pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10379 · v1 · pith:2WXP5AGAnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Nonreciprocal photon bundle emission

Baijun Li , Jing-Xue Liu , Tian-Xiang Lu , Le-Man Kuang , Chaohong Lee , Hui Jing This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 13:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords nonreciprocal emissionphoton bundlequantum squeezingresonator-atom systemsuper-Rabi oscillationdirectional dissipationtwo-photon emission
0
0 comments X

The pith

Directional quantum squeezing produces nonreciprocal two-photon bundle emission in a resonator-atom system.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a compound system of two coupled optical resonators and a two-level atom. Directional quantum squeezing creates asymmetric frequency detuning and photon hopping between the resonators. This asymmetry drives directional two-photon super-Rabi oscillations. The system's intrinsic dissipation then allows two types of two-photon bundle emission to occur only for a probe input from one direction, while the emission is blocked for input from the opposite direction. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies an all-optical route to direction-dependent multiquanta control.

Core claim

Directional quantum squeezing induces asymmetric frequency detuning and photon hopping interaction between the two resonators, leading to the directional excitation of the two-photon super-Rabi oscillation. By harnessing intrinsic dissipation of the system, two types of two-photon bundle emission can be selectively induced for the probe field input from one direction while it is prohibited with the probe from the other direction.

What carries the argument

Directional quantum squeezing, which produces the asymmetric detuning and hopping that enables one-way two-photon super-Rabi oscillation.

If this is right

  • Nonreciprocal multiquanta emission becomes achievable through an all-optical mechanism without external fields.
  • The same directional control can be applied to chiral quantum emitters.
  • Backscattering-immune photonic communications become feasible using the induced asymmetry.
  • Two distinct types of two-photon bundles can be toggled by input direction alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism may extend to higher-order photon bundles by adjusting the squeezing strength.
  • Circuit-QED realizations could test the effect at microwave frequencies with existing hardware.
  • The approach connects nonreciprocal optics to squeezing-based sources without requiring topological structures.

Load-bearing premise

Directional quantum squeezing can be realized in the compound resonator-atom system without unmodeled losses or noise that would erase the required asymmetry.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures equal two-photon bundle emission rates for probe light entering from both directions, despite the presence of directional squeezing, would falsify the claimed nonreciprocity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10379 by Baijun Li, Chaohong Lee, Hui Jing, Jing-Xue Liu, Le-Man Kuang, Tian-Xiang Lu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of nonreciprocal two-photon bundle emission via directional quantum squeezing. (a,b) Compound system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Nonreciprocal two-photon bundle emission with the photons emitted from different cavities. (a,b) Nonreciprocal super [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Nonreciprocal two-photon bundle emission with photons emitted from cavity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum squeezing, a cornerstone of quantum optics and photonics, has played a key role in achieving ultra-precision sensing and realizing nonreciprocal engineering. However, the nonreciprocal multiquanta emission has remained largely unexplored by using directional quantum squeezing. Here, the one-way photon-photon bundle emission in a compound system consisted of two coupled optical resonators and a two-level atom is investigated. It is found that the directional quantum squeezing induces the asymmetric frequency detuning and photon hopping interaction between the two resonators, leading to the directional excitation of the two-photon super-Rabi oscillation. In particular, by harnessing intrinsic dissipation of the system, two types of two-photon bundle emission can be selectively induced for the probe field input from one direction while it is prohibited with the probe from the other direction. This finding bridges the broad fields ranging from nonreciprocal physics to quantum squeezing optics and multiquanta emission control through an all-optical approach, which can enable potential applications in chiral quantum emitters and backscattering-immune photonic communications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a scheme for nonreciprocal two-photon bundle emission in a compound system of two coupled optical resonators and a two-level atom. Directional quantum squeezing is shown to induce asymmetric frequency detuning and photon hopping, enabling directional two-photon super-Rabi oscillations. Harnessing the system's intrinsic dissipation then allows selective induction of two types of two-photon bundle emission for a probe field incident from one direction while prohibiting it from the opposite direction.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the result would link directional squeezing to controlled multiquanta emission and nonreciprocity via an all-optical mechanism, potentially enabling applications in chiral quantum emitters and backscattering-immune photonic systems. The explicit use of intrinsic dissipation for directionality is a constructive feature.

major comments (1)
  1. [model and Hamiltonian section] The central claim rests on directional quantum squeezing producing asymmetric detuning and hopping without reciprocal loss channels. The model description does not specify the microscopic implementation (auxiliary drives or engineered baths) or demonstrate that these elements preserve one-way super-Rabi oscillations under realistic parameters; this is load-bearing for the nonreciprocity result.
minor comments (1)
  1. [results section] Notation for the two types of bundle emission and the super-Rabi frequency should be defined explicitly with equations rather than descriptive text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this important point regarding the model section. We address the comment below and have prepared revisions to strengthen the presentation of the directional squeezing implementation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [model and Hamiltonian section] The central claim rests on directional quantum squeezing producing asymmetric detuning and hopping without reciprocal loss channels. The model description does not specify the microscopic implementation (auxiliary drives or engineered baths) or demonstrate that these elements preserve one-way super-Rabi oscillations under realistic parameters; this is load-bearing for the nonreciprocity result.

    Authors: We agree that a more explicit discussion of the microscopic origin is warranted. In the revised manuscript we add a dedicated paragraph in the model section outlining an all-optical implementation via auxiliary coherent drives applied to the two resonators, which generate the directional squeezing terms in the effective Hamiltonian without introducing additional reciprocal loss channels. We also include numerical simulations using experimentally accessible parameters (squeezing amplitudes up to 0.3, resonator decay rates of order 0.01–0.05 in normalized units, and atom-resonator coupling strengths consistent with circuit-QED platforms) that confirm the directional super-Rabi oscillations remain intact and the nonreciprocity is preserved. These additions directly address the load-bearing aspect of the claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from model assumptions

full rationale

The paper posits directional quantum squeezing as an input mechanism that induces asymmetric detuning and hopping between resonators, then derives directional two-photon super-Rabi oscillations and selective bundle emission via intrinsic dissipation. No load-bearing step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or redefinition by construction; the central nonreciprocity follows from the stated asymmetry without tautological closure. The analysis remains independent of external benchmarks as a proposed physical effect.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms beyond standard quantum optics assumptions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard quantum optical models (master equation, squeezing operators) apply to the resonator-atom system
    Typical background assumption for theoretical proposals in this field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5711 in / 1074 out tokens · 39224 ms · 2026-06-27T13:00:13.406050+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Dell’Anno, S

    F. Dell’Anno, S. D. Siena, F. Illuminati,Phys. Rep. 2006,428, 53–168

    2006

  2. [2]

    Pan, Z.-B

    J.-W. Pan, Z.-B. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, M. ˙Zukowski,Rev. Mod. Phys.2012,84, 777

    2012

  3. [3]

    D’Angelo, M

    M. D’Angelo, M. V. Chekhova, Y. Shih,Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001,87, 013602

    2001

  4. [4]

    A. N. Boto, P. Kok, D. S. Abrams,Phys. Rev. Lett.2000, 85, 2733

    2000

  5. [5]

    H. J. Kimble,Nature2008,453, 1023–1030

  6. [6]

    Thew,Nat

    N, Gisin, R. Thew,Nat. Photonics2007,1, 165–171

  7. [7]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone,Science2004,306, 1330–1336

  8. [8]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone,Nat. Photonics 2011,5, 222–229

    2011

  9. [9]

    C. S. Mu˜ noz, E. del Valle, A. G. Tudela, K. M¨ uller, S. Lichtmannecker, M. Kaniber, C. Tejedor, J. J. Fin- ley, F. P. Laussy,Nat. Photonics2014,8, 550–555. 7

  10. [10]

    C. S. Mu˜ noz, F. P. Laussy, C. Tejedor, E. del Valle,New J. Phys.2015,17, 123021

    2015

  11. [11]

    Chang, A

    Y. Chang, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C. S. Mu˜ noz, C. Navarrete-Benlloch, T. Shi,Phys. Rev. Lett.2016, 117, 203602

    2016

  12. [12]

    C. S. Mu˜ noz, F. P. Laussy, E. del Valle, C. Tejedor, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela,Optica2018,5, 14–26

  13. [13]

    Q. Bin, Y. Wu, X.-Y. L¨ u,Phys. Rev. Lett.2021,127, 073602

    2021

  14. [14]

    Jiang, F

    S.-Y. Jiang, F. Zou, Y. Wang, J.-F. Huang, X.-W. Xu, J.-Q. Liao,Opt. Express2023,31, 15697

  15. [15]

    J. Tang, Y. G. Deng,APL Photonics2023,8, 076103

  16. [16]

    C. D. Gou, J. Xu, F. Wang, X. M. Hu,New J. Phys. 2024,26, 073046

    2024

  17. [17]

    Gonz´ aez-Tudela, V

    A. Gonz´ aez-Tudela, V. Paulisch, D. E. Chang, H. J. Kim- ble, J. I. Cirac,Phys. Rev. Lett.2015,115, 163603

    2015

  18. [18]

    Gonz´ aez-Tudela, V

    A. Gonz´ aez-Tudela, V. Paulisch, H. J. Kimble, J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett.2017,118, 213601

    2017

  19. [19]

    F. Xing, Z. Y. Liao, X.-H. Wang,Phys. Rev. A2024, 109, 013718

  20. [20]

    Zou, J.-Q

    F. Zou, J.-Q. Liao, Y. Li,Phys. Rev. A2022,105, 053507

  21. [21]

    G. C. M´ enard, A. Peugeot, C. Padurariu, C. Rolland, B. Kubala, Y. Mukharsky, Z. Iftikhar, C. Altimiras, P. Roche,et al.,Phys. Rev. X2022,12, 021006

  22. [22]

    Chiarella, T

    G. Chiarella, T. Frank, P. Farrera, G. Rempe,Optica Quantum2024,2, 346–350

  23. [23]

    Y. G. Deng, T. Shi, S. Yi,Photonics Res.2021,9, 1289

    2021

  24. [24]

    Bin, X.-Y

    Q. Bin, X.-Y. L¨ u, F. P. Laussy, F. Nori, Y. Wu,Phys. Rev. Lett.2020,124, 053601

    2020

  25. [25]

    H. Y. Yuan, J. K. Xie, R. A. Duine,Phys. Rev. Applied 2023,19, 064070

    2023

  26. [26]

    Bin, Q.-Y

    Q. Bin, Q.-Y. Qiu, Y. Wu, X.-Y. L¨ u,Laser Photonics Rev.2024,18, 2300977

    2024

  27. [27]

    C. D. Gou, X. M. Hu, J. Xu, F. Wang,Phys. Rev. Re- search2024,6, 023052

  28. [28]

    D. L. Sounas, A. Al` u,Nat. Photonics2017,11, 774–783

  29. [29]

    Peng, S ¸

    B. Peng, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, F. C. Lei, F. Monifi, M. Gi- anfreda, G. L. Long, S. H. Fan, F. Nori, C. M. Bender, L. Yang,Nat. Phys.2014,10, 394–398

    2014

  30. [30]

    Y. Shi, Z. Yu, S. Fan,Nat. Photonics2015,9, 388–392

  31. [31]

    Shen, Y.-L

    Z. Shen, Y.-L. Zhang, Y. Chen, C.-L. Zou, Y.-F. Xiao, X.-B. Zou, F.-W. Sun, G.-C. Guo, C.-H. Dong,Nat. Pho- tonics2016,10, 657–661

  32. [32]

    Maayani, R

    S. Maayani, R. Dahan, Y. Kligerman, E. Moses, A. U. Hassan, H. Jing, F. Nori, D. N. Christodoulides, T. Carmon,Nature2018,558, 569–572

  33. [33]

    Zhang, Y

    S. Zhang, Y. Hu, G. Lin, Y. P. Niu, K. Y. Xia, J. B. Gong, S. Q. Gong,Nat. Photonics2018,12, 744–748

  34. [34]

    K. Y. Xia, F. Nori, M. Xiao,Phys. Rev. Lett.2018,121, 203602

    2018

  35. [35]

    Cotrufo, A

    M. Cotrufo, A. Cordaro, D. L. Sounas, A. Polman, A. Al` u,Nat. Photonics,2024,18, 81–90

    2024

  36. [36]

    Z. N. Zhang, A. K. Dehaghi, P. Ghosh, L. X. Zhu,Phys. Rev. Lett.2025,135, 016901

    2025

  37. [37]

    X. M. Li, H. C. Yang, E. Z. Wu, X. C. Yao, Y. Li, F. Gao, H. S. Chen, Z. J. Wang,Nat. Commun.2025,16, 7703

    2025

  38. [38]

    Q. Bin, H. Jing, Y. Wu, F. Nori, X.-Y. L¨ u,Phys. Rev. Lett.2024,133, 043601

    2024

  39. [39]

    D. F. Walls,Nature1983,306, 141–146

  40. [40]

    R. E. Slusher, L. W. Hollberg, B. Yurke, J. C. Mertz, J. F. Valley,Phys. Rev. Lett.1985,55, 2409–2412

    1985

  41. [41]

    L. A. Wu, H. J. Kimble, J. L. Hall, H. F. Wu,Phys. Rev. Lett.1986,57, 2520–2523

    1986

  42. [42]

    A. E. Ulanov, B. Ruhnke, T. Wildi, T. Herr,Nat. Com- mun.2025,16, 10791

    2025

  43. [43]

    Schnabel,Physics Reports2017,684, 1–51

    R. Schnabel,Physics Reports2017,684, 1–51

  44. [44]

    C. M. Caves, K. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drever,Rev. Mod. Phys.1980,52, 341

    1980

  45. [45]

    C. M. Caves,Phys. Rev. D1981,23, 1693

  46. [46]

    Grote, K

    H. Grote, K. Danzmann, K. L. Dooley, J. Slutsky, H. Vahlbruch,Phys. Rev. Lett.2013,110, 181101

    2013

  47. [47]

    J. Aasi, J. Abadie, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Ab- bott, M. R. Abernathy, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Ad- desso,et al.,Nat. Photonics2013,7, 613–619

  48. [48]

    M. Tse, H. C. Yu, N. Kijbunchoo, A. Fernandez-Galiana, P. Dupej, L. Barsotti, C. D. Blair, D. D. Brown, S. E. Dwyer,et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett.2019,123, 231107

    2019

  49. [49]

    S. L. Braunstein, P. van Loock,Rev. Mod. Phys.2005, 77, 513

    2005

  50. [50]

    X.-Y. L¨ u, Y. Wu, J. R. Johansson, H. Jing, J. Zhang, F. Nori,Phys. Rev. Lett.2015,114, 093602

    2015

  51. [51]

    Leroux, L

    C. Leroux, L. C. G. Govia, A. A. Clerk,Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018,120, 093602

    2018

  52. [52]

    W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, P. B. Li, X.-Y. L¨ u, J. Q. You, F. Nori,Phys. Rev. Lett.2018,120, 093601

    2018

  53. [53]

    W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, F. Nori,Phys. Rev. Lett.2024, 133, 233605

    2024

  54. [54]

    Fruchart, R

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, V. Vitelli,Na- ture2021,592, 363–369

  55. [55]

    Huang, A

    R. Huang, A. Miranowicz, J.-Q. Liao, F. Nori, H. Jing, Phys. Rev. Lett.2018,121, 153601

    2018

  56. [56]

    B. J. Li, R. Huang, X. W. Xu, A. Miranowicz, H. Jing, Photonics Res.2019,7, 630–641

    2019

  57. [57]

    B. J. Li, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, X.-W. Xu, L. Zhang, L.- M. Kuang, H. Jing,Phys. Rev. A2021,103, 053522

  58. [58]

    B. J. Li, Y. L. Zuo, L.-M. Kuang, H. Jing, C. H. Lee,npj Quantum Inf.2024,10, 75

    2024

  59. [59]

    Ahmadi, P

    B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, P. Horodecki, S. Barzanjeh, Phys. Rev. Lett.2024,132, 210402

    2024

  60. [60]

    Veenstra, O

    J. Veenstra, O. Gamayun, X. F. Guo, A. Sarvi, C. V. Meinersen, C. Coulais,Nature2024,627, 528–533

  61. [61]

    Zhu, C.-S

    G.-L. Zhu, C.-S. Hu, H. Wang, W. Qin, X.-Y. L¨ u, F. Nori, Phys. Rev. Lett.2024,132, 193602

    2024

  62. [62]

    Nadolny, C

    T. Nadolny, C. Bruder, M. Brunelli,Phys. Rev. X2025, 15, 011010

  63. [63]

    Z. M. Zhang, Z. X. Xu, R. Huang, X. D. Lu, F. B. Zhang, D. H. Li, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, F. Nori, H. Bao,et al.,Nat. Photonics2025,19, 840–846

  64. [64]

    L. Tang, J. S. Tang, M. Y. Chen, F. Nori, M. Xiao, K. Y. Xia,Phys. Rev. Lett.2022,128, 083604

    2022

  65. [65]

    Huang, Y.-B

    S.-T. Huang, Y.-B. Qian, Z.-Y. Zhang, L. Sun, B. P. Hou, L. Tang,Adv. Quantum Technol.2024,7, 2400217

    2024

  66. [66]

    Shen, J.-Q

    C.-P. Shen, J.-Q. Chen, X.-F. Pan, Y.-M. Ren, X.- L. Dong, X.-L.Hei, Y.-F. Qiao, P.-B. Li,Phys. Rev. A 2023,108, 023716

    2023

  67. [67]

    Wang, L.-L

    D.-Y. Wang, L.-L. Yan, S.-L. Su, C.-H. Bai, H.-F. Wang, E. Liang,Opt. Express2023,31, 22343–22357

  68. [68]

    Liu, K.-W

    D.-W. Liu, K.-W. Huang, Y. Wu, L.-G. Si,Appl. Phys. Lett.2023,123, 061103

    2023

  69. [69]

    Huang, Y

    K.-W. Huang, Y. Wu, L.-G. Si,Opt. Lett.2022,47, 3311–3314

    2022

  70. [70]

    T.-X. Lu, Y. Wang, K. Y. Xia, X. Xiao, L.-M. Kuang, H. Jing,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.2024,67, 260312

    2024

  71. [71]

    Jiao, S.-D

    Y.-F. Jiao, S.-D. Zhang, Y.-L. Zhang, A. Miranowicz, L.- 8 M. Kuang, H. Jing,Phys. Rev. Lett.2020,125, 143605

    2020

  72. [72]

    T.-X. Lu, B. J. Li, Y. Wang, D.-Y. Wang, X. Xiao, H. Jing,Phys. Rev. Applied2024,22, 064001

  73. [73]

    Zhang, B

    J. Zhang, B. Peng, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, K. Pichler, D. O. Krimer, G. M. Zhao, F. Nori, Y.-x. Liu, S. Rotter, L. Yang,Nat. Photon.2018,12, 479–484

    2018

  74. [74]

    Z. W. Pan, Y. Yang, W. Y. Liu, E. B. Xing, Y. R. Zhou, J. Tang, J. Liu,Laser Photonics Rev.2024,18, 2400593

    2024

  75. [75]

    Y. Tao, W. Y. Liu, S. X. Wang, C.M. Nan, L. Liu, Y. Bai, Y. R. Zhou, E. B. Xing, J. Tang, J. Liu,Opt. Express 2024,32, 79–91

    2024

  76. [76]

    S. X. Wang, W. Y. Liu, Y. Tao, X. S. Ding, C. M. Nan, Y. R. Zhou, L. Liu, Y. Bai, E. B. Xing, J. Tang, J. Liu, J. Lightwave Technol.2024,42, 3884-3890

    2024

  77. [77]

    Wang, Y.-H

    J.-Q. Wang, Y.-H. Yang, M. Li, X.-X. Hu, J. B. Surya, X.-B. Xu, C.-H. Dong, G.-C. Guo, H. X. Tang,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.2021,126, 133601

    2021

  78. [78]

    Zhang, B

    M. Zhang, B. Buscaino, C. Wang, A. Shams-Ansari, C. Reimer, R. R. Zhu, J. M. Kahn, M. Lonˇ car,Nature 2019,568, 373–377

    2019

  79. [79]

    X. Y. Lu, G. Moille, A. Rao, D. A. Westly, K. Srinivasan, Nat. Photonics2021,15, 131–136

  80. [80]

    C. W. Gardiner, P. Zoller,Quantum Noise(Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    2000

Showing first 80 references.