon, C.E.; Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication ; University of Illinois Press: Champaign-Urbana, IL, USA, 1963

    1963

  67. [68]

    A Brief Introduction to Information Theory , Excess Entropy , and Computational Mechanics

    Feldman, D. A Brief Introduction to Information Theory , Excess Entropy , and Computational Mechanics. College of the Atlantic, Bar Harbor, ME, USA, 1998

    1998

  68. [69]

    Causal Architecture, Complexity , and Self-Organization in Time Series and Cellular Automata

    Shalizi, C.R. Causal Architecture, Complexity , and Self-Organization in Time Series and Cellular Automata. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA, 2001. Available online: http://bactra.org/thesis/ (accessed on accessed on 18 January 2026 )

    2001

  69. [70]

    Probabilistic Deterministic Finite Automata and Recurrent Networks, Revisited

    Marzen, S.E.; Crutchfield, J.P . Probabilistic Deterministic Finite Automata and Recurrent Networks, Revisited. Entropy 2022, 24, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24010090

    work page doi:10.3390/e24010090 2022

  70. [71]

    Fluctuation Spectroscopy

    Young, K.; Crutchfield, J.P . Fluctuation Spectroscopy . Chaos Solitons Fractals 1994, 4, 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-077 9(94)90007-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0960-077 1994

  71. [72]

    The Grammar and Statistical Mechanics of Complex Physical Systems

    Young, K.A. The Grammar and Statistical Mechanics of Complex Physical Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 1991

    1991

  72. [73]

    Real Patterns

    Dennett, D.C. Real Patterns. J. Philos. 1991, 88, 27–51

    1991

  73. [74]

    Statistical Mechanics of Liquid He 3

    Kikuchi, R. Statistical Mechanics of Liquid He 3. Phys. Rev. 1955, 99, 1666–1671

    1955

  74. [75]

    Many-Neighbored Ising Chain

    Dobson, J.F. Many-Neighbored Ising Chain. J. Math. Phys. 1969, 10

    1969

  75. [76]

    Magnetic Neutron Diffraction from Exchange-Coupled Lattices at High Temperatures

    Slotnick, M. Magnetic Neutron Diffraction from Exchange-Coupled Lattices at High Temperatures. Phys. Rev. 1951, 83, 996–1000. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev .83.996

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev 1951

  76. [77]

    Exchange Interactions

    Zener, C.; Heikes, R.R. Exchange Interactions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1953, 25, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.25.191. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28010123 Entropy 2026, 28, 123 42 of 42

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.25.191 1953

  77. [78]

    Frustration Properties of the 1D Ising Model

    Zarubin, A.V .; Kassan-Ogly , F.A.; Proshkin, A.I.; Shestakov , A.E. Frustration Properties of the 1D Ising Model. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2019, 128, 778–807. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377611904006X

    work page doi:10.1134/s106377611904006x 2019

  78. [79]

    Frustration in a generalized Kagome Ising antiferromagnet: Exact results

    Mutallib, K.A.; Barry , J.H. Frustration in a generalized Kagome Ising antiferromagnet: Exact results. Phys. Rev. E 2022, 106, 014149. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.014149

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.106.014149 2022

  79. [80]

    Ising models of quantum frustration

    Moessner, R.; Sondhi, S.L. Ising models of quantum frustration. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 224401. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.63.224401

    2001

  80. [81]

    The Growth of Crystals and the Equilibrium Structure of Their Surfaces

    Burton, W.K.; Cabrera, N.; Frank, F.C. The Growth of Crystals and the Equilibrium Structure of Their Surfaces. Philos. T rans. R. Soc. London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1951, 243, 299–358

    1951

Showing first 80 references.